Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Fees for the BBO Data Feed for Securities Traded on the CBOE Stock Exchange, 24258-24261 [2013-09627]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24258
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
OCC also believes that risk and
volume are relevant factors because they
distinctly measure material aspects of
clearance and settlement activity and
therefore a Clearing Member’s use of
OCC’s resources. OCC notes that
Clearing Members whose OCC accounts
contain positions that are welldiversified and/or exhibit relatively
little exposure to overall market
direction will likely have a smaller
required contribution under the
proposed formula. Clearing Members
exhibiting a relatively large exposure to
market direction, a concentration in
contracts that individually present high
amounts of risk, and undiversified
accounts will generally experience a
larger required contribution than is the
case under the current formula.
OCC notes that most Clearing Member
Groups6 will experience a material
change (i.e., an increase or decrease of
10% or greater in the dollar amount of
a Clearing Member Group’s aggregated
Clearing Fund requirement) under the
new formula. OCC notes that smaller
single firms with lower initial Clearing
Fund requirements may experience an
increase under the new allocation
formula because (i) they may have
portfolios lacking the diversification
that lowers the risk compared with open
interest for larger firms, and (ii) the new
formula adds a Clearing Fund share on
top of the $150,000 minimum as
opposed to instead of it.
The Clearing Fund requirements
under the new allocation formula will
be communicated to Clearing Members
with significant lead time to allow
Clearing Members to review and prepare
for any changes they may experience in
their specific Clearing Fund
contribution amount. OCC will contact
those Clearing Members that will be
negatively impacted in a material
manner (i.e., an increase of 10% or
greater in the dollar amount of a
Clearing Member Group’s aggregate
Clearing Fund requirement) to confirm
such Clearing Members have reviewed
the pro forma Clearing Fund
requirement numbers and they are ready
to meet the new requirement upon
implementation. OCC will then begin a
two stage phase in process for the new
Clearing Fund requirements. The first
stage of implementation will occur
within 180 calendar days from the date
that OCC provides notice to Clearing
Members of its intent to implement the
new formula. At that stage, open
interest, total risk charge, and volume
6 The term ‘‘Clearing Member Group’’ is defined
in Article I, Section 1 of OCC’s By-Laws as ‘‘a
Clearing Member and any Member Affiliates of such
Clearing Member.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
will be applied in the formula with
weightings of 75%, 17.5%, and 7.5%,
respectively. The second stage of
implementation and the final
weightings of 50%, 35%, and 15% will
then be implemented within 360 days
from the same date of the original notice
to Clearing Members concerning
implementation of the new formula.
The proposed rule change will also
create a defined term in OCC’s By-Laws,
‘‘Futures-Only Affiliated Clearing
Member,’’ to refer to a Clearing Member
that is admitted solely for the purpose
of clearing transactions in security
futures, commodity futures, and/or
futures options.7 While the definition is
new, there will be no substantive
change to Section 2 of Article VIII,
under which, if such a Clearing Member
is a member affiliate of an earlieradmitted Clearing Member, the Clearing
Member’s initial Clearing Fund
contribution may be fixed by the Board
as an amount that excludes the
minimum Clearing Fund component of
$150,000, so long as the earlier-admitted
Clearing Member already satisfies that
requirement.
III. Discussion
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 8 directs
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if it finds that such
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 9 requires, among
other things, that the rules of a clearing
agency are designed to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions,
and to the extent applicable derivative
agreements, contracts, and transactions,
to assure the safeguarding of securities
and funds which are in the custody or
control of the clearing agency or for
which it is responsible, and to protect
investors and the public interest.
Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act 10
requires that the rules of the clearing
agency provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its participants.
Rule 17Ad–22(b)(2) 11 requires a
7 Article VIII, Section 2 of OCC’s By-Laws
actually refers also to ‘‘commodity options,’’ but
options directly on an underlying commodity—as
opposed to options on futures—are now included
in Section 1a(47) of the Commodity Exchange Act
to fall within the definition of a ‘‘swap.’’ 7 U.S.C.
1a(47). Since OCC does not currently have rules for
the clearing of swaps, the reference to commodity
options is being omitted from the new definition.
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
9 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
10 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D).
11 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(3).
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
registered clearing agency that performs
central counterparty services to
establish, implement, maintain, and
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to use risk-based
models and parameters to set margin
requirements and review such margin
requirements and the related risk-based
models and parameters at least monthly.
The proposed rule change
accomplishes these purposes by
enhancing the Clearing Fund allocation
methodology by incorporating measures
that OCC believes will apportion
contributions based on more
sophisticated measurements of Clearing
Members’ usage of OCC’s facilities and
recognize demands on OCC’s services
and facilities that are not captured by
the current methodology.
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and in particular with the
requirements of Section 17A of the
Act 12 and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
OCC–2013–02) be and hereby is
APPROVED.14
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–09632 Filed 4–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69399; File No. SR–CBOE–
2013–039]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Fees for the BBO Data Feed for
Securities Traded on the CBOE Stock
Exchange
April 18, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
12 15
U.S.C. 78q–1.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
14 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
13 15
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 5,
2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) proposes to amend the fee
schedule of Market Data Express, LLC
(‘‘MDX’’), an affiliate of CBOE, for the
BBO Data Feed (‘‘CBSX BBO Data Feed’’
or ‘‘Data’’) for securities traded on the
CBOE Stock Exchange (‘‘CBSX’’). The
text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend the fees charged by
MDX for the CBSX BBO Data Feed and
to make a few clarifying changes to the
MDX fee schedule.3 CBSX is CBOE’s
stock trading facility.
1 U.S.C.
785(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The CBSX BBO Data Feed and the fees charged
by MDX for the CBSX BBO Data Feed were
established in March 2011. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 63998 (March 1, 2011), 76 FR
12384 (March 7, 2011).
2 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
The CBSX BBO Data Feed is a realtime, low latency data feed that includes
CBSX ‘‘BBO data’’ and last sale data.4
CBOE reports CBSX BBO data under the
Consolidated Quotation Plan (‘‘CQ
Plan’’) and CBSX last sale data under
the Consolidated Tape Association Plan
(‘‘CTA Plan’’) with respect to NYSElisted securities and securities listed on
exchanges other than NYSE and Nasdaq
for inclusion in those Plans’
consolidated data streams. CBOE reports
CBSX BBO data and CBSX last sale data
under the Nasdaq Unlisted Trading
Privileges Plan (‘‘Nasdaq/UTP Plan’’)
with respect to Nasdaq-listed securities
for inclusion in that Plan’s consolidated
data stream. The BBO and last sale data
contained in the CBSX BBO Data Feed
is identical to the data that CBOE sends
to the processors under the CQ, CTA
and Nasdaq/UTP Plans for
redistribution to the public.5
The CBSX BBO Data Feed also
includes certain data that is not
included in the data sent to the
processors under the CQ, CTA and
Nasdaq/UTP Plans, namely, totals of
customer versus non-customer contracts
at the BBO, and All-or-None
contingency orders priced better than or
equal to the BBO.
MDX currently charges Customers a
‘‘direct connect fee’’ of $500 per
connection per month and a ‘‘per user
fee’’ of $25 per month per ‘‘Authorized
User’’ or ‘‘Device’’ for receipt of the
CBSX BBO Data Feed by Subscribers.6
Either a CBSX Trading Permit Holder or
a non-CBSX Trading Permit Holder may
be a Customer. All Customers are
assessed the same fees.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate
both the direct connect fee and the per
4 The CBSX BBO Data Feed includes the ‘‘best bid
and offer,’’ or ‘‘BBO’’, consisting of all outstanding
quotes and standing orders at the best available
price level on each side of the market, with
aggregate size (‘‘BBO data,’’ sometimes referred to
as ‘‘top-of-book data’’). Data with respect to
executed trades is referred to as ‘‘last sale’’ data.
5 The Exchange notes that MDX makes available
to Customers the BBO data and last sale data that
is included in the CBSX BBO Data Feed no earlier
than the time at which the Exchange sends that data
to the processors under the CQ, CTA and
Nasdaq.UTP Plans. A ‘‘Customer’’ is any entity that
receives the CBSX BBO Data Feed directly from
MDX’s system and then distributes it either
internally or externally to Subscribers. A
‘‘Subscriber’’ is a person (other than an employee
of a Customer) that receives the CBSX BBO Data
Feed from a Customer for its own internal use.
6 An ‘‘Authorized User’’ is defined as an
individual user (an individual human being) who
is uniquely identified (by user ID and confidential
password or other unambiguous method reasonably
acceptable to MDX) and authorized by a Customer
to access the CBSX BBO Data Feed supplied by the
Customer. A ‘‘Device’’ is defined as any computer,
workstation or other item of equipment, fixed or
portable, that receives, accesses and/or displays
data in visual, audible or other form.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24259
user fee and replace them with a ‘‘data
fee’’, payable by a Customer, of $500 per
month for internal use and external
redistribution of the CBSX BBO Data
Feed. A ‘‘Customer’’ is any entity that
receives the CBSX BBO Data Feed
directly from MDX’s system or through
a connection to MDX provided by an
approved redistributor (i.e., a market
data vendor or an extranet service
provider) and then distributes it
internally and/or externally. The data
fee would entitle a Customer to provide
the CBSX BBO Data Feed to an
unlimited number of internal users and
Devices within the Customer. The data
fee would also entitle a Customer to
distribute externally the CBSX BBO
Data Feed to other Customers. A
Customer receiving the CBSX BBO Data
Feed from another Customer would be
assessed the data fee by MDX and
would be entitled to distribute the Data
internally and/or externally.7 All
Customers would have the same rights
to utilize the Data (i.e., distribute the
Data internally and/or externally) as
long as the Customer has entered into an
agreement with MDX for the Data and
pays the data fee. Either a CBSX Trading
Permit Holder or a non-CBSX Trading
Permit Holder may be a Customer.
The Exchange also proposes to make
a few clarifying changes to the MDX fee
schedule. The Exchange proposes to
create a separate Definitions section on
the fee schedule. The Exchange
proposes to clarify that MDX will not
charge the data fee for any calendar
month in which a Customer commences
receipt of Data after the 15th day of the
month or discontinues receipt of the
Data before the 15th day of the month.
The Exchange also proposes to include
in the MDX fee schedule provisions
relating to invoicing and late payments.
Lastly, the Exchange proposes to remove
the definition of per user fee from the
MDX fee schedule consistent with the
elimination of that fee.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 8 in general, and, in particular,
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 9 in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among users and recipients of
7 A Customer may choose to receive the Data from
another Customer rather than directly from MDX’s
system because it does not want to or is not
equipped to manage the technology necessary to
establish a direct connection to MDX.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
24260
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Data, and with Section 6(b)(5) 10 of
the Act in that it is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
them. The Exchange believes the
proposed fee is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it
would apply equally to all Customers.
All Customers would have the same
rights to utilize the Data (i.e., distribute
the Data internally and/or externally) as
long as the Customer has entered into an
agreement with MDX for the Data and
pays the data fee.
The Exchange believes the proposed
fee is reasonable because it compares
favorably to fees that other markets
charge for similar products. For
example, the Exchange believes Nasdaq
charges distributors of its ‘‘Nasdaq
Basic’’ data feed a monthly fee of $1,500
per firm for either internal or external
distribution or both and charges each
professional subscriber a per subscriber
monthly charge of $10 for Nasdaq-listed
stocks, $5 for NYSE-listed stocks, and
$5 for Amex-listed stocks.11 Like the
CBSX BBO Data Feed, the Nasdaq Basic
data feed includes best bid and offer
data and last sale data as well as other
market data. The Exchange believes the
NYSE charges a monthly fee of $1,500
for the receipt of access to the ‘‘NYSE
BBO’’ data feed plus $15 per month per
professional subscriber and $5 per
month per non-professional subscriber.
The NYSE BBO data feed provides best
bid and offer information for NYSEtraded securities.12 The Exchange notes
that the CBSX BBO Data Feed also
competes with products offered by the
NYSE entitled NYSE Arca BBO and
NYSE MKT BBO that include top-ofbook data and NYSE Arca Trades and
NYSE MKT Trades that include last sale
data similar to the data in the CBSX
BBO Data Feed.13 As noted above, the
CBSX BBO Data Feed also includes
totals of customer versus non-customer
contracts at the BBO, and All-or-None
contingency orders priced better than or
equal to the BBO.
For the reasons cited above, the
Exchange believes the proposed fee for
the CBSX BBO Data Feed is equitable,
reasonable and not unfairly
discriminatory. In addition, the
Exchange believes that no substantial
countervailing basis exists to support a
finding that the proposed terms and fee
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Nasdaq Rule 7047 and https://
www.nasdaqtrader.com. The Exchange believes
Nasdaq charges each non-professional subscriber to
Nasdaq Basic a per subscriber monthly charge of
$0.50 for Nasdaq-listed stocks, $0.25 for NYSElisted stocks, and $0.25 for Amex-listed stocks.
12 See https://www.nyxdata.com.
13 Id.
11 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
Jkt 229001
for the CBSX BBO Data Feed fails to
meet the requirements of the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. To the
contrary, the market for orders and
executions is already highly competitive
and the Exchange’s proposal is itself
pro-competitive as described below.
The Exchange believes competition
provides an effective constraint on the
market data fees that the Exchange,
through MDX, has the ability and the
incentive to charge. CBSX has a
compelling need to attract order flow
from market participants in order to
maintain its share of trading volume.
This compelling need to attract order
flow imposes significant pressure on
CBOE to act reasonably in setting its
fees for market data, particularly given
that the market participants that will
pay such fees often will be the same
market participants from whom CBSX
must attract order flow. These market
participants include broker-dealers that
control the handling of a large volume
of customer and proprietary order flow.
Given the portability of order flow from
one exchange to another, any exchange
that sought to charge unreasonably high
data fees would risk alienating many of
the same customers on whose orders it
depends for competitive survival. CBSX
competes for order flow with the other
national securities exchanges that
currently trade equities, with electronic
communication networks (‘‘ECNs’’) and
with other trading platforms.
CBOE is constrained in pricing the
CBSX BBO Data Feed by the availability
to market participants of alternatives to
purchasing the CBSX BBO Data Feed.
CBOE must consider the extent to which
market participants would choose one
or more alternatives instead of
purchasing CBSX’s data. For example,
the BBO data and last sale data available
in the CBSX BBO Data Feed is included
in the CQ, CTA and Nasdaq/UTP data
feeds. The CQ, CTA and Nasdaq/UTP
data feeds are widely distributed and
relatively inexpensive, thus
constraining CBOE’s ability to price the
CBSX BBO Data Feed. In this respect,
the CQ, CTA and Nasdaq/UTP data
feeds, which include CBSX’s transaction
information, are significant alternatives
to the CBSX BBO Data Feed.
Further, the various self-regulatory
organizations, ECNs and the several
Trade Reporting Facilities of FINRA that
produce proprietary data are sources of
potential competition for MDX. As
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
noted above, Nasdaq and NYSE offer
market data products that compete with
the CBSX BBO Data Feed. In addition,
the Exchange believes other exchanges
may currently offer top-of-book market
data products for a fee or for free.
The Exchange believes that the CBSX
BBO Data Feed offered by MDX will
help attract new users and new order
flow to CBSX, thereby improving
CBSX’s ability to compete in the market
for order flow and executions.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.14 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2013–039 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2013–039. This file
14 15
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
24APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 24, 2013 / Notices
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2013–039 and should be submitted on
or before May 15, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–09627 Filed 4–23–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69398; File No. SR–FINRA–
2013–020]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to FINRA Rule
5250 (Payments for Market Making)
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
April 18, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 15,
2013, Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by FINRA. FINRA has
designated the proposed rule change as
constituting a ‘‘non-controversial’’ rule
change under paragraph (f)(6) of Rule
19b–4 under the Act,3 which renders
the proposal effective upon receipt of
this filing by the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
Rule 5250 (Payments for Market
Making) to create an exception for
payments to members that are expressly
provided for under the rules of a
national securities exchange.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on FINRA’s Web site at
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
FINRA Rule 5250 (Payments for
Market Making or ‘‘Rule’’) explicitly
prohibits any payment by issuers or
issuers’ affiliates and promoters,
directly or indirectly, to a member for
publishing a quotation, acting as a
market maker, or submitting an
application in connection therewith.
The Rule is intended, among other
things, to prohibit members from
receiving compensation or other
payments from an issuer for quoting or
making a market in the issuer’s
securities and to assure that members
act in an independent capacity when
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:05 Apr 23, 2013
3 17
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24261
publishing a quotation or making a
market in an issuer’s securities.
FINRA’s policy concerning payments
for market making was first set forth in
Notice to Members 75–16 and then
codified as NASD Rule 2460 (now
FINRA Rule 5250) in 1997.4 Among
other things, FINRA recognized that
members generally have considerable
latitude and freedom to make or
terminate market making activities and
was concerned that payments by an
issuer to a market maker could
influence a firm’s decision to make a
market. In particular, the existence of
undisclosed, private arrangements
between market makers and an issuer
and/or its promoters may make it
difficult for investors to ascertain the
true market for the securities, such that
what might appear to be independent
trading activity may well be illusory.5
FINRA staff has received inquiries
regarding the application of the Rule to
various types of arrangements provided
for by the rules of a national securities
exchange (an ‘‘exchange’’). For example,
the Commission has approved a rule
change by NASDAQ Stock Market
implementing a voluntary program for
market makers that would be funded
through fees by the issuer or an affiliate
of the issuer (‘‘NASDAQ MQP’’).6 The
Commission also currently is
considering a proposed rule change by
NYSE Arca to adopt a voluntary market
maker program for certain exchangetraded products that would be funded
through fees by the issuer.7
FINRA believes certain exchange
program structures, such as the one
adopted by NASDAQ, could be deemed
an indirect payment under Rule 5250;
4 See Notice to Members 75–16 (February 20,
1975) and Securities Exchange Act Release No.
38812 (July 3, 1997), 62 FR 37105 (July 10, 1997)
(‘‘Order Approving File No. SR–NASD–97–29’’).
5 ‘‘If payments * * * were permitted, investors
would not be able to ascertain which quotations in
the marketplace are based on actual interest and
which quotations are supported by issuers or
promoters. This structure would harm investor
confidence in the overall integrity of the
marketplace.’’ See Order Approving File No. SR–
NASD–97–29 at 37107.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69195
(March 20, 2013), 78 FR 18393 (March 26, 2013)
(Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 3
Thereto, To Establish the Market Quality Program)
(File No. SR–NASDAQ–2012–137) (‘‘SEC Approval
Order’’).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69335
(April 5, 2013), 78 FR 21681 (April 11, 2013)
(Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Implement a OneYear Pilot Program for Issuers of Certain ExchangeTraded Products Listed on the Exchange) (File No.
SR–NYSEArca–2013–34). This proposal has not
been acted upon by the Commission. The
Commission has solicited comment on the
proposed rule change, which are due by May 2,
2013.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24258-24261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09627]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69399; File No. SR-CBOE-2013-039]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Fees for the BBO
Data Feed for Securities Traded on the CBOE Stock Exchange
April 18, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the
[[Page 24259]]
``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 5, 2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ U.S.C. 785(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or
``CBOE'') proposes to amend the fee schedule of Market Data Express,
LLC (``MDX''), an affiliate of CBOE, for the BBO Data Feed (``CBSX BBO
Data Feed'' or ``Data'') for securities traded on the CBOE Stock
Exchange (``CBSX''). The text of the proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the fees
charged by MDX for the CBSX BBO Data Feed and to make a few clarifying
changes to the MDX fee schedule.\3\ CBSX is CBOE's stock trading
facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The CBSX BBO Data Feed and the fees charged by MDX for the
CBSX BBO Data Feed were established in March 2011. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 63998 (March 1, 2011), 76 FR 12384 (March
7, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CBSX BBO Data Feed is a real-time, low latency data feed that
includes CBSX ``BBO data'' and last sale data.\4\ CBOE reports CBSX BBO
data under the Consolidated Quotation Plan (``CQ Plan'') and CBSX last
sale data under the Consolidated Tape Association Plan (``CTA Plan'')
with respect to NYSE-listed securities and securities listed on
exchanges other than NYSE and Nasdaq for inclusion in those Plans'
consolidated data streams. CBOE reports CBSX BBO data and CBSX last
sale data under the Nasdaq Unlisted Trading Privileges Plan (``Nasdaq/
UTP Plan'') with respect to Nasdaq-listed securities for inclusion in
that Plan's consolidated data stream. The BBO and last sale data
contained in the CBSX BBO Data Feed is identical to the data that CBOE
sends to the processors under the CQ, CTA and Nasdaq/UTP Plans for
redistribution to the public.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The CBSX BBO Data Feed includes the ``best bid and offer,''
or ``BBO'', consisting of all outstanding quotes and standing orders
at the best available price level on each side of the market, with
aggregate size (``BBO data,'' sometimes referred to as ``top-of-book
data''). Data with respect to executed trades is referred to as
``last sale'' data.
\5\ The Exchange notes that MDX makes available to Customers the
BBO data and last sale data that is included in the CBSX BBO Data
Feed no earlier than the time at which the Exchange sends that data
to the processors under the CQ, CTA and Nasdaq.UTP Plans. A
``Customer'' is any entity that receives the CBSX BBO Data Feed
directly from MDX's system and then distributes it either internally
or externally to Subscribers. A ``Subscriber'' is a person (other
than an employee of a Customer) that receives the CBSX BBO Data Feed
from a Customer for its own internal use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CBSX BBO Data Feed also includes certain data that is not
included in the data sent to the processors under the CQ, CTA and
Nasdaq/UTP Plans, namely, totals of customer versus non-customer
contracts at the BBO, and All-or-None contingency orders priced better
than or equal to the BBO.
MDX currently charges Customers a ``direct connect fee'' of $500
per connection per month and a ``per user fee'' of $25 per month per
``Authorized User'' or ``Device'' for receipt of the CBSX BBO Data Feed
by Subscribers.\6\ Either a CBSX Trading Permit Holder or a non-CBSX
Trading Permit Holder may be a Customer. All Customers are assessed the
same fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ An ``Authorized User'' is defined as an individual user (an
individual human being) who is uniquely identified (by user ID and
confidential password or other unambiguous method reasonably
acceptable to MDX) and authorized by a Customer to access the CBSX
BBO Data Feed supplied by the Customer. A ``Device'' is defined as
any computer, workstation or other item of equipment, fixed or
portable, that receives, accesses and/or displays data in visual,
audible or other form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to eliminate both the direct connect fee and
the per user fee and replace them with a ``data fee'', payable by a
Customer, of $500 per month for internal use and external
redistribution of the CBSX BBO Data Feed. A ``Customer'' is any entity
that receives the CBSX BBO Data Feed directly from MDX's system or
through a connection to MDX provided by an approved redistributor
(i.e., a market data vendor or an extranet service provider) and then
distributes it internally and/or externally. The data fee would entitle
a Customer to provide the CBSX BBO Data Feed to an unlimited number of
internal users and Devices within the Customer. The data fee would also
entitle a Customer to distribute externally the CBSX BBO Data Feed to
other Customers. A Customer receiving the CBSX BBO Data Feed from
another Customer would be assessed the data fee by MDX and would be
entitled to distribute the Data internally and/or externally.\7\ All
Customers would have the same rights to utilize the Data (i.e.,
distribute the Data internally and/or externally) as long as the
Customer has entered into an agreement with MDX for the Data and pays
the data fee. Either a CBSX Trading Permit Holder or a non-CBSX Trading
Permit Holder may be a Customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ A Customer may choose to receive the Data from another
Customer rather than directly from MDX's system because it does not
want to or is not equipped to manage the technology necessary to
establish a direct connection to MDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to make a few clarifying changes to the
MDX fee schedule. The Exchange proposes to create a separate
Definitions section on the fee schedule. The Exchange proposes to
clarify that MDX will not charge the data fee for any calendar month in
which a Customer commences receipt of Data after the 15th day of the
month or discontinues receipt of the Data before the 15th day of the
month. The Exchange also proposes to include in the MDX fee schedule
provisions relating to invoicing and late payments. Lastly, the
Exchange proposes to remove the definition of per user fee from the MDX
fee schedule consistent with the elimination of that fee.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \8\ in general, and, in particular, with Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act \9\ in that it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among users and recipients of
[[Page 24260]]
the Data, and with Section 6(b)(5) \10\ of the Act in that it is not
designed to permit unfair discrimination between them. The Exchange
believes the proposed fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because it would apply equally to all Customers. All Customers would
have the same rights to utilize the Data (i.e., distribute the Data
internally and/or externally) as long as the Customer has entered into
an agreement with MDX for the Data and pays the data fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed fee is reasonable because it
compares favorably to fees that other markets charge for similar
products. For example, the Exchange believes Nasdaq charges
distributors of its ``Nasdaq Basic'' data feed a monthly fee of $1,500
per firm for either internal or external distribution or both and
charges each professional subscriber a per subscriber monthly charge of
$10 for Nasdaq-listed stocks, $5 for NYSE-listed stocks, and $5 for
Amex-listed stocks.\11\ Like the CBSX BBO Data Feed, the Nasdaq Basic
data feed includes best bid and offer data and last sale data as well
as other market data. The Exchange believes the NYSE charges a monthly
fee of $1,500 for the receipt of access to the ``NYSE BBO'' data feed
plus $15 per month per professional subscriber and $5 per month per
non-professional subscriber. The NYSE BBO data feed provides best bid
and offer information for NYSE-traded securities.\12\ The Exchange
notes that the CBSX BBO Data Feed also competes with products offered
by the NYSE entitled NYSE Arca BBO and NYSE MKT BBO that include top-
of-book data and NYSE Arca Trades and NYSE MKT Trades that include last
sale data similar to the data in the CBSX BBO Data Feed.\13\ As noted
above, the CBSX BBO Data Feed also includes totals of customer versus
non-customer contracts at the BBO, and All-or-None contingency orders
priced better than or equal to the BBO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Nasdaq Rule 7047 and https://www.nasdaqtrader.com. The
Exchange believes Nasdaq charges each non-professional subscriber to
Nasdaq Basic a per subscriber monthly charge of $0.50 for Nasdaq-
listed stocks, $0.25 for NYSE-listed stocks, and $0.25 for Amex-
listed stocks.
\12\ See https://www.nyxdata.com.
\13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons cited above, the Exchange believes the proposed fee
for the CBSX BBO Data Feed is equitable, reasonable and not unfairly
discriminatory. In addition, the Exchange believes that no substantial
countervailing basis exists to support a finding that the proposed
terms and fee for the CBSX BBO Data Feed fails to meet the requirements
of the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the market for
orders and executions is already highly competitive and the Exchange's
proposal is itself pro-competitive as described below.
The Exchange believes competition provides an effective constraint
on the market data fees that the Exchange, through MDX, has the ability
and the incentive to charge. CBSX has a compelling need to attract
order flow from market participants in order to maintain its share of
trading volume. This compelling need to attract order flow imposes
significant pressure on CBOE to act reasonably in setting its fees for
market data, particularly given that the market participants that will
pay such fees often will be the same market participants from whom CBSX
must attract order flow. These market participants include broker-
dealers that control the handling of a large volume of customer and
proprietary order flow. Given the portability of order flow from one
exchange to another, any exchange that sought to charge unreasonably
high data fees would risk alienating many of the same customers on
whose orders it depends for competitive survival. CBSX competes for
order flow with the other national securities exchanges that currently
trade equities, with electronic communication networks (``ECNs'') and
with other trading platforms.
CBOE is constrained in pricing the CBSX BBO Data Feed by the
availability to market participants of alternatives to purchasing the
CBSX BBO Data Feed. CBOE must consider the extent to which market
participants would choose one or more alternatives instead of
purchasing CBSX's data. For example, the BBO data and last sale data
available in the CBSX BBO Data Feed is included in the CQ, CTA and
Nasdaq/UTP data feeds. The CQ, CTA and Nasdaq/UTP data feeds are widely
distributed and relatively inexpensive, thus constraining CBOE's
ability to price the CBSX BBO Data Feed. In this respect, the CQ, CTA
and Nasdaq/UTP data feeds, which include CBSX's transaction
information, are significant alternatives to the CBSX BBO Data Feed.
Further, the various self-regulatory organizations, ECNs and the
several Trade Reporting Facilities of FINRA that produce proprietary
data are sources of potential competition for MDX. As noted above,
Nasdaq and NYSE offer market data products that compete with the CBSX
BBO Data Feed. In addition, the Exchange believes other exchanges may
currently offer top-of-book market data products for a fee or for free.
The Exchange believes that the CBSX BBO Data Feed offered by MDX
will help attract new users and new order flow to CBSX, thereby
improving CBSX's ability to compete in the market for order flow and
executions.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\14\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2013-039 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2013-039. This
file
[[Page 24261]]
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2013-039 and should be
submitted on or before May 15, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-09627 Filed 4-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P