Certain Mobile Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics; Termination of Investigation, 23593 [2013-09179]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2013 / Notices terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. The ALJ issued the subject ID on March 25, 2013, granting the joint motion for termination of the investigation. He found that the joint motion for termination based on a settlement agreement satisfied Commission rule 210.21(b)(1). He further found, pursuant to Commission rule 210.50(b)(2), that termination of this investigation based on a settlement agreement is in the public interest. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID, and has terminated the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h)). Issued: April 15, 2013. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–09170 Filed 4–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–834] Certain Mobile Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics; Termination of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 35) terminating the investigation on the basis of withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:11 Apr 18, 2013 Jkt 229001 information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on April 6, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Immersion Corporation of San Jose, California (‘‘Immersion’’). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile electronic devices incorporating haptics that infringe certain claims of six Immersion patents. 77 FR 20847 (Apr. 6, 2012). The notice of institution named as respondents HTC Corporation of Taoyuan, Taiwan and HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington (collectively, ‘‘HTC’’); and Motorola Mobility, Inc. and Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc., both of Libertyville, Illinois (collectively, ‘‘Motorola’’). On February 13, 2013, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ’s ID (Order No. 30) terminating the investigation as to the Motorola respondents on the basis of a settlement agreement. On March 12, 2013, Immersion moved to terminate the investigation on the basis of withdrawal of the complaint. See 19 CFR 210.21(a)(1). On March 14, 2013, HTC responded, agreeing that the investigation should be terminated. On March 27, 2013, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID. Order No. 35. The ALJ found that Immersion complied with the requirements of 19 CFR 210.21(a), and that ‘‘extraordinary circumstances’’ did not prevent termination of the investigation. Order No. 35 at 2 (citing Certain Ultrafiltration Membrane Systems, and Components Thereof, Including Ultrafiltration Membranes, Inv. No. 337–TA–107, Comm’n Action and Order, at 2 (Mar. 11, 1982)). No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.21 and 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42). Issued: April 15, 2013. PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23593 By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–09179 Filed 4–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’) Notice is hereby given that on April 11, 2013, a proposed Consent Decree (‘‘proposed Decree’’) in United States v. Jay-Cee Cleaners, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:13CV186 was lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. In this action under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a) (‘‘CERCLA’’), the United States sought reimbursement of response costs incurred or to be incurred for response actions taken at or in connection with the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at the Jay-Cee Cleaners Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) located at 16163 Lankford Highway in Nelsonia, Accomack County, Virginia. The proposed Decree requires Settling Defendants to pay 100% of the proceeds from the sale of the Site property to the United States in reimbursement of response costs. The proposed Decree also requires Settling Defendants to pay 50% of the proceeds from the sale of an adjacent property located behind the Site, known as ‘‘Poulson Lot 3,’’ and designated as Parcel Identification No. 069C00200000300 in the County of Accomack, Virginia Real Estate Taxable Landbook, as payment of a civil penalty for the alleged failure to comply with Section 104(e)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9604(e)(2). The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the proposed Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. Jay-Cee Cleaners, Inc., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–09938/1. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM 19APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 23593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09179]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-834]


Certain Mobile Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics; 
Termination of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 35) 
terminating the investigation on the basis of withdrawal of the 
complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on April 6, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Immersion Corporation 
of San Jose, California (``Immersion''). The complaint alleged 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in 
the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United 
States after importation of certain mobile electronic devices 
incorporating haptics that infringe certain claims of six Immersion 
patents. 77 FR 20847 (Apr. 6, 2012). The notice of institution named as 
respondents HTC Corporation of Taoyuan, Taiwan and HTC America, Inc. of 
Bellevue, Washington (collectively, ``HTC''); and Motorola Mobility, 
Inc. and Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc., both of Libertyville, 
Illinois (collectively, ``Motorola''). On February 13, 2013, the 
Commission determined not to review the ALJ's ID (Order No. 30) 
terminating the investigation as to the Motorola respondents on the 
basis of a settlement agreement.
    On March 12, 2013, Immersion moved to terminate the investigation 
on the basis of withdrawal of the complaint. See 19 CFR 210.21(a)(1). 
On March 14, 2013, HTC responded, agreeing that the investigation 
should be terminated.
    On March 27, 2013, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID. Order No. 
35. The ALJ found that Immersion complied with the requirements of 19 
CFR 210.21(a), and that ``extraordinary circumstances'' did not prevent 
termination of the investigation. Order No. 35 at 2 (citing Certain 
Ultrafiltration Membrane Systems, and Components Thereof, Including 
Ultrafiltration Membranes, Inv. No. 337-TA-107, Comm'n Action and 
Order, at 2 (Mar. 11, 1982)).
    No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has 
determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.21 and 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.21, 210.42).

     Issued: April 15, 2013.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-09179 Filed 4-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.