Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 22922-22923 [2013-08975]

Download as PDF 22922 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 17, 2013 / Notices annual burden of 937,251 hours for this collection of information. Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number. Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: April 11, 2013. Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–08978 Filed 4–16–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549–0213. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Extension: Rule 6a–3. SEC File No. 270–0015, OMB Control No. 3235–0021. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the existing collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 Apr 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (‘‘Act’’) sets out a framework for the registration and regulation of national securities exchanges. Under Rule 6a–3 (17 CFR 240.6a–3), one of the rules that implements Section 6, a national securities exchange (or an exchange exempted from registration as a national securities exchange based on limited trading volume) must provide certain supplemental information to the Commission, including any material (including notices, circulars, bulletins, lists, and periodicals) issued or made generally available to members of, or participants or subscribers to, the exchange. Rule 6a–3 also requires the exchanges to file monthly reports that set forth the volume and aggregate dollar amount of securities sold on the exchange each month. The information required to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 6a–3 is designed to enable the Commission to carry out its statutorily mandated oversight functions and to ensure that registered and exempt exchanges continue to be in compliance with the Act. The Commission estimates that each respondent makes approximately 25 such filings on an annual basis at an average cost of approximately $52.50 per response. Currently, 19 respondents (17 national securities exchanges and two exempt exchanges) are subject to the collection of information requirements of Rule 6a–3. The Commission estimates that the total burden for all respondents is 237.5 hours (25 filings/respondent per year × 0.5 hours/response × 19 respondents) and $24,937.50 ($52.50/response × 25 responses/respondent per year × 19 respondents) per year. Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Please direct your written comments to: Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: April 12, 2013. Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–08994 Filed 4–16–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549–0213. Extension: Rule 0–4. OMB Control No. 3235–0633, SEC File No. 270–569. Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. Rule 0–4 (17 CFR 275.0–4) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Advisers Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et seq.) entitled ‘‘General Requirements of Papers and Applications,’’ prescribes general instructions for filing an application seeking exemptive relief with the Commission. Rule 0–4 currently requires that every application for an order for which a form is not specifically prescribed and which is executed by a corporation, partnership or other company and filed with the Commission contain a statement of the applicable provisions of the articles of incorporation, bylaws or similar documents, relating to the right of the person signing and filing such application to take such action on behalf of the applicant, and a statement that all such requirements have been complied with and that the person signing and filing the application is fully authorized to do so. If such authorization is dependent on resolutions of stockholders, directors, or other bodies, such resolutions must be attached as an E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 17, 2013 / Notices exhibit to or quoted in the application. Any amendment to the application must contain a similar statement as to the applicability of the original statement of authorization. When any application or amendment is signed by an agent or attorney, rule 0–4 requires that the power of attorney evidencing his authority to sign shall state the basis for the agent’s authority and shall be filed with the Commission. Every application subject to rule 0–4 must be verified by the person executing the application by providing a notarized signature in substantially the form specified in the rule. Each application subject to rule 0– 4 must state the reasons why the applicant is deemed to be entitled to the action requested with a reference to the provisions of the Act and rules thereunder, the name and address of each applicant, and the name and address of any person to whom any questions regarding the application should be directed. Rule 0–4 requires that a proposed notice of the proceeding initiated by the filing of the application accompany each application as an exhibit and, if necessary, be modified to reflect any amendment to the application. The requirements of rule 0–4 are designed to provide Commission staff with the necessary information to assess whether granting the orders of exemption are necessary and appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the intended purposes of the Act. Applicants for orders under the Advisers Act can include registered investment advisers, affiliated persons of registered investment advisers, and entities seeking to avoid investment adviser status, among others. Commission staff estimates that it receives up to 9 applications per year submitted under rule 0–4 of the Act seeking relief from various provisions of the Advisers Act and, in addition, up to 7 applications per year submitted under Advisers Act rule 206(4)-5, which addresses certain ‘‘pay to play’’ practices and also provides the Commission the authority to grant applications seeking relief from certain of the rule’s restrictions. Although each application typically is submitted on behalf of multiple applicants, the applicants in the vast majority of cases are related entities and are treated as a single respondent for purposes of this analysis. Most of the work of preparing an application is performed by outside counsel and, therefore, imposes no hourly burden on respondents. The cost outside counsel charges applicants depends on the complexity of the issues VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 Apr 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 covered by the application and the time required. Based on conversations with applicants and attorneys, and recent analyses by the Commission,1 the cost for applications ranges from approximately $12,800 for preparing a well-precedented, routine (or otherwise less involved) application to approximately $200,000 to prepare a complex or novel application. We estimate that the Commission receives 2 of the most time-consuming applications annually, 4 applications of medium difficulty, and 10 of the least difficult applications subject to rule 0– 4.2 This distribution gives a total estimated annual cost burden to applicants of filing all applications of $702,000 [(2x$200,000) + (4x$43,500) + (10x$12,800)]. The estimate of annual cost burden is made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a comprehensive or even representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules and forms. The requirements of this collection of information are required to obtain or retain benefits. Responses will not be kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 1 See Family Offices, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 3220 (June 22, 2011), at section IV.A (‘‘We estimate that a typical family office will incur legal fees of $200,000 on average to engage in the exemptive order application process, including preparation and revision of an application and consultations with Commission staff.’’) Although the Commission may receive fewer exemptive applications from family offices in light of rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1, which defines family offices that are now excluded from regulation under the Advisers Act, the costs to prepare family office applications may be representative of the costs required to prepare other more complex and novel applications. See also Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 3043 (July 1, 2010), at section V.D. (estimating that applications filed under Advisers Act rule 206(4)-5 ‘‘will cost approximately $12,800’’). 2 The estimated 10 least difficult applications include the estimated 7 applications per year submitted under Advisers Act rule 206(4)-5. The Commission previously estimated that these applications will cost approximately $12,800 each. Id. PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22923 through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: April 11, 2013. Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–08975 Filed 4–16–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–69362; File No. 600–23] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Amended Application for Registration as a Clearing Agency April 11, 2013. I. Introduction On April 5, 2013, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) an amended Form CA–1 1 seeking permanent registration as a clearing agency under Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2 (‘‘Act’’) and Rule 17Ab2–1 thereunder.3 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments from interested persons regarding this amended Form CA–1.4 The Commission will consider any comments it receives in making its determination whether to grant FICC’s request for permanent registration as a clearing agency. The Commission will grant FICC permanent registration only if it concludes that 1 See Letter from Donaldine Temple, Senior Associate Counsel and Corporate Secretary, FICC, to Joseph P. Kamnik, Assistant Director, Division of Trading and Markets (April 4, 2013). The amendment filed by FICC updates all of the information required by Form CA–1 and incorporates by reference all information submitted in connection with FICC’s prior application and amendments thereto, to the extent this previously submitted information remains accurate. 2 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. 3 17 CFR 240.17Ab2–1(a). 4 The descriptions set forth in this notice regarding the structure and operations of FICC have been largely derived from information contained in FICC’s amended Form CA–1 application and publicly available sources. The application and non-confidential exhibits thereto are available on the Commission’s Web site. E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22922-22923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension: Rule 0-4.
    OMB Control No. 3235-0633, SEC File No. 270-569.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the 
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to 
submit this collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 0-4 (17 CFR 275.0-4) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 
(``Act'' or ``Advisers Act'') (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et seq.) entitled 
``General Requirements of Papers and Applications,'' prescribes general 
instructions for filing an application seeking exemptive relief with 
the Commission. Rule 0-4 currently requires that every application for 
an order for which a form is not specifically prescribed and which is 
executed by a corporation, partnership or other company and filed with 
the Commission contain a statement of the applicable provisions of the 
articles of incorporation, bylaws or similar documents, relating to the 
right of the person signing and filing such application to take such 
action on behalf of the applicant, and a statement that all such 
requirements have been complied with and that the person signing and 
filing the application is fully authorized to do so. If such 
authorization is dependent on resolutions of stockholders, directors, 
or other bodies, such resolutions must be attached as an

[[Page 22923]]

exhibit to or quoted in the application. Any amendment to the 
application must contain a similar statement as to the applicability of 
the original statement of authorization. When any application or 
amendment is signed by an agent or attorney, rule 0-4 requires that the 
power of attorney evidencing his authority to sign shall state the 
basis for the agent's authority and shall be filed with the Commission. 
Every application subject to rule 0-4 must be verified by the person 
executing the application by providing a notarized signature in 
substantially the form specified in the rule. Each application subject 
to rule 0-4 must state the reasons why the applicant is deemed to be 
entitled to the action requested with a reference to the provisions of 
the Act and rules thereunder, the name and address of each applicant, 
and the name and address of any person to whom any questions regarding 
the application should be directed. Rule 0-4 requires that a proposed 
notice of the proceeding initiated by the filing of the application 
accompany each application as an exhibit and, if necessary, be modified 
to reflect any amendment to the application.
    The requirements of rule 0-4 are designed to provide Commission 
staff with the necessary information to assess whether granting the 
orders of exemption are necessary and appropriate in the public 
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the 
intended purposes of the Act.
    Applicants for orders under the Advisers Act can include registered 
investment advisers, affiliated persons of registered investment 
advisers, and entities seeking to avoid investment adviser status, 
among others. Commission staff estimates that it receives up to 9 
applications per year submitted under rule 0-4 of the Act seeking 
relief from various provisions of the Advisers Act and, in addition, up 
to 7 applications per year submitted under Advisers Act rule 206(4)-5, 
which addresses certain ``pay to play'' practices and also provides the 
Commission the authority to grant applications seeking relief from 
certain of the rule's restrictions. Although each application typically 
is submitted on behalf of multiple applicants, the applicants in the 
vast majority of cases are related entities and are treated as a single 
respondent for purposes of this analysis. Most of the work of preparing 
an application is performed by outside counsel and, therefore, imposes 
no hourly burden on respondents. The cost outside counsel charges 
applicants depends on the complexity of the issues covered by the 
application and the time required. Based on conversations with 
applicants and attorneys, and recent analyses by the Commission,\1\ the 
cost for applications ranges from approximately $12,800 for preparing a 
well-precedented, routine (or otherwise less involved) application to 
approximately $200,000 to prepare a complex or novel application. We 
estimate that the Commission receives 2 of the most time-consuming 
applications annually, 4 applications of medium difficulty, and 10 of 
the least difficult applications subject to rule 0-4.\2\ This 
distribution gives a total estimated annual cost burden to applicants 
of filing all applications of $702,000 [(2x$200,000) + (4x$43,500) + 
(10x$12,800)]. The estimate of annual cost burden is made solely for 
the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a 
comprehensive or even representative survey or study of the costs of 
Commission rules and forms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Family Offices, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 3220 
(June 22, 2011), at section IV.A (``We estimate that a typical 
family office will incur legal fees of $200,000 on average to engage 
in the exemptive order application process, including preparation 
and revision of an application and consultations with Commission 
staff.'') Although the Commission may receive fewer exemptive 
applications from family offices in light of rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1, 
which defines family offices that are now excluded from regulation 
under the Advisers Act, the costs to prepare family office 
applications may be representative of the costs required to prepare 
other more complex and novel applications. See also Political 
Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers, Investment Advisers 
Act Release No. 3043 (July 1, 2010), at section V.D. (estimating 
that applications filed under Advisers Act rule 206(4)-5 ``will cost 
approximately $12,800'').
    \2\ The estimated 10 least difficult applications include the 
estimated 7 applications per year submitted under Advisers Act rule 
206(4)-5. The Commission previously estimated that these 
applications will cost approximately $12,800 each. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The requirements of this collection of information are required to 
obtain or retain benefits. Responses will not be kept confidential. An 
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an 
email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.

    Dated: April 11, 2013.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-08975 Filed 4-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.