Certain Electronic Devices Having Placeshifting or Display Replication Functionality and Products Containing Same; Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 22899-22900 [2013-08964]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 17, 2013 / Notices
April 1, 2013. The amended complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain omega-3 extracts
from marine or aquatic biomass and
products containing the same by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,278,351 (‘‘the ‘351 patent’’)
and U.S. Patent No. 8,383,675 (‘‘the ‘675
patent’’). The amended complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
The amended complaint,
except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
ADDRESSES:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2012).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the amended complaint, the
U.S. International Trade Commission,
on April 10, 2013, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Apr 16, 2013
Jkt 229001
importation of certain omega-3 extracts
from marine or aquatic biomass and
products containing the same by reason
of infringement of one or more of claims
1–46 and 94 of the ‘351 patent and
claim 1 of the ‘675 patent, and whether
an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Neptune Technologies & Bioressources
Inc., 545 Promenade du Centropolis,
´
Suite 100, Laval, Quebec, Canada H7T
0A3;
Acasti Pharma Inc., 545 Promenade du
´
Centropolis, Suite 100, Laval, Quebec,
Canada H7T 0A3.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Aker BioMarine AS, Fjordallen 16, Vika,
0115 Oslo, Norway;
Aker BioMarine Anarctic USA. Inc., 10
Newport Way NW., Suite D, Issaquah,
WA 98027;
Aker BioMarine Antarctic AS, J.M.
jonasens vei 99, 8340, Stamsund,
Norway;
Enzymotec Limited, Sagi 2000,
Industrial Zone K’far Baruch, Israel;
Enzymotec USA, Inc., 55 Madison
Avenue, Suite 400, Morristown, NJ
07960;
˚
Olympic Seafood AS, Vagsplassen 6090,
˚
Fosnavag, Norway;
Olympic Biotec Ltd., 79 Appleby
Highway Richmond, 7050, New
Zealand;
Avoca, Inc., 841 Avoca Farm Road,
Merry Hill, NC 27957;
Rimfrost USA, LLC, 841 Avoca Farm
Road, Merry Hill, NC 27957;
Bioriginal Food & Science Corp., 102
Melville Street, Saskatoon, SK, S7J
0R1 Canada.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22899
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the amended complaint
and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the amended
complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the amended
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
amended complaint and in this notice
may be deemed to constitute a waiver of
the right to appear and contest the
allegations of the amended complaint
and this notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the amended complaint and
this notice and to enter an initial
determination and a final determination
containing such findings, and may
result in the issuance of an exclusion
order or a cease and desist order or both
directed against the respondent.
Issued: April 11, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–08963 Filed 4–16–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–878]
Certain Electronic Devices Having
Placeshifting or Display Replication
Functionality and Products Containing
Same; Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
March 12, 2013, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
22900
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 17, 2013 / Notices
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Sling Media,
Inc. of Foster City, California. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain electronic
devices having placeshifting or display
replication functionality and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,877,776 (‘‘the ‘776 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 8,051,454 (‘‘the ‘454
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,060,909 (‘‘the
‘909 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,725,912
(‘‘the ‘912 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
8,266,657 (‘‘the ‘657 patent’’); and U.S.
Patent No. 8,365,236 (‘‘the ‘236 patent’’).
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Docket Services, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–1802.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2012).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
April 10, 2013, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Apr 16, 2013
Jkt 229001
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain electronic devices
having placeshifting or display
replication functionality and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims
18–24, 26, 28–30, 32–40, 42, and 43 of
the ‘776 patent; claims 7, 9–12, 14, 15,
and 17 of the ‘909 patent; claims 1, 2,
4, and 6–20 of the ‘454 patent; claims
58–68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 103, 104, 106, and
108 of the ‘912 patent; claim 81 of the
‘657 patent; and claims 1–8 and 15–20
of the ‘236 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Sling Media, Inc., 1051 East Hillsdale
Boulevard, Suite 500, Foster City, CA
94404.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Belkin International, Inc., 12045 East
Waterfront Drive, Playa Vista, CA
90094.
Monsoon Multimedia, Inc., 1730
South Amphlett Boulevard, Suite 101,
San Mateo, CA 94402.
C2 Microsystems, Inc., 2833 Junction
Avenue, Suite 101, San Jose, CA 95134.
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: April 11, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–08964 Filed 4–16–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
Decree
In accordance with Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. John F. Ashe, Jr.,
Dianne Ashe, and Wayne D. Raether, d/
b/a County Line Grading, Civil Action
No.13–cv–246, was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
Western District of Wisconsin on April
10, 2013.
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against John F. Ashe, Jr.,
Dianne Ashe, and Wayne D. Raether, d/
b/a County Line Grading, pursuant to
Section 309(b) of the Clean Water Act,
33 U.S.C. 1319(b), to obtain injunctive
relief from the Defendants for violating
the Clean Water Act by discharging
pollutants without a permit into waters
of the United States. The proposed
Consent Decree resolves these
allegations by requiring the Defendants
to restore the impacted areas.
The Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to this
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)
days from the date of publication of this
Notice. Please address comments to
Laurel A. Bedig, United States
Department of Justice, Environment and
Natural Resources Division,
Environmental Defense Section, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044 and
refer to United States v. John F. Ashe,
Jr., Dianne Ashe, and Wayne D. Raether,
d/b/a County Line Grading, DJ # 90–5–
1–1–19322.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22899-22900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08964]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-878]
Certain Electronic Devices Having Placeshifting or Display
Replication Functionality and Products Containing Same; Institution of
investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on March 12, 2013, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
[[Page 22900]]
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Sling Media, Inc. of Foster City, California.
The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic
devices having placeshifting or display replication functionality and
products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of
U.S. Patent No. 7,877,776 (``the `776 patent''); U.S. Patent No.
8,051,454 (``the `454 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,060,909 (``the `909
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,725,912 (``the `912 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 8,266,657 (``the `657 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,365,236
(``the `236 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry
in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Docket Services, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-1802.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2012).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on April 10, 2013, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic
devices having placeshifting or display replication functionality and
products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 18-24, 26, 28-30, 32-40, 42, and 43 of the `776 patent; claims
7, 9-12, 14, 15, and 17 of the `909 patent; claims 1, 2, 4, and 6-20 of
the `454 patent; claims 58-68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 103, 104, 106, and 108
of the `912 patent; claim 81 of the `657 patent; and claims 1-8 and 15-
20 of the `236 patent, and whether an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Sling Media, Inc., 1051 East Hillsdale Boulevard, Suite 500, Foster
City, CA 94404.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Belkin International, Inc., 12045 East Waterfront Drive, Playa
Vista, CA 90094.
Monsoon Multimedia, Inc., 1730 South Amphlett Boulevard, Suite 101,
San Mateo, CA 94402.
C2 Microsystems, Inc., 2833 Junction Avenue, Suite 101, San Jose,
CA 95134.
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as
a party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: April 11, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-08964 Filed 4-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
