Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 22227-22228 [2013-08792]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 72 / Monday, April 15, 2013 / Notices
capabilities of Peruvian and U.S. textile
producers to determine whether certain
fabrics, yarns, or fibers are available in
commercial quantities in a timely
manner in the United States or Peru,
subject to Section 203(o) of the Act.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: Wendy Liberante,
(202) 395–3647.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
JJessup@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Wendy Liberante, OMB Desk
Officer, Fax number (202) 395–5167 or
via the Internet at
Wendy_L._Liberante@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: April 10, 2013.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–08755 Filed 4–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–825]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011–2012
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 22, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar (SSB) from Brazil. For these
final results, we continue to find that
Villares Metals S.A. (Villares) has not
sold subject merchandise at less than
normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0768 and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Apr 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 22, 2013, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on SSB from
Brazil.1 The period of review is
February 1, 2011, through January 31,
2012.
We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results.
We received a case brief from Villares
on February 21, 2013, in which it
alleged two clerical errors in the
calculation. The petitioners 2 did not file
a case or rebuttal brief.
The Department has conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is SSB. The term SSB with respect to the
order means articles of stainless steel in
straight lengths that have been either
hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn,
cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished,
or ground, having a uniform solid cross
section along their whole length in the
shape of circles, segments of circles,
ovals, rectangles (including squares),
triangles, hexagons, octagons or other
convex polygons. SSB includes coldfinished SSBs that are turned or ground
in straight lengths, whether produced
from hot-rolled bar or from straightened
and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars
that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or
other deformations produced during the
rolling process. Except as specified
above, the term does not include
stainless steel semi-finished products,
cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cutlength rolled products which if less than
4.75 mm in thickness have a width
measuring at least 10 times the
thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in
thickness having a width which exceeds
150 mm and measures at least twice the
thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed
products in coils, of any uniform solid
cross section along their whole length,
which do not conform to the definition
of flat-rolled products), and angles,
shapes and sections. The SSB subject to
the order is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00,
7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
1 See Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2011–2012, 78 FR 4383 (January 22, 2013)
(Preliminary Results).
2 Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible
Industries LLC, and Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22227
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.3
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have corrected
two programming errors in the
weighted-average dumping margin
calculation in the Preliminary Results.
These changes, however, did not affect
the final weighted-average dumping
margin for Villares. A detailed
discussion of the corrections made is
included in the final analysis
memorandum,4 which is hereby
adopted by this notice and is on file
electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in
the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of
the main Department of Commerce
building.
Final Results of Review
As a result of this review, we
determine that a weighted-average
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists
for Villares for the period February 1,
2011, through January 31, 2012.
Assessment Rates
In accordance with the Final
Modification,5 we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
liquidate entries covered in this review
without regard to antidumping duties.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the period of review produced by
Villares for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the country-specific all-others
rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
3 The HTSUS numbers provided in the scope
have changed since the publication of the order. See
Antidumping Duty Orders: Stainless Steel Bar from
Brazil, India and Japan, 60 FR 9661 (February 21,
1995).
4 See Memorandum to the file from Sandra
Dreisonstok through Minoo Hatten entitled,
‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil: Final
Analysis Memorandum for Villares Metals S.A.;
2011–2012,’’ dated concurrently with this notice.
5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
22228
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 72 / Monday, April 15, 2013 / Notices
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
We intend to issue liquidation
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of
review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results for all
shipments of SSB from Brazil entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) No cash deposit
will be required for Villares which
received a rate of 0.00 percent in the
final results of this administrative
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 19.43
percent, the all-others rate established
in the Notice of Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Stainless
Steel Bar From Brazil, 59 FR 66914
(December 28, 1994). These cash deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Apr 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
These final results of administrative
review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 9, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–08792 Filed 4–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–848]
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Partial
Rescission; 2010–2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 9, 2012, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
freshwater crawfish tail meat from the
People’s Republic of China (the PRC).
The period of review (POR) is
September 1, 2010, through August 31,
2011. For the final results, we continue
to find that certain companies covered
by this review made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3477 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On October 9, 2012, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on freshwater
crawfish tail meat from the PRC.1 On
1 See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the
People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2010–2011, 77 FR 61383
(October 9, 2012) (Preliminary Results) and the
accompanying Memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
January 14, 2013, we issued a
memorandum extending the time limit
for the final results of the review to
April 9, 2013.2 On February 25, 2013,
we issued a post-preliminary
memorandum finding that Xiping
Opeck Food Co., Ltd.’s (Xiping Opeck)
U.S. customer’s customer is a price
discriminator, i.e., is in a position to set
the price of the product, for most of
Xiping Opeck’s entries subject to this
review.3
We received case and rebuttal briefs
with respect to the Preliminary Results
and the Post-Preliminary Analysis
Memo, and at the Crawfish Processors
Alliance’s request, we held a hearing on
March 14, 2013.
We have conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the
antidumping duty order is freshwater
crawfish tail meat. The freshwater
crawfish tail meat subject to the order is
currently classifiable under subheadings
1605.40.10.10, 1605.40.10.90,
0306.19.00.10, and 0306.29.00.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes
only. A full description of the scope of
the order is contained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum,4 which is
hereby adopted by this notice. The
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by
parties to this administrative review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the
People’s Republic of China,’’ dated October 9, 2012
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
2 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled
‘‘Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated January 14, 2013.
3 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, entitled,
‘‘Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s
Republic of China—Post-Preliminary Analysis
Memorandum’’ dated February 25, 2013 (PostPreliminary Analysis Memo).
4 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, from Christian
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled
‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the
People’s Republic of China’’ dated concurrently
with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 72 (Monday, April 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22227-22228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08792]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-825]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 22, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar (SSB) from
Brazil. For these final results, we continue to find that Villares
Metals S.A. (Villares) has not sold subject merchandise at less than
normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0768 and (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 22, 2013, the Department published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
SSB from Brazil.\1\ The period of review is February 1, 2011, through
January 31, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 78 FR 4383
(January 22, 2013) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results. We received a case brief from Villares on February 21, 2013,
in which it alleged two clerical errors in the calculation. The
petitioners \2\ did not file a case or rebuttal brief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Carpenter Technology Corporation, Crucible Industries LLC,
and Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department has conducted this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is SSB. The term SSB with
respect to the order means articles of stainless steel in straight
lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn,
cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or ground, having a uniform
solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles,
segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles,
hexagons, octagons or other convex polygons. SSB includes cold-finished
SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether produced
from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire, and
reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other
deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as specified
above, the term does not include stainless steel semi-finished
products, cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut-length rolled
products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width measuring
at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in thickness
having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the
thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in coils, of any uniform
solid cross section along their whole length, which do not conform to
the definition of flat-rolled products), and angles, shapes and
sections. The SSB subject to the order is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The HTSUS numbers provided in the scope have changed since
the publication of the order. See Antidumping Duty Orders: Stainless
Steel Bar from Brazil, India and Japan, 60 FR 9661 (February 21,
1995).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have corrected
two programming errors in the weighted-average dumping margin
calculation in the Preliminary Results. These changes, however, did not
affect the final weighted-average dumping margin for Villares. A
detailed discussion of the corrections made is included in the final
analysis memorandum,\4\ which is hereby adopted by this notice and is
on file electronically via Import Administration's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov
and in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum to the file from Sandra Dreisonstok through
Minoo Hatten entitled, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil: Final Analysis
Memorandum for Villares Metals S.A.; 2011-2012,'' dated concurrently
with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
As a result of this review, we determine that a weighted-average
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for Villares for the period
February 1, 2011, through January 31, 2012.
Assessment Rates
In accordance with the Final Modification,\5\ we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate entries covered in
this review without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012)
(Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the period of review produced by Villares for which
it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at
the country-specific all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and
[[Page 22228]]
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results for all shipments of SSB
from Brazil entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the
Act: (1) No cash deposit will be required for Villares which received a
rate of 0.00 percent in the final results of this administrative
review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not
covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 19.43 percent, the all-others rate
established in the Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, 59 FR 66914 (December 28,
1994). These cash deposit requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
These final results of administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: April 9, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-08792 Filed 4-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P