Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Pricing for Mini Options, 22353-22357 [2013-08724]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 72 / Monday, April 15, 2013 / Notices
ICC’s rules relating to swap data
reporting. Furthermore, the
Commission’s approval of the proposed
rule change in no way limits or
precludes any future actions by the
Commission, including pending
rulemakings 43 or proposed rule
changes, in connection with securitybased swaps.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act 44
that the proposed rule change (SR–ICC–
2013–05), as modified by Amendment
No. 1, be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.45
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–08727 Filed 4–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69351; File No. SR–Phlx–
2013–35]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Pricing for Mini Options
April 9, 2013.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on March
26, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
43 See, e.g., Regulation SBSR—Reporting and
Dissemination of Security-Based Swap Information,
Securities Exchange Act Rel. No. 63346 (Nov. 19,
2010), 75 FR 75208 (Dec. 2, 2010); Security-Based
Swap Data Repository Registration, Duties, and
Core Principles, Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 63347 (Nov. 19, 2010), 75 FR 77306 (Dec. 10,
2010), corrected at 75 FR 79320 (Dec. 20, 2010) and
76 FR 2287 (Jan. 13, 2011).
44 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
45 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Apr 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
its Pricing Schedule by adding Section
A, entitled ‘‘Mini Options Fees,’’ and by
redesignating existing Section A as
Section B.
The text of the proposed rule change
is provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the
proposed rule change is also available
on the Exchange’s Web site at https://
nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
While changes to the Pricing
Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has
designated that they become operative
on March 28, 2013.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to set forth in new Section A
of the Pricing Schedule the applicability
of various existing fees, rebates, and
caps to Mini Options, and specifically to
establish that transaction fees with
respect to Mini Options will be set at
$0.00. Existing Section A, Customer
Rebate Program, will be redesignated as
Section B.
The Exchange represented in its filing
establishing Mini Options (the ‘‘Mini
Options Listing Filing’’) that ‘‘the
current Pricing Schedule will not apply
to the trading of mini-option contracts’’
and that ‘‘[t]he Exchange will not
commence trading of mini-option
contracts until specific fees for minioptions contracts trading have been
filed with the Commission.’’ 3 The
3 See SR–Phlx–2012–126, page 8. See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68132
(November 1, 2012), 77 FR 66904 (November 7,
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22353
purpose of the proposed new Section A
is to adopt the fees that are specific to
Mini Options, as provided for in the
Mini Options Listing Filing.
New Section A will appear after the
Preface section of the Pricing Schedule
which contains definitions that apply to
the entire Pricing Schedule, including
new Section A. Except where different
treatment is specified for Mini Options
in Section A, the rest of the Pricing
Schedule will apply to Mini Options in
the same way it applies to all other
options. For example, a Mini Options
class will count as an options class
assignment for purposes of determining
the level of Streaming Quote Trader
Fees and Remote Streaming Quote
Trader Fees in Section VI. Cross
references to Section A in the Table of
Contents and Section IV.A, PIXL
Pricing, will be updated to refer to
Section B, and the Table of Contents
will be updated to refer to Mini Options
as new Section A.
Applicable Symbols. Proposed new
Section A identifies the Mini Options
symbols as AAPL7, AMZN7, GLD7,
GOOG7 and SPY7. Accordingly, new
Section A will apply exclusively to
these new symbols.
Transaction Fees. New Section A
provides for a ‘‘Mini Options
Transaction Fee—Electronic’’ and for a
‘‘Mini-Options Transaction Fee—Floor
and QCC’’, both of which will apply in
the Customer, Professional, Specialist
and Market Maker, Broker-Dealer and
Firm fee categories.4 In each case, the
Exchange is currently setting these fees
at $0.00 but may in the future file
proposed rule changes to amend the
transaction fee level in one or more
categories. The Exchange is establishing
the separate Section A Pricing Schedule
section for Mini Options transaction
fees in order to facilitate differentiation
in the future between Mini Options
transaction fees and other options
transaction fees.
PIXL Executions. The new Section A
transaction fees will apply to PIXL
executions in Mini Options rather than
the PIXL Pricing fees set forth in Section
IV.A.5
Payment for Order Flow. Pursuant to
new Section A, Payment for Order Flow
Fees set forth in Section II of the Pricing
2012) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Option
Contracts Overlying 10 Shares of Certain
Securities).
4 Transaction fees for options other than Mini
Options are currently found in Sections I through
III of the Pricing Schedule.
5 PIXL is the Exchange’s price improvement
mechanism known as Price Improvement XL or
(PIXLSM). See Rule 1080(n) and Section IV of the
Pricing Schedule.
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
22354
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 72 / Monday, April 15, 2013 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Schedule will not apply to Mini
Options.6
Customer Rebate Program. New
Section A clarifies that Mini Options
volume will not be included in and will
not be eligible for the Customer Rebate
Program which is being moved from
Section A of the Pricing Schedule to
Section B of the Pricing Schedule.7
Routing Fees. Today, the Exchange
calculates Routing Fees by assessing
certain Exchange costs related to routing
orders to away markets plus the away
market’s actual transaction fee.8 The
Exchange assesses a $0.05 per contract
fixed Routing Fee when routing orders
to the NASDAQ Options Market LLC
(‘‘NOM’’) and NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.
(‘‘BX Options’’) and a $0.11 per contract
fixed Routing Fee to all other options
exchanges in addition to the actual
transaction fee or rebate paid by the
away market.9 With respect to the
rebate, the Exchange pays a market
participant the rebate offered by an
away market where there is such a
6 The Payment for Order Flow program started on
July 1, 2005 as a pilot and after a series of orders
extending the pilot became effective on April 29,
2012. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
52114 (July 22, 2005), 70 FR 44138 (August 1, 2005)
(SR–Phlx–2005–44); 57851 (May 22, 2008), 73 FR
31177 (May 20, 2008) (SR–Phlx–2008–38); 55891
(June 11, 2007), 72 FR 333271 (June 15, 2007) (SR–
Phlx–2007–39); 53754 (May 3, 2006), 71 FR 27301
(May 10, 2006) (SR–Phlx–2006–25); 53078 (January
9, 2006), 71 FR 2289 (January 13, 2006) (SR–Phlx–
2005–88); 52568 (October 6, 2005), 70 FR 60120
(October 14, 2005) (SR–Phlx–2005–58); and 59841
(April 29, 2009), 74 FR 21035 (May 6, 2009) (SR–
Phlx–2009–38).
7 The Exchange has recently described and
amended its Customer Rebate Program. See SR–
Phlx–2013–13. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 68924 (February 13, 2013), 78 FR 11916
(February 20, 2013).
8 Routing fees applicable to options other than
Mini Options are set forth in Section V of the
Pricing Schedule. Routing fees allow the Exchange
to recoup costs it incurs for routing and executing
orders in equity options to various away markets.
9 The fixed Routing Fee is based on costs that are
incurred by the Exchange when routing to an away
market in addition to the away market’s transaction
fee. For example, the Exchange incurs a fee when
it utilizes Nasdaq Options Services LLC (‘‘NOS’’),
a member of the Exchange and the Exchange’s
exclusive order router, to route orders in options
listed and open for trading on the PHLX XL system
to destination markets. Each time NOS routes to
away markets NOS incurs a clearing-related cost
and, in the case of certain exchanges, a transaction
fee is also charged in certain symbols, which fees
are passed through to the Exchange. The Exchange
also incurs administrative and technical costs
associated with operating NOS, membership fees at
away markets, Options Regulatory Fees (‘‘ORFs’’)
and technical costs associated with routing options.
The transaction fee assessed by the Exchange is
based on the away market’s actual transaction fee
or rebate for a particular market participant at the
time that the order was entered into the Exchange’s
trading system. This transaction fee is calculated on
an order-by-order basis, since different away
markets charge different amounts. In the event that
there is no transaction fee or rebate assessed by the
away market, the only fee assessed is the fixed
Routing Fee.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Apr 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
rebate. Any rebate available is netted
against a fee assessed by the Exchange.
With respect to orders routed to C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘C2’’),
the Exchange assesses non-Customer
simple, non-complex orders in equity
options (single stock) that are routed to
C2 a Routing Fee which includes a fixed
cost of $0.11 per contract plus a flat rate
of $0.85 per contract, except with
respect to Customers. With respect to
Customers, the Exchange does not pass
the rebate offered by C2, rather,
Customer simple, non-complex orders
in equity options (single stock) that are
routed to C2 are assessed $0.00 per
contract.
The Exchange has recently filed a
proposed rule change to make a number
of pricing changes described in this
paragraph to its Routing Fees. Effective
April 1, 2013, the Exchange’s Routing
Fees in Section V of the Pricing
Schedule will be as follows: NonCustomers will be assessed a $0.95 per
contract flat fee and the Customer
Routing Fee will be dependent on the
away market.10 With respect to
Customer orders routed to NOM, the
Exchange will assess a fixed fee of $0.05
per contract (‘‘Fixed Fee’’) in addition to
the actual transaction fee assessed by
the away market would apply. With
respect to Customer orders that are
routed to BX Options, the Exchange will
not assess a Routing Fee and will not
pass the rebate. The Exchange will
assess a Customer Routing Fee of $0.11
per contract (‘‘Fixed Fee’’) in addition to
the actual transaction fee when routing
to an options exchange other than NOM
and BX Options. Similar to Customer
orders routed to BX, the Exchange will
no longer pass any rebate paid by any
away market for any Customer orders.
New Section A establishes Routing
Fees for Mini Options that will apply
instead of the existing Routing Fees set
forth in Section V of the Pricing
Schedule. Routing Fees for Customers
are set at $0.01 per contract in addition
to the actual transaction fee assessed. If
the away market pays a rebate, the
Customer Routing Fee will be $0.00.
Routing Fees for all other participants
(non-Customers) will be a flat rate of
$0.15 per contract and the Exchange
will not charge non-Customers the
actual transaction fee assessed by the
away market or pass back any rebate.
QCC Transaction Fees and Rebates.
New Section A establishes that QCC
Transaction fees and rebates, set forth in
Section II 11 of the Pricing Schedule, are
10 See
SR–Phlx–2013–23 (not yet published) [sic].
Orders are defined in Rule 1080(o).
11 QCC
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
not applicable to Section A of the
Pricing Schedule.
Fee Caps. New Section A provides
that the Monthly Market Maker Cap 12
and the Monthly Firm Fee Cap 13,
defined in Section II of the Pricing
Schedule, will not be applicable to
transactions in Mini Options. Therefore,
any fees that may be assessed with
respect to transactions in Mini Options
will not be applied toward these caps.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Pricing Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act 14 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 15
in particular, in that it is an equitable
allocation of reasonable fees and other
charges among Exchange members and
other persons using its facilities.
Transaction Fees. The Exchange
believes that the proposed Mini Options
Transaction Fee-Electronic and Mini
Options Transaction Fee—Floor and
QCC, as well as the applicability of
those fees to PIXL executions in Mini
Options, are reasonable because those
fees are set at zero in order to encourage
market participants to transact Mini
Options. They are also equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because all the
market participant categories will be
12 The Monthly Market Maker Cap is $550,000
for: (i) Electronic and floor Option Transaction
Charges; (ii) QCC Transaction Fees (as defined in
Exchange Rule 1080(o) and Floor QCC Orders, as
defined in 1064(e)); and (iii) fees related to an order
or quote that is contra to a PIXL Order or
specifically responding to a PIXL auction. The
trading activity of separate Specialist and Market
Maker member organizations will be aggregated in
calculating the Monthly Market Maker Cap if there
is Common Ownership between the member
organizations. All dividend, merger, short stock
interest and reversal and conversion strategy
executions (as defined in this Section II) will be
excluded from the Monthly Market Maker Cap. In
addition, Specialists or Market Makers that (i) are
on the contra-side of an electronically-delivered
and executed Customer order; and (ii) have reached
the Monthly Market Maker Cap will be assessed a
$0.16 per contract fee. For QCC Orders as defined
in Exchange Rule 1080(o), and Floor QCC Orders,
as defined in 1064(e), a Service Fee of $0.07 per
side applies once a Specialist or Market Maker has
reached the Monthly Market Maker Cap. The $0.07
Service Fee applies to every contract side of the
QCC Order and Floor QCC Order after a Specialist
or Market Maker has reached the Monthly Market
Maker Cap, except for reversal and conversion
strategies executed via QCC. The Service Fee is not
being assessed to a Specialist or Market Maker that
does not reach the Monthly Market Maker Cap in
a particular calendar month.
13 Firms are subject to a maximum fee of $75,000
(‘‘Monthly Firm Fee Cap’’). Firm floor option
transaction charges and QCC Transaction Fees as
defined in Section II of the Pricing Schedule in the
aggregate, for one billing month will not exceed the
Monthly Firm Fee Cap per member organization
when such members are trading in their own
proprietary account.
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 72 / Monday, April 15, 2013 / Notices
able to take advantage of the zero fee
level and will therefore be treated in a
uniform matter. Likewise, the Exchange
believes that not applying QCC
Transaction fees and rebates to
transactions in Mini Options is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
does not desire to assess certain
transaction fees to encourage all market
participants to transact Mini Options.
No market participant would be
assessed QCC Transaction fees or
rebates.
Fee Caps. The Exchange believes that
it is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to not apply the
Monthly Market Maker Cap or Monthly
Firm Fee Cap to Mini Options
transaction fees because the Mini
Options transaction fees are set at zero
in any event for all market participants.
The fee caps would not be affected by
transactions in Mini Options for which
transaction fees are not assessed in the
first place.
Customer Rebate Program. The
Exchange believes that it is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory that Mini Options
volume will not be included in and will
not be eligible for the Customer Rebate
Program defined in newly relocated
Section B of the Pricing Schedule. The
Customer Rebate Program was
established to incentivize market
participants to increase the amount of
Customer order flow they transact on
the Exchange.16 The Customer Rebate
Program is predicated on certain volume
tiers that assume an option contract size
of 100 shares. Due to the smaller size of
the Mini Options contract, Mini Options
will not make sense in the context of the
volume tiers upon which the calculation
of the Customer Rebate is based and the
logic behind the Customer Rebate
Program would not be achieved by
including them. For this reason the
Exchange believes that it is reasonable
to not permit Mini Options to qualify in
the Customer Rebate Program. Also, the
Exchange would uniformly not pay
rebates to any market participant
transacting Customer Mini Options.
Finally, redesignation of the caption of
the Customer Rebate Program from A. to
B. will provide clarity to the Pricing
Schedule as it accommodates the new
Mini Options Fees language in A.
Payment for Order Flow Fees. The
Exchange believes that it is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory that the Payment for
Order Flow fees set forth in Section II
16 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68924
(February 13, 2013), 78 FR 11916 (February 20,
2013).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Apr 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
will not apply to Mini Options because
the Exchange is not charging any
transaction fees for these products at
this time. By eliminating Payment for
Order Flow Fees as applied to Mini
Options the Exchange will incentivize
members to transact in them. Further,
Specialists and Market Makers will not
be singled out from among other market
participants for assessment of this fee.
All market participants will be treated
the same way by not having the
Payment for Order Flow fees imposed
on them with respect to Mini Options.
Proposed Mini Options Routing
Fees—Customers. In the proposed new
language in Section A of the Pricing
Schedule, for Mini Options a $0.01 per
contract Routing Fee will be charged for
Customer orders in addition to the
actual transaction fee assessed, provided
that if the away market pays a rebate to
the Exchange, the Customer Routing Fee
is $0.00. The Customer Routing Fees for
Mini Options are reasonable because
they will allow the Exchange to recoup
and cover its costs of providing routing
services for Customer orders in Mini
Options just as it does for other standard
equity options for which it incurs the
same costs. The Exchange believes this
Routing Fee for Customers in Mini
Options is reasonable because it is lower
than the other fixed Routing Fees for
standard options, as discussed above,
which are assessed with respect to
Customer transactions in other options
pursuant to Section V of the Pricing
Schedule. Additionally, the Customer
Routing Fees will be similar to the new
Routing Fees that the Exchange recently
filed and which will be operative on
April 1, 2013, except the fixed cost will
be lower in the case of Mini Options.
Similar to that filing, the Exchange
would not pass rebates back to
Customers, but would also not asses a
Customer a Routing Fee if a rebate were
paid by the away market. The Exchange
believes that its proposal to not pass a
rebate that is offered by an away market
for Customers orders in Mini Options is
reasonable because to the extent that
another market is paying a rebate, the
Exchange will not assess a Routing Fee
for that transaction. If a market
participant desires the rebate, the
market participant has the option to
direct the order to that away market.
Other options exchanges today do not
pass the rebate.17
The Exchange believes the Routing
Fees for Mini Options for Customers are
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
would uniformly assess the same
17 See CBOE’s Fees Schedule and International
Securities Exchange LLC’s (‘‘ISE’’) Fee Schedule.
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22355
Routing Fees to all Customers, and
because market participants have the
ability to directly route orders in Mini
Options to an away market and avoid
the Routing Fee. Also, market
participants may submit orders to the
Exchange as ineligible for routing or
‘‘DNR’’ to avoid Routing Fees. The
Exchange believes that its proposal to
not pass a rebate that is offered by an
away market for Customer Mini Option
orders is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
would not pay such a rebate on any
Customer Mini Option order.
Proposed Mini Options Routing
Fees—Non-Customers. In the proposed
new language in Section A of the
Pricing Schedule, Routing Fees for Mini
Options for all participants other than
Customers (‘‘non-Customers’’) will be a
flat fee of $0.15 per contract. The
Exchange believes this fee is reasonable
because it is lower than the $0.95 per
contract flat fee that will be in effect on
April 1, 2013 for non-Customers orders
routed to all options exchanges (other
than BX Options and NOM) for orders
in options other than Mini Options.18
The non-Customer Routing Fees for
Mini Options are reasonable because
they will allow the Exchange to recoup
and cover its costs of providing routing
services for non-Customer orders in
Mini Options just as it does for other
equity options for which it incurs the
same costs. The Exchange believes that
its proposal to amend its non-Customer
Routing Fees from a fixed fee plus
actual transaction charges to a flat rate
is reasonable because the flat rate makes
it easier for market participants to
anticipate the Routing Fees which they
would be assessed at any given time.
The Exchange believes that assessing all
non-Customer orders the same flat rate
will provide market participants with
certainty with respect to Routing Fees.
While each destination market’s
transaction charge varies and there is a
cost incurred by the Exchange when
routing orders to away markets,
including clearing costs, administrative
and technical costs associated with
operating NOS, membership fees at
away markets, ORFs and technical costs
associated with routing options, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
Routing Fees will enable it to recover
the costs it incurs to route nonCustomer orders to away markets. Other
18 The Exchange believes that the proposed nonCustomer Routing Fee for Mini Options that are
routed to BX and NOM is reasonable even though
it is higher than $0.05 Routing Fee assessed with
respect to non-Customer orders routed to BX and
NOM today in options other than Mini Options,
inasmuch as the Exchange is not charging any
transaction fees with respect to Mini Options.
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
22356
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 72 / Monday, April 15, 2013 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
exchanges similarly assess a fixed rate
fee to route non-Customer orders.19
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend the non-Customer
Routing Fees from a fixed fee plus
actual transaction charges to a flat rate
is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
would uniformly assess the same
Routing Fees to all non-Customer
market participants. Under its flat fee
structure, taking all costs to the
Exchange into account, the Exchange
may operate at a slight gain or a slight
loss for non-Customer orders routed to
and executed at away markets. The
proposed Routing Fee for non-Customer
orders is an approximation of the
maximum fees the Exchange will be
charged for such executions, including
costs, at away markets. As a general
matter, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees will allow it to recoup
and cover its costs of providing routing
services for non-Customer orders. The
Exchange believes that the fixed rate
non-Customer Routing Fee is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because
market participants have the ability to
directly route orders to an away market
and avoid the Routing Fee. Also, market
participants may submit orders to the
Exchange as ineligible for routing or
‘‘DNR’’ to avoid Routing Fees. It is
important to note that when orders are
routed to an away market they are
routed based on price first.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to not pass a rebate that is
offered by an away market for nonCustomers orders is reasonable because
to the extent that another market is
paying a rebate, the Exchange will
assess a $0.15 per contract fee as its total
cost in each instance. The Routing Fee
is transparent and simple. If a market
participant desires the rebate, the
market participant has the option to
direct the order to that away market.
Other options exchanges today do not
pass the rebate. The Exchange believes
that its proposal to not pass a rebate that
is offered by an away market for nonCustomers orders is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the
Exchange would not pay such a rebate
on any non-Customer order. The
Exchange believes the Routing Fees for
Mini Options for non-Customers are
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
19 BATS Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BATS’’) assesses nonCustomer fixed rates of $0.57 and $0.95 per contract
when routing to away markets. See BATS BZX
Exchange Fee Schedule. The Chicago Board
Options Exchange Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’) assesses
non-Customer orders a $0.50 per contract routing
fee in addition to the customary CBOE execution
charges. See CBOE’s Fees Schedule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Apr 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
would uniformly assess the same
Routing Fees to all non-Customer
market participants.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to assess different fees
for Customers orders as compared to
non-Customer orders because the
Exchange has traditionally assessed
lower fees to Customers as compared to
non-Customers. Customers will
continue to receive the lowest fees or no
fees when routing orders, as is the case
today. Other options exchanges also
assess lower Routing Fees for customer
orders as compared to non-customer
orders in standard options.20
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market, comprised of
eleven exchanges, in which market
participants can easily and readily
direct order flow to competing venues if
they deem fee levels at a particular
venue to be excessive or rebates to be
inadequate. Accordingly, the fees that
are assessed and the rebates paid by the
Exchange described in the above
proposal are influenced by these robust
market forces and therefore must remain
competitive with fees charged and
rebates paid by other venues and
therefore must continue to be reasonable
and equitably allocated to those
members that opt to direct orders to the
Exchange rather than competing venues.
The Mini Options are a new product
that will commence trading on the
Exchange on March 28, 2013. The
Exchange believes that incentivizing
market participants to transact Mini
Options by not assessing transaction
fees and certain other fees encourages
competition in these products. There is
no intra-market competition as the
Exchange will treat all market
participants in a like manner with
respect to the transaction fees. Also, the
Exchange believes that because other
markets will also list Mini Options there
is no undue burden on intermarket
competition because market participants
will be able to select the venue where
they will trade these products. In terms
of Routing, the Exchange-believes that
assessing Customers lower fees as
20 BATS assesses lower customer routing fees as
compared to non-customer routing fees per the
away market. For example BATS assesses ISE
customer routing fees of $0.30 per contract and an
ISE non-customer routing fee of $0.57 per contract.
See BATS BZX Exchange Fee Schedule.
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
compared to Non-Customers and
assessing the same Routing Fees to all
Non-Customers regardless of the venue
does not create an undue burden on
competition. The Exchange has
traditionally assessed no or lower fees to
Customers. Also, the Exchange believes
that because Mini Options represent 1/
10th of the size of a standard option
contract, reduced Routing Fees will not
misalign the cost to transact Mini
Options.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.21 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2013–35 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2013–35. This file
number should be included on the
21 15
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
15APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 72 / Monday, April 15, 2013 / Notices
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2013–35 and should be submitted on or
before May 6, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–08724 Filed 4–12–13; 8:45 am]
[Release No. 34–69354; File No. SR–MIAX–
2013–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC;
Order Approving, on an Accelerated
Basis, Proposed Rule Change Relating
to Limit Up Limit Down Functionality
April 9, 2013.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
On March 25, 2013, Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC
(the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘MIAX’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1)1 of the Securities
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
17:00 Apr 12, 2013
On May 6, 2010, the U.S. equity
markets experienced a severe disruption
that, among other things, resulted in the
prices of a large number of individual
securities suddenly declining by
significant amounts in a very short time
period before suddenly reversing to
prices consistent with their pre-decline
levels.6 This severe price volatility led
to a large number of trades being
executed at temporarily depressed
prices, including many that were more
than 60% away from pre-decline prices.
One response to the events of May 6,
2010, was the development of the
single-stock circuit breaker pilot
program, which was implemented
through a series of rule filings by the
equity exchanges and by FINRA.7 The
single-stock circuit breaker was
designed to reduce extraordinary market
volatility in NMS stocks by imposing a
five-minute trading pause when a trade
U.S.C. 78a.
CFR 240.19b–4.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 692347
(March 25, 2013), 78 FR 19344 (‘‘Notice’’).
5 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange removed
language from proposed Rule 530(h) to clarify that
its treatment of options overlying securities that are
subject to a trading pause in the Limit Up-Limit
Down context is intended to be the same as what
is currently set forth in Exchange Rule 504(c),
which provides generally for the treatment of
options overlying securities that are subject to a
trading pause. Because the changes made in
Amendment No. 1 do not materially alter the
substance of the proposed rule change or raise any
novel regulatory issues, Amendment No. 1 is not
subject to notice and comment.
6 The events of May 6 are described more fully
in a joint report by the staffs of the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’) and the
Commission. See Report of the Staffs of the CFTC
and SEC to the Joint Advisory Committee on
Emerging Regulatory Issues, ‘‘Findings Regarding
the Market Events of May 6, 2010,’’ dated
September 30, 2010, available at https://
www.sec.gov/news/studies/2010/marketeventsreport.pdf.
7 For further discussion on the development of
the single-stock circuit breaker pilot program, see
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May
31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (‘‘Limit UpLimit Down Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’).
3 17
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
VerDate Mar<15>2010
II. Background
2 15
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),2 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 a proposed rule
change to provide for how the Exchange
proposes to treat market-making quoting
obligations in response to the
Regulation NMS Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
March 29, 2013.4 On April 8, 2013, the
Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1
to the proposed rule change.5 The
Commission received no comment
letters on the proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change on
an accelerated basis.
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22357
was executed at a price outside of a
specified percentage threshold.8
To replace the single-stock circuit
breaker pilot program, the equity
exchanges filed a National Market
System Plan9 pursuant to Section 11A
of the Act,10 and Rule 608 thereunder,11
which featured a ‘‘limit up-limit down’’
mechanism (as amended, the ‘‘Limit UpLimit Down Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’).
The Plan sets forth requirements that
are designed to prevent trades in
individual NMS stocks from occurring
outside of the specified price bands. The
price bands consist of a lower price
band and an upper price band for each
NMS stock. When one side of the
market for an individual security is
outside the applicable price band, i.e.,
the National Best Bid is below the
Lower Price Band, or the National Best
Offer is above the Upper Price band, the
Processors 12 are required to disseminate
such National Best Bid or National Best
Offer 13 with a flag identifying that quote
as non-executable. When the other side
of the market reaches the applicable
price band, i.e., the National Best Offer
reaches the lower price band, or the
National Best Bid reaches the upper
price band, the market for an individual
security enters a 15-second Limit State,
and the Processors are required
disseminate such National Best Offer or
National Best Bid with an appropriate
flag identifying it as a Limit State
Quotation. Trading in that stock would
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 62884
(September 10, 2010), 75 FR 56618 (September 16,
2010) and Securities Exchange Act Release No.
62883 (September 10, 2010), 75 FR 56608
(September 16, 2010) (SR–FINRA–2010–033)
(describing the ‘‘second stage’’ of the single-stock
circuit breaker pilot) and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 64735 (June 23, 2011), 76 FR 38243
(June 29, 2011) (describing the ‘‘third stage’’ of the
single-stock circuit breaker pilot).
9 NYSE Euronext filed on behalf of New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’), NYSE Amex LLC
(‘‘NYSE Amex’’), and NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Arca’’), and the parties to the proposed National
Market System Plan, BATS Exchange, Inc., BATS YExchange, Inc., Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’), Chicago Stock Exchange,
Inc., EDGA Exchange, Inc., EDGX Exchange, Inc.,
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.,
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc., NASDAQ OMX PHLX
LLC, the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, and National
Stock Exchange, Inc. (collectively with NYSE,
NYSE MKT, and NYSE Arca, the ‘‘Participants’’).
On May 14, 2012, NYSE Amex filed a proposed rule
change on an immediately effective basis to change
its name to NYSE MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT’’). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67037 (May
21, 2012) (SR–NYSEAmex-2012–32).
10 15 U.S.C. 78k–1.
11 17 CFR 242.608.
12 As used in the Plan, the Processor refers to the
single plan processor responsible for the
consolidation of information for an NMS Stock
pursuant to Rule 603(b) of Regulation NMS under
the Exchange Act. See id.
13 ‘‘National Best Bid’’ and ‘‘National Best Offer’’
has the meaning provided in Rule 600(b)(42) of
Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act. See id.
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 72 (Monday, April 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22353-22357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08724]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69351; File No. SR-Phlx-2013-35]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Pricing for Mini Options
April 9, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on March 26, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the its Pricing Schedule by adding
Section A, entitled ``Mini Options Fees,'' and by redesignating
existing Section A as Section B.
The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The
text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
While changes to the Pricing Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated that they become
operative on March 28, 2013.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to set forth in new
Section A of the Pricing Schedule the applicability of various existing
fees, rebates, and caps to Mini Options, and specifically to establish
that transaction fees with respect to Mini Options will be set at
$0.00. Existing Section A, Customer Rebate Program, will be
redesignated as Section B.
The Exchange represented in its filing establishing Mini Options
(the ``Mini Options Listing Filing'') that ``the current Pricing
Schedule will not apply to the trading of mini-option contracts'' and
that ``[t]he Exchange will not commence trading of mini-option
contracts until specific fees for mini-options contracts trading have
been filed with the Commission.'' \3\ The purpose of the proposed new
Section A is to adopt the fees that are specific to Mini Options, as
provided for in the Mini Options Listing Filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See SR-Phlx-2012-126, page 8. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 68132 (November 1, 2012), 77 FR 66904 (November 7,
2012) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To List and Trade Option Contracts Overlying 10 Shares of
Certain Securities).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Section A will appear after the Preface section of the Pricing
Schedule which contains definitions that apply to the entire Pricing
Schedule, including new Section A. Except where different treatment is
specified for Mini Options in Section A, the rest of the Pricing
Schedule will apply to Mini Options in the same way it applies to all
other options. For example, a Mini Options class will count as an
options class assignment for purposes of determining the level of
Streaming Quote Trader Fees and Remote Streaming Quote Trader Fees in
Section VI. Cross references to Section A in the Table of Contents and
Section IV.A, PIXL Pricing, will be updated to refer to Section B, and
the Table of Contents will be updated to refer to Mini Options as new
Section A.
Applicable Symbols. Proposed new Section A identifies the Mini
Options symbols as AAPL7, AMZN7, GLD7, GOOG7 and SPY7. Accordingly, new
Section A will apply exclusively to these new symbols.
Transaction Fees. New Section A provides for a ``Mini Options
Transaction Fee--Electronic'' and for a ``Mini-Options Transaction
Fee--Floor and QCC'', both of which will apply in the Customer,
Professional, Specialist and Market Maker, Broker-Dealer and Firm fee
categories.\4\ In each case, the Exchange is currently setting these
fees at $0.00 but may in the future file proposed rule changes to amend
the transaction fee level in one or more categories. The Exchange is
establishing the separate Section A Pricing Schedule section for Mini
Options transaction fees in order to facilitate differentiation in the
future between Mini Options transaction fees and other options
transaction fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Transaction fees for options other than Mini Options are
currently found in Sections I through III of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PIXL Executions. The new Section A transaction fees will apply to
PIXL executions in Mini Options rather than the PIXL Pricing fees set
forth in Section IV.A.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ PIXL is the Exchange's price improvement mechanism known as
Price Improvement XL or (PIXL\SM\). See Rule 1080(n) and Section IV
of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payment for Order Flow. Pursuant to new Section A, Payment for
Order Flow Fees set forth in Section II of the Pricing
[[Page 22354]]
Schedule will not apply to Mini Options.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Payment for Order Flow program started on July 1, 2005
as a pilot and after a series of orders extending the pilot became
effective on April 29, 2012. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
52114 (July 22, 2005), 70 FR 44138 (August 1, 2005) (SR-Phlx-2005-
44); 57851 (May 22, 2008), 73 FR 31177 (May 20, 2008) (SR-Phlx-2008-
38); 55891 (June 11, 2007), 72 FR 333271 (June 15, 2007) (SR-Phlx-
2007-39); 53754 (May 3, 2006), 71 FR 27301 (May 10, 2006) (SR-Phlx-
2006-25); 53078 (January 9, 2006), 71 FR 2289 (January 13, 2006)
(SR-Phlx-2005-88); 52568 (October 6, 2005), 70 FR 60120 (October 14,
2005) (SR-Phlx-2005-58); and 59841 (April 29, 2009), 74 FR 21035
(May 6, 2009) (SR-Phlx-2009-38).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Rebate Program. New Section A clarifies that Mini Options
volume will not be included in and will not be eligible for the
Customer Rebate Program which is being moved from Section A of the
Pricing Schedule to Section B of the Pricing Schedule.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange has recently described and amended its Customer
Rebate Program. See SR-Phlx-2013-13. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 68924 (February 13, 2013), 78 FR 11916 (February 20,
2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Routing Fees. Today, the Exchange calculates Routing Fees by
assessing certain Exchange costs related to routing orders to away
markets plus the away market's actual transaction fee.\8\ The Exchange
assesses a $0.05 per contract fixed Routing Fee when routing orders to
the NASDAQ Options Market LLC (``NOM'') and NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX
Options'') and a $0.11 per contract fixed Routing Fee to all other
options exchanges in addition to the actual transaction fee or rebate
paid by the away market.\9\ With respect to the rebate, the Exchange
pays a market participant the rebate offered by an away market where
there is such a rebate. Any rebate available is netted against a fee
assessed by the Exchange. With respect to orders routed to C2 Options
Exchange, Incorporated (``C2''), the Exchange assesses non-Customer
simple, non-complex orders in equity options (single stock) that are
routed to C2 a Routing Fee which includes a fixed cost of $0.11 per
contract plus a flat rate of $0.85 per contract, except with respect to
Customers. With respect to Customers, the Exchange does not pass the
rebate offered by C2, rather, Customer simple, non-complex orders in
equity options (single stock) that are routed to C2 are assessed $0.00
per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Routing fees applicable to options other than Mini Options
are set forth in Section V of the Pricing Schedule. Routing fees
allow the Exchange to recoup costs it incurs for routing and
executing orders in equity options to various away markets.
\9\ The fixed Routing Fee is based on costs that are incurred by
the Exchange when routing to an away market in addition to the away
market's transaction fee. For example, the Exchange incurs a fee
when it utilizes Nasdaq Options Services LLC (``NOS''), a member of
the Exchange and the Exchange's exclusive order router, to route
orders in options listed and open for trading on the PHLX XL system
to destination markets. Each time NOS routes to away markets NOS
incurs a clearing-related cost and, in the case of certain
exchanges, a transaction fee is also charged in certain symbols,
which fees are passed through to the Exchange. The Exchange also
incurs administrative and technical costs associated with operating
NOS, membership fees at away markets, Options Regulatory Fees
(``ORFs'') and technical costs associated with routing options. The
transaction fee assessed by the Exchange is based on the away
market's actual transaction fee or rebate for a particular market
participant at the time that the order was entered into the
Exchange's trading system. This transaction fee is calculated on an
order-by-order basis, since different away markets charge different
amounts. In the event that there is no transaction fee or rebate
assessed by the away market, the only fee assessed is the fixed
Routing Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has recently filed a proposed rule change to make a
number of pricing changes described in this paragraph to its Routing
Fees. Effective April 1, 2013, the Exchange's Routing Fees in Section V
of the Pricing Schedule will be as follows: Non-Customers will be
assessed a $0.95 per contract flat fee and the Customer Routing Fee
will be dependent on the away market.\10\ With respect to Customer
orders routed to NOM, the Exchange will assess a fixed fee of $0.05 per
contract (``Fixed Fee'') in addition to the actual transaction fee
assessed by the away market would apply. With respect to Customer
orders that are routed to BX Options, the Exchange will not assess a
Routing Fee and will not pass the rebate. The Exchange will assess a
Customer Routing Fee of $0.11 per contract (``Fixed Fee'') in addition
to the actual transaction fee when routing to an options exchange other
than NOM and BX Options. Similar to Customer orders routed to BX, the
Exchange will no longer pass any rebate paid by any away market for any
Customer orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See SR-Phlx-2013-23 (not yet published) [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Section A establishes Routing Fees for Mini Options that will
apply instead of the existing Routing Fees set forth in Section V of
the Pricing Schedule. Routing Fees for Customers are set at $0.01 per
contract in addition to the actual transaction fee assessed. If the
away market pays a rebate, the Customer Routing Fee will be $0.00.
Routing Fees for all other participants (non-Customers) will be a flat
rate of $0.15 per contract and the Exchange will not charge non-
Customers the actual transaction fee assessed by the away market or
pass back any rebate.
QCC Transaction Fees and Rebates. New Section A establishes that
QCC Transaction fees and rebates, set forth in Section II \11\ of the
Pricing Schedule, are not applicable to Section A of the Pricing
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ QCC Orders are defined in Rule 1080(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee Caps. New Section A provides that the Monthly Market Maker Cap
\12\ and the Monthly Firm Fee Cap \13\, defined in Section II of the
Pricing Schedule, will not be applicable to transactions in Mini
Options. Therefore, any fees that may be assessed with respect to
transactions in Mini Options will not be applied toward these caps.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The Monthly Market Maker Cap is $550,000 for: (i)
Electronic and floor Option Transaction Charges; (ii) QCC
Transaction Fees (as defined in Exchange Rule 1080(o) and Floor QCC
Orders, as defined in 1064(e)); and (iii) fees related to an order
or quote that is contra to a PIXL Order or specifically responding
to a PIXL auction. The trading activity of separate Specialist and
Market Maker member organizations will be aggregated in calculating
the Monthly Market Maker Cap if there is Common Ownership between
the member organizations. All dividend, merger, short stock interest
and reversal and conversion strategy executions (as defined in this
Section II) will be excluded from the Monthly Market Maker Cap. In
addition, Specialists or Market Makers that (i) are on the contra-
side of an electronically-delivered and executed Customer order; and
(ii) have reached the Monthly Market Maker Cap will be assessed a
$0.16 per contract fee. For QCC Orders as defined in Exchange Rule
1080(o), and Floor QCC Orders, as defined in 1064(e), a Service Fee
of $0.07 per side applies once a Specialist or Market Maker has
reached the Monthly Market Maker Cap. The $0.07 Service Fee applies
to every contract side of the QCC Order and Floor QCC Order after a
Specialist or Market Maker has reached the Monthly Market Maker Cap,
except for reversal and conversion strategies executed via QCC. The
Service Fee is not being assessed to a Specialist or Market Maker
that does not reach the Monthly Market Maker Cap in a particular
calendar month.
\13\ Firms are subject to a maximum fee of $75,000 (``Monthly
Firm Fee Cap''). Firm floor option transaction charges and QCC
Transaction Fees as defined in Section II of the Pricing Schedule in
the aggregate, for one billing month will not exceed the Monthly
Firm Fee Cap per member organization when such members are trading
in their own proprietary account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \14\ in general,
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \15\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transaction Fees. The Exchange believes that the proposed Mini
Options Transaction Fee-Electronic and Mini Options Transaction Fee--
Floor and QCC, as well as the applicability of those fees to PIXL
executions in Mini Options, are reasonable because those fees are set
at zero in order to encourage market participants to transact Mini
Options. They are also equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because all the market participant categories will be
[[Page 22355]]
able to take advantage of the zero fee level and will therefore be
treated in a uniform matter. Likewise, the Exchange believes that not
applying QCC Transaction fees and rebates to transactions in Mini
Options is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because the Exchange does not desire to assess certain transaction fees
to encourage all market participants to transact Mini Options. No
market participant would be assessed QCC Transaction fees or rebates.
Fee Caps. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory to not apply the Monthly Market Maker
Cap or Monthly Firm Fee Cap to Mini Options transaction fees because
the Mini Options transaction fees are set at zero in any event for all
market participants. The fee caps would not be affected by transactions
in Mini Options for which transaction fees are not assessed in the
first place.
Customer Rebate Program. The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory that Mini Options
volume will not be included in and will not be eligible for the
Customer Rebate Program defined in newly relocated Section B of the
Pricing Schedule. The Customer Rebate Program was established to
incentivize market participants to increase the amount of Customer
order flow they transact on the Exchange.\16\ The Customer Rebate
Program is predicated on certain volume tiers that assume an option
contract size of 100 shares. Due to the smaller size of the Mini
Options contract, Mini Options will not make sense in the context of
the volume tiers upon which the calculation of the Customer Rebate is
based and the logic behind the Customer Rebate Program would not be
achieved by including them. For this reason the Exchange believes that
it is reasonable to not permit Mini Options to qualify in the Customer
Rebate Program. Also, the Exchange would uniformly not pay rebates to
any market participant transacting Customer Mini Options. Finally,
redesignation of the caption of the Customer Rebate Program from A. to
B. will provide clarity to the Pricing Schedule as it accommodates the
new Mini Options Fees language in A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68924 (February 13,
2013), 78 FR 11916 (February 20, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payment for Order Flow Fees. The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory that the Payment
for Order Flow fees set forth in Section II will not apply to Mini
Options because the Exchange is not charging any transaction fees for
these products at this time. By eliminating Payment for Order Flow Fees
as applied to Mini Options the Exchange will incentivize members to
transact in them. Further, Specialists and Market Makers will not be
singled out from among other market participants for assessment of this
fee. All market participants will be treated the same way by not having
the Payment for Order Flow fees imposed on them with respect to Mini
Options.
Proposed Mini Options Routing Fees--Customers. In the proposed new
language in Section A of the Pricing Schedule, for Mini Options a $0.01
per contract Routing Fee will be charged for Customer orders in
addition to the actual transaction fee assessed, provided that if the
away market pays a rebate to the Exchange, the Customer Routing Fee is
$0.00. The Customer Routing Fees for Mini Options are reasonable
because they will allow the Exchange to recoup and cover its costs of
providing routing services for Customer orders in Mini Options just as
it does for other standard equity options for which it incurs the same
costs. The Exchange believes this Routing Fee for Customers in Mini
Options is reasonable because it is lower than the other fixed Routing
Fees for standard options, as discussed above, which are assessed with
respect to Customer transactions in other options pursuant to Section V
of the Pricing Schedule. Additionally, the Customer Routing Fees will
be similar to the new Routing Fees that the Exchange recently filed and
which will be operative on April 1, 2013, except the fixed cost will be
lower in the case of Mini Options. Similar to that filing, the Exchange
would not pass rebates back to Customers, but would also not asses a
Customer a Routing Fee if a rebate were paid by the away market. The
Exchange believes that its proposal to not pass a rebate that is
offered by an away market for Customers orders in Mini Options is
reasonable because to the extent that another market is paying a
rebate, the Exchange will not assess a Routing Fee for that
transaction. If a market participant desires the rebate, the market
participant has the option to direct the order to that away market.
Other options exchanges today do not pass the rebate.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See CBOE's Fees Schedule and International Securities
Exchange LLC's (``ISE'') Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the Routing Fees for Mini Options for
Customers are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the
Exchange would uniformly assess the same Routing Fees to all Customers,
and because market participants have the ability to directly route
orders in Mini Options to an away market and avoid the Routing Fee.
Also, market participants may submit orders to the Exchange as
ineligible for routing or ``DNR'' to avoid Routing Fees. The Exchange
believes that its proposal to not pass a rebate that is offered by an
away market for Customer Mini Option orders is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange would not pay such a
rebate on any Customer Mini Option order.
Proposed Mini Options Routing Fees--Non-Customers. In the proposed
new language in Section A of the Pricing Schedule, Routing Fees for
Mini Options for all participants other than Customers (``non-
Customers'') will be a flat fee of $0.15 per contract. The Exchange
believes this fee is reasonable because it is lower than the $0.95 per
contract flat fee that will be in effect on April 1, 2013 for non-
Customers orders routed to all options exchanges (other than BX Options
and NOM) for orders in options other than Mini Options.\18\ The non-
Customer Routing Fees for Mini Options are reasonable because they will
allow the Exchange to recoup and cover its costs of providing routing
services for non-Customer orders in Mini Options just as it does for
other equity options for which it incurs the same costs. The Exchange
believes that its proposal to amend its non-Customer Routing Fees from
a fixed fee plus actual transaction charges to a flat rate is
reasonable because the flat rate makes it easier for market
participants to anticipate the Routing Fees which they would be
assessed at any given time. The Exchange believes that assessing all
non-Customer orders the same flat rate will provide market participants
with certainty with respect to Routing Fees. While each destination
market's transaction charge varies and there is a cost incurred by the
Exchange when routing orders to away markets, including clearing costs,
administrative and technical costs associated with operating NOS,
membership fees at away markets, ORFs and technical costs associated
with routing options, the Exchange believes that the proposed Routing
Fees will enable it to recover the costs it incurs to route non-
Customer orders to away markets. Other
[[Page 22356]]
exchanges similarly assess a fixed rate fee to route non-Customer
orders.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The Exchange believes that the proposed non-Customer
Routing Fee for Mini Options that are routed to BX and NOM is
reasonable even though it is higher than $0.05 Routing Fee assessed
with respect to non-Customer orders routed to BX and NOM today in
options other than Mini Options, inasmuch as the Exchange is not
charging any transaction fees with respect to Mini Options.
\19\ BATS Exchange, Inc. (``BATS'') assesses non-Customer fixed
rates of $0.57 and $0.95 per contract when routing to away markets.
See BATS BZX Exchange Fee Schedule. The Chicago Board Options
Exchange Incorporated (``CBOE'') assesses non-Customer orders a
$0.50 per contract routing fee in addition to the customary CBOE
execution charges. See CBOE's Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend the non-Customer
Routing Fees from a fixed fee plus actual transaction charges to a flat
rate is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange
would uniformly assess the same Routing Fees to all non-Customer market
participants. Under its flat fee structure, taking all costs to the
Exchange into account, the Exchange may operate at a slight gain or a
slight loss for non-Customer orders routed to and executed at away
markets. The proposed Routing Fee for non-Customer orders is an
approximation of the maximum fees the Exchange will be charged for such
executions, including costs, at away markets. As a general matter, the
Exchange believes that the proposed fees will allow it to recoup and
cover its costs of providing routing services for non-Customer orders.
The Exchange believes that the fixed rate non-Customer Routing Fee is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because market participants
have the ability to directly route orders to an away market and avoid
the Routing Fee. Also, market participants may submit orders to the
Exchange as ineligible for routing or ``DNR'' to avoid Routing Fees. It
is important to note that when orders are routed to an away market they
are routed based on price first.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to not pass a rebate that
is offered by an away market for non-Customers orders is reasonable
because to the extent that another market is paying a rebate, the
Exchange will assess a $0.15 per contract fee as its total cost in each
instance. The Routing Fee is transparent and simple. If a market
participant desires the rebate, the market participant has the option
to direct the order to that away market. Other options exchanges today
do not pass the rebate. The Exchange believes that its proposal to not
pass a rebate that is offered by an away market for non-Customers
orders is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the
Exchange would not pay such a rebate on any non-Customer order. The
Exchange believes the Routing Fees for Mini Options for non-Customers
are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange
would uniformly assess the same Routing Fees to all non-Customer market
participants.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory to assess different fees for Customers
orders as compared to non-Customer orders because the Exchange has
traditionally assessed lower fees to Customers as compared to non-
Customers. Customers will continue to receive the lowest fees or no
fees when routing orders, as is the case today. Other options exchanges
also assess lower Routing Fees for customer orders as compared to non-
customer orders in standard options.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ BATS assesses lower customer routing fees as compared to
non-customer routing fees per the away market. For example BATS
assesses ISE customer routing fees of $0.30 per contract and an ISE
non-customer routing fee of $0.57 per contract. See BATS BZX
Exchange Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market, comprised of
eleven exchanges, in which market participants can easily and readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or rebates to be inadequate.
Accordingly, the fees that are assessed and the rebates paid by the
Exchange described in the above proposal are influenced by these robust
market forces and therefore must remain competitive with fees charged
and rebates paid by other venues and therefore must continue to be
reasonable and equitably allocated to those members that opt to direct
orders to the Exchange rather than competing venues.
The Mini Options are a new product that will commence trading on
the Exchange on March 28, 2013. The Exchange believes that
incentivizing market participants to transact Mini Options by not
assessing transaction fees and certain other fees encourages
competition in these products. There is no intra-market competition as
the Exchange will treat all market participants in a like manner with
respect to the transaction fees. Also, the Exchange believes that
because other markets will also list Mini Options there is no undue
burden on intermarket competition because market participants will be
able to select the venue where they will trade these products. In terms
of Routing, the Exchange-believes that assessing Customers lower fees
as compared to Non-Customers and assessing the same Routing Fees to all
Non-Customers regardless of the venue does not create an undue burden
on competition. The Exchange has traditionally assessed no or lower
fees to Customers. Also, the Exchange believes that because Mini
Options represent 1/10th of the size of a standard option contract,
reduced Routing Fees will not misalign the cost to transact Mini
Options.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\21\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-Phlx-2013-35 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-35. This file
number should be included on the
[[Page 22357]]
subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the
proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all
written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Phlx-2013-35 and should be submitted on or before May 6,
2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-08724 Filed 4-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P