Presence Sensing Device Initiation (PSDI) Standard; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements, 21155-21157 [2013-08183]
Download as PDF
21155
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[23 TAA petitions instituted between 3/18/13 and 3/22/13]
TA–W
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
82568 ................
Homeward Residentiall, formerly American Home Serv
(State/One-Stop).
Abbott Ross Division (Workers) ...........................................
LexisNexis/Matthew Bender (Company) ..............................
LexisNexis/Matthew Bender (Company) ..............................
Hasbro Games (Union) ........................................................
Hewlett Packard Company (New Version) (Company) ........
Hewlett-Packard Company (Company) ................................
Compucom Systems, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ........................
Global Functions of Hewlett Packard Company (Company)
Hewlett Packard Company (Company) ................................
Hewlett Packard Software (Company) .................................
Resolute Forest Products (Company) ..................................
Revstone Greenwood Forgings (Company) .........................
West Point Home LLC—Wagram Division Office (Company).
Standard Motor Products (Company) ..................................
Chromalloy (State/One-Stop) ...............................................
Nanosolar, Inc. (State/One-Stop) .........................................
Phillips Lightolier (formerly Genlyte Group) (State/OneStop).
AAR Mobility Systems (Union) .............................................
McConway & Torley Corporation (Union) ............................
Katana Summit, LLC (State/One-Stop) ................................
Jacksonville, FL ....................
03/18/13
03/15/13
Altavista, VA ..........................
Charlottesville, VA .................
Albany, NY ............................
East Longmeadow, MA .........
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Dallas, TX .............................
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Palo Alto, CA ........................
Calhoun, TN ..........................
Greenwood, SC ....................
Wagram, NC .........................
03/18/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/21/13
03/07/13
03/18/13
03/18/13
03/15/13
03/18/13
03/18/13
03/15/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/19/13
03/07/13
03/20/13
Independence, KS ................
Gardena, CA .........................
San Jose, CA ........................
Fall River, MA .......................
03/21/13
03/21/13
03/22/13
03/22/13
03/20/13
03/20/13
03/07/13
03/22/13
Cadillac, MI ...........................
Kutztown, PA ........................
Ephrata, WA ..........................
03/22/13
03/22/13
03/22/13
02/28/13
03/21/13
03/15/13
82569
82570
82571
82572
82573
82574
82575
82576
82577
82578
82579
82580
82581
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
82582
82583
82584
82585
................
................
................
................
82586 ................
82587 ................
82588 ................
Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of
March, 2013.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013–08134 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[FR Doc. 2013–08137 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
[TA–W–81,387]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Eastman Kodak Company, IPS—
Dayton Location, Including On-site
Leased Workers From Adecco, Dayton,
Ohio; Notice of Termination of
Reconsideration Investigation
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Employment and Training
Administration
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, a
reconsideration investigation was
initiated in on August 1, 2012 by the
Department of Labor on behalf of
workers and former workers of Eastman
Kodak Company, IPS—Dayton Location,
including on-site leased workers from
Adecco, Dayton, Ohio.
The worker group on whose behalf
the request for reconsideration was filed
is eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance under an amended
certification (TA–W–74,813A) which
was issued on March 19, 2013.
Consequently, the investigation has
been terminated.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0009]
Presence Sensing Device Initiation
(PSDI) Standard; Extension of the
Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
specified in the Presence Sensing
Device Initiation (PSDI) Standard (29
CFR 1910.217(h)).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by June
10, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
Date of
petition
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2010–0009, Occupational Safety
and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–2625,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries
(hand, express mail, messenger, and
courier service) are accepted during the
Department of Labor’s and Docket
Office’s normal business hours, 8:15
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2010–0009) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
21156
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from the Web site. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH
Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
Description of the requirements. A
number of paragraphs in the Standard
contain paperwork requirements. These
requirements include: Certifying brakemonitor adjustments, alternatives to
photoelectric presence sensing devices
(PSDs), safety system design and
installation, and worker training; annual
recertification of safety systems;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
establishing and maintaining the
original certification and validation
records as well as the most recent
recertification and revalidation records;
affixing labels to test rods and to
certified and recertified presses; and
notifying an OSHA-recognized thirdparty validation organization when a
safety system component fails, the
employer modifies the safety system, or
a point-of-operation injury occurs.
Use and purpose of the requirements.
Requiring employers to certify brakemonitor adjustments, alternatives to
photoelectric PSDs, and safety system
design and installation, and to recertify
safety systems annually, provides the
employer, systems engineers,
maintenance personnel, and other
workers with reliable information
regarding the status and operating
characteristics of the presses, which
they can use to determine that the
systems are operating according to the
requirements of the Standard. The
training certification requirement
assures employers that workers receive
the training specified by the Standard at
the required frequencies and, therefore,
can safely operate a PSDI-equipped
mechanical power press. Specifying that
employers establish and maintain for
each press the original certification and
validation records, as well as the most
recent recertification and revalidation
records, allows employers, engineers,
maintenance personnel, and other
workers to determine if the presses are
operating within required
specifications, thereby ensuring that the
presses remain in safe operating
condition.
Having employers affix labels to test
rods provides information to workers
about the minimum object sensitivity of
the sensing field, thereby allowing them
to use the test rods in determining that
a field is operating correctly. The
provision specifying that employers
affix labels to certified and recertified
presses gives assurance to employers
and workers that the presses meet the
requirements of the Standard and,
therefore, that workers can operate them
safely.
Requiring employers to notify an
OSHA-recognized third-party validation
organization when a safety system
component fails, or a point-of-operation
injury occurs, permits these
organizations to identify and correct
design problems in the safety systems.
Having employers inform these
organizations of modifications made to
safety systems allows the organizations
to review the modifications and
determine if the presses will continue to
operate safely.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
By complying with these paperwork
requirements, employers ensure that
PSDI-equipped mechanical power
presses are in safe working order,
thereby preventing severe injury and
death to press operators and other
workers who work near this equipment.
In addition, these records provide the
most efficient means for an OSHA
compliance officer to determine that an
employer performed the requirements
and that the equipment is safe.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
To date, OSHA has not recognized a
third-party organization to validate
employer and manufacturer
certifications that their PSDI equipment
and practices meet the requirements of
the Standard. Therefore, the Agency
cannot attribute burden hours and cost
to the paperwork requirements of the
Standard.
OSHA is proposing that OMB approve
the information collection requirements
specified by the Standard so that it can
enforce these requirements if employers
obtain third-party certification/
validation; thus, the Agency reports no
program changes or adjustments and
requests that it be allowed to retain its
previous estimate of one burden hour
should the requirements of the standard
be implemented.
The Agency will summarize the
comments submitted in response to this
notice and will include this summary in
the request to OMB to extend the
approval of the information collection
requirements contained in the Standard.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Presence Sensing Device
Initiation (PSDI) (29 CFR 1910.217(h)).
OMB Control Number: 1218–0143.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits; Not-for-profit organizations;
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2013 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Government; State, Local, or
Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 0.
Total Responses: 0.
Frequency: Initially; Annually; On
occasion.
Average Time per Response: 0.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health,
directed the preparation of this notice.
The authority for this notice is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of
Labor’s Order No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912).
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the
ICR (Docket No. OSHA–2010–0009).
You may supplement electronic
submissions by uploading document
files electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Due to security procedures, the use of
regular mail may cause a significant
delay in the receipt of comments. For
information about security procedures
concerning the delivery of materials by
hand, express delivery, messenger, or
courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–2350,
(TTY (877) 889–5627). Comments and
submissions are posted without change
at https://www.regulations.gov.
Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters
about submitting personal information
such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index, some
information (e.g., copyrighted material)
is not publicly available to read or
download through this Web site.
All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA
Docket Office. Information on using the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site to
submit comments and access the docket
is available at the Web site’s ‘‘User
Tips’’ link. Contact the OSHA Docket
Office for information about materials
not available through the Web site, and
for assistance in using the Internet to
locate docket submissions.
Signed at Washington, DC, on April 3,
2013.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2013–08183 Filed 4–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0016]
Derricks; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
contained in its Standard on Derricks
(29 CFR 1910.181).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by June
10, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, OSHA
Docket No. OSHA–2010–0016, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration,
Room N–2625, 200 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries
(hand, express mail, messenger, and
courier service) are accepted during the
Department of Labor’s and Docket
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21157
Office’s normal business hours, 8:15
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2010–0016) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program ensures that information is in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act
or for developing information regarding
the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21155-21157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08183]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
[Docket No. OSHA-2010-0009]
Presence Sensing Device Initiation (PSDI) Standard; Extension of
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements specified in the Presence Sensing
Device Initiation (PSDI) Standard (29 CFR 1910.217(h)).
DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
June 10, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2010-0009,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket Office's normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA-2010-0009) for the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without change, and may be made
available online at https://www.regulations.gov. For further information
on submitting comments see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the
section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
[[Page 21156]]
Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download from the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, Directorate
of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609,
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-
2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accord with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information
is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of
the information collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes
information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for
enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires that OSHA obtain
such information with minimum burden upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to reduce to the maximum extent
feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in obtaining information
(29 U.S.C. 657).
Description of the requirements. A number of paragraphs in the
Standard contain paperwork requirements. These requirements include:
Certifying brake-monitor adjustments, alternatives to photoelectric
presence sensing devices (PSDs), safety system design and installation,
and worker training; annual recertification of safety systems;
establishing and maintaining the original certification and validation
records as well as the most recent recertification and revalidation
records; affixing labels to test rods and to certified and recertified
presses; and notifying an OSHA-recognized third-party validation
organization when a safety system component fails, the employer
modifies the safety system, or a point-of-operation injury occurs.
Use and purpose of the requirements. Requiring employers to certify
brake-monitor adjustments, alternatives to photoelectric PSDs, and
safety system design and installation, and to recertify safety systems
annually, provides the employer, systems engineers, maintenance
personnel, and other workers with reliable information regarding the
status and operating characteristics of the presses, which they can use
to determine that the systems are operating according to the
requirements of the Standard. The training certification requirement
assures employers that workers receive the training specified by the
Standard at the required frequencies and, therefore, can safely operate
a PSDI-equipped mechanical power press. Specifying that employers
establish and maintain for each press the original certification and
validation records, as well as the most recent recertification and
revalidation records, allows employers, engineers, maintenance
personnel, and other workers to determine if the presses are operating
within required specifications, thereby ensuring that the presses
remain in safe operating condition.
Having employers affix labels to test rods provides information to
workers about the minimum object sensitivity of the sensing field,
thereby allowing them to use the test rods in determining that a field
is operating correctly. The provision specifying that employers affix
labels to certified and recertified presses gives assurance to
employers and workers that the presses meet the requirements of the
Standard and, therefore, that workers can operate them safely.
Requiring employers to notify an OSHA-recognized third-party
validation organization when a safety system component fails, or a
point-of-operation injury occurs, permits these organizations to
identify and correct design problems in the safety systems. Having
employers inform these organizations of modifications made to safety
systems allows the organizations to review the modifications and
determine if the presses will continue to operate safely.
By complying with these paperwork requirements, employers ensure
that PSDI-equipped mechanical power presses are in safe working order,
thereby preventing severe injury and death to press operators and other
workers who work near this equipment. In addition, these records
provide the most efficient means for an OSHA compliance officer to
determine that an employer performed the requirements and that the
equipment is safe.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
To date, OSHA has not recognized a third-party organization to
validate employer and manufacturer certifications that their PSDI
equipment and practices meet the requirements of the Standard.
Therefore, the Agency cannot attribute burden hours and cost to the
paperwork requirements of the Standard.
OSHA is proposing that OMB approve the information collection
requirements specified by the Standard so that it can enforce these
requirements if employers obtain third-party certification/validation;
thus, the Agency reports no program changes or adjustments and requests
that it be allowed to retain its previous estimate of one burden hour
should the requirements of the standard be implemented.
The Agency will summarize the comments submitted in response to
this notice and will include this summary in the request to OMB to
extend the approval of the information collection requirements
contained in the Standard.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Title: Presence Sensing Device Initiation (PSDI) (29 CFR
1910.217(h)).
OMB Control Number: 1218-0143.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profits; Not-for-profit
organizations;
[[Page 21157]]
Federal Government; State, Local, or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 0.
Total Responses: 0.
Frequency: Initially; Annually; On occasion.
Average Time per Response: 0.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1.
Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2010-0009). You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and the docket number so the Agency can attach them
to your comments.
Due to security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-2350, (TTY (877) 889-5627). Comments
and submissions are posted without change at https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download through this
Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on using
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments and access
the docket is available at the Web site's ``User Tips'' link. Contact
the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not available
through the Web site, and for assistance in using the Internet to
locate docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012
(77 FR 3912).
Signed at Washington, DC, on April 3, 2013.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2013-08183 Filed 4-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P