Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 18366-18368 [2013-06889]

Download as PDF 18366 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in the production of decorative hardware to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–80,317 is hereby issued as follows: Approval No. 1105–0098, expiration date March 31, 2016. Brian M. Simkin, Chief Counsel. [FR Doc. 2013–06874 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–BA–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–80,317] srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Baldwin Hardware Corporation, a Subsidiary of Spectrum Brands, Formerly Known as a Subsidiary of Stanley Black & Decker Including OnSite Leased Workers From Gage Personnel, Adecco, Mack Employment and John Galt Staffing, Reading, Pennsylvania; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on August 10, 2011, applicable to workers of Baldwin Hardware Corporation, a Subsidiary of Stanley Black & Decker, including onsite leased workers from Gage personnel, Adecco, Mack Employment and John Galt Staffing, Reading, Pennsylvania. The workers are engaged in the production of decorative hardware. The Notice was published in the Federal Register on September 2, 2011 (76 FR 54796). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows that on December 17, 2012, Spectrum Brands purchased Baldwin Hardware, and that the subject firm is now known as Baldwin Hardware Corporation, a Subsidiary of Spectrum Brands, formerly known as a Subsidiary of Stanley Black & Decker. Some workers separated from employment at the subject firm had wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under ‘‘Spectrum Brands.’’ Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to include workers of the subject firm whose UI wages are reported under Spectrum Brands. VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:07 Mar 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 All workers of Baldwin Hardware Corporation, a Subsidiary of Spectrum Brands, formerly known as a Subsidiary of Stanley Black & Decker, including on-site leased workers from Gage Personnel, Adecco, Mack Employment, and John Galt Staffing, Reading, Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after July 25, 2010, through August 10, 2013, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of March, 2013. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2013–06887 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of February 25, 2013 through March 1, 2013. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the 18367 International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 82,211 .......... 82,264 .......... 82,270 .......... AGY Huntingdon, AGY Holding Corporation .............................................. American Cotton Growers, Plains Cotton Cooperative Association .......... Trim Masters, Inc., Toyota Boshuko American and Johnson Controls Automotive, Nesco Resources. O. Mustad & Son, Inc., Kelly Services ....................................................... Harte-Hanks Response Management/Austin, Inc., Technisource and Adecco. Grede II, LLC, Key Staff Source ................................................................ Hampton Capital Partners, LLC, Gulistan Carpet Division, Ronile, Mega Force Staffing Group. Hampton Capital Partners, LLC, Gulistan Carpet Division, Ronile, Inc. .... Versalogic Corporation, Quantum Recruiters and VanderHouwen & Associates. Huntingdon, PA .................... Littlefield, TX ........................ Nicholasville, KY .................. October 8, 2012. December 14, 2011. October 23, 2012. Auburn, NY ........................... Austin, TX ............................. December 26, 2011. January 9, 2012. Marion, AL ............................ Aberdeen, NC ...................... January 11, 2012. January 12, 2012. Wagram, NC ........................ Eugene, OR ......................... January 12, 2012. January 14, 2012. 82,303 .......... 82,331 .......... 82,337 .......... 82,338 .......... 82,338A ....... 82,352 .......... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or Impact date services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 82,361 .......... 82,368 .......... General Electric, Energy Division ............................................................... Imation Corporation, Research and Development and Engineering Organization. Energizer Holdings, Inc., Staff Management/SMX, Seaton Companies .... Energizer Holdings, Inc., Staff Management/SMX, Seaton Companies .... Apex Tool Group, LLC, Gastonia Operation Division, Adecco USA and Aerotek Commercial Staffing. Schawk, Atlanta .......................................................................................... ZF Marine Propulsion Systems LLC, Northwest Staffing, UI Wages Though ZF Marine Electronics LLC. NXP Semiconductors, U.S. Automotive Design, Randstad General Partner LLC and Targetcw. Mersen USA Newburyport MA LLC, Mersen USA BN Corporation, Aerotek, Accountemps & Office Team, etc. Entegris, Inc., Volt Workforce Solutions ..................................................... San German, PR .................. Oakdale, MN ........................ January 22, 2012. February 5, 2013. Maryville, MO ....................... St. Albans, VT ...................... Gastonia, NC ........................ January 17, 2012. January 17, 2012. January 25, 2012. Atlanta, GA ........................... Mukilteo, WA ........................ January 30, 2012. February 4, 2012. San Jose, CA ....................... February 11, 2012. Newburyport, MA ................. February 11, 2012. Billerica, MA ......................... February 5, 2012. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 82,369 .......... 82,369A ....... 82,375 .......... 82,384 .......... 82,419 .......... 82,443 .......... 82,445 .......... 82,449 .......... VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:07 Mar 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1 Impact date 18368 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 82,454 .......... 82,471 .......... Laserwords US, Inc., Madison Division, Laserwords Private Limited ........ Amantea Nonwovens, Express Employment Professionals and The Job Store. Madison, WI ......................... Cincinnati, OH ...................... September 17, 2012. February 18, 2012. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) TA–W No. Subject firm 82,044 .......... International Paper Company ..................................................................... The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) Location TA–W No. Subject firm 82,004 .......... 82,345 .......... 82,365 .......... TRG Customer Solutions, Inc., TRG Holdings, Inc .................................... Connextions Olympus Program, Connextions, Inc .................................... Siwel Consulting, Inc., Working on Site at Verizon .................................... Subject firm 82,082 .......... Manpower, The Evercare Company ........................................................... Dated: March 5, 2013. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2013–06889 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:07 Mar 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 Frm 00064 workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Location Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date Waynesboro, GA. U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of March 4, 2013 through March 8, 2013. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles PO 00000 Impact date Oil City, PA. Concord, NC. Tulsa, OK. required by Section 221 of the Act (19 USC 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of February 25, 2013 through March 1, 2013. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888–365–6822. country) of section 222 have not been met. Location TA–W No. Impact date Albany, OR. (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department’s Web site, as (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18366-18368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
February 25, 2013 through March 1, 2013.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased 
absolutely; and
    (3) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive 
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have 
increased;
    (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are 
directly incorporated, have increased;
    (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more 
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or 
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more 
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
    (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have 
increased; and
    (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the 
sales or production of such firm; or
    II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign 
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or 
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
    (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly 
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
    (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' 
separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public 
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to 
become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services 
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such 
agency; and
    (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such

[[Page 18367]]

workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or 
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for 
such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described 
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or 
threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade 
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply 
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
    (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the 
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an 
investigation resulting in--
    (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat 
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
    (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat 
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
    (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat 
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
    (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the 
date on which--
    (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the 
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to 
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is 
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
    (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in 
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
    (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the 
workers' firm within--
    (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
    (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding 
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       TA-W No.                    Subject firm                   Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,211...............  AGY Huntingdon, AGY Holding          Huntingdon, PA......  October 8, 2012.
                        Corporation.
82,264...............  American Cotton Growers, Plains      Littlefield, TX.....  December 14, 2011.
                        Cotton Cooperative Association.
82,270...............  Trim Masters, Inc., Toyota Boshuko   Nicholasville, KY...  October 23, 2012.
                        American and Johnson Controls
                        Automotive, Nesco Resources.
82,303...............  O. Mustad & Son, Inc., Kelly         Auburn, NY..........  December 26, 2011.
                        Services.
82,331...............  Harte-Hanks Response Management/     Austin, TX..........  January 9, 2012.
                        Austin, Inc., Technisource and
                        Adecco.
82,337...............  Grede II, LLC, Key Staff Source....  Marion, AL..........  January 11, 2012.
82,338...............  Hampton Capital Partners, LLC,       Aberdeen, NC........  January 12, 2012.
                        Gulistan Carpet Division, Ronile,
                        Mega Force Staffing Group.
82,338A..............  Hampton Capital Partners, LLC,       Wagram, NC..........  January 12, 2012.
                        Gulistan Carpet Division, Ronile,
                        Inc..
82,352...............  Versalogic Corporation, Quantum      Eugene, OR..........  January 14, 2012.
                        Recruiters and VanderHouwen &
                        Associates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act 
have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       TA-W No.                    Subject firm                   Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,361...............  General Electric, Energy Division..  San German, PR......  January 22, 2012.
82,368...............  Imation Corporation, Research and    Oakdale, MN.........  February 5, 2013.
                        Development and Engineering
                        Organization.
82,369...............  Energizer Holdings, Inc., Staff      Maryville, MO.......  January 17, 2012.
                        Management/SMX, Seaton Companies.
82,369A..............  Energizer Holdings, Inc., Staff      St. Albans, VT......  January 17, 2012.
                        Management/SMX, Seaton Companies.
82,375...............  Apex Tool Group, LLC, Gastonia       Gastonia, NC........  January 25, 2012.
                        Operation Division, Adecco USA and
                        Aerotek Commercial Staffing.
82,384...............  Schawk, Atlanta....................  Atlanta, GA.........  January 30, 2012.
82,419...............  ZF Marine Propulsion Systems LLC,    Mukilteo, WA........  February 4, 2012.
                        Northwest Staffing, UI Wages
                        Though ZF Marine Electronics LLC.
82,443...............  NXP Semiconductors, U.S. Automotive  San Jose, CA........  February 11, 2012.
                        Design, Randstad General Partner
                        LLC and Targetcw.
82,445...............  Mersen USA Newburyport MA LLC,       Newburyport, MA.....  February 11, 2012.
                        Mersen USA BN Corporation,
                        Aerotek, Accountemps & Office
                        Team, etc.
82,449...............  Entegris, Inc., Volt Workforce       Billerica, MA.......  February 5, 2012.
                        Solutions.

[[Page 18368]]

 
82,454...............  Laserwords US, Inc., Madison         Madison, WI.........  September 17, 2012.
                        Division, Laserwords Private
                        Limited.
82,471...............  Amantea Nonwovens, Express           Cincinnati, OH......  February 18, 2012.
                        Employment Professionals and The
                        Job Store.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs 
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) 
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 
have not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       TA-W No.                    Subject firm                   Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,044...............  International Paper Company........  Albany, OR.           ..............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investigation revealed that the criteria under 
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in 
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not 
been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       TA-W No.                    Subject firm                   Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,004...............  TRG Customer Solutions, Inc., TRG    Oil City, PA.         ..............................
                        Holdings, Inc.
82,345...............  Connextions Olympus Program,         Concord, NC.          ..............................
                        Connextions, Inc.
82,365...............  Siwel Consulting, Inc., Working on   Tulsa, OK.            ..............................
                        Site at Verizon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register 
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act 
(19 USC 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these 
petitions.
    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active 
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases 
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be 
covered by more than one certification at a time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       TA-W No.                    Subject firm                   Location                  Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,082...............  Manpower, The Evercare Company.....  Waynesboro, GA.       ..............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of February 25, 2013 through March 1, 2013. These 
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or 
by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-
365-6822.

    Dated: March 5, 2013.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013-06889 Filed 3-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P