Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Permit the Minimum Price Variation for Mini Options To Be the Same as Permitted for Standard Options on the Same Security, 18407-18410 [2013-06790]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices
No. SR–MIAX–2013–07 on the subject
line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
[Release No. 34–69184; File No. SR–BX–
2013–028]
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–MIAX–2013–07. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–MIAX–
2013–07 and should be submitted on or
before April 16, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–06787 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Permit the
Minimum Price Variation for Mini
Options To Be the Same as Permitted
for Standard Options on the Same
Security
March 19, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 15,
2013, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (‘‘BX
Options’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I and II below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify
Chapter IV (Securities Traded on BX
Options), Supplementary Material .08 to
Section 6 (Series of Options Contracts
Open for Trading), and Chapter VI
(Trading Systems), Section 5 (Minimum
Increments) to permit the minimum
price variation for Mini Options
contracts that deliver 10 shares to be the
same as permitted for standard options
that deliver 100 shares on the same
security.
The text of the proposed rule change
is provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the
proposed rule change is also available
on the Exchange’s Web site at https://
nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
1 15
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:07 Mar 25, 2013
2 17
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18407
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposal is to
change the rules of the Exchange in
Chapter IV, Supplementary Material .08
to Section 6, and Chapter VI, Section 5
to permit the minimum price variation
for Mini Options contracts that deliver
10 shares to be the same as permitted for
standard options that deliver 100 shares
on the same security.
This filing is based on a recent
proposal of Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CBOE’’), with virtually
identical rule text in CBOE Rules 6.42
and 5.5.3
The Exchange recently amended its
rules to allow for the listing of Mini
Options that deliver 10 physical shares
on SPDR S&P 500 (‘‘SPY’’), Apple, Inc.
(‘‘AAPL’’), SPDR Gold Trust (‘‘GLD’’),
Google Inc. (‘‘GOOG’’) and Amazon.com
Inc. (‘‘AMZN’’).4 Mini Options trading
is expected to commence in March
2013. Prior to the commencement of
trading Mini Options, the Exchange
proposes to establish and permit the
minimum price variation for Mini
Option contracts to be the same as
permitted for standard options on the
same security. In addition to giving
market participants clarity as to the
minimum pricing increments for Mini
Options, the filing would harmonize
penny pricing between Mini Options
and standard options on the same
security.
Of the five securities on which Mini
Options are permitted, four of them
(SPY, AAPL, GLD and AMZN)
participate in the Penny Pilot Program.5
Under the Penny Pilot Program:
• The minimum price variation for
AAPL, GLD and AMZN options is $0.01
for all quotations in series that are
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69124
(March 12, 2013) (SR–CBOE–2013–016; SR–ISE–
2013–08) (approval order).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68719
(January 24, 2013), 78 FR 6391 (January 30, 2013)
(SR–BX–2013–006) (notice of filing and immediate
effectiveness of proposed rule change establishing
Mini Options on BX).
5 The Penny Pilot was established in July 2012
and was last extended in December 2012. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 67256 (June
26, 2012), 77 FR 39277 (July 2, 2012) (SR–BX–
2012–030) (order approving BX option rules and
establishing Penny Pilot); and 68518 (December 21,
2012), 77 FR 77152 (December 31, 2012) (SR–BX–
2012–076) (notice of filing and immediate
effectiveness extending the Penny Pilot through
June 30, 2013).
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18408
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices
quoted at less than $3 per contract and
$0.05 for all quotations in series that are
quoted at $3 per contract or greater; and
• The minimum price variation for
SPY options is $0.01 for all quotations
in all series.6
In the lead up to the launch of Mini
Options trading on an industry-wide
basis, firms with customer bases of
potential product users have indicated a
preference that premium pricing for
Mini Options match what is currently
permitted for standard options that
deliver 100 physical shares on the same
securities. The Exchange understands
that firms’ systems are configured using
the ‘‘root symbol’’ of an underlying
security and cannot differentiate, for
purposes of minimum variation pricing,
between contracts on the same security.
Mini Options will be loaded into firms’
systems using the same ‘‘root symbol’’
that is used for standard options on the
same security. As a result, it is believed
that existing systems will not be able to
assign different minimum pricing
variations to different contracts on the
same security. As a result, firms have
indicated their preference that there be
matched pricing between Mini Options
and standard options on the same
security because their systems, which
are programmed using ‘‘root symbols,’’
would not be able to assign different
minimum pricing variations to Mini
Options and standard options on the
same security.
Because Mini Options are a separate
class from standard options on the same
security, Mini Options would have to
qualify separately for entry into the
Penny Pilot Program. This, however, is
not possible by product launch (or
possibly ever) for a number of reasons.
First, there is a six calendar month
trading volume criteria for entry into the
Penny Pilot Program, which Mini
Options cannot satisfy prior to launch.
Second, even if Mini Options met the
trading volume criteria, replacement
classes are only added to the Penny
Pilot Program on the second trading day
following January 1 and July 1 in a
given year. Finally, there is a price test
for entry into the Penny Pilot Program
which excludes ‘‘high premium’’
classes, which are defined as classes
priced at $200 per share or higher at the
time of selection. As of the date of this
filing, three of the five securities (AAPL,
AMZN and GOOG) eligible for Mini
Options would be excluded as ‘‘high
premium’’ classes, even though two of
those securities (AAPL and AMZN) are
in the Penny Pilot Program for standard
6 Chapter
VI, Section 5(a)(3).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:07 Mar 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
options. The Exchange notes that GOOG
is not in the Penny Pilot Program.7
The Exchange, therefore, is proposing
to establish a pricing regime for Mini
Options separate from the Penny Pilot
Program that permits the minimum
price variation for Mini Option
contracts to be the same as permitted for
standard options on the same security,
which would encompass penny pricing
for Mini Option contracts on securities
that participate in the Penny Pilot
Program.8
As to the Penny Pilot Program, the
Exchange believes that there are several
good reasons to allow penny pricing for
Mini Options on securities that
currently participate in the Penny Pilot
Program, without requiring Mini
Options to separately qualify for the
Penny Pilot Program. First, the Penny
Pilot Program applies to the most
actively-traded, multiply-listed option
classes. Likewise, the five securities
which may underlie Mini Options were
chosen because of the significant
liquidity in standard options on the
same security. The Exchange also
believes that the marketplace and
investors will be expecting the
minimum price variation for contracts
on the same security to be the same.
Second, one of the primary goals of the
Penny Pilot Program is to narrow the
bid-ask spreads of exchange-traded
options to reduce the cost of entering
and exiting positions. This same goal
can similarly be accomplished by
permitting penny pricing for Mini
Option contracts on securities that
already participate in the Penny Pilot
Program. Finally, the Exchange believes
that penny pricing for Mini Options is
desirable for a product that is geared
toward retail investors. Mini Options
are on high priced securities and are
meant to be an investment tool with
more affordable and realistic prices for
the average retail investor. Penny
pricing for Mini Options on securities
that are currently in the Penny Pilot
7 The minimum price variation for standard
options on GOOG is $0.05 for all quotations in
series that are quoted at less than $3 per contract
and $0.10 for all quotations in series that are quoted
at $3 per contract or greater. See Chapter VI, Section
5(a).
8 As noted in the Exchange’s original Mini Option
filing, Mini Options are limited to five securities
and any expansion of the program would require
that a subsequent proposed rule change be
submitted to the Commission. The current proposal
is limited to the five securities originally approved
to underlie Mini Options. The Exchange anticipates
that a similar minimum pricing variation regime
would be included in any rule change to expand the
Mini Option program. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 68719 (January 24, 2013), 78 FR 6391
(January 30, 2013) (SR–BX–2013–006) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule
change establishing Mini Options on BX).
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Program would benefit the anticipated
users of Mini Options by providing
more price points. The Exchange notes
that it is not requesting penny pricing
for all of the five securities eligible for
Mini Options trading; but rather is
seeking to permit matched penny
pricing for Mini Options on those
securities for which standard options
already trade in pennies.
To effect the current proposed rule
changes, the Exchange proposes to add
new language in Chapter IV,
Supplementary Material .08 to Section
6, and in Chapter VI, Section 5. As to
Chapter VI, Section 5, the Exchange
proposes adding new subsection (a)(4)
that has an internal cross reference to
new proposed Chapter IV,
Supplementary Material .08(d) to
Section 6 as the provision that sets forth
the minimum price variation for bids
and offers for Mini Options. As to
Supplementary Material .08 to Section
6, the Exchange proposes adding new
subsection (d), which would provide as
follows:
The minimum price variation for bids and
offers for Mini Options shall be the same as
permitted for standard options on the same
security. For example, if a security
participates in the Penny Pilot Program, Mini
Options on the same underlying security may
be quoted in the same minimum increments,
e.g., $0.01 for all quotations in series that are
quoted at less than $3 per contract and $0.05
for all quotations in series that are quoted at
$3 per contract or greater, $0.01 for all SPY
option series, and Mini Options do not
separately need to qualify for the Penny Pilot
Program.
With regard to the impact of this
proposal on system capacity, the
Exchange has analyzed its capacity and
represents that it and the Options Price
Reporting Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) have the
necessary systems capacity to handle
the potential additional traffic
associated with this proposal. The
Exchange does not believe that this
increased traffic will become
unmanageable since Mini Options are
limited to a fixed number of underlying
securities.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder, including the requirements
of Section 6(b) of the Act.9 In particular,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 10 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
9 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10 15
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices
acts, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and to perfect
the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system,
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.
Specifically, the Exchange believes
that investors and other market
participants would benefit from the
current rule proposal because it would
clarify and establish the minimum price
variation for Mini Options prior to the
commencement of trading. The
Exchange believes that the marketplace
and investors will be expecting the
minimum price variation for contracts
on the same security to be the same. As
a result, the Exchange believes that this
change would lessen investor and
marketplace confusion because Mini
Options and standard options on the
same security would have the same
minimum price variation.
While price protection between Mini
Options and standard options on the
same security is not required, the
Exchange believes that consistency
between Mini Options and standard
options as to the minimum price
variation is desirable and is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade. Matching the minimum price
variation between Mini Options and
standard options on the same security
would help to eliminate any
unnecessary arbitrage opportunities that
could result from having contracts on
the same underlying security traded in
different minimum price increments.
Similarly, matched minimum pricing
would hopefully generate enhanced
competition among liquidity providers.
The Exchange believes that matched
pricing for Mini Options and standard
options on the same security would
attract additional liquidity providers
who would make markets in Mini
Options and standard options on the
same security. In addition to the
possibility of more liquidity providers,
the Exchange believes that the ability to
quote Mini Options and standard
options on the same security in the
same minimum increments would
hopefully result in more efficient
pricing via arbitrage and possible price
improvement in both contracts on the
same security. The Exchange also
believes that allowing penny pricing for
Mini Options on securities that
currently participate in the Penny Pilot
Program (without Mini Options having
to qualify separately for entry into the
Penny Pilot Program) will benefit the
marketplace and investors because
penny pricing in Mini Options may also
accomplish one of the primary goals of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:07 Mar 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
the Penny Pilot Program, which is to
narrow the bid-ask spreads of exchangetraded options to reduce the cost of
entering and exiting positions. Finally,
the proposed rule would be beneficial
from a logistical perspective since firms’
existing systems are configured using
the ‘‘root symbol’’ of an underlying
security and would not be able to assign
different minimum pricing variations to
Mini Options and standard options on
the same security.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Specifically,
since Mini Options are permitted on
multiply-listed classes, other exchanges
that have received approval to trade
Mini Options will have the opportunity
to similarly establish the minimum
price variation for Mini Options prior to
the anticipated launch on or about
March 18, 2013. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed rule change
will enhance competition by allowing
products on the same security to be
priced in the same minimum price
increments.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change: (1) Does not significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and
(3) by its terms does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of
this filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.12
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally does not
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
provide the Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with
a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
12 17
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18409
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange requests that the Commission
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposed rule change may coincide
with the anticipated launch of trading in
Mini Options. The Commission believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.13
Waiver of the operative delay will allow
the Exchange to implement its proposal
consistent with the commencement of
trading in Mini Options as scheduled
and expected by members and other
participants on March 18, 2013. For
these reasons, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change as
operative upon filing.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BX–2013–028 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2013–028. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
18410
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BX–
2013–028 and should be submitted on
or before April 16, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–06790 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69196]
Order Granting a Limited Exemption
From Rule 102 of Regulation M
Concerning the NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC Market Quality Program Pilot
Pursuant to Regulation M Rule 102(e)
March 20, 2013.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) approved
a proposed rule change of the NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘NASDAQ’’) to add new NASDAQ Rule
5950 (‘‘New Rule 5950’’) to establish the
Market Quality Program (‘‘MQP’’ or
‘‘Program’’).1 In connection with the
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Exchange Act Release No. 69195,
(Mar. 20, 2013) (‘‘Approval Order’’). The Approval
Order contains a detailed description of the MQP.
On December 7, 2012, NASDAQ filed with the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) and Rule 19b–4
thereunder, a proposed rule change to establish the
1 Securities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:07 Mar 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
Program, an MQP Company 2 may list
an eligible MQP Security 3 on NASDAQ
and in addition to the standard (nonMQP) NASDAQ listing fee, a sponsor
may pay a fee (‘‘MQP Fee’’) 4 that will
be used for the purpose of incentivizing
one or more market makers to enhance
the market quality of an MQP Security
on a voluntary pilot basis. The
Commission believes that payment of
MQP. The proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1 thereto, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on December 31,
2012. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68515
(Dec. 21, 2012), 77 FR 77141 (Dec. 31, 2012)
(‘‘Notice’’). On February 7, 2013, NASDAQ
submitted Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change. On February 8, 2013 NASDAQ withdrew
Amendment No. 2 due to a technical error in that
amendment and submitted Amendment No. 3 to the
proposed rule change. As noted in the Approval
Order, Amendment No. 3 provided clarification to
the proposed rule change and did not require notice
and comment. On February 14, 2013, the
Commission designated a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed rule change.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68925 (Feb. 14,
2013), 78 FR 12116 (Feb. 21, 2013). The Approval
Order grants approval of the proposed rule change,
as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 3.
Previously, NASDAQ filed, but later withdrew,
an initial proposed rule change to establish the
MQP. On March 23, 2012, NASDAQ filed with the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Exchange Act and Rule 19b–4 thereunder, a
proposed rule change to establish the MQP. On
March 29, 2012, the Exchange submitted
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1 thereto, was published for comment in the
Federal Register on April 12, 2012. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 66765 (Apr. 6, 2012), 77
FR 22042 (Apr. 12, 2012). On May 18, 2012, the
Commission extended the time period in which to
either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change to July 11, 2012. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 67022 (May 18, 2012), 77
FR 31050 (May 24, 2012). On July 11, 2012, the
Commission instituted proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67411 (Jul. 11,
2012), 77 FR 42052 (Jul. 17, 2012). On October 2,
2012, the Commission issued a notice of
designation of a longer period for Commission
action on proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 67961, 77 FR 61452 (Oct.
9, 2012). On November 6, 2012, NASDAQ
submitted Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change. On December 6, 2012, NASDAQ withdrew
the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 thereto. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 68378, 77 FR 74042 (Dec.
12, 2012) (Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
66765, 67022, 67411, 67961, and 68378 collectively,
the ‘‘Initial Proposal’’).
2 The term ‘‘MQP Company’’ means the trust or
company housing the exchange traded fund
(‘‘ETF’’) or, if the ETF is not a series of a trust or
company, then the ETF itself. New Rule 5950(e)(5).
3 The term ‘‘MQP Security’’ means an ETF
security issued by an MQP Company that meets all
of the requirements to be listed on NASDAQ
pursuant to Rule 5705. New Rule 5950(e)(1).
4 The MQP Fee, as described more fully in New
Rule 5950(b)(2), consists of an annual basic MQP
Fee, and may include an additional annual
supplemental fee.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the MQP Fee, which is incurred by the
MQP Company but paid by the sponsor
associated with the MQP Company, for
the purpose of incentivizing market
makers to make a quality market in
otherwise less liquid MQP Securities
would constitute an indirect attempt by
the issuer to induce a bid for or a
purchase of a covered security during a
restricted period.5 As a result, absent
exemptive relief, participation in the
MQP by an MQP Company would
violate Rule 102 of Regulation M.6 This
order grants a limited exemption from
Rule 102 of Regulation M solely to
permit MQP Companies to participate in
the MQP during the pilot, subject to
certain conditions described below.
NASDAQ represents that the MQP is
designed to ‘‘promote market quality’’ in
certain ETFs listed on NASDAQ.7
NASDAQ represents that, pursuant to
the MQP, the MQP Fee will be used for
the purpose of incentivizing one or
more market makers in the MQP
Security (‘‘MQP Market Maker’’) 8 to
make a quality market in the MQP
Security.9 An MQP Company
participating in the MQP shall incur an
annual basic MQP Fee of $50,000 per
MQP Security.10 An MQP Company
may also voluntarily incur an annual
supplemental MQP Fee per MQP
Security.11 The MQP Fee is in addition
to the standard (non-MQP) NASDAQ
listing fee applicable to the MQP
Security.12 NASDAQ will prospectively
bill each MQP Company for the MQP
Fee.13 The MQP Fee will be credited to
the NASDAQ General Fund.14 MQP
Credits for each MQP Security will be
calculated monthly and credited out of
the NASDAQ General Fund quarterly on
a pro rata basis to one or more eligible
MQP Market Makers.15 The voluntary
MQP established by New Rule 5950 will
be effective on a pilot basis.16
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67411
(Jul. 11, 2012), 77 FR 42052 (Jul. 17, 2012) (stating
‘‘The Commission believes that issuer payments
made under the SRO Proposals would constitute an
indirect attempt by the issuer of a covered security
to induce a purchase or bid in a covered security
during a restricted period in violation of Rue 102
* * * [u]nder the NASDAQ Proposal, the issuer
payments would ‘be used for the purpose of
incentivizing one or more Market Makers in the
MQP Security,’ which could induce bids or
purchases for the issuer’s security during a
restricted period’’).
6 17 CFR 242.102.
7 New Rule 5950 Preamble.
8 ‘‘The term ‘Market Maker’ has the meaning
given in Rule 5005(a)(24).’’ New Rule 5950(e)(3).
9 New Rule 5950 Preamble.
10 New Rule 5950(b)(2)(A).
11 New Rule 5950(b)(2)(B).
12 New Rule 5950(b)(2)(C).
13 New Rule 5950(b)(2)(D).
14 New Rule 5950(b)(2)(E).
15 New Rule 5950(c)(2).
16 New Rule 5950(f).
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18407-18410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06790]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69184; File No. SR-BX-2013-028]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Permit
the Minimum Price Variation for Mini Options To Be the Same as
Permitted for Standard Options on the Same Security
March 19, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 15, 2013, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX Options'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify Chapter IV (Securities Traded on BX
Options), Supplementary Material .08 to Section 6 (Series of Options
Contracts Open for Trading), and Chapter VI (Trading Systems), Section
5 (Minimum Increments) to permit the minimum price variation for Mini
Options contracts that deliver 10 shares to be the same as permitted
for standard options that deliver 100 shares on the same security.
The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The
text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposal is to change the rules of the Exchange
in Chapter IV, Supplementary Material .08 to Section 6, and Chapter VI,
Section 5 to permit the minimum price variation for Mini Options
contracts that deliver 10 shares to be the same as permitted for
standard options that deliver 100 shares on the same security.
This filing is based on a recent proposal of Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Inc. (``CBOE''), with virtually identical rule text in CBOE
Rules 6.42 and 5.5.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69124 (March 12,
2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-016; SR-ISE-2013-08) (approval order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange recently amended its rules to allow for the listing of
Mini Options that deliver 10 physical shares on SPDR S&P 500 (``SPY''),
Apple, Inc. (``AAPL''), SPDR Gold Trust (``GLD''), Google Inc.
(``GOOG'') and Amazon.com Inc. (``AMZN'').\4\ Mini Options trading is
expected to commence in March 2013. Prior to the commencement of
trading Mini Options, the Exchange proposes to establish and permit the
minimum price variation for Mini Option contracts to be the same as
permitted for standard options on the same security. In addition to
giving market participants clarity as to the minimum pricing increments
for Mini Options, the filing would harmonize penny pricing between Mini
Options and standard options on the same security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68719 (January 24,
2013), 78 FR 6391 (January 30, 2013) (SR-BX-2013-006) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change
establishing Mini Options on BX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of the five securities on which Mini Options are permitted, four of
them (SPY, AAPL, GLD and AMZN) participate in the Penny Pilot
Program.\5\ Under the Penny Pilot Program:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Penny Pilot was established in July 2012 and was last
extended in December 2012. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
67256 (June 26, 2012), 77 FR 39277 (July 2, 2012) (SR-BX-2012-030)
(order approving BX option rules and establishing Penny Pilot); and
68518 (December 21, 2012), 77 FR 77152 (December 31, 2012) (SR-BX-
2012-076) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness extending
the Penny Pilot through June 30, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The minimum price variation for AAPL, GLD and AMZN options
is $0.01 for all quotations in series that are
[[Page 18408]]
quoted at less than $3 per contract and $0.05 for all quotations in
series that are quoted at $3 per contract or greater; and
The minimum price variation for SPY options is $0.01 for
all quotations in all series.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Chapter VI, Section 5(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the lead up to the launch of Mini Options trading on an
industry-wide basis, firms with customer bases of potential product
users have indicated a preference that premium pricing for Mini Options
match what is currently permitted for standard options that deliver 100
physical shares on the same securities. The Exchange understands that
firms' systems are configured using the ``root symbol'' of an
underlying security and cannot differentiate, for purposes of minimum
variation pricing, between contracts on the same security. Mini Options
will be loaded into firms' systems using the same ``root symbol'' that
is used for standard options on the same security. As a result, it is
believed that existing systems will not be able to assign different
minimum pricing variations to different contracts on the same security.
As a result, firms have indicated their preference that there be
matched pricing between Mini Options and standard options on the same
security because their systems, which are programmed using ``root
symbols,'' would not be able to assign different minimum pricing
variations to Mini Options and standard options on the same security.
Because Mini Options are a separate class from standard options on
the same security, Mini Options would have to qualify separately for
entry into the Penny Pilot Program. This, however, is not possible by
product launch (or possibly ever) for a number of reasons. First, there
is a six calendar month trading volume criteria for entry into the
Penny Pilot Program, which Mini Options cannot satisfy prior to launch.
Second, even if Mini Options met the trading volume criteria,
replacement classes are only added to the Penny Pilot Program on the
second trading day following January 1 and July 1 in a given year.
Finally, there is a price test for entry into the Penny Pilot Program
which excludes ``high premium'' classes, which are defined as classes
priced at $200 per share or higher at the time of selection. As of the
date of this filing, three of the five securities (AAPL, AMZN and GOOG)
eligible for Mini Options would be excluded as ``high premium''
classes, even though two of those securities (AAPL and AMZN) are in the
Penny Pilot Program for standard options. The Exchange notes that GOOG
is not in the Penny Pilot Program.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The minimum price variation for standard options on GOOG is
$0.05 for all quotations in series that are quoted at less than $3
per contract and $0.10 for all quotations in series that are quoted
at $3 per contract or greater. See Chapter VI, Section 5(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange, therefore, is proposing to establish a pricing regime
for Mini Options separate from the Penny Pilot Program that permits the
minimum price variation for Mini Option contracts to be the same as
permitted for standard options on the same security, which would
encompass penny pricing for Mini Option contracts on securities that
participate in the Penny Pilot Program.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ As noted in the Exchange's original Mini Option filing, Mini
Options are limited to five securities and any expansion of the
program would require that a subsequent proposed rule change be
submitted to the Commission. The current proposal is limited to the
five securities originally approved to underlie Mini Options. The
Exchange anticipates that a similar minimum pricing variation regime
would be included in any rule change to expand the Mini Option
program. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68719 (January 24,
2013), 78 FR 6391 (January 30, 2013) (SR-BX-2013-006) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change
establishing Mini Options on BX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As to the Penny Pilot Program, the Exchange believes that there are
several good reasons to allow penny pricing for Mini Options on
securities that currently participate in the Penny Pilot Program,
without requiring Mini Options to separately qualify for the Penny
Pilot Program. First, the Penny Pilot Program applies to the most
actively-traded, multiply-listed option classes. Likewise, the five
securities which may underlie Mini Options were chosen because of the
significant liquidity in standard options on the same security. The
Exchange also believes that the marketplace and investors will be
expecting the minimum price variation for contracts on the same
security to be the same. Second, one of the primary goals of the Penny
Pilot Program is to narrow the bid-ask spreads of exchange-traded
options to reduce the cost of entering and exiting positions. This same
goal can similarly be accomplished by permitting penny pricing for Mini
Option contracts on securities that already participate in the Penny
Pilot Program. Finally, the Exchange believes that penny pricing for
Mini Options is desirable for a product that is geared toward retail
investors. Mini Options are on high priced securities and are meant to
be an investment tool with more affordable and realistic prices for the
average retail investor. Penny pricing for Mini Options on securities
that are currently in the Penny Pilot Program would benefit the
anticipated users of Mini Options by providing more price points. The
Exchange notes that it is not requesting penny pricing for all of the
five securities eligible for Mini Options trading; but rather is
seeking to permit matched penny pricing for Mini Options on those
securities for which standard options already trade in pennies.
To effect the current proposed rule changes, the Exchange proposes
to add new language in Chapter IV, Supplementary Material .08 to
Section 6, and in Chapter VI, Section 5. As to Chapter VI, Section 5,
the Exchange proposes adding new subsection (a)(4) that has an internal
cross reference to new proposed Chapter IV, Supplementary Material
.08(d) to Section 6 as the provision that sets forth the minimum price
variation for bids and offers for Mini Options. As to Supplementary
Material .08 to Section 6, the Exchange proposes adding new subsection
(d), which would provide as follows:
The minimum price variation for bids and offers for Mini Options
shall be the same as permitted for standard options on the same
security. For example, if a security participates in the Penny Pilot
Program, Mini Options on the same underlying security may be quoted
in the same minimum increments, e.g., $0.01 for all quotations in
series that are quoted at less than $3 per contract and $0.05 for
all quotations in series that are quoted at $3 per contract or
greater, $0.01 for all SPY option series, and Mini Options do not
separately need to qualify for the Penny Pilot Program.
With regard to the impact of this proposal on system capacity, the
Exchange has analyzed its capacity and represents that it and the
Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') have the necessary systems
capacity to handle the potential additional traffic associated with
this proposal. The Exchange does not believe that this increased
traffic will become unmanageable since Mini Options are limited to a
fixed number of underlying securities.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ In particular, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) \10\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative
[[Page 18409]]
acts, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
to perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange believes that investors and other market
participants would benefit from the current rule proposal because it
would clarify and establish the minimum price variation for Mini
Options prior to the commencement of trading. The Exchange believes
that the marketplace and investors will be expecting the minimum price
variation for contracts on the same security to be the same. As a
result, the Exchange believes that this change would lessen investor
and marketplace confusion because Mini Options and standard options on
the same security would have the same minimum price variation.
While price protection between Mini Options and standard options on
the same security is not required, the Exchange believes that
consistency between Mini Options and standard options as to the minimum
price variation is desirable and is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade. Matching the minimum price variation
between Mini Options and standard options on the same security would
help to eliminate any unnecessary arbitrage opportunities that could
result from having contracts on the same underlying security traded in
different minimum price increments. Similarly, matched minimum pricing
would hopefully generate enhanced competition among liquidity
providers. The Exchange believes that matched pricing for Mini Options
and standard options on the same security would attract additional
liquidity providers who would make markets in Mini Options and standard
options on the same security. In addition to the possibility of more
liquidity providers, the Exchange believes that the ability to quote
Mini Options and standard options on the same security in the same
minimum increments would hopefully result in more efficient pricing via
arbitrage and possible price improvement in both contracts on the same
security. The Exchange also believes that allowing penny pricing for
Mini Options on securities that currently participate in the Penny
Pilot Program (without Mini Options having to qualify separately for
entry into the Penny Pilot Program) will benefit the marketplace and
investors because penny pricing in Mini Options may also accomplish one
of the primary goals of the Penny Pilot Program, which is to narrow the
bid-ask spreads of exchange-traded options to reduce the cost of
entering and exiting positions. Finally, the proposed rule would be
beneficial from a logistical perspective since firms' existing systems
are configured using the ``root symbol'' of an underlying security and
would not be able to assign different minimum pricing variations to
Mini Options and standard options on the same security.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, since Mini
Options are permitted on multiply-listed classes, other exchanges that
have received approval to trade Mini Options will have the opportunity
to similarly establish the minimum price variation for Mini Options
prior to the anticipated launch on or about March 18, 2013. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change will enhance
competition by allowing products on the same security to be priced in
the same minimum price increments.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. However,
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange requests that the Commission waive
the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule change may
coincide with the anticipated launch of trading in Mini Options. The
Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest.\13\ Waiver of the operative delay will allow the Exchange to
implement its proposal consistent with the commencement of trading in
Mini Options as scheduled and expected by members and other
participants on March 18, 2013. For these reasons, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-BX-2013-028 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2013-028. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will
[[Page 18410]]
post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-BX-2013-028 and should be submitted on or before April
16, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-06790 Filed 3-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P