Certain Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing the Same; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 16533-16534 [2013-06005]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2013 / Notices No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42–46 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–46). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 11, 2013. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–05993 Filed 3–14–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–873] Certain Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing the Same; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337 U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on February 8, 2013, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Tela Innovations, Inc. of Los Gatos, California. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on February 28, 2013. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain integrated circuit devices and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,264,049 (‘‘the ’049 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,264,044 (‘‘the ’044 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,258,550 (‘‘the ’550 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,258,547 (‘‘the ’547 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,217,428 (‘‘the ’428 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,258,552 (‘‘the ’552 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 8,030,689 (‘‘the ’689 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained VerDate Mar<14>2013 17:37 Mar 14, 2013 Jkt 229001 therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2012). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on March 11, 2013, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain integrated circuit devices and products containing the same that infringe one or more of claims 1–11 and 20–23 of the ’049 patent; claims 1–5, 7, 8, 10–14, 17, 18, 21–25, 28, 29, 32–36, 39, and 40 of the ’044 patent; claims 1–23, 26–31, and 38–46 of the ’550 patent; claims 1–34 of the ’547 patent; claims 1–13 of the ’428 patent; claims 1–5, 11, and 18–47 of the ’552 patent; and claims 2–4, 29, and 33– 46 of the ’689 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16533 recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1) and (f)(1); (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Tela Innovations, Inc., 485 Alberto Way, Suite 115, Los Gatos, CA 95032. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: HTC Corporation, 23 Xinghua Road, Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan. HTC America, Inc., 13920 SE. Eastgate Way, Bellevue, WA 98005. LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, 20, Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150–721, Republic of Korea. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632. LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., 10101 Old Grove Road, San Diego, CA 92131. Motorola Mobility LLC, 600 N. U.S. Highway 45, Libertyville, IL 60048. Nokia Corporation (Nokia Oyj), Keilalahdentie 2–4, FI–02150 Espoo, Finland. Nokia, Inc., 200 South Matilda Avenue, West Washington Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086. Pantech Co., Ltd., Pantech R&D Center, I–2, DMC Sangam-dong Mapo-go, Seoul, 121–270, Republic of Korea. Pantech Wireless, Inc., 5607 Glenridge Dr. NE., Suite 500, Atlanta, GA 30342. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1 16534 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Friday, March 15, 2013 / Notices complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondents, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order, or both, directed against the respondents. Issued: March 12, 2013. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–06005 Filed 3–14–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB No. 1121–0094] Agency Information Collection Activities; Existing Collection; Comments Requested;Extension of a Currently Approved Collection: Annual Survey of Jails srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: 30-Day Notice. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. The proposed information was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 78, Number 4, pages 959–961 on Monday, January 7, 2013, allowing a 60-day comment period. The burden estimate for local jails in the Annual Survey of Jails increased from 929 respondents as indicated in the 60-day notice to 950 respondents, due to the inclusion of 21 respondents from all other California jail jurisdictions not originally selected in the sample survey. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment April 15, 2013. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Todd D. Minton, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street VerDate Mar<14>2013 17:37 Mar 14, 2013 Jkt 229001 NW., Washington, DC 20531 (phone: 202–305–9630). Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Revisions of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ). The collection includes the forms: Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ), which includes the regular form and the certainty jurisdiction form; and the Survey of Jails in Indian Country (SJIC) regular form. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form numbers include: • Annual Survey of Jails: This collection consists of four forms: Æ CJ–5 and CJ–5A, the ASJ regular forms: These forms go to jail jurisdictions in the ASJ sample that are not selected with certainty. The CJ–5 form goes to jail jurisdictions operated by the county or city and the CJ–5A goes to privately owned or operated confinement facilities. In an effort to assess the recent impact California jails have on the national jail population due to significant correctional policy changes in that state, non-sampled jail jurisdiction from California will also be included in the data collection, but not included in the national jail population estimate; PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Æ CJ–5D and CJ–5DA, the ASJ certainty jurisdiction forms: The forms go to jail jurisdictions in the ASJ sample that are selected with certainty. The CJ– 5D and CJ–5DA request additional information about the distribution of time served, staffing, and inmate misconduct that are not requested on the CJ–5 and CJ–5A. The CJ–5D goes to jurisdictions operated by the county or city; the CJ–5DA goes to confinement facilities administered by two or more governments and privately owned or operated confinement facilities. • Survey of Jails in Indian Country (SJIC): All respondents receive the CJ– 5B (the SJIC regular form). The applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection is the Bureau of Justice Statistics, which is within the Office of Justice Programs. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: The affected public that will be asked to respond include approximately 1,000 county, city, and Tribal jail authorities (950 respondents to the ASJ and 82 to the SJIC). As community institutions that book an estimated 12 million inmates per year, local jails are an integral part of the justice system, operating at the front end (that is, following arrest or referral) as well as the back end (discharging inmates and holding those sentenced to jail). Their broad functions include handling inmates who are awaiting trial or sentencing, holding inmates for other authorities, detaining inmates with special needs such as mental health holds or alcohol detoxifications, transferring inmates to court appearances and bringing them back to detention, discharging inmates at the behest of the court or other entities, and holding inmates who have been sentenced to terms in jail. In response to the increase in the California jail population as the result of legislature and governor enacted laws to reduce the number of inmates housed in state prisons, BJS plans to collect data from the non-selected California jails in the sample survey to assess the impact on the national jail population. On May 23, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ruling by a lower three-judge court that the State of California must reduce its prison population to 137.5% of design capacity (approximately 110,000 prisoners) within two years to alleviate overcrowding. In response, the California State Legislature and governor enacted two laws—AB 109 and AB 117—to reduce the number of inmates housed in state prisons starting October 1, 2011. The Public Safety Realignment (PSR) policy is designed to E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 51 (Friday, March 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16533-16534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-873]


Certain Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing the 
Same; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on February 8, 2013, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Tela Innovations, Inc. of Los Gatos, California. A letter supplementing 
the complaint was filed on February 28, 2013. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain integrated circuit devices and 
products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain 
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,264,049 (``the '049 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 8,264,044 (``the '044 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,258,550 (``the 
'550 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,258,547 (``the '547 patent''); U.S. 
Patent No. 8,217,428 (``the '428 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,258,552 
(``the '552 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,030,689 (``the '689 
patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-2560.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2012).

    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on March 11, 2013, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain integrated 
circuit devices and products containing the same that infringe one or 
more of claims 1-11 and 20-23 of the '049 patent; claims 1-5, 7, 8, 10-
14, 17, 18, 21-25, 28, 29, 32-36, 39, and 40 of the '044 patent; claims 
1-23, 26-31, and 38-46 of the '550 patent; claims 1-34 of the '547 
patent; claims 1-13 of the '428 patent; claims 1-5, 11, and 18-47 of 
the '552 patent; and claims 2-4, 29, and 33-46 of the '689 patent, and 
whether an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), 
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other 
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested 
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as 
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a 
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the 
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1) and 
(f)(1);
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is:

Tela Innovations, Inc., 485 Alberto Way, Suite 115, Los Gatos, CA 
95032.

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

HTC Corporation, 23 Xinghua Road, Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan.
HTC America, Inc., 13920 SE. Eastgate Way, Bellevue, WA 98005.
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, 20, Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-
gu, Seoul 150-721, Republic of Korea.
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 
07632.
LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., 10101 Old Grove Road, San 
Diego, CA 92131.
Motorola Mobility LLC, 600 N. U.S. Highway 45, Libertyville, IL 60048.
Nokia Corporation (Nokia Oyj), Keilalahdentie 2-4, FI-02150 Espoo, 
Finland.
Nokia, Inc., 200 South Matilda Avenue, West Washington Avenue, 
Sunnyvale, CA 94086.
Pantech Co., Ltd., Pantech R&D Center, I-2, DMC Sangam-dong Mapo-go, 
Seoul, 121-270, Republic of Korea.
Pantech Wireless, Inc., 5607 Glenridge Dr. NE., Suite 500, Atlanta, GA 
30342.

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the

[[Page 16534]]

complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of 
the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and 
this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the 
Commission, without further notice to the respondents, to find the 
facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an 
initial determination and a final determination containing such 
findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a 
cease and desist order, or both, directed against the respondents.

     Issued: March 12, 2013.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-06005 Filed 3-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.