Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.'s and Avago Technologies U.S. Inc.'s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 16296-16297 [2013-05865]

Download as PDF 16296 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Notices procedures, click on ‘‘Review Committee,’’ then click on ‘‘Procedures.’’ Meeting minutes may be accessed by going to the Web site; then clicking on ‘‘Review Committee;’’ and then clicking on ‘‘Meeting Minutes.’’ Approximately fourteen weeks after each Review Committee meeting, the meeting transcript is posted for a limited time on the National NAGPRA Program Web site. The Review Committee members are appointed by the Secretary of the Interior. The Review Committee is responsible for monitoring the NAGPRA inventory and identification process; reviewing and making findings related to the identity or cultural affiliation of cultural items, or the return of such items; facilitating the resolution of disputes; compiling an inventory of culturally unidentifiable human remains that are in the possession or control of each Federal agency and museum, and recommending specific actions for developing a process for disposition of such human remains; consulting with Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations and museums on matters affecting such tribes or organizations lying within the scope of work of the Review Committee; consulting with the Secretary of the Interior on the development of regulations to carry out NAGPRA; and making recommendations regarding future care of repatriated cultural items. The Review Committee’s work is carried out during the course of meetings that are open to the public. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Dated: February 27, 2013. Sherry Hutt, Designated Federal Officer, Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee. [FR Doc. 2013–05922 Filed 3–13–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–50–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:51 Mar 13, 2013 Jkt 229001 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS–SER–BISC–09775; PPSESEROC3, PPMPSAF1Y.YP0000] Record of Decision for the Coral Reef Restoration Plan, Biscayne National Park, FL National Park Service, Interior. Notice of Availability. AGENCY: ACTION: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service announces the availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Coral Reef Restoration Plan (Plan) for Biscayne National Park, Florida. On May 31, 2012, the Regional Director, Southeast Region, approved the ROD for the project. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elsa Alvear, Biscayne National Park, 9700 SW. 328th Street, Homestead, FL 33033; Telephone (786)–335–3623. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Many vessel groundings occur annually in Biscayne National Park, causing injuries to submerged resources. The goal of coral reef restoration actions in Biscayne National Park is to create a stable, selfsustaining reef environment of similar topography and surface complexity to that which existed prior to injury, such that natural recovery processes, enhanced through mitigation, if needed, will lead to a fully functioning coral reef community with near natural complexity, structure, and make-up of organisms. The Plan provides a systematic approach to addressing injuries to coral reefs caused by vessel groundings within Biscayne National Park. The Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the Plan analyzed two alternatives, the No Action alternative (Alternative 1) and Restoration Using a Programmatic Approach (Alternative 2). Alternative 1 would not change the existing approach to coral reef restoration planning and implementation, including NEPA compliance. Currently, Biscayne National Park resource managers evaluate the impacts of coral reef restoration actions and specific restoration methods when planning and implementing restoration at each grounding incident. In contrast, to address each coral injury under Alternative 2, the most appropriate restoration actions and specific restoration methods would be selected from a ‘‘toolbox’’ of methods that already have had their impacts evaluated programmatically. Under SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Alternative 2, 10 reasonable and common coral reef restoration actions were identified and evaluated for inclusion in the toolbox. The ROD identifies Alternative 2 (Restoration Using a Programmatic Approach) as the National Park Service’s selected action. The ROD includes a statement of the decision made, a summary of the other alternative considered, the basis for the decision, a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, and a summary of public and agency involvement in the decision-making process. Copies of the ROD may be obtained from the contact listed below or online at http:// parkplanning.nps.gov/bisc. The responsible official for this Record of Decision is the Regional Director, Southeast Region, National Park Service, 100 Alabama Street SW., 1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Dated: March 7, 2013. Gordon Wissinger, Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region. [FR Doc. 2013–05898 Filed 3–13–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–JD–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–860] Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.’s and Avago Technologies U.S. Inc.’s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 8) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) in the abovecaptioned investigation granting a motion of complainants Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore (‘‘Avago General IP’’) and Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. of San Jose, California (‘‘Avago Technologies’’) to amend the complaint and notice of investigation (‘‘NOI’’). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2013 / Notices General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3115. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by notice on October 25, 2012, based upon a complaint filed by Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore (‘‘Avago Fiber IP’’); Avago General IP and Avago Technologies alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain optoelectronic devices for fiber optic communications, components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,947,456 and 5,596,595 (collectively, ‘‘Asserted Patents’’). 77 FR 65713 (Oct. 30, 2012). The Commission named IPtronics A/S of Roskilde, Denmark; IPtronics Inc. of Menlo Park, California; FCI USA, LLC, of Etters, Pennsylvania; FCI Deutschland GmbH of Berlin, Germany; FCI SA of Guyancourt, France; Mellanox Technologies, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California; and Mellanox Technologies Ltd. of Yokneam, Israel (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’) as respondents. The Commission also named the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) as a party in this investigation. On December 21, 2012, complainants Avago General IP and Avago Technologies (collectively, ‘‘Avago’’) filed a motion to amend the complaint and NOI to reflect the merger of original complainants, Avago Fiber IP and Avago General IP. Avago also moved to amend the complaint and NOI to reflect the change in ownership of the Asserted Patents from Avago Fiber IP to Avago General IP by virtue of an assignment from the merger. The motion states that Avago General IP remains the sole surviving entity as a result of the merger VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:51 Mar 13, 2013 Jkt 229001 and that the OUII does not oppose the motion. On January 4, 2013, Respondents opposed the motion. Specifically, the Respondents opposed the withdrawal of Avago Fiber IP as a complainant; they did not oppose the amendments that reflect the assignment of the Asserted Patents to Avago General IP. On February 7, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting Avago’s motion. The ALJ found that good cause exists and that the interests of the parties and the public will be best served by amending the complaint and NOI. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h). Issued: March 8, 2013. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–05865 Filed 3–13–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 332–503] Earned Import Allowance Program: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Program for Certain Apparel From the Dominican Republic, Fourth Annual Review United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of opportunity to provide written comments in connection with the Commission’s fourth annual review. AGENCY: The U.S. International Trade Commission (Commission) has announced its schedule, including deadlines for filing written submissions, in connection with the preparation of its fourth annual review in investigation No. 332–503, Earned Import Allowance Program: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Program for Certain Apparel from the Dominican Republic, Fourth Annual Review. DATES: April 12, 2013: Deadline for filing written submissions. July 26, 2013: Transmittal of fourth report to House Committee on Ways and Means and Senate Committee on Finance. ADDRESSES: All Commission offices, including the Commission’s hearing SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16297 rooms, are located in the United States International Trade Commission Building, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC. All written submissions, including requests to appear at the hearing, statements, and briefs, should be addressed to the Secretary, United States International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Project Leader Laura Rodriguez (202– 205–3499 or laura.rodriguez@usitc.gov) for information specific to this investigation. For information on the legal aspects of this investigation, contact William Gearhart of the Commission’s Office of the General Counsel (202–205–3091 or william.gearhart@usitc.gov). The media should contact Margaret O’Laughlin, Office of External Relations (202–205– 1819 or margaret.olaughlin@usitc.gov). Hearing-impaired individuals may obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal at 202–205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Web site (http://www.usitc.gov). Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. Background: Section 404 of the Dominican Republic-Central AmericaUnited States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (DR–CAFTA Act) (19 U.S.C. 4112) required the Secretary of Commerce to establish an Earned Import Allowance Program (EIAP) and directed the Commission to conduct annual reviews of the program to evaluate its effectiveness and make recommendations for improvements. Section 404 of the DR–CAFTA Act authorizes certain apparel articles wholly assembled in an eligible country to enter the United States free of duty if accompanied by a certificate that shows evidence of the purchase of certain U.S. fabric. The term ‘‘eligible country’’ is defined to mean the Dominican Republic. More specifically, the program allows producers (in the Dominican Republic) that purchase a certain quantity of qualifying U.S. fabric for use in the production of certain bottoms of cotton in the Dominican Republic to receive a credit that can be used to ship a certain quantity of eligible apparel using third country fabrics from the Dominican Republic to the United States free of duty. E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16296-16297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05865]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-860]


Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications, 
Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting 
Complainants Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.'s and 
Avago Technologies U.S. Inc.'s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice 
of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission (``the Commission'') has determined not to review an initial 
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 8) issued by the presiding 
administrative law judge (``ALJ'') in the above-captioned investigation 
granting a motion of complainants Avago Technologies General IP 
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore (``Avago General IP'') and Avago 
Technologies U.S. Inc. of San Jose, California (``Avago Technologies'') 
to amend the complaint and notice of investigation (``NOI'').

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the

[[Page 16297]]

General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted by notice 
on October 25, 2012, based upon a complaint filed by Avago Technologies 
Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore (``Avago Fiber IP''); Avago 
General IP and Avago Technologies alleging a violation of section 337 
in the importation, sale for importation, or sale within the United 
States after importation of certain optoelectronic devices for fiber 
optic communications, components thereof, and products containing the 
same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 
6,947,456 and 5,596,595 (collectively, ``Asserted Patents''). 77 FR 
65713 (Oct. 30, 2012). The Commission named IPtronics A/S of Roskilde, 
Denmark; IPtronics Inc. of Menlo Park, California; FCI USA, LLC, of 
Etters, Pennsylvania; FCI Deutschland GmbH of Berlin, Germany; FCI SA 
of Guyancourt, France; Mellanox Technologies, Inc. of Sunnyvale, 
California; and Mellanox Technologies Ltd. of Yokneam, Israel 
(collectively, ``Respondents'') as respondents. The Commission also 
named the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') as a party 
in this investigation.
    On December 21, 2012, complainants Avago General IP and Avago 
Technologies (collectively, ``Avago'') filed a motion to amend the 
complaint and NOI to reflect the merger of original complainants, Avago 
Fiber IP and Avago General IP. Avago also moved to amend the complaint 
and NOI to reflect the change in ownership of the Asserted Patents from 
Avago Fiber IP to Avago General IP by virtue of an assignment from the 
merger. The motion states that Avago General IP remains the sole 
surviving entity as a result of the merger and that the OUII does not 
oppose the motion. On January 4, 2013, Respondents opposed the motion. 
Specifically, the Respondents opposed the withdrawal of Avago Fiber IP 
as a complainant; they did not oppose the amendments that reflect the 
assignment of the Asserted Patents to Avago General IP.
    On February 7, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting Avago's 
motion. The ALJ found that good cause exists and that the interests of 
the parties and the public will be best served by amending the 
complaint and NOI. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The 
Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h).

    Issued: March 8, 2013.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-05865 Filed 3-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P