Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee Schedule, 15783-15790 [2013-05583]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / Notices
to BATS BYX and remove liquidity will
increase competition because it is
comparable to the rates charged by
BATS BYX for removing liquidity. The
Exchange believes its proposal will not
burden intramarket competition or
intermarket competition given that the
Exchange’s proposal conforms to an
existing practice and does not modify
the rate for Flag BY and it applies
uniformly to all Members that place
orders in securities priced below $1.00.
The Exchange believes that its proposal
will increase competition for routing
services because the market for order
execution is competitive and the
Exchange’s proposal provides customers
with another alternative to route their
orders. The Exchange notes that routing
through DE Route is voluntary.
Regarding Flags 5, EA and ER, the
Exchange believes that its proposal to
amend its fee schedule to list the default
rate of ‘‘Free’’ in the column ‘‘Fee/
(Rebate) Securities below $1.00’’ for
customer internalization will not
burden intermarket or intramarket
competition as the proposed rate is no
more favorable than the Exchange’s
prevailing maker/taker spread. In
addition, the Exchange believes that its
proposal will not burden intramarket
competition or intermarket competition
given that the Exchange’s proposal does
not modify the current rates for Flags 5,
EA and ER and they apply uniformly to
all Members that place orders in
securities priced below $1.00.
Regarding Flags HA and HR, the
Exchange’s fee schedule displays ‘‘Free’’
as the default rates for Members orders
that add or remove liquidity for
securities priced below $1.00. However,
in practice, the Exchange assesses a
charge of 0.10% of the dollar value of
the transaction for securities priced
below $1.00 for Flags HA and HR. The
Exchange believes that its proposal to
assess a charge of 0.10% of the dollar
value of the transaction will not burden
intramarket competition or intermarket
competition given that the Exchange’s
proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rates
for Flags HA and HR and they apply
uniformly to all Members that place
orders in securities priced below $1.00.
Regarding Flags DM and DT, the
Exchange’s fee schedule displays ‘‘Free’’
as the default rates for Members orders
that add or remove liquidity for
securities priced below $1.00. However,
in practice, the Exchange assesses a
charge of 0.05% of the dollar value of
the transaction for securities priced
below $1.00 for Flags DM and DT. The
Exchange believes that its proposal to
assess a charge of 0.05% of the dollar
value of the transaction will not burden
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Mar 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
intramarket competition or intermarket
competition given that the Exchange’s
proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate for
Flags DM and DT and they apply
uniformly to all Members that place
orders in securities priced below $1.00.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
Members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 17 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 18
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–EDGA–2013–09 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGA–2013–09. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGA–
2013–09 and should be submitted on or
before April 2, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–05584 Filed 3–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69042; File No. SR–EDGX–
2013–10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Amendments
to the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee
Schedule
March 5, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
28, 2013, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
19 17
17 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
18 17 CFR 19b–4(f)(2)[sic].
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15783
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
15784
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / Notices
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fees and rebates applicable to Members 3
of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rule
15.1(a) and (c). All of the changes
described herein are applicable to EDGX
Members. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Internet Web site at
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Securities Priced Below $1.00
The Exchange’s default 4 rates for
securities priced below $1.00 that add,
remove or route liquidity are listed on
the Exchange’s fee schedule. Under
‘‘Liquidity Flags and Associated Fees,’’
the Exchange proposes to modify the
title of the existing column from ‘‘Fee/
(Rebate)’’ to ‘‘Fee/(Rebate) Securities at
or above $1.00.’’ The Exchanges also
3 As
defined in Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
‘‘default’’ refers to the standard rate that
the Exchange charges its Members for orders that
add, remove, or route liquidity from the Exchange
absent Members qualifying for additional volume
tiered pricing. The Exchange maintains default rates
for securities at or above $1.00 and securities priced
below $1.00 for orders that add, remove, and route
liquidity. The Exchange notes that a Member may
qualify for a higher rebate if the Member satisfies
the volume tier requirements outlined in Footnotes
1, 2, 6, 11 and 13 of the fee schedule for securities
priced at or above $1.00. The Exchange notes that
the volume from securities priced below $1.00
contributes toward volume tiered requirements for
securities priced at or above $1.00 as outlined in
Footnotes 1, 2, 6, 11 and 13 of the fee schedule.
Unless otherwise stated in the fee schedule, the
Exchange does not offer volume tiered pricing for
securities priced below $1.00.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 Where
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Mar 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
proposes to insert a column titled ‘‘Fee/
(Rebate) Securities below $1.00’’ to list
the rate that corresponds to each
liquidity flag for securities priced below
$1.00 in order to increase the
transparency of the Exchange’s fee
schedule, as described in greater detail
below. In addition, the Exchange
proposes to delete the text under
‘‘Liquidity Flags and Associated Fees’’
that states ‘‘unless otherwise noted, the
following rebates and fees apply to
orders in securities priced $1 and over’’
because this text is no longer accurate
given the Exchange’s proposed changes.
The Exchange’s fee schedule states
that it offers Members the default rebate
of $0.00003 per share for orders that add
liquidity in securities priced below
$1.00. The Exchange proposes to amend
its fee schedule to list the rebate of
$0.00003 in the column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate)
Securities below $1.00’’ for Flags B, V,
Y, 3, 4, HA, MM, RP, and ZA. The
Exchange notes that this proposal does
not modify the current rates it charges
its Members for orders that yield Flags
B, V, Y, 3, 4, HA, MM, RP, and ZA for
securities priced below $1.00 that add
liquidity to the Exchange.
The Exchange’s fee schedule states
that it charges Members the default rate
of 0.30% of the dollar value of the
transaction for orders that remove
liquidity in securities priced below
$1.00.5 The Exchange proposes to
amend its fee schedule to list the rate of
0.30% of the dollar value of the
transaction in the column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate)
Securities below $1.00’’ for Flags N, W,
6, BB, MT, PI, PR, and ZR. The
Exchange notes that this proposal does
not modify the current rates it charges
its Members for orders that yield Flags
N, W, 6, BB, MT, PI, PR, and ZR for
securities priced below $1.00 that
remove liquidity from the Exchange.
The Exchange’s fee schedule states
that it charges Members the default rate
of 0.30% of the dollar value of the
transaction for orders that route to away
trading destinations in securities priced
below $1.00. The Exchange proposes to
amend its fee schedule to list the rate of
0.30% of the dollar value of the
transaction in the column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate)
Securities below $1.00’’ for Flags D, G,
I, J, K, L, O, Q, R, S, T, U, X, Z, 2, 7,
CL, RQ, RR, RT, RX, and SW. The
Exchange notes that this proposal does
not modify the current rates it charges
its Members for orders that yield Flags
D, G, I, J, K, L, O, Q, R, S, T, U, X, Z,
2, 7, CL, RQ, RR, RT, RX, and SW for
securities priced below $1.00 that route
5 This fee is consistent with the limitations of
Regulation NMS, SEC Rule 610(c), for securities
priced below $1.00.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to away trading destinations and remove
liquidity. In addition, the Exchange
proposes to amend the title of the
routing liquidity category to ‘‘Routing
and Removing Liquidity’’ in order to
increase the transparency of the
Exchange’s fee schedule. Regarding the
flags’ descriptions contained on the fee
schedule, the Exchange proposes to
delete references to removing liquidity
for Flags D, G, J, L, U, 2, RR, RT and RX
because the Exchange’s references to
‘‘route’’ imply that the flags route and
remove liquidity. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to make conforming
changes to the description of Flag U in
order to make the descriptions for all
flags that route and remove liquidity
consistent.
The Exchange’s fee schedule does not
clearly disclose its pricing for Members’
orders that route to some away trading
destinations 6 and add liquidity in
securities priced below $1.00. The
Exchange currently assesses no charge
to Members for orders that route to these
away trading destinations and add
liquidity because these away trading
destinations pass through no charge to
Direct Edge ECN LLC (d/b/a DE Route)
(‘‘DE Route’’), the Exchange’s affiliated
routing broker dealer, for adding
liquidity in securities priced below
$1.00. The Exchange proposes to amend
its fee schedule to assess no charge for
Flags A, F, M, 8, 9, 10, RA, RB, RS, RW,
RY, and RZ. The Exchange notes that its
proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rates
that the Exchange has been charging its
Members for orders that yield Flags A,
F, M, 8, 9, 10, RA, RB, RS, RW, RY, and
RZ for securities priced below $1.00 that
route to away trading destinations and
add liquidity. In addition, the Exchange
proposes to make conforming changes to
Flag M’s description in order to make
the descriptions for all flags that route
to these away trading destinations and
add liquidity consistent and to revise
Flag 8 to replace the entity formerly
known as NYSE Amex with NYSE MKT
LLC.
The Exchange’s fee schedule displays
a rebate of $0.00003 per share as the
default rate for Members, orders that
add liquidity and a charge of 0.30% of
the dollar value of the transaction as the
6 The Exchange currently assess no charge for
Members’ orders that route to the following away
trading destinations and add liquidity: NYSE Arca,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’), New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’), The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘NASDAQ’’), LavaFlow ECN, NASDAQ OMX BX,
Inc.’s (‘‘NASDAQ BX’’), CBOE Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘CBSX’’), BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BATS BYX’’),
BATS Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BATS BZX’’), EDGA
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’), NASDAQ OMX PSX, Inc.
(‘‘NASDAQ PSX’’), and NYSE MKT LLC (formerly
NYSE Amex).
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / Notices
default rate for Members, orders that
remove liquidity for securities priced
below $1.00. However, in practice, the
Exchange assesses no charge for
Members’ orders that that yield Flag OO
in securities priced below $1.00, which
represents Members’ orders that are
matched at the ‘‘Direct Edge Opening’’
and either add or remove liquidity. The
Exchange proposes to amend its fee
schedule to assess no charge for Flag
OO. The Exchange notes that its
proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate
that the Exchange has been charging its
Members for orders that yield Flag OO
for securities priced below $1.00 that
are matched at the Direct Edge Opening.
The Exchange’s fee schedule does not
clearly disclose its pricing for Members’
orders that yield Flag RC in securities
priced below $1.00. The Exchange
currently assesses no charge for
Members’ orders that yield Flag RC,
which route to the National Stock
Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘NSX’’) and add
liquidity. The Exchange proposes to
amend its fee schedule to assess no
charge for Flag RC. The Exchange notes
that its proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate
that the Exchange has been charging its
Members for orders that yield Flag RC
for securities priced below $1.00 that
route to the NSX and add liquidity.
As provided in Footnote 3 of the fee
schedule, the Exchange currently
assesses a charge of 0.10% of the dollar
value of the transaction for Members’
orders that yield Flag C, which route to
NASDAQ BX and remove liquidity in
securities priced below $1.00. The
Exchange proposes to amend its fee
schedule to list a charge of 0.10% of the
dollar value of the transaction in the
column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate) Securities below
$1.00’’ for Flag C. The Exchange notes
that this proposal does not modify the
current rate it charges its Members for
orders that yield Flag C for securities
priced below $1.00 that route to
NASDAQ BX and add liquidity. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to
delete ‘‘removes liquidity’’ in Flag C’s
description because the Exchange’s
reference to ‘‘routed’’ implies that Flag
C routes and removes liquidity. The
Exchange proposes to delete the text of
Footnote 3 and its associated
annotations on the default rate for
routing and removing liquidity at the
top of the fee schedule in addition to
Flags C, D, J, L, and 2 on the Exchange’s
fee schedule because the Exchange
proposes to list these rates in the
column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate) Securities below
$1.00’’ on the Exchange’s fee schedule.
The Exchange proposes to insert
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Mar 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
‘‘intentionally omitted’’ in Footnote 3 in
place of the deleted text.
The Exchange notes that Footnote 10
on the fee schedule incorrectly lists a
flat rate of $0.0010 per share for
Members’ orders that yield Flag BY in
securities priced below $1.00. However,
in practice, the Exchange charges
Members 0.10% of the dollar value of
the transaction for Members’ orders that
yield Flag BY, which routes to BATS
BYX and removes liquidity using
routing strategies ROUC, ROUE or
ROBY.7 This rate represents a pass
through of the rate that BATS BYX
charges DE Route. Accordingly, the
Exchange proposes to amend its fee
schedule to assess a charge of 0.10% of
the dollar value of the transaction for
Flag BY. The Exchange notes that its
proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate
that the Exchange has been charging its
Members for orders that yield Flag BY
for securities priced below $1.00 that
route to BATS BYX and remove
liquidity using routing strategies ROUC,
ROUE or ROBY. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to delete the text of
Footnote 10 and its associated
annotation on Flag BY on the fee
schedule because the Exchange
proposes to list this rate in the column
‘‘Fee/(Rebate) Securities below $1.00.’’
The Exchange proposes to insert
‘‘intentionally omitted’’ in Footnote 10
in place of the deleted text. In addition,
the Exchange proposes to delete
‘‘removes liquidity’’ in Flag BY’s
description because the Exchange’s
reference to ‘‘routed’’ implies that Flag
BY routes and removes liquidity.
Customer internalization generally
occurs when one Member presents two
orders to the Exchange from the same
Member Participant Identifier (‘‘MPID’’)
separately, rather than in a paired
manner, and the two orders
inadvertently match with one another.8
As provided in Footnote 11 of the fee
schedule, the Exchange currently
assesses a charge of 0.15% of the dollar
value of the transaction per side for
Members’ orders in securities priced
below $1.00 that yield Flags 5, EA and
ER, which are the flags associated with
customer internalization. The Exchange
proposes to amend its fee schedule to
list the rate of 0.15% of the dollar value
of the transaction per side in the column
‘‘Fee/(Rebate) Securities below $1.00’’
for Flags 5, EA and ER. The Exchange
notes that this proposal does not modify
the current rates charged for Members’
orders that yield Flags 5, EA and ER for
7 As
defined in Exchange Rule 11.9(b)(3).
are advised to consult Exchange Rule
12.2 regarding fictitious trading.
8 Members
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15785
securities priced below $1.00 that are
associated with customer
internalization. The Exchange also notes
that the internalization fee is no more
favorable than the prevailing maker/
taker spread of 0.30% of the dollar value
of the transaction.9 In addition, the
Exchange proposes to delete the text of
Footnote 11 on the Exchange’s fee
schedule that states, ‘‘for stocks priced
below $1, the internalization rate is
0.15% of the dollar value of the
transaction per share per side’’ because
the Exchange proposes to list these rates
in the column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate) Securities
below $1.00’’ on the Exchange’s fee
schedule because this text is no longer
necessary given the Exchange’s
proposed changes.
Rate Changes for Flag AA
The Exchange currently assesses no
charge for Members’ orders that yield
Flag AA for securities priced at or above
$1.00 at this time. The Exchange
proposes to increase the rate it charges
for Flag AA in securities priced at or
above $1.00 from no charge to $0.0012
per share per side for Members’ orders
that inadvertently match with
themselves at the Midpoint Match 10 in
the same MPID. Therefore, the
Exchange’s proposed internalization fee
will be no more favorable than the
current spread of $0.0012 per share per
side for Members’ orders that add
liquidity at the Midpoint Match and
yield Flag MM and Members’ orders
that remove liquidity at the Midpoint
Match and yield Flag MT. The Exchange
notes that this proposed internalization
fee will discourage Members from
engaging in potential wash sales.
In conjunction with the Exchange’s
proposal to amend the rate for Members’
orders that yield Flag AA in securities
priced at or above $1.00 as described
above, the Exchange proposes to amend
the rate it charges Members for orders
that yield Flag AA in securities priced
below $1.00. The Exchange currently
assesses no charge for Members’ orders
that inadvertently match with
themselves at the Midpoint Match in the
same MPID. The Exchange proposes to
charge Members 0.15% of the dollar
value of the transaction per side for
securities priced below $1.00 so the
internalization fee is no more favorable
than the spread per side for Members’
orders in securities priced below $1.00
that add liquidity at the Midpoint Match
9 See Securities Exchange Release No. 64452 (May
10, 2011), 76 FR 28110, 28111 (May 13, 2011) (SR–
EDGX–2011–13), where the Exchange represented
that it ‘‘will work promptly to ensure that the
internalization fee is no more favorable than each
prevailing maker/taker spread.’’
10 As defined in Exchange Rule 11.5(c)(7).
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
15786
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / Notices
and yield Flag MM, and Members’
orders that remove liquidity at the
Midpoint Match and yield Flag MT.11
The Exchange notes that this proposed
internalization fee will discourage
Members from engaging in potential
wash sales.
The Exchange proposes to implement
these amendments to its fee schedule on
March 1, 2013.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,12
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4),13 in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its Members and
other persons using its facilities.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Securities Priced Below $1.00
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to revise its fee schedule to list
the default rate that corresponds to each
liquidity flag for securities priced below
$1.00 that add liquidity on the
Exchange’s fee schedule represents an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its
Members and other persons using its
facilities. Specifically, for Members’
orders that add liquidity, the Exchange
proposes to list the default rebate of
$0.00003 per share next to Flags B, V,
Y, 3, 4, HA, MM, RP, and ZA. The
Exchange’s proposal to revise the
corresponding text on the fee schedule,
as described above, will increase the
level of transparency of the Exchange’s
fee schedule and improve the
Exchange’s ability to effectively convey
the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members. In addition, the
Exchange believes it is equitable and
reasonable to offer Members a default
rebate of $0.00003 per share for orders
that add liquidity in securities priced
below $1.00 because it will incentivize
Members to add liquidity to the
Exchange by offering them a rebate and
offering rebates to Members that add
liquidity is consistent with the
Exchange’s maker/taker model. The
Exchange notes that its proposal does
not modify the current rates it charges
its Members for orders that yield Flags
11 The rate of 0.15% of the dollar value of the
transaction per side is derived from calculating the
spread between adding and removing liquidity in
securities priced below $1.00 for Flags MM and MT.
The Exchange assumes a security is priced at $0.99
and dividing that result by two (2) to account for
each side of the transaction: (0.30% × 1 share ×
$0.99)¥(rebate of $0.00003 per share) = $0.00294/
2 =$.00147 per share/$0.99 × 100 = approx. 0.15%
of the dollar value of the transaction.
12 15 U.S.C. 78f.
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Mar 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
B, V, Y, 3, 4, HA, MM, RP, and ZA for
securities priced below $1.00 that add
liquidity from the Exchange. Lastly, the
Exchange also believes that these
proposed amendments are nondiscriminatory because they apply
uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to revise its fee schedule to list
the default rate that corresponds to each
liquidity flag for securities priced below
$1.00 that remove liquidity on the
Exchange’s fee schedule represents an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its
Members and other persons using its
facilities. Specifically, for Members’
orders that remove liquidity, the
Exchange proposes to list the default
removal rate of 0.30% of the dollar
value of the transaction next to Flags N,
W, 6, BB, MT, PI, PR, and ZR. The
Exchange’s proposal to revise the
corresponding text on the fee schedule,
as described above, will increase the
level of transparency of the Exchange’s
fee schedule and improve the
Exchange’s ability to effectively convey
the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members. In addition, the
Exchange believes it is equitable and
reasonable to charge Members a default
removal rate of 0.30% of the dollar
value of the transaction because these
fees allow the Exchange to offset its
administrative, clearing, and other
operating costs incurred in executing
such trades. The Exchange notes that its
proposal does not modify the current
rates it charges its Members for orders
that yield Flags N, W, 6, BB, MT, PI, PR,
and ZR for securities priced below $1.00
that remove liquidity from the
Exchange. Lastly, the Exchange also
believes that these proposed
amendments are non-discriminatory
because they apply uniformly to all
Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to revise its fee schedule to list
the default rate that corresponds to each
liquidity flag for securities priced below
$1.00 that route and remove liquidity on
the Exchange’s fee schedule represents
an equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its
Members and other persons using its
facilities. Specifically, for Members’
orders that route and remove liquidity,
the Exchange proposes to list the default
rate of 0.30% of the dollar value of the
transaction next to Flags D, G, I, J, K, L,
O, Q, R, S, T, U, X, Z, 2, 7, CL, RQ, RR,
RT, RX, and SW. The Exchange’s
proposal to revise the corresponding
text on the fee schedule, as described
above, will increase the level of
transparency of the Exchange’s fee
schedule and improve the Exchange’s
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ability to effectively convey the rates for
securities priced below $1.00 to
Members. In addition, the Exchange
believes it is equitable and reasonable to
charge Members a default routing and
removal rate of 0.30% of the dollar
value of the transaction because these
fees allow the Exchange to offset its
administrative, clearing, and other
operating costs incurred in executing
such trades. The Exchange also notes
that routing through DE Route is
voluntary. The Exchange notes that its
proposal does not modify the current
rates it charges its Members for orders
that yield Flags D, G, I, J, K, L, O, Q, R,
S, T, U, X, Z, 2, 7, CL, RQ, RR, RT, RX,
and SW for securities priced below
$1.00 that route to away trading
destinations and remove liquidity.
Lastly, the Exchange also believes that
these proposed amendments are nondiscriminatory because they apply
uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to pass through no charge for
securities priced below $1.00 that route
to some away trading destinations and
add liquidity represents an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its Members and
other persons using its facilities because
the Exchange does not levy additional
fees or offer additional rebates for orders
that it routes to these away trading
destinations through DE Route. The
Exchange’s fee schedule does not clearly
disclose its pricing for Members’ orders
that route to these away trading
destinations and add liquidity in
securities priced below $1.00. Currently,
the away trading destinations assess no
charge to DE Route for orders that route
to those destinations and add liquidity,
and DE Route passes through no charge
to the Exchange and the Exchange
passes through no charge to its
Members.14 Therefore, since DE Route is
14 NYSE Arca, NYSE, NYSE MKT LLC, BATS
BZX, BATS BYX, CBSX, NASDAQ, NASDAQ BX,
NASDAQ PSX, LavaFlow ECN, and EDGA assess
customers no charge for orders that add liquidity on
their respective exchanges in securities priced
below $1.00. See NYSE Arca, NYSE Arca Trading
Fees, https://usequities.nyx.com/markets/nyse-arcaequities/trading-fees; NYSE, NYSE Trading Fees,
https://usequities.nyx.com/markets/nyse-equities/
trading-fees; NYSE MKT LLC, NYSE MKT Trading
Fees, https://usequities.nyx.com/markets/nyse-mktequities/trading-fees; BATS, BATS BZX and BYX
Exchange Fee Schedules, https://
cdn.batstrading.com/resources/regulation/
rule_book/BATS-Exchanges_Fee_Schedules.pdf;
Chicago Board Options Exchange, CBOE Stock
Exchange Fees Schedule, https://www.cboe.com/
publish/cbsxfeeschedule/cbsxfeeschedule.pdf;
NASDAQ, Price List—Trading and Connectivity,
https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2; NASDAQ OMX
BX, Inc., NASDAQ OMX BX Price List—Trading
and Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
Trader.aspx?id=bx_pricing; NASDAQ OMX PSX,
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / Notices
not charged a fee by the away trading
destination for routing orders that add
liquidity to its trading center in
securities priced below $1.00, the
Exchange believes it is equitable and
reasonable to not charge its Members for
orders that yield Flags A, F, M, 8, 9, 10,
RA, RB, RS, RW, RY, and RZ. The
Exchange’s proposal allows the
Exchange to continue to charge its
Members a pass-through rate for orders
that are routed to some away trading
destinations and add liquidity through
DE Route. The Exchange notes that its
proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rates
that the Exchange has been charging its
Members for orders that yield Flags A,
F, M, 8, 9, 10, RA, RB, RS, RW, RY, and
RZ for securities priced below $1.00 that
route to these away trading destinations
and add liquidity. The Exchange notes
that routing through DE Route is
voluntary. The Exchange’s proposal to
revise the corresponding text on the fee
schedule, as described above, will
increase the level of transparency of the
Exchange’s fee schedule and improve
the Exchange’s ability to effectively
convey the rates for securities priced
below $1.00 to Members. Lastly, the
Exchange also believes that these
proposed amendments are nondiscriminatory because they apply
uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to assess no charge for
securities priced below $1.00 that yield
Flag OO represents an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its Members and
other persons using its facilities.
Members will yield Flag OO when their
orders are matched at the Direct Edge
Opening on EDGX, whether the
Member’s order adds or removes
liquidity. The Exchange’s fee schedule
displays a rebate of $0.00003 per share
as the default rate for Members’ orders
that add liquidity and a charge of 0.30%
of the dollar value of the transaction as
the default rate for Members’ orders that
remove liquidity for securities priced
below $1.00. However, in practice, the
Exchange assesses no charge for
Members’ orders that that yield Flag OO
in securities priced below $1.00, which
represents Members’ orders that are
matched at the ‘‘Direct Edge Opening’’
and either add or remove liquidity.
Because the Exchange is not a primary
Inc., NASDAQ OMX PSX Price List—Trading and
Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
Trader.aspx?id=PSX_Pricing; LavaFlow ECN,
LavaFlow Pricing, https://www.lavatrading.com/
solutions/pricing.php; and EDGA Exchange, Inc.,
EDGA Exchange Fee Schedule, https://
www.directedge.com/Membership/FeeSchedule/
EDGAFeeSchedule.aspx.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Mar 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
listing market, Flag OO generates low
volume; therefore, the Exchange
believes its proposal to assess no charge
is equitable and reasonable given that
the Exchange incurs only nominal
administrative, clearing, and other
operating costs in executing trades. The
Exchange notes that its proposal
conforms an existing practice and does
not modify the rate that the Exchange
has been charging its Members for
orders that yield Flag OO for securities
priced below $1.00 that are matched at
the Direct Edge Opening. The
Exchange’s proposal to revise the
corresponding text on the fee schedule,
as described above, will increase the
level of transparency of the Exchange’s
fee schedule and improve the
Exchange’s ability to effectively convey
the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members. Lastly, the Exchange
also believes that the proposed
amendment is non-discriminatory
because it applies uniformly to all
Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to assess no charge for
securities priced below $1.00 that yield
Flag RC represents an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its Members and
other persons using its facilities.
Members will yield Flag RC when their
orders route to the NSX and add
liquidity. The Exchange’s fee schedule
does not clearly disclose its pricing for
Members’ orders that yield Flag RC in
securities priced below $1.00. The
Exchange notes that the NSX offers a
rebate to DE Route for Members’ orders
that yield Flag RC. The Exchange also
notes that Flag RC generates low volume
and nominal revenue to the Exchange.
Therefore, the Exchange believes its
proposal to assess no charge is equitable
and reasonable because the rebate paid
by NSX to DE Route and DE Route to the
Exchange does not offset the
administrative, clearing, and other
operating costs associated with passing
through the NSX rebate to Members.
The Exchange notes that routing
through DE Route is voluntary. The
Exchange also notes that its proposal
conforms to an existing practice and
does not modify the rate that the
Exchange has been charging its
Members for orders that yield Flag RC
for securities priced below $1.00. The
Exchange’s proposal to revise the
corresponding text on the fee schedule,
as described above, will increase the
level of transparency of the Exchange’s
fee schedule and improve the
Exchange’s ability to effectively convey
the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members. Lastly, the Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15787
also believes that the proposed
amendment is non-discriminatory
because it applies uniformly to all
Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to revise its fee schedule to list
the rate of 0.10% of the dollar value of
the transaction for Members’ orders that
yield Flag C for securities priced below
$1.00 represents an equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among its Members and other
persons using its facilities because it is
a pass-through rate and the Exchange
does not levy additional fees or offer
additional rebates for orders that it
routes to NASDAQ BX through DE
Route. Therefore, since DE Route is
charged a fee by NASDAQ BX for
routing orders that remove liquidity to
its trading center in securities priced
below $1.00, the Exchange believes it is
equitable and reasonable to charge its
Members for orders that yield Flag C.
The Exchange’s proposal allows the
Exchange to continue to charge its
Members a pass-through rate for orders
that are routed to NASDAQ BX and
remove liquidity through DE Route. The
Exchange notes that routing through DE
Route is voluntary. The Exchange notes
that its proposal does not modify the
current rate it charges its Members for
orders that yield Flag C for securities
priced below $1.00. The Exchange’s
proposal to revise the corresponding
text on the fee schedule, as described
above and deleting the text of Footnote
3 and its associated annotations on
Flags C, D, J, L, and 2, will increase the
level of transparency of the Exchange’s
fee schedule and improve the
Exchange’s ability to effectively convey
the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members. Lastly, the Exchange
also believes that this proposed
amendment is non-discriminatory
because it applies uniformly to all
Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to pass through 0.10% of the
dollar value of the transaction for
Members’ orders that yield Flag BY for
securities priced below $1.00 represents
an equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its
Members and other persons using its
facilities because the Exchange does not
levy additional fees or offer additional
rebates for orders that it routes to BATS
BYX through DE Route. The Exchange
notes that Footnote 10 on the fee
schedule incorrectly lists a flat rate of
$0.0010 per share for Members’ orders
that yield Flag BY in securities priced
below $1.00. In practice, the Exchange
charges Members 0.10% of the dollar
value of the transaction for Members’
orders that yield Flag BY. Since DE
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15788
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / Notices
Route is charged a fee by BATS BYX for
routing orders that remove liquidity
using routing strategies ROUC, ROUE or
ROBY to its trading center in securities
priced below $1.00, the Exchange
believes it is equitable and reasonable to
charge its Members for orders that yield
Flag BY. The Exchange’s proposal
allows the Exchange to continue to
charge its Members a pass-through rate
for orders that are routed to BATS BYX
and remove liquidity through DE Route.
The Exchange notes that its proposal
conforms to an existing practice and
does not modify the rate that the
Exchange has been charging its
Members for orders that yield Flag BY
for securities priced below $1.00. The
Exchange notes that routing through DE
Route is voluntary. The Exchange’s
proposal to revise the corresponding
text on the fee schedule, as described
above and deleting the text of Footnote
10 and its associated annotation on Flag
BY, will increase the level of
transparency of the Exchange’s fee
schedule and improve the Exchange’s
ability to effectively convey the rates for
securities priced below $1.00 to
Members. Lastly, the Exchange also
believes that this proposed amendment
is non-discriminatory because it applies
uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal revise its fee schedule to list a
charge of 0.15% of the dollar value of
the transaction per side for Members’
orders in securities priced below $1.00
that yield Flags 5, EA and ER, which are
associated with customer
internalization, represents an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges. The Exchange’s rate of
0.15% of the dollar value of the
transaction per side for customer
internalization is equitable because the
rate is consistent with the Exchange’s
proposed maker/taker spread for
securities priced below $1.00.
Therefore, in each case, the
internalization fee of 0.15% of the dollar
value of the transaction per side is no
more favorable to the Member than the
proposed maker/taker spread. Since the
spread for customer internalization
equals the Exchange’s maker/taker
spread, the Exchange’s proposal
continues to discourage Members from
engaging in potential wash sales. The
Exchange notes that its proposal does
not modify the current rates it charges
its Members for orders that yield Flags
5, EA or ER for securities priced below
$1.00. The Exchange’s proposal to revise
the corresponding text on the fee
schedule, as described above and
deleting the applicable text of Footnote
11, will increase the level of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Mar 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
transparency of the Exchange’s fee
schedule and improve the Exchange’s
ability to effectively convey the rates for
securities priced below $1.00 to
Members. Lastly, the Exchange believes
that these proposed rates are nondiscriminatory in that they apply
uniformly to all Members.
As described in Section 3, the
Exchange proposes to make conforming
and non-substantive revisions to the fee
schedule in general and the description
of certain flags in particular in order to
increase the level of transparency of the
Exchange’s fee schedule, promote
consistent descriptions and
applications, and improve the
Exchange’s ability to effectively convey
the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members.
Rate Changes for Flag AA
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to increase the rate it charges
Members for customer internalization
from no charge per share per side to
$0.0012 per share per side for Members’
orders that yield Flag AA in securities
priced at or above $1.00 is an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges. The Exchange’s proposed
rate of $0.0012 per side per share for
Members’ orders that inadvertently
match with themselves at the Midpoint
Match in the same MPID is equitable
because the rate is consistent with the
Exchange’s proposed maker/taker
spread of $0.0012 per share, where the
rate to add liquidity at the Midpoint
Match and yield Flag MM is $0.0012 per
share and the rate to remove liquidity at
the Midpoint Match and yield Flag MT
is $0.0012 per share. Therefore, in each
case, the proposed internalization fee of
$0.0012 per side per share, equaling a
total cost of $0.0024 per share for Flag
AA, is no more favorable to the Member
than the proposed maker/taker spread
for Midpoint Match. Since the spread
for customer internalization and the
Exchange’s maker/taker spread for
Midpoint Match will equal $0.0012 per
share, the Exchange’s proposal
discourages Members from engaging in
potential wash sales. Lastly, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rate is non-discriminatory in that it
applies uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to charge Members 0.15% of
the dollar value of the transaction per
side for customer internalization for
orders that yield Flag AA in securities
priced below $1.00 is an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges. The Exchange’s proposed
rate of 0.15% of the dollar value of the
transaction per side for Members’ orders
that inadvertently match with
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
themselves at the Midpoint Match in the
same MPID is equitable because the rate
is consistent with the Exchange’s
proposed maker/taker spread for
Midpoint Match. Therefore, in each
case, the proposed internalization fee of
0.15% of the dollar value of the
transaction per side, equaling a total
cost of 0.30% of the dollar value of the
transaction, where the rebate to add to
Midpoint Match (Flag MM) is $0.00003
per share and the fee to remove from
Midpoint Match (Flag MT) is 0.30% of
the dollar value of the transaction, is no
more favorable to the Member than the
proposed maker/taker spread for
Midpoint Match. Since the spread for
customer internalization will equal the
Exchange’s maker/taker spread for
Midpoint Match, the Exchange’s
proposal discourages Members from
engaging in potential wash sales. Lastly,
the Exchange believes that the proposed
rate is non-discriminatory in that it
applies uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange also notes that it
operates in a highly-competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive. The
proposed rule change reflects a
competitive pricing structure designed
to incent market participants to direct
their order flow to the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rates are equitable and nondiscriminatory in that they apply
uniformly to all Members. The
Exchange believes the fees and credits
remain competitive with those charged
by other venues and therefore continue
to be reasonable and equitably allocated
to Members.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
These proposed rule changes do not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that any
of these changes represent a significant
departure from previous pricing offered
by the Exchange or pricing offered by
the Exchange’s competitors. As
described in Section 3, the Exchange
proposes to make conforming and nonsubstantive revisions to the fee schedule
in general and the description of certain
flags in particular in order to increase
the level of transparency of the
Exchange’s fee schedule, promote
consistent descriptions and
applications, and improve the
Exchange’s ability to effectively convey
the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / Notices
Securities Priced Below $1.00
Regarding Flags B, V, Y, 3, 4, HA,
MM, RP, and ZA, the Exchange believes
that its proposal to amend its fee
schedule to list the default rebate of
$0.00003 in the column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate)
Securities below $1.00’’ will not burden
intramarket competition or intermarket
competition given that the Exchange’s
proposal does not modify its current
rates for orders that add liquidity and
they apply uniformly to all Members
that place orders in securities priced
below $1.00.
Regarding Flags N, W, 6, BB, MT, PI,
PR, and ZR, the Exchange believes that
its proposal to amend its fee schedule to
list the default rate of 0.30% of the
dollar value of the transaction in the
column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate) Securities below
$1.00’’ will not burden intramarket
competition or intermarket competition
given that the Exchange’s proposal does
not modify its current rates for orders
that remove liquidity and they apply
uniformly to all Members that place
orders in securities priced below $1.00.
Regarding Flags D, G, I, J, K, L, O, Q,
R, S, T, U, X, Z, 2, 7, CL, RQ, RR, RT,
RX, and SW, the Exchange believes that
its proposal to amend its fee schedule to
list the default rate of 0.30% of the
dollar value of the transaction in the
column ‘‘Fee/(Rebate) Securities below
$1.00’’ will not burden intramarket
competition or intermarket competition
given that the Exchange’s proposal does
not modify its current rates for orders
that route and remove liquidity and they
apply uniformly to all Members that
place orders in securities priced below
$1.00.
Regarding Flags A, F, M, 8, 9, 10, RA,
RB, RS, RW, RY, and RZ, the Exchange’s
fee schedule does not clearly disclose its
pricing for Members’ orders that route to
these away trading destinations and add
liquidity in securities priced below
$1.00. The Exchange believes that its
proposal to pass through no charge for
securities priced below $1.00 that route
to some away trading destinations and
add liquidity will increase competition
because it is comparable to the rates
charged by the away trading
destinations for adding liquidity. The
Exchange believes its proposal will not
burden intramarket competition or
intermarket competition given that the
Exchange’s proposal conforms to an
existing practice and does not modify
the rates for orders that route and add
liquidity and they apply uniformly to all
Members that place orders in securities
priced below $1.00. The Exchange
believes that its proposal will increase
competition for routing services because
the market for order execution is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Mar 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
competitive and the Exchange’s
proposal provides customers with
another alternative to route their orders.
The Exchange notes that routing
through DE Route is voluntary.
Regarding Flag OO, the Exchange’s fee
schedule displays a rebate of $0.00003
per share as the default rate for
Members orders that add liquidity and
a charge of 0.30% of the dollar value of
the transaction as the default rate for
Members orders that remove liquidity
for securities priced below $1.00.
However, in practice, the Exchange
assesses no charge for Members’ orders
that that yield Flag OO in securities
priced below $1.00, which represents
Members’ orders that are matched at the
‘‘Direct Edge Opening’’ and either add
or remove liquidity. The Exchange
believes that its proposal to assess no
charge will not burden intramarket
competition or intermarket competition
given that the Exchange’s proposal
conforms to an existing practice and
does not modify the rate for Flag OO
and it applies uniformly to all Members
that place orders in securities priced
below $1.00.
Regarding Flag RC, the Exchange’s fee
schedule does not clearly disclose its
pricing for Members’ orders yield Flag
RC in securities priced below $1.00. The
Exchange believes that its proposal to
assess no charge will not burden
intramarket competition or intermarket
competition given that the Exchange’s
proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate for
Flag RC and it applies uniformly to all
Members that place orders in securities
priced below $1.00.
Regarding Flag C, the Exchange
believes that its proposal to amend its
fee schedule to list a charge of 0.10% of
the dollar value of the transaction will
not burden intramarket competition or
intermarket competition given that the
Exchange’s proposal does not modify its
current rate for Flag C and it applies
uniformly to all Members that place
orders in securities priced below $1.00.
By charging a pass-through rate for
securities priced below $1.00 that route
to NASDAQ BX and remove liquidity,
the Exchange will increase competition
because it is comparable to the rates
charged by NASDAQ BX for removing
liquidity. The Exchange believes that its
proposal will increase competition for
routing services because the market for
order execution is competitive and the
Exchange’s proposal provides customers
with another alternative to route their
orders. The Exchange notes that routing
through DE Route is voluntary.
Regarding Flag BY, the Exchange
notes that Footnote 10 on the fee
schedule incorrectly lists a flat rate of
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15789
$0.0010 per share for Members’ orders
that yield Flag BY in securities priced
below $1.00. However, in practice, the
Exchange charges Members 0.10% of
the dollar value of the transaction for
Members’ orders that yield Flag BY. The
Exchange believes that its proposal to
pass through a charge of 0.10% of the
dollar value of the transaction for
securities priced below $1.00 that route
to BATS BYX and remove liquidity will
increase competition because it is
comparable to the rates charged by
BATS BYX for removing liquidity. The
Exchange believes its proposal will not
burden intramarket competition or
intermarket competition given that the
Exchange’s proposal conforms to an
existing practice and does not modify
the rate for Flag BY and it applies
uniformly to all Members that place
orders in securities priced below $1.00.
The Exchange believes that its proposal
will increase competition for routing
services because the market for order
execution is competitive and the
Exchange’s proposal provides customers
with another alternative to route their
orders. The Exchange notes that routing
through DE Route is voluntary.
Regarding Flags 5, EA and ER, the
Exchange believes that its proposal to
amend its fee schedule to list the rate of
0.15% of the dollar value of the
transaction per side in the column ‘‘Fee/
(Rebate) Securities below $1.00’’ for
customer internalization will not
burden intermarket or intramarket
competition as the proposed rate is no
more favorable than the Exchange’s
prevailing maker/taker spread. In
addition, the Exchange believes that its
proposal will not burden intramarket
competition or intermarket competition
given that the Exchange’s proposal does
not modify its current rates for Flags 5,
EA and ER and they apply uniformly to
all Members that place orders in
securities priced below $1.00.
Rate Changes for Flag AA
Regarding Flag AA in securities
priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange
believes that its proposal to assess a
charge of $0.0012 per share per side for
Members’ orders that inadvertently
match with themselves at the Midpoint
Match in the same MPID will not
burden intermarket or intramarket
competition as the proposed rate is no
more favorable than the Exchange’s
prevailing maker/taker spread at the
Midpoint Match. In addition, the
Exchange believes that its proposal will
not burden intramarket competition or
intermarket competition because it
applies uniformly to all Members.
Regarding Flag AA in securities
priced below $1.00, the Exchange
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
15790
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 12, 2013 / Notices
believes that its proposal to assess a
charge of 0.15% of the dollar value of
the transaction per side will not burden
intermarket or intramarket competition
as the proposed rate is no more
favorable than the Exchange’s prevailing
maker/taker spread at the Midpoint
Match. In addition, the Exchange
believes that its proposal will not
burden intramarket competition or
intermarket competition because it
applies uniformly to all Members that
place orders in securities priced below
$1.00.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
Members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 15 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 16
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–EDGX–2013–10 on the
subject line.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
15 15
16 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 19b–4(f)(2)[sic].
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Mar 11, 2013
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGX–2013–10. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGX–
2013–10 and should be submitted on or
before April 2, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–05583 Filed 3–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–69037; File No. SR–FINRA–
2012–052]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Granting
Approval of Proposed Rule Change To
Require Members To Report to TRACE
the ‘‘Factor’’ in Limited Instances
Involving Asset-Backed Security
Transactions
March 5, 2013.
I. Introduction
On November 29, 2012, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
17 17
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to require FINRA
members to report to the Trade
Reporting and Compliance Engine
(‘‘TRACE’’) the Factor used to determine
the size (volume) of each transaction in
an Asset-Backed Security ‘‘(ABS’’)
(except ABS traded To Be Announced
(‘‘TBA’’)), in the limited instances when
members effect such transactions as
agent and charge a commission.3 The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
December 18, 2012.4 The Commission
received one comment on the proposal
and a response to the comment from
FINRA.5 On January 30, 2013, the
Commission extended to March 18,
2013 the time period in which to
approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.6 This order
approves the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposal
FINRA utilizes TRACE to collect from
its members and publicly disseminate
information on secondary over-thecounter transactions in corporate debt
securities and Agency Debt Securities 7
and certain primary market transactions.
FINRA also utilizes TRACE to collect
information on ABS transactions but,
until recently, FINRA’s rules did not
provide for the dissemination of such
information publicly.8 Last year,
however, FINRA amended its rules to
provide for public dissemination of
information regarding, among other
things, certain ABS traded in Specified
Pool Transactions.9 FINRA has
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The terms ‘‘Asset-Backed Security,’’ ‘‘To Be
Announced,’’ and ‘‘Factor’’ are defined in FINRA
Rules 6710(m), (u), and (w), respectively.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68414
(December 12, 2012), 77 FR 74896 (‘‘Notice’’).
5 See comment from Mark Sokolow, dated
December 18, 2012 (‘‘Sokolow Comment’’); see also
response letter from Kathryn Moore, Assistant
General Counsel, FINRA, to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Commission, dated January 11, 2013
(‘‘FINRA Letter’’).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68768
(January 30, 2013), 78 FR 8216 (February 5, 2013).
7 The term ‘‘Agency Debt Security’’ is defined in
FINRA Rule 6710(l).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61566
(February 22, 2010), 75 FR 9262 (March 1, 2010)
(approving SR–FINRA–2009–065).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68084
(October 23, 2012), 77 FR 65436 (October 26, 2012)
(approving SR–FINRA–2012–042). The term
‘‘Specified Pool Transaction’’ is defined in FINRA
Rule 6710(x).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15783-15790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05583]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-69042; File No. SR-EDGX-2013-10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee Schedule
March 5, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 28, 2013, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The
[[Page 15784]]
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its fees and rebates applicable to
Members \3\ of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rule 15.1(a) and (c). All
of the changes described herein are applicable to EDGX Members. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Internet Web site at www.directedge.com, at the Exchange's principal
office, and at the Public Reference Room of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As defined in Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Securities Priced Below $1.00
The Exchange's default \4\ rates for securities priced below $1.00
that add, remove or route liquidity are listed on the Exchange's fee
schedule. Under ``Liquidity Flags and Associated Fees,'' the Exchange
proposes to modify the title of the existing column from ``Fee/
(Rebate)'' to ``Fee/(Rebate) Securities at or above $1.00.'' The
Exchanges also proposes to insert a column titled ``Fee/(Rebate)
Securities below $1.00'' to list the rate that corresponds to each
liquidity flag for securities priced below $1.00 in order to increase
the transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule, as described in
greater detail below. In addition, the Exchange proposes to delete the
text under ``Liquidity Flags and Associated Fees'' that states ``unless
otherwise noted, the following rebates and fees apply to orders in
securities priced $1 and over'' because this text is no longer accurate
given the Exchange's proposed changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Where ``default'' refers to the standard rate that the
Exchange charges its Members for orders that add, remove, or route
liquidity from the Exchange absent Members qualifying for additional
volume tiered pricing. The Exchange maintains default rates for
securities at or above $1.00 and securities priced below $1.00 for
orders that add, remove, and route liquidity. The Exchange notes
that a Member may qualify for a higher rebate if the Member
satisfies the volume tier requirements outlined in Footnotes 1, 2,
6, 11 and 13 of the fee schedule for securities priced at or above
$1.00. The Exchange notes that the volume from securities priced
below $1.00 contributes toward volume tiered requirements for
securities priced at or above $1.00 as outlined in Footnotes 1, 2,
6, 11 and 13 of the fee schedule. Unless otherwise stated in the fee
schedule, the Exchange does not offer volume tiered pricing for
securities priced below $1.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's fee schedule states that it offers Members the
default rebate of $0.00003 per share for orders that add liquidity in
securities priced below $1.00. The Exchange proposes to amend its fee
schedule to list the rebate of $0.00003 in the column ``Fee/(Rebate)
Securities below $1.00'' for Flags B, V, Y, 3, 4, HA, MM, RP, and ZA.
The Exchange notes that this proposal does not modify the current rates
it charges its Members for orders that yield Flags B, V, Y, 3, 4, HA,
MM, RP, and ZA for securities priced below $1.00 that add liquidity to
the Exchange.
The Exchange's fee schedule states that it charges Members the
default rate of 0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction for orders
that remove liquidity in securities priced below $1.00.\5\ The Exchange
proposes to amend its fee schedule to list the rate of 0.30% of the
dollar value of the transaction in the column ``Fee/(Rebate) Securities
below $1.00'' for Flags N, W, 6, BB, MT, PI, PR, and ZR. The Exchange
notes that this proposal does not modify the current rates it charges
its Members for orders that yield Flags N, W, 6, BB, MT, PI, PR, and ZR
for securities priced below $1.00 that remove liquidity from the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ This fee is consistent with the limitations of Regulation
NMS, SEC Rule 610(c), for securities priced below $1.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's fee schedule states that it charges Members the
default rate of 0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction for orders
that route to away trading destinations in securities priced below
$1.00. The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to list the rate
of 0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction in the column ``Fee/
(Rebate) Securities below $1.00'' for Flags D, G, I, J, K, L, O, Q, R,
S, T, U, X, Z, 2, 7, CL, RQ, RR, RT, RX, and SW. The Exchange notes
that this proposal does not modify the current rates it charges its
Members for orders that yield Flags D, G, I, J, K, L, O, Q, R, S, T, U,
X, Z, 2, 7, CL, RQ, RR, RT, RX, and SW for securities priced below
$1.00 that route to away trading destinations and remove liquidity. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to amend the title of the routing
liquidity category to ``Routing and Removing Liquidity'' in order to
increase the transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule. Regarding the
flags' descriptions contained on the fee schedule, the Exchange
proposes to delete references to removing liquidity for Flags D, G, J,
L, U, 2, RR, RT and RX because the Exchange's references to ``route''
imply that the flags route and remove liquidity. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to make conforming changes to the description of Flag
U in order to make the descriptions for all flags that route and remove
liquidity consistent.
The Exchange's fee schedule does not clearly disclose its pricing
for Members' orders that route to some away trading destinations \6\
and add liquidity in securities priced below $1.00. The Exchange
currently assesses no charge to Members for orders that route to these
away trading destinations and add liquidity because these away trading
destinations pass through no charge to Direct Edge ECN LLC (d/b/a DE
Route) (``DE Route''), the Exchange's affiliated routing broker dealer,
for adding liquidity in securities priced below $1.00. The Exchange
proposes to amend its fee schedule to assess no charge for Flags A, F,
M, 8, 9, 10, RA, RB, RS, RW, RY, and RZ. The Exchange notes that its
proposal conforms to an existing practice and does not modify the rates
that the Exchange has been charging its Members for orders that yield
Flags A, F, M, 8, 9, 10, RA, RB, RS, RW, RY, and RZ for securities
priced below $1.00 that route to away trading destinations and add
liquidity. In addition, the Exchange proposes to make conforming
changes to Flag M's description in order to make the descriptions for
all flags that route to these away trading destinations and add
liquidity consistent and to revise Flag 8 to replace the entity
formerly known as NYSE Amex with NYSE MKT LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange currently assess no charge for Members' orders
that route to the following away trading destinations and add
liquidity: NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca''), New York Stock Exchange
LLC (``NYSE''), The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ''), LavaFlow
ECN, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.'s (``NASDAQ BX''), CBOE Stock Exchange,
Inc. (``CBSX''), BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (``BATS BYX''), BATS
Exchange, Inc. (``BATS BZX''), EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA''),
NASDAQ OMX PSX, Inc. (``NASDAQ PSX''), and NYSE MKT LLC (formerly
NYSE Amex).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's fee schedule displays a rebate of $0.00003 per share
as the default rate for Members, orders that add liquidity and a charge
of 0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction as the
[[Page 15785]]
default rate for Members, orders that remove liquidity for securities
priced below $1.00. However, in practice, the Exchange assesses no
charge for Members' orders that that yield Flag OO in securities priced
below $1.00, which represents Members' orders that are matched at the
``Direct Edge Opening'' and either add or remove liquidity. The
Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to assess no charge for
Flag OO. The Exchange notes that its proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate that the Exchange has been
charging its Members for orders that yield Flag OO for securities
priced below $1.00 that are matched at the Direct Edge Opening.
The Exchange's fee schedule does not clearly disclose its pricing
for Members' orders that yield Flag RC in securities priced below
$1.00. The Exchange currently assesses no charge for Members' orders
that yield Flag RC, which route to the National Stock Exchange, Inc.
(the ``NSX'') and add liquidity. The Exchange proposes to amend its fee
schedule to assess no charge for Flag RC. The Exchange notes that its
proposal conforms to an existing practice and does not modify the rate
that the Exchange has been charging its Members for orders that yield
Flag RC for securities priced below $1.00 that route to the NSX and add
liquidity.
As provided in Footnote 3 of the fee schedule, the Exchange
currently assesses a charge of 0.10% of the dollar value of the
transaction for Members' orders that yield Flag C, which route to
NASDAQ BX and remove liquidity in securities priced below $1.00. The
Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to list a charge of 0.10%
of the dollar value of the transaction in the column ``Fee/(Rebate)
Securities below $1.00'' for Flag C. The Exchange notes that this
proposal does not modify the current rate it charges its Members for
orders that yield Flag C for securities priced below $1.00 that route
to NASDAQ BX and add liquidity. In addition, the Exchange proposes to
delete ``removes liquidity'' in Flag C's description because the
Exchange's reference to ``routed'' implies that Flag C routes and
removes liquidity. The Exchange proposes to delete the text of Footnote
3 and its associated annotations on the default rate for routing and
removing liquidity at the top of the fee schedule in addition to Flags
C, D, J, L, and 2 on the Exchange's fee schedule because the Exchange
proposes to list these rates in the column ``Fee/(Rebate) Securities
below $1.00'' on the Exchange's fee schedule. The Exchange proposes to
insert ``intentionally omitted'' in Footnote 3 in place of the deleted
text.
The Exchange notes that Footnote 10 on the fee schedule incorrectly
lists a flat rate of $0.0010 per share for Members' orders that yield
Flag BY in securities priced below $1.00. However, in practice, the
Exchange charges Members 0.10% of the dollar value of the transaction
for Members' orders that yield Flag BY, which routes to BATS BYX and
removes liquidity using routing strategies ROUC, ROUE or ROBY.\7\ This
rate represents a pass through of the rate that BATS BYX charges DE
Route. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to
assess a charge of 0.10% of the dollar value of the transaction for
Flag BY. The Exchange notes that its proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate that the Exchange has been
charging its Members for orders that yield Flag BY for securities
priced below $1.00 that route to BATS BYX and remove liquidity using
routing strategies ROUC, ROUE or ROBY. In addition, the Exchange
proposes to delete the text of Footnote 10 and its associated
annotation on Flag BY on the fee schedule because the Exchange proposes
to list this rate in the column ``Fee/(Rebate) Securities below
$1.00.'' The Exchange proposes to insert ``intentionally omitted'' in
Footnote 10 in place of the deleted text. In addition, the Exchange
proposes to delete ``removes liquidity'' in Flag BY's description
because the Exchange's reference to ``routed'' implies that Flag BY
routes and removes liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ As defined in Exchange Rule 11.9(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer internalization generally occurs when one Member presents
two orders to the Exchange from the same Member Participant Identifier
(``MPID'') separately, rather than in a paired manner, and the two
orders inadvertently match with one another.\8\ As provided in Footnote
11 of the fee schedule, the Exchange currently assesses a charge of
0.15% of the dollar value of the transaction per side for Members'
orders in securities priced below $1.00 that yield Flags 5, EA and ER,
which are the flags associated with customer internalization. The
Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to list the rate of 0.15%
of the dollar value of the transaction per side in the column ``Fee/
(Rebate) Securities below $1.00'' for Flags 5, EA and ER. The Exchange
notes that this proposal does not modify the current rates charged for
Members' orders that yield Flags 5, EA and ER for securities priced
below $1.00 that are associated with customer internalization. The
Exchange also notes that the internalization fee is no more favorable
than the prevailing maker/taker spread of 0.30% of the dollar value of
the transaction.\9\ In addition, the Exchange proposes to delete the
text of Footnote 11 on the Exchange's fee schedule that states, ``for
stocks priced below $1, the internalization rate is 0.15% of the dollar
value of the transaction per share per side'' because the Exchange
proposes to list these rates in the column ``Fee/(Rebate) Securities
below $1.00'' on the Exchange's fee schedule because this text is no
longer necessary given the Exchange's proposed changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Members are advised to consult Exchange Rule 12.2 regarding
fictitious trading.
\9\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 64452 (May 10, 2011), 76
FR 28110, 28111 (May 13, 2011) (SR-EDGX-2011-13), where the Exchange
represented that it ``will work promptly to ensure that the
internalization fee is no more favorable than each prevailing maker/
taker spread.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate Changes for Flag AA
The Exchange currently assesses no charge for Members' orders that
yield Flag AA for securities priced at or above $1.00 at this time. The
Exchange proposes to increase the rate it charges for Flag AA in
securities priced at or above $1.00 from no charge to $0.0012 per share
per side for Members' orders that inadvertently match with themselves
at the Midpoint Match \10\ in the same MPID. Therefore, the Exchange's
proposed internalization fee will be no more favorable than the current
spread of $0.0012 per share per side for Members' orders that add
liquidity at the Midpoint Match and yield Flag MM and Members' orders
that remove liquidity at the Midpoint Match and yield Flag MT. The
Exchange notes that this proposed internalization fee will discourage
Members from engaging in potential wash sales.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ As defined in Exchange Rule 11.5(c)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In conjunction with the Exchange's proposal to amend the rate for
Members' orders that yield Flag AA in securities priced at or above
$1.00 as described above, the Exchange proposes to amend the rate it
charges Members for orders that yield Flag AA in securities priced
below $1.00. The Exchange currently assesses no charge for Members'
orders that inadvertently match with themselves at the Midpoint Match
in the same MPID. The Exchange proposes to charge Members 0.15% of the
dollar value of the transaction per side for securities priced below
$1.00 so the internalization fee is no more favorable than the spread
per side for Members' orders in securities priced below $1.00 that add
liquidity at the Midpoint Match
[[Page 15786]]
and yield Flag MM, and Members' orders that remove liquidity at the
Midpoint Match and yield Flag MT.\11\ The Exchange notes that this
proposed internalization fee will discourage Members from engaging in
potential wash sales.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The rate of 0.15% of the dollar value of the transaction
per side is derived from calculating the spread between adding and
removing liquidity in securities priced below $1.00 for Flags MM and
MT. The Exchange assumes a security is priced at $0.99 and dividing
that result by two (2) to account for each side of the transaction:
(0.30% x 1 share x $0.99)-(rebate of $0.00003 per share) = $0.00294/
2 =$.00147 per share/$0.99 x 100 = approx. 0.15% of the dollar value
of the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to implement these amendments to its fee
schedule on March 1, 2013.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\12\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\13\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities Priced Below $1.00
The Exchange believes that its proposal to revise its fee schedule
to list the default rate that corresponds to each liquidity flag for
securities priced below $1.00 that add liquidity on the Exchange's fee
schedule represents an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees
and other charges among its Members and other persons using its
facilities. Specifically, for Members' orders that add liquidity, the
Exchange proposes to list the default rebate of $0.00003 per share next
to Flags B, V, Y, 3, 4, HA, MM, RP, and ZA. The Exchange's proposal to
revise the corresponding text on the fee schedule, as described above,
will increase the level of transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule
and improve the Exchange's ability to effectively convey the rates for
securities priced below $1.00 to Members. In addition, the Exchange
believes it is equitable and reasonable to offer Members a default
rebate of $0.00003 per share for orders that add liquidity in
securities priced below $1.00 because it will incentivize Members to
add liquidity to the Exchange by offering them a rebate and offering
rebates to Members that add liquidity is consistent with the Exchange's
maker/taker model. The Exchange notes that its proposal does not modify
the current rates it charges its Members for orders that yield Flags B,
V, Y, 3, 4, HA, MM, RP, and ZA for securities priced below $1.00 that
add liquidity from the Exchange. Lastly, the Exchange also believes
that these proposed amendments are non-discriminatory because they
apply uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to revise its fee schedule
to list the default rate that corresponds to each liquidity flag for
securities priced below $1.00 that remove liquidity on the Exchange's
fee schedule represents an equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using its
facilities. Specifically, for Members' orders that remove liquidity,
the Exchange proposes to list the default removal rate of 0.30% of the
dollar value of the transaction next to Flags N, W, 6, BB, MT, PI, PR,
and ZR. The Exchange's proposal to revise the corresponding text on the
fee schedule, as described above, will increase the level of
transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule and improve the Exchange's
ability to effectively convey the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members. In addition, the Exchange believes it is equitable
and reasonable to charge Members a default removal rate of 0.30% of the
dollar value of the transaction because these fees allow the Exchange
to offset its administrative, clearing, and other operating costs
incurred in executing such trades. The Exchange notes that its proposal
does not modify the current rates it charges its Members for orders
that yield Flags N, W, 6, BB, MT, PI, PR, and ZR for securities priced
below $1.00 that remove liquidity from the Exchange. Lastly, the
Exchange also believes that these proposed amendments are non-
discriminatory because they apply uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to revise its fee schedule
to list the default rate that corresponds to each liquidity flag for
securities priced below $1.00 that route and remove liquidity on the
Exchange's fee schedule represents an equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other
persons using its facilities. Specifically, for Members' orders that
route and remove liquidity, the Exchange proposes to list the default
rate of 0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction next to Flags D,
G, I, J, K, L, O, Q, R, S, T, U, X, Z, 2, 7, CL, RQ, RR, RT, RX, and
SW. The Exchange's proposal to revise the corresponding text on the fee
schedule, as described above, will increase the level of transparency
of the Exchange's fee schedule and improve the Exchange's ability to
effectively convey the rates for securities priced below $1.00 to
Members. In addition, the Exchange believes it is equitable and
reasonable to charge Members a default routing and removal rate of
0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction because these fees allow
the Exchange to offset its administrative, clearing, and other
operating costs incurred in executing such trades. The Exchange also
notes that routing through DE Route is voluntary. The Exchange notes
that its proposal does not modify the current rates it charges its
Members for orders that yield Flags D, G, I, J, K, L, O, Q, R, S, T, U,
X, Z, 2, 7, CL, RQ, RR, RT, RX, and SW for securities priced below
$1.00 that route to away trading destinations and remove liquidity.
Lastly, the Exchange also believes that these proposed amendments are
non-discriminatory because they apply uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to pass through no charge
for securities priced below $1.00 that route to some away trading
destinations and add liquidity represents an equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other
persons using its facilities because the Exchange does not levy
additional fees or offer additional rebates for orders that it routes
to these away trading destinations through DE Route. The Exchange's fee
schedule does not clearly disclose its pricing for Members' orders that
route to these away trading destinations and add liquidity in
securities priced below $1.00. Currently, the away trading destinations
assess no charge to DE Route for orders that route to those
destinations and add liquidity, and DE Route passes through no charge
to the Exchange and the Exchange passes through no charge to its
Members.\14\ Therefore, since DE Route is
[[Page 15787]]
not charged a fee by the away trading destination for routing orders
that add liquidity to its trading center in securities priced below
$1.00, the Exchange believes it is equitable and reasonable to not
charge its Members for orders that yield Flags A, F, M, 8, 9, 10, RA,
RB, RS, RW, RY, and RZ. The Exchange's proposal allows the Exchange to
continue to charge its Members a pass-through rate for orders that are
routed to some away trading destinations and add liquidity through DE
Route. The Exchange notes that its proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rates that the Exchange has been
charging its Members for orders that yield Flags A, F, M, 8, 9, 10, RA,
RB, RS, RW, RY, and RZ for securities priced below $1.00 that route to
these away trading destinations and add liquidity. The Exchange notes
that routing through DE Route is voluntary. The Exchange's proposal to
revise the corresponding text on the fee schedule, as described above,
will increase the level of transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule
and improve the Exchange's ability to effectively convey the rates for
securities priced below $1.00 to Members. Lastly, the Exchange also
believes that these proposed amendments are non-discriminatory because
they apply uniformly to all Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ NYSE Arca, NYSE, NYSE MKT LLC, BATS BZX, BATS BYX, CBSX,
NASDAQ, NASDAQ BX, NASDAQ PSX, LavaFlow ECN, and EDGA assess
customers no charge for orders that add liquidity on their
respective exchanges in securities priced below $1.00. See NYSE
Arca, NYSE Arca Trading Fees, https://usequities.nyx.com/markets/nyse-arca-equities/trading-fees; NYSE, NYSE Trading Fees, https://usequities.nyx.com/markets/nyse-equities/trading-fees; NYSE MKT LLC,
NYSE MKT Trading Fees, https://usequities.nyx.com/markets/nyse-mkt-equities/trading-fees; BATS, BATS BZX and BYX Exchange Fee
Schedules, https://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/regulation/rule_book/BATS-Exchanges_Fee_Schedules.pdf; Chicago Board Options
Exchange, CBOE Stock Exchange Fees Schedule, https://www.cboe.com/publish/cbsxfeeschedule/cbsxfeeschedule.pdf; NASDAQ, Price List--
Trading and Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc., NASDAQ OMX BX
Price List--Trading and Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=bx_pricing; NASDAQ OMX PSX, Inc., NASDAQ OMX PSX
Price List--Trading and Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PSX_Pricing; LavaFlow ECN, LavaFlow Pricing, https://www.lavatrading.com/solutions/pricing.php; and EDGA Exchange, Inc.,
EDGA Exchange Fee Schedule, https://www.directedge.com/Membership/FeeSchedule/EDGAFeeSchedule.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to assess no charge for
securities priced below $1.00 that yield Flag OO represents an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
its Members and other persons using its facilities. Members will yield
Flag OO when their orders are matched at the Direct Edge Opening on
EDGX, whether the Member's order adds or removes liquidity. The
Exchange's fee schedule displays a rebate of $0.00003 per share as the
default rate for Members' orders that add liquidity and a charge of
0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction as the default rate for
Members' orders that remove liquidity for securities priced below
$1.00. However, in practice, the Exchange assesses no charge for
Members' orders that that yield Flag OO in securities priced below
$1.00, which represents Members' orders that are matched at the
``Direct Edge Opening'' and either add or remove liquidity. Because the
Exchange is not a primary listing market, Flag OO generates low volume;
therefore, the Exchange believes its proposal to assess no charge is
equitable and reasonable given that the Exchange incurs only nominal
administrative, clearing, and other operating costs in executing
trades. The Exchange notes that its proposal conforms an existing
practice and does not modify the rate that the Exchange has been
charging its Members for orders that yield Flag OO for securities
priced below $1.00 that are matched at the Direct Edge Opening. The
Exchange's proposal to revise the corresponding text on the fee
schedule, as described above, will increase the level of transparency
of the Exchange's fee schedule and improve the Exchange's ability to
effectively convey the rates for securities priced below $1.00 to
Members. Lastly, the Exchange also believes that the proposed amendment
is non-discriminatory because it applies uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to assess no charge for
securities priced below $1.00 that yield Flag RC represents an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
its Members and other persons using its facilities. Members will yield
Flag RC when their orders route to the NSX and add liquidity. The
Exchange's fee schedule does not clearly disclose its pricing for
Members' orders that yield Flag RC in securities priced below $1.00.
The Exchange notes that the NSX offers a rebate to DE Route for
Members' orders that yield Flag RC. The Exchange also notes that Flag
RC generates low volume and nominal revenue to the Exchange. Therefore,
the Exchange believes its proposal to assess no charge is equitable and
reasonable because the rebate paid by NSX to DE Route and DE Route to
the Exchange does not offset the administrative, clearing, and other
operating costs associated with passing through the NSX rebate to
Members. The Exchange notes that routing through DE Route is voluntary.
The Exchange also notes that its proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate that the Exchange has been
charging its Members for orders that yield Flag RC for securities
priced below $1.00. The Exchange's proposal to revise the corresponding
text on the fee schedule, as described above, will increase the level
of transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule and improve the
Exchange's ability to effectively convey the rates for securities
priced below $1.00 to Members. Lastly, the Exchange also believes that
the proposed amendment is non-discriminatory because it applies
uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to revise its fee schedule
to list the rate of 0.10% of the dollar value of the transaction for
Members' orders that yield Flag C for securities priced below $1.00
represents an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among its Members and other persons using its facilities
because it is a pass-through rate and the Exchange does not levy
additional fees or offer additional rebates for orders that it routes
to NASDAQ BX through DE Route. Therefore, since DE Route is charged a
fee by NASDAQ BX for routing orders that remove liquidity to its
trading center in securities priced below $1.00, the Exchange believes
it is equitable and reasonable to charge its Members for orders that
yield Flag C. The Exchange's proposal allows the Exchange to continue
to charge its Members a pass-through rate for orders that are routed to
NASDAQ BX and remove liquidity through DE Route. The Exchange notes
that routing through DE Route is voluntary. The Exchange notes that its
proposal does not modify the current rate it charges its Members for
orders that yield Flag C for securities priced below $1.00. The
Exchange's proposal to revise the corresponding text on the fee
schedule, as described above and deleting the text of Footnote 3 and
its associated annotations on Flags C, D, J, L, and 2, will increase
the level of transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule and improve
the Exchange's ability to effectively convey the rates for securities
priced below $1.00 to Members. Lastly, the Exchange also believes that
this proposed amendment is non-discriminatory because it applies
uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to pass through 0.10% of
the dollar value of the transaction for Members' orders that yield Flag
BY for securities priced below $1.00 represents an equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other
persons using its facilities because the Exchange does not levy
additional fees or offer additional rebates for orders that it routes
to BATS BYX through DE Route. The Exchange notes that Footnote 10 on
the fee schedule incorrectly lists a flat rate of $0.0010 per share for
Members' orders that yield Flag BY in securities priced below $1.00. In
practice, the Exchange charges Members 0.10% of the dollar value of the
transaction for Members' orders that yield Flag BY. Since DE
[[Page 15788]]
Route is charged a fee by BATS BYX for routing orders that remove
liquidity using routing strategies ROUC, ROUE or ROBY to its trading
center in securities priced below $1.00, the Exchange believes it is
equitable and reasonable to charge its Members for orders that yield
Flag BY. The Exchange's proposal allows the Exchange to continue to
charge its Members a pass-through rate for orders that are routed to
BATS BYX and remove liquidity through DE Route. The Exchange notes that
its proposal conforms to an existing practice and does not modify the
rate that the Exchange has been charging its Members for orders that
yield Flag BY for securities priced below $1.00. The Exchange notes
that routing through DE Route is voluntary. The Exchange's proposal to
revise the corresponding text on the fee schedule, as described above
and deleting the text of Footnote 10 and its associated annotation on
Flag BY, will increase the level of transparency of the Exchange's fee
schedule and improve the Exchange's ability to effectively convey the
rates for securities priced below $1.00 to Members. Lastly, the
Exchange also believes that this proposed amendment is non-
discriminatory because it applies uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its proposal revise its fee schedule to
list a charge of 0.15% of the dollar value of the transaction per side
for Members' orders in securities priced below $1.00 that yield Flags
5, EA and ER, which are associated with customer internalization,
represents an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges. The Exchange's rate of 0.15% of the dollar value of the
transaction per side for customer internalization is equitable because
the rate is consistent with the Exchange's proposed maker/taker spread
for securities priced below $1.00. Therefore, in each case, the
internalization fee of 0.15% of the dollar value of the transaction per
side is no more favorable to the Member than the proposed maker/taker
spread. Since the spread for customer internalization equals the
Exchange's maker/taker spread, the Exchange's proposal continues to
discourage Members from engaging in potential wash sales. The Exchange
notes that its proposal does not modify the current rates it charges
its Members for orders that yield Flags 5, EA or ER for securities
priced below $1.00. The Exchange's proposal to revise the corresponding
text on the fee schedule, as described above and deleting the
applicable text of Footnote 11, will increase the level of transparency
of the Exchange's fee schedule and improve the Exchange's ability to
effectively convey the rates for securities priced below $1.00 to
Members. Lastly, the Exchange believes that these proposed rates are
non-discriminatory in that they apply uniformly to all Members.
As described in Section 3, the Exchange proposes to make conforming
and non-substantive revisions to the fee schedule in general and the
description of certain flags in particular in order to increase the
level of transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule, promote
consistent descriptions and applications, and improve the Exchange's
ability to effectively convey the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members.
Rate Changes for Flag AA
The Exchange believes that its proposal to increase the rate it
charges Members for customer internalization from no charge per share
per side to $0.0012 per share per side for Members' orders that yield
Flag AA in securities priced at or above $1.00 is an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges. The Exchange's
proposed rate of $0.0012 per side per share for Members' orders that
inadvertently match with themselves at the Midpoint Match in the same
MPID is equitable because the rate is consistent with the Exchange's
proposed maker/taker spread of $0.0012 per share, where the rate to add
liquidity at the Midpoint Match and yield Flag MM is $0.0012 per share
and the rate to remove liquidity at the Midpoint Match and yield Flag
MT is $0.0012 per share. Therefore, in each case, the proposed
internalization fee of $0.0012 per side per share, equaling a total
cost of $0.0024 per share for Flag AA, is no more favorable to the
Member than the proposed maker/taker spread for Midpoint Match. Since
the spread for customer internalization and the Exchange's maker/taker
spread for Midpoint Match will equal $0.0012 per share, the Exchange's
proposal discourages Members from engaging in potential wash sales.
Lastly, the Exchange believes that the proposed rate is non-
discriminatory in that it applies uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to charge Members 0.15% of
the dollar value of the transaction per side for customer
internalization for orders that yield Flag AA in securities priced
below $1.00 is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges. The Exchange's proposed rate of 0.15% of the dollar
value of the transaction per side for Members' orders that
inadvertently match with themselves at the Midpoint Match in the same
MPID is equitable because the rate is consistent with the Exchange's
proposed maker/taker spread for Midpoint Match. Therefore, in each
case, the proposed internalization fee of 0.15% of the dollar value of
the transaction per side, equaling a total cost of 0.30% of the dollar
value of the transaction, where the rebate to add to Midpoint Match
(Flag MM) is $0.00003 per share and the fee to remove from Midpoint
Match (Flag MT) is 0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction, is no
more favorable to the Member than the proposed maker/taker spread for
Midpoint Match. Since the spread for customer internalization will
equal the Exchange's maker/taker spread for Midpoint Match, the
Exchange's proposal discourages Members from engaging in potential wash
sales. Lastly, the Exchange believes that the proposed rate is non-
discriminatory in that it applies uniformly to all Members.
The Exchange also notes that it operates in a highly-competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. The proposed rule change reflects a competitive pricing
structure designed to incent market participants to direct their order
flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed rates are
equitable and non-discriminatory in that they apply uniformly to all
Members. The Exchange believes the fees and credits remain competitive
with those charged by other venues and therefore continue to be
reasonable and equitably allocated to Members.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
These proposed rule changes do not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. The Exchange does not believe that any of these changes
represent a significant departure from previous pricing offered by the
Exchange or pricing offered by the Exchange's competitors. As described
in Section 3, the Exchange proposes to make conforming and non-
substantive revisions to the fee schedule in general and the
description of certain flags in particular in order to increase the
level of transparency of the Exchange's fee schedule, promote
consistent descriptions and applications, and improve the Exchange's
ability to effectively convey the rates for securities priced below
$1.00 to Members.
[[Page 15789]]
Securities Priced Below $1.00
Regarding Flags B, V, Y, 3, 4, HA, MM, RP, and ZA, the Exchange
believes that its proposal to amend its fee schedule to list the
default rebate of $0.00003 in the column ``Fee/(Rebate) Securities
below $1.00'' will not burden intramarket competition or intermarket
competition given that the Exchange's proposal does not modify its
current rates for orders that add liquidity and they apply uniformly to
all Members that place orders in securities priced below $1.00.
Regarding Flags N, W, 6, BB, MT, PI, PR, and ZR, the Exchange
believes that its proposal to amend its fee schedule to list the
default rate of 0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction in the
column ``Fee/(Rebate) Securities below $1.00'' will not burden
intramarket competition or intermarket competition given that the
Exchange's proposal does not modify its current rates for orders that
remove liquidity and they apply uniformly to all Members that place
orders in securities priced below $1.00.
Regarding Flags D, G, I, J, K, L, O, Q, R, S, T, U, X, Z, 2, 7, CL,
RQ, RR, RT, RX, and SW, the Exchange believes that its proposal to
amend its fee schedule to list the default rate of 0.30% of the dollar
value of the transaction in the column ``Fee/(Rebate) Securities below
$1.00'' will not burden intramarket competition or intermarket
competition given that the Exchange's proposal does not modify its
current rates for orders that route and remove liquidity and they apply
uniformly to all Members that place orders in securities priced below
$1.00.
Regarding Flags A, F, M, 8, 9, 10, RA, RB, RS, RW, RY, and RZ, the
Exchange's fee schedule does not clearly disclose its pricing for
Members' orders that route to these away trading destinations and add
liquidity in securities priced below $1.00. The Exchange believes that
its proposal to pass through no charge for securities priced below
$1.00 that route to some away trading destinations and add liquidity
will increase competition because it is comparable to the rates charged
by the away trading destinations for adding liquidity. The Exchange
believes its proposal will not burden intramarket competition or
intermarket competition given that the Exchange's proposal conforms to
an existing practice and does not modify the rates for orders that
route and add liquidity and they apply uniformly to all Members that
place orders in securities priced below $1.00. The Exchange believes
that its proposal will increase competition for routing services
because the market for order execution is competitive and the
Exchange's proposal provides customers with another alternative to
route their orders. The Exchange notes that routing through DE Route is
voluntary.
Regarding Flag OO, the Exchange's fee schedule displays a rebate of
$0.00003 per share as the default rate for Members orders that add
liquidity and a charge of 0.30% of the dollar value of the transaction
as the default rate for Members orders that remove liquidity for
securities priced below $1.00. However, in practice, the Exchange
assesses no charge for Members' orders that that yield Flag OO in
securities priced below $1.00, which represents Members' orders that
are matched at the ``Direct Edge Opening'' and either add or remove
liquidity. The Exchange believes that its proposal to assess no charge
will not burden intramarket competition or intermarket competition
given that the Exchange's proposal conforms to an existing practice and
does not modify the rate for Flag OO and it applies uniformly to all
Members that place orders in securities priced below $1.00.
Regarding Flag RC, the Exchange's fee schedule does not clearly
disclose its pricing for Members' orders yield Flag RC in securities
priced below $1.00. The Exchange believes that its proposal to assess
no charge will not burden intramarket competition or intermarket
competition given that the Exchange's proposal conforms to an existing
practice and does not modify the rate for Flag RC and it applies
uniformly to all Members that place orders in securities priced below
$1.00.
Regarding Flag C, the Exchange believes that its proposal to amend
its fee schedule to list a charge of 0.10% of the dollar value of the
transaction will not burden intramarket competition or intermarket
competition given that the Exchange's proposal does not modify its
current rate for Flag C and it applies uniformly to all Members that
place orders in securities priced below $1.00. By charging a pass-
through rate for securities priced below $1.00 that route to NASDAQ BX
and remove liquidity, the Exchange will increase competition because it
is comparable to the rates charged by NASDAQ BX for removing liquidity.
The Exchange believes that its proposal will increase competition for
routing services because the market for order execution is competitive
and the Exchange's proposal provides customers with another alternative
to route their orders. The Exchange notes that routing through DE Route
is voluntary.
Regarding Flag BY, the Exchange notes that Footnote 10 on the fee
schedule incorrectly lists a flat rate of $0.0010 per share for
Members' orders that yield Flag BY in securities priced below $1.00.
However, in practice, the Exchange charges Members 0.10% of the dollar
value of the transaction for Members' orders that yield Flag BY. The
Exchange believes that its proposal to pass through a charge of 0.10%
of the dollar value of the transaction for securities priced below
$1.00 that route to BATS BYX and remove liquidity will increase
competition because it is comparable to the rates charged by BATS BYX
for removing liquidity. The Exchange believes its proposal will not
burden intramarket competition or intermarket competition given that
the Exchange's proposal conforms to an existing practice and does not
modify the rate for Flag BY and it applies uniformly to all Members
that place orders in securities priced below $1.00. The Exchange
believes that its proposal will increase competition for routing
services because the market for order execution is competitive and the
Exchange's proposal provides customers with another alternative to
route their orders. The Exchange notes that routing through DE Route is
voluntary.
Regarding Flags 5, EA and ER, the Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its fee schedule to list the rate of 0.15% of the
dollar value of the transaction per side in the column ``Fee/(Rebate)
Securities below $1.00'' for customer internalization will not burden
intermarket or intramarket competition as the proposed rate is no more
favorable than the Exchange's prevailing maker/taker spread. In
addition, the Exchange believes that its proposal will not burden
intramarket competition or intermarket competition given that the
Exchange's proposal does not modify its current rates for Flags 5, EA
and ER and they apply uniformly to all Members that place orders in
securities priced below $1.00.
Rate Changes for Flag AA
Regarding Flag AA in securities priced at or above $1.00, the
Exchange believes that its proposal to assess a charge of $0.0012 per
share per side for Members' orders that inadvertently match with
themselves at the Midpoint Match in the same MPID will not burden
intermarket or intramarket competition as the proposed rate is no more
favorable than the Exchange's prevailing maker/taker spread at the
Midpoint Match. In addition, the Exchange believes that its proposal
will not burden intramarket competition or intermarket competition
because it applies uniformly to all Members.
Regarding Flag AA in securities priced below $1.00, the Exchange
[[Page 15790]]
believes that its proposal to assess a charge of 0.15% of the dollar
value of the transaction per side will not burden intermarket or
intramarket competition as the proposed rate is no more favorable than
the Exchange's prevailing maker/taker spread at the Midpoint Match. In
addition, the Exchange believes that its proposal will not burden
intramarket competition or intermarket competition because it applies
uniformly to all Members that place orders in securities priced below
$1.00.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from Members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \16\ thereunder. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\16\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2)[sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-EDGX-2013-10 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2013-10. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2013-10 and should be
submitted on or before April 2, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2013-05583 Filed 3-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P