Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices and Products Containing Same, 14835-14836 [2013-05267]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
14835
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Notices
Supervisory Auditor, Team B, Western
Audit and Compliance, ONRR,
telephone (303) 231–3741; email
Michael.Curry@onrr.gov. Team B’s fax
number is (303) 231–3473. Team B’s
mailing address is Office of Natural
Resources Revenue, Western Audit and
Compliance Management, Team B, P.O.
Box 25165, MS 62520B, Denver,
Colorado 80225–0165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
10, 1999, ONRR published a final rule
titled ‘‘Amendments to Gas Valuation
Regulations for Indian Leases’’ effective
January 1, 2000 (64 FR 43506). The
Indian gas valuation regulations apply
to all gas production from Indian (tribal
and allotted) oil and gas leases, except
leases on the Osage Indian Reservation.
The regulations require ONRR to
publish major portion prices for each
designated area not associated with an
index zone for each production month
beginning January 2000, as well as a due
date for additional royalty payments.
See 30 CFR 1206.174(a)(4)(ii). If you
owe additional royalties based on a
published major portion price, you must
submit to ONRR, by the due date, an
amended Form MMS–2014, Report of
Sales and Royalty Remittance (which is
valid while we update our form number
to ONRR–2014 due to the
reorganization). If you do not pay the
additional royalties by the due date,
ONRR will bill you late payment
interest under 30 CFR 1218.54. ONRR
will accrue the interest from the due
date until we receive your payment and
an amended Form MMS–2014. The
table below lists the major portion
prices for all designated areas not
associated with an index zone. The due
date is 60 days after the publication date
of this notice.
GAS MAJOR PORTION PRICES ($/MMBTU) FOR DESIGNATED AREAS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH AN INDEX ZONE
ONRR-Designated areas
Jan 2011
Blackfeet Reservation ......................................................................................
Fort Belknap ....................................................................................................
Fort Berthold ....................................................................................................
Fort Peck Reservation .....................................................................................
Navajo Allotted Leases in the Navajo Reservation .........................................
Rocky Boys Reservation .................................................................................
ONRR-Designated areas
3.45
5.09
4.34
6.58
4.16
3.84
May 2011
Blackfeet Reservation ......................................................................................
Fort Belknap ....................................................................................................
Fort Berthold ....................................................................................................
Fort Peck Reservation .....................................................................................
Navajo Allotted Leases in the Navajo Reservation .........................................
Rocky Boys Reservation .................................................................................
ONRR-Designated areas
Dated: February 26, 2013.
Gregory J. Gould,
Director, Office of Natural Resources
Revenue.
[FR Doc. 2013–05284 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4310–T2–P
Sep 2011
14:43 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–836]
Investigations: Terminations,
Modifications and Rulings: Certain
Consumer Electronics and Display
Devices and Products Containing
Same
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Jun 2011
Sfmt 4703
3.57
5.09
3.80
6.23
4.07
3.95
Oct 2011
3.17
4.99
4.48
6.27
3.78
3.54
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 30) granting a joint motion
to terminate the above-captioned
investigation based on settlement
agreements. The investigation is
terminated.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
3.20
5.13
4.03
7.06
4.05
3.64
3.55
5.11
3.68
6.22
4.04
3.82
Blackfeet Reservation ......................................................................................
Fort Belknap ....................................................................................................
Fort Berthold ....................................................................................................
Fort Peck Reservation .....................................................................................
Navajo Allotted Leases in the Navajo Reservation .........................................
Rocky Boys Reservation .................................................................................
For information on how to report
additional royalties associated with
major portion prices, please refer to our
Dear Payor letter dated December 1,
1999, on our Web site at https://
www.onrr.gov/FM/PDFDocs/991201.pdf.
Feb 2011
2.82
4.93
5.00
6.11
3.57
3.13
Mar 2011
3.29
4.96
4.12
6.39
3.70
3.63
Jul 2011
3.36
5.13
4.38
6.59
4.11
3.78
Nov 2011
2.68
4.81
4.87
6.42
3.38
3.00
Apr 2011
3.46
5.12
4.21
6.47
3.98
3.72
Aug 2011
3.22
5.10
4.29
5.64
4.14
3.58
Dec 2011
2.54
4.78
3.95
5.67
3.29
2.82
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2661. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
14836
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Notices
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on April 10, 2012, based on a complaint
filed by Graphics Properties Holdings,
Inc. of New Rochelle, New York
(‘‘GPH’’). 77 FR 21584 (April 10, 2012).
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain consumer electronics devices
and display devices and products
containing same, by reason of
infringement of various claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,650,327; U.S. Patent No.
6,816,145; and U.S. Patent No.
5,717,881. The notice of investigation
named numerous respondents,
including HTC Corporation of Taoyuan,
Taiwan; HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue,
Washington; LG Electronics, Inc. of
Seoul, South Korea; LG Electronics,
Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego,
California; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; Research
in Motion Ltd. of Ontario, Canada;
Research In Motion Corp. of Irving,
Texas; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., of
Seoul, South Korea; Samsung
Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield
Park, New Jersey; Samsung
Telecommunications America, LLC of
Richardson, Texas; Sony Corporation of
Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation of
America of New York, New York; Sony
Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California;
Sony Mobile Communications AB of
Lund, Sweden; Sony Mobile
Communications (USA) Inc. of Atlanta,
Georgia (collectively ‘‘the remaining
respondents’’); and Apple Inc. of
Cupertino, California (previously
terminated).
On January 15, 2013, GPH and the
remaining respondents filed joint a
motion to terminate the investigation on
the basis of settlement agreements. On
January 25, 2013, the Commission
investigative attorney filed a response in
support of the motion. No party
opposed the motion.
On January 28, 2013, the ALJ issued
the subject ID (Order No. 30) granting
the motion pursuant to section 210.21(b)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (19 CFR 21.21(b)). The
ALJ found no indication that
termination of the investigation based
on the settlement agreements would
have an adverse impact on the public
interest. No petitions for review of the
ID were filed.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID. The investigation is
terminated.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42).
Issued: March 1, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–05267 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—ASTM International
Standards
Notice is hereby given that, on
February 11, 2013, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
ASTM International (‘‘ASTM’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
additions or changes to its standards
development activities. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
ASTM has provided an updated list of
current, ongoing ASTM standards
activities originating between December
2012 and February 2013 designated as
Work Items. A complete listing of
ASTM Work Items, along with a brief
description of each, is available at
https://www.astm.org.
On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004
(69 FR 65226).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 12, 2012.
A notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on January 9, 2013 (78 FR 1884).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–05308 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
February 5, 2013, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc. (‘‘MSGIP
2.0’’) has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the
nature and objectives of the venture.
The notifications were filed for the
purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: American Association for
Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA),
Frederick, MD; American Electric
Power, Columbus, OH; Arizona Public
Service Company, Phoenix, AZ;
Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers, Washington, DC;
Battelle Pacific Northwest Lab,
Richland, WA; California Public
Utilities Commission, San Francisco,
CA; Clevest Solutions, Inc., Richmond,
British Columbia, CANADA; Climate
Talk Alliance, San Ramon, CA; Florida
Power & Light Company, Juno Beach,
FL; Utilities Telecom Council, Inc.,
Washington, DC; WiMAX Forum,
Solana Beach, CA; Hydro-Quebec,
Montreal, Quebec, CANADA; SunSpec
Alliance, Scotts Valley, CA; Tendril,
Boulder, CO; Ameren Services, St.
Louis, MO; CenterPoint Energy Houston
Electric, Houston, TX; New York
Independent System Operator, Inc.,
Rensselaer, NY; American Council of
Independent Laboratories, Washington,
DC; Lakeview Consulting Group,
Morgan Hill, CA; Grid2Home, Inc., San
Diego, CA; Homegrid Forum, Beaverton,
OR; Japan Smart Community Alliance,
Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, JAPAN;
Southern Company Services, Inc.,
Birmingham, AL; Systems Integration
Specialists Company, Inc. (SISCO),
Sterling Heights, MI; National Rural
Electric Cooperative Association
(NRECA), Arlington, VA; PJM
Interconnection, Norristown, PA;
Landis+Gyr Technology, Inc.,
Alpharetta, GA; DTE Energy, Detroit,
MI; Eaton Corporation, Arden, NC;
Buford Goff & Associates, Inc.,
Columbia, SC; FirstEnergy Service
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 45 (Thursday, March 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14835-14836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05267]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-836]
Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain
Consumer Electronics and Display Devices and Products Containing Same
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 30) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-
captioned investigation based on settlement agreements. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2661. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by
[[Page 14836]]
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on April 10, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Graphics Properties
Holdings, Inc. of New Rochelle, New York (``GPH''). 77 FR 21584 (April
10, 2012). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of certain consumer electronics
devices and display devices and products containing same, by reason of
infringement of various claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,650,327; U.S.
Patent No. 6,816,145; and U.S. Patent No. 5,717,881. The notice of
investigation named numerous respondents, including HTC Corporation of
Taoyuan, Taiwan; HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington; LG
Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, South Korea; LG Electronics, Mobilecomm
U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; Research in Motion Ltd. of Ontario,
Canada; Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas; Samsung Electronics
Co., Ltd., of Seoul, South Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of
Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of
Richardson, Texas; Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation
of America of New York, New York; Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego,
California; Sony Mobile Communications AB of Lund, Sweden; Sony Mobile
Communications (USA) Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (collectively ``the
remaining respondents''); and Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California
(previously terminated).
On January 15, 2013, GPH and the remaining respondents filed joint
a motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of settlement
agreements. On January 25, 2013, the Commission investigative attorney
filed a response in support of the motion. No party opposed the motion.
On January 28, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 30)
granting the motion pursuant to section 210.21(b) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 21.21(b)). The ALJ found no
indication that termination of the investigation based on the
settlement agreements would have an adverse impact on the public
interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The
investigation is terminated.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 210.42).
Issued: March 1, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-05267 Filed 3-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
