Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices and Products Containing Same, 14835-14836 [2013-05267]

Download as PDF 14835 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Notices Supervisory Auditor, Team B, Western Audit and Compliance, ONRR, telephone (303) 231–3741; email Michael.Curry@onrr.gov. Team B’s fax number is (303) 231–3473. Team B’s mailing address is Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Western Audit and Compliance Management, Team B, P.O. Box 25165, MS 62520B, Denver, Colorado 80225–0165. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 10, 1999, ONRR published a final rule titled ‘‘Amendments to Gas Valuation Regulations for Indian Leases’’ effective January 1, 2000 (64 FR 43506). The Indian gas valuation regulations apply to all gas production from Indian (tribal and allotted) oil and gas leases, except leases on the Osage Indian Reservation. The regulations require ONRR to publish major portion prices for each designated area not associated with an index zone for each production month beginning January 2000, as well as a due date for additional royalty payments. See 30 CFR 1206.174(a)(4)(ii). If you owe additional royalties based on a published major portion price, you must submit to ONRR, by the due date, an amended Form MMS–2014, Report of Sales and Royalty Remittance (which is valid while we update our form number to ONRR–2014 due to the reorganization). If you do not pay the additional royalties by the due date, ONRR will bill you late payment interest under 30 CFR 1218.54. ONRR will accrue the interest from the due date until we receive your payment and an amended Form MMS–2014. The table below lists the major portion prices for all designated areas not associated with an index zone. The due date is 60 days after the publication date of this notice. GAS MAJOR PORTION PRICES ($/MMBTU) FOR DESIGNATED AREAS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH AN INDEX ZONE ONRR-Designated areas Jan 2011 Blackfeet Reservation ...................................................................................... Fort Belknap .................................................................................................... Fort Berthold .................................................................................................... Fort Peck Reservation ..................................................................................... Navajo Allotted Leases in the Navajo Reservation ......................................... Rocky Boys Reservation ................................................................................. ONRR-Designated areas 3.45 5.09 4.34 6.58 4.16 3.84 May 2011 Blackfeet Reservation ...................................................................................... Fort Belknap .................................................................................................... Fort Berthold .................................................................................................... Fort Peck Reservation ..................................................................................... Navajo Allotted Leases in the Navajo Reservation ......................................... Rocky Boys Reservation ................................................................................. ONRR-Designated areas Dated: February 26, 2013. Gregory J. Gould, Director, Office of Natural Resources Revenue. [FR Doc. 2013–05284 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am] emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4310–T2–P Sep 2011 14:43 Mar 06, 2013 Jkt 229001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–836] Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices and Products Containing Same U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Jun 2011 Sfmt 4703 3.57 5.09 3.80 6.23 4.07 3.95 Oct 2011 3.17 4.99 4.48 6.27 3.78 3.54 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 30) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based on settlement agreements. The investigation is terminated. VerDate Mar<15>2010 3.20 5.13 4.03 7.06 4.05 3.64 3.55 5.11 3.68 6.22 4.04 3.82 Blackfeet Reservation ...................................................................................... Fort Belknap .................................................................................................... Fort Berthold .................................................................................................... Fort Peck Reservation ..................................................................................... Navajo Allotted Leases in the Navajo Reservation ......................................... Rocky Boys Reservation ................................................................................. For information on how to report additional royalties associated with major portion prices, please refer to our Dear Payor letter dated December 1, 1999, on our Web site at https:// www.onrr.gov/FM/PDFDocs/991201.pdf. Feb 2011 2.82 4.93 5.00 6.11 3.57 3.13 Mar 2011 3.29 4.96 4.12 6.39 3.70 3.63 Jul 2011 3.36 5.13 4.38 6.59 4.11 3.78 Nov 2011 2.68 4.81 4.87 6.42 3.38 3.00 Apr 2011 3.46 5.12 4.21 6.47 3.98 3.72 Aug 2011 3.22 5.10 4.29 5.64 4.14 3.58 Dec 2011 2.54 4.78 3.95 5.67 3.29 2.82 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2661. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1 14836 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Notices contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted this investigation on April 10, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc. of New Rochelle, New York (‘‘GPH’’). 77 FR 21584 (April 10, 2012). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain consumer electronics devices and display devices and products containing same, by reason of infringement of various claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,650,327; U.S. Patent No. 6,816,145; and U.S. Patent No. 5,717,881. The notice of investigation named numerous respondents, including HTC Corporation of Taoyuan, Taiwan; HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington; LG Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, South Korea; LG Electronics, Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; Research in Motion Ltd. of Ontario, Canada; Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., of Seoul, South Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas; Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation of America of New York, New York; Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California; Sony Mobile Communications AB of Lund, Sweden; Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (collectively ‘‘the remaining respondents’’); and Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California (previously terminated). On January 15, 2013, GPH and the remaining respondents filed joint a motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of settlement agreements. On January 25, 2013, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. No party opposed the motion. On January 28, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 30) granting the motion pursuant to section 210.21(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 21.21(b)). The ALJ found no indication that termination of the investigation based on the settlement agreements would have an adverse impact on the public interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:43 Mar 06, 2013 Jkt 229001 The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Issued: March 1, 2013. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–05267 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—ASTM International Standards Notice is hereby given that, on February 11, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), ASTM International (‘‘ASTM’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between December 2012 and February 2013 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at https://www.astm.org. On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226). The last notification was filed with the Department on December 12, 2012. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 9, 2013 (78 FR 1884). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2013–05308 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on February 5, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc. (‘‘MSGIP 2.0’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), Frederick, MD; American Electric Power, Columbus, OH; Arizona Public Service Company, Phoenix, AZ; Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, Washington, DC; Battelle Pacific Northwest Lab, Richland, WA; California Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco, CA; Clevest Solutions, Inc., Richmond, British Columbia, CANADA; Climate Talk Alliance, San Ramon, CA; Florida Power & Light Company, Juno Beach, FL; Utilities Telecom Council, Inc., Washington, DC; WiMAX Forum, Solana Beach, CA; Hydro-Quebec, Montreal, Quebec, CANADA; SunSpec Alliance, Scotts Valley, CA; Tendril, Boulder, CO; Ameren Services, St. Louis, MO; CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, Houston, TX; New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Rensselaer, NY; American Council of Independent Laboratories, Washington, DC; Lakeview Consulting Group, Morgan Hill, CA; Grid2Home, Inc., San Diego, CA; Homegrid Forum, Beaverton, OR; Japan Smart Community Alliance, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, JAPAN; Southern Company Services, Inc., Birmingham, AL; Systems Integration Specialists Company, Inc. (SISCO), Sterling Heights, MI; National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA), Arlington, VA; PJM Interconnection, Norristown, PA; Landis+Gyr Technology, Inc., Alpharetta, GA; DTE Energy, Detroit, MI; Eaton Corporation, Arden, NC; Buford Goff & Associates, Inc., Columbia, SC; FirstEnergy Service E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 45 (Thursday, March 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14835-14836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05267]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-836]


Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain 
Consumer Electronics and Display Devices and Products Containing Same

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 30) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-
captioned investigation based on settlement agreements. The 
investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2661. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by

[[Page 14836]]

contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on April 10, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Graphics Properties 
Holdings, Inc. of New Rochelle, New York (``GPH''). 77 FR 21584 (April 
10, 2012). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain consumer electronics 
devices and display devices and products containing same, by reason of 
infringement of various claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,650,327; U.S. 
Patent No. 6,816,145; and U.S. Patent No. 5,717,881. The notice of 
investigation named numerous respondents, including HTC Corporation of 
Taoyuan, Taiwan; HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington; LG 
Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, South Korea; LG Electronics, Mobilecomm 
U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of 
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; Research in Motion Ltd. of Ontario, 
Canada; Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas; Samsung Electronics 
Co., Ltd., of Seoul, South Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of 
Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of 
Richardson, Texas; Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation 
of America of New York, New York; Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, 
California; Sony Mobile Communications AB of Lund, Sweden; Sony Mobile 
Communications (USA) Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (collectively ``the 
remaining respondents''); and Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California 
(previously terminated).
    On January 15, 2013, GPH and the remaining respondents filed joint 
a motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of settlement 
agreements. On January 25, 2013, the Commission investigative attorney 
filed a response in support of the motion. No party opposed the motion.
    On January 28, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 30) 
granting the motion pursuant to section 210.21(b) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 21.21(b)). The ALJ found no 
indication that termination of the investigation based on the 
settlement agreements would have an adverse impact on the public 
interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The 
investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 
CFR 210.42).

     Issued: March 1, 2013.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-05267 Filed 3-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.