Proposed Information Collection Request of the Resource Justification Model (RJM); Comment Request, 14838-14839 [2013-05264]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14838
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Notices
(individual member), Dalton, GA; Tracy
Backus (individual member), Mount
Laurel, NJ; Amanda Kaminsky
(individual member), New York, NY;
Michael Deane (individual member),
New York, NY; N’Nekka Butler
(individual member), Washington, DC;
Pauline Souza (individual member), San
Francisco, CA; Eric Raff (individual
member), Milpitas, CA; Doug Sams
(individual member), Portland, OR; Beth
Stroshane (individual member), Seattle,
WA; Christopher R Schaffner
(individual member), Concord, MA;
Holly Debrodt (individual member),
Portland, OR; Justin M. Hardy
(individual member), New York, NY;
Marion J. White (individual member),
San Jose, CA; Anna Bevan (individual
member), Royersford, PA; and Michel
Couvreux (individual member),
Petaluma, CA.
The Joint Venture was formed as a
Delaware non-stock member
corporation. The general area of HPDC’s
planned activities are to develop,
maintain and evolve the Healthy
Product Declaration format (the ‘‘HPD
Standard’’) as an open standard that
meets the needs of building product
consumers for reporting of product
content and associated health
information relating to individual
building products and materials. In
pursuit of this purpose, the Joint
Venture may engage in all or some of
the following activities: (a) Develop,
maintain and support the HPD Standard
and related standards (the
‘‘Specifications’’); (b) promote such
Specifications and solutions worldwide;
(c) provide for testing and conformity
assessment of implementations in order
to ensure and/or facilitate compliance
with Specifications; (d) operate a
branding program based upon
distinctive trademarks to create high
customer awareness of, demand for, and
confidence in products designed in
compliance with Specifications; and (e)
undertake such other activities as may
from time to time be appropriate to
further the purposes and achieve the
goals set forth above.
Membership in the Joint Venture
remains open and the Joint Venture
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–05312 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act Of 1993—National Center for
Manufacturing Sciences, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
February 5, 2013, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
National Center for Manufacturing
Sciences, Inc. (‘‘NCMS’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
the following members have been added
as parties to this venture: Anglicotech,
LLC, Washington, DC; Applied
Technology Integration, Inc. (ATI),
Maumee, OH; BDM Associates, Long
Beach, CA; Equipois, Inc., Los Angeles,
CA; General Motors LLC, Pontiac, MI;
KALO, LLC, Arlington, VA; Industrial
Technology Institute, dba Michigan
Manufacturing Technology Center
(MMTC), Plymouth, MI; Macro USA
Corporation, McClellan, CA; Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ), Lansing, MI; Onodi Tool and
Engineering Company, Melvindale, MI;
One Network Enterprises, Inc., Dallas,
TX; PARC, a Xerox Company, Palo Alto,
CA; The Procter & Gamble Company,
Cincinnati, OH; QinetiQ North America,
Waltham, MA; Russells Technical
Products, Inc., Holland, MI; Siemens
Product Lifecycle Management
Software, Inc., Plano, TX; Tactical Edge,
LLC, San Diego, CA; Terascala, Inc.,
Avon, MA; Tracen Technologies, Inc.,
Manassas, VA; Troika Solutions, LLC,
Bloomington, MN; University of
Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL; University of
Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH;
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI;
Whitney, Bradley & Brown, Inc., Reston,
VA; and Workforce Intelligence
Network of Southeast Michigan (WIN),
Detroit, MI.
Also, the following members have
withdrawn as parties to this venture:
Albright Strategy Group, LLC,
Morristown, NJ; Automated Precision,
Inc., Rockville, MD; Battelle,
Centerville, OH; Betis Group, Inc.,
Arlington, VA; CIMS at Rochester
Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY;
Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc.,
Newberg, OR; Clockwork Solutions,
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Inc., Austin, TX; Diamond Nets Inc.,
Everson, WA; Eastern Michigan
University, Ypsilanti, MI; Edison
Welding Institute, Columbus, OH;
Emerson Process Management, Billerica,
MA; Henry Ford Healthcare, Detroit, MI;
Honeywell Process Solutions, Phoenix,
AZ; InTheWorks, Bainbridge Island,
WA; Knovalent, Ann Arbor, MI; The
Marlin Group, Inc., Arlington, VA; OBD
Solutions, Phoenix, AZ; Picometrix,
LLC, Ann Arbor, MI; Plasan Carbon
Composites, Bennington, VT; Osterhout
Group, Inc., San Francisco, CA; The
POM Group, Auburn Hills, MI; QinetiQ,
Reston, VA; SenGenuity, Westbrook,
ME; SpaceForm Welding Solutions, Inc.,
Madison Heights, MI; Toyota Motor
Engineering & Manufacturing NA,
Erlanger, KY; University of Texas–
Austin, Austin, TX; and Wend
Associates, Inc., Marine City, MI.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and NCMS
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On February 20, 1987, NCMS filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on March 17, 1987 (52 FR 8375).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on February April 30,
2012. A notice was published in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on June 8, 2012 (77 FR
34068).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–05305 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Proposed Information Collection
Request of the Resource Justification
Model (RJM); Comment Request
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
14839
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 45 / Thursday, March 7, 2013 / Notices
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that required
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained
by contacting the office listed below in
the addressee section of this notice or by
accessing: https://www.doleta.gov/
OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
May 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to John
Ake, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training
Administration, Office of
Unemployment Insurance, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Frances
Perkins Bldg. Room S–4524,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone
number (202) 693–2865 (this is not a
toll-free number). Email address is
Ake.John@dol.gov and fax number is
I. Background
The collection of actual
Unemployment Insurance (UI)
administrative cost data from states’
accounting records and projected
expenditures for upcoming years is
accomplished through the Resource
Justification Model (RJM) data
collection instrument. The data
collected consists of program
expenditures and hours worked by state
staff, broken out by functional activity,
for the most recent two years of
expenditures. This actual cost data
informs ETA’s administrative funding
allocation model so that state UI
program administration funds are
allocated in proportion to the level of
state activities.
Total
respondents
Frequency
Crosswalk ........................
ACCT SUM ......................
RJM 1–6 ..........................
Narrative ..........................
TOTALS ....................
53
53
53
53
........................
Annually ..........................
Annually ..........................
Annually ..........................
Annually ..........................
.........................................
Dated: Signed in Washington, DC, on this
25th day of February, 2013.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and
Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2013–05264 Filed 3–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
Sunshine Act Meeting
The Legal Services
Corporation’s Institutional
Advancement Committee will meet
telephonically on March 12, 2013 and
March 26, 2013. Each meeting will
commence at 4:00 p.m., Eastern
DATE AND TIME:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
III. Current Actions
Type of Review: Extension without
change.
Title: Resource Justification Model.
OMB Number: 1205–0430.
Affected Public: State Workforce
Agencies.
Total Respondents: 53 State
Workforce Agencies.
Frequency: Annually.
Total Responses: 53 respondents x 4
annual reports submitted = 212
responses
Average Estimated Response Time:
123 hours.
Total Estimated Burden Hours: 6,519.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is
particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
Form Activity
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $0.
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
(202) 693–2874 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Total
responses
53
53
53
53
212
Average time per
response
108 hrs. ...........................
4 hours ............................
3 hours ............................
8 hours ............................
.........................................
Standard Time (EST), and will continue
until the conclusion of the Committee’s
agenda.
LOCATION: F. William McCalpin
Conference Center, Legal Services
Corporation Headquarters, 3333 K Street
NW, Washington DC 20007.
STATUS OF MEETING: Closed. Upon a vote
of the Board of Directors, the meetings
may be closed to the public to discuss
prospective funders for LSC’s
development activities and 40th
anniversary celebration.
A verbatim written transcript will be
made of each closed session meeting of
the Institutional Advancement
Committee. The transcript of any
portion of the closed sessions falling
within the relevant provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(9) will not be available
for public inspection. A copy of the
General Counsel’s Certification that, in
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total
estimated
burden
5,724 hrs.
212 hrs.
159 hours.
424 hours.
6,519 hrs
his opinion, the closings are authorized
by law will be available upon request.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1.
Discussion of prospective funders for
LSC’s development activities and 40th
anniversary celebration
2. Consider and act on adjournment of
meeting
CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:
Katherine Ward, Executive Assistant to
the Vice President & General Counsel, at
(202) 295–1500. Questions may be sent
by electronic mail to
FR_NOTICE_QUESTIONS@lsc.gov.
ACCESSIBILITY: LSC complies with the
Americans with Disabilities Act and
Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation
Act. Upon request, meeting notices and
materials will be made available in
alternative formats to accommodate
individuals with disabilities.
Individuals who need other
accommodations due to disability in
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 45 (Thursday, March 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14838-14839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05264]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Proposed Information Collection Request of the Resource
Justification Model (RJM); Comment Request
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed
[[Page 14839]]
and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that required data can be provided in the
desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is
minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the
impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly
assessed.
A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be
obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section
of this notice or by accessing: https://www.doleta.gov/OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before May 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to John Ake, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training Administration, Office of Unemployment
Insurance, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Frances Perkins Bldg. Room S-
4524, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-2865 (this is
not a toll-free number). Email address is Ake.John@dol.gov and fax
number is (202) 693-2874 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The collection of actual Unemployment Insurance (UI) administrative
cost data from states' accounting records and projected expenditures
for upcoming years is accomplished through the Resource Justification
Model (RJM) data collection instrument. The data collected consists of
program expenditures and hours worked by state staff, broken out by
functional activity, for the most recent two years of expenditures.
This actual cost data informs ETA's administrative funding allocation
model so that state UI program administration funds are allocated in
proportion to the level of state activities.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments
which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the information collection on those
who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions
Type of Review: Extension without change.
Title: Resource Justification Model.
OMB Number: 1205-0430.
Affected Public: State Workforce Agencies.
Total Respondents: 53 State Workforce Agencies.
Frequency: Annually.
Total Responses: 53 respondents x 4 annual reports submitted = 212
responses
Average Estimated Response Time: 123 hours.
Total Estimated Burden Hours: 6,519.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Total Average time Total estimated
Form Activity respondents Frequency responses per response burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crosswalk.................... 53 Annually....... 53 108 hrs........ 5,724 hrs.
ACCT SUM..................... 53 Annually....... 53 4 hours........ 212 hrs.
RJM 1-6...................... 53 Annually....... 53 3 hours........ 159 hours.
Narrative.................... 53 Annually....... 53 8 hours........ 424 hours.
TOTALS................... .............. ............... 212 ............... 6,519 hrs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintaining): $0.
Dated: Signed in Washington, DC, on this 25th day of February,
2013.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2013-05264 Filed 3-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P