Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From Mexico: Notice of Settlement of NAFTA Proceedings, 14270-14271 [2013-05060]
Download as PDF
14270
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2013 / Notices
calculated rate that reflects the behavior
of exporters without the discipline of an
order or suspension agreement in place,
under certain circumstances, the
Department may select a more recently
calculated rate to report to the ITC.
Thus, we determined that the margins
likely to prevail were the order revoked
would be above de minimis. As stated
above, Domestic Parties submitted
comments in support of our Preliminary
Results, and we did not receive
comments from any respondent
interested party. Therefore, for the
reasons explained in the Preliminary
Results, we continue to determine that
the margins likely to prevail were the
Order revoked would be above de
minimis.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
the Department determines that
revocation of the Order on folding gift
boxes from the PRC would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the rate listed below:
for all imports of subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation of
the Order will be the date of publication
in the Federal Register of this notice of
final results and continuation. Pursuant
to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the
Department intends to initiate the next
five-year review of the Order not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: February 25, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–05055 Filed 3–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–822]
Exporter
All exporters 5 ............
Weighted-average
margin
Above de minimis.
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
From Mexico: Notice of Settlement of
NAFTA Proceedings
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is announcing the
settlement of proceedings before five
separate North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) binational dispute
settlement panels.
DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mykhaylo Gryzlov, Office of the Chief
Counsel for Import Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the Order on folding gift
boxes from the PRC would likely lead to
a continuation or recurrence of dumping
and material injury to an industry in the
United States, pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department
hereby orders the continuation of the
antidumping duty order on folding gift
boxes from the PRC. U.S. Customs and
Border Protection will continue to
collect antidumping duty cash deposits
at the rates in effect at the time of entry
5 Max Fortune Industrial Ltd. was excluded from
the Order. See Order.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Mar 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
Background
On July 27, 1999, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel sheet and strip in coils
from Mexico (SSSS from Mexico). See
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from Mexico, 64 FR 40560 (July 27,
1999) (notice of amended LTFV
determination and antidumping duty
order) (Order). Since the Order was
issued, ThyssenKrupp Mexinox S.A. de
C.V. and Mexinox USA, Inc. (together,
Mexinox) have challenged various
aspects of five administrative reviews 1
1 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 71 FR 76978 (December 22, 2006) (admin.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the Order before NAFTA panels.2 On
August 10, 2011, the Department
revoked the Order, effective July 25,
2010, as a result of a sunset review. See
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from Germany, Italy and Mexico, 76 FR
49450 (August 10, 2011) (revocation of
the antidumping duty orders). As a
result of this revocation, the Department
instructed Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to terminate the
suspension of liquidation and collection
of cash deposits of the subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse on or after July 25, 2010.
On September 20, 2012, the
Department and Mexinox entered into a
Settlement Agreement that fully
resolves all pending NAFTA disputes
brought by Mexinox. Pursuant to this
settlement of litigation, the Department
and Mexinox agreed to a termination of
the following cases (collectively, the
five NAFTA disputes):
1. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2004–2005
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2007–1904–01;
2. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2005–2006
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2008–1904–01;
3. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2006–2007
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2009–1904–02;
4. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2007–2008
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2010–1904–01;
5. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2008–2009
review); Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from Mexico, 73 FR 7710 (February 11, 2008)
(admin. review), as amended by 73 FR 14215
(March 17, 2008); Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in
Coils from Mexico, 74 FR 6365 (February 9, 2009);
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 75 FR 6627 (February 10, 2010) (admin.
review), as amended by 75 FR 17122 (April 05,
2010); Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 76 FR 2332 (January 13, 2011) (admin.
review), as amended by 76 FR 76 FR 9542 (February
18, 2011).
2 Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, North
American Stainless, and AK Steel Corporation
(collectively, the domestic industry or petitioners)
challenged certain aspects of the final results of
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 71 FR 76978 (December 22, 2006) (admin.
review). On April 14, 2010, the NAFTA panel
affirmed the final results with respect to all aspects
challenged by petitioners.
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2013 / Notices
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2011–1904–01.
Pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement, the five NAFTA disputes
have been dismissed. Pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement, following the
publication of this notice, the
Department will instruct CBP to assess
appropriate antidumping duties on the
affected entries of the subject
merchandise and liquidate such entries
as indicated below.
Assessment of Duties
Pursuant to the terms of the
Settlement Agreement, for any entries of
the subject merchandise produced and
exported by Mexinox that were entered
or withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption from July 1, 2004 through
June 30, 2005, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate the entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement
Agreement, for any entries of the subject
merchandise produced and exported by
Mexinox that were entered or
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption from July 1, 2005 through
June 30, 2009, the Department will
instruct CBP to assess duties at the cash
deposit rate in effect at the time of entry.
Dated: February 26, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–05060 Filed 3–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Availability of Seats for the Monterey
Bay National Marine Sanctuary
Advisory Council
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice and request for
applications.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The ONMS is seeking
applications for the following vacant
seats on the Monterey Bay National
Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council:
Commercial Fishing. Applicants are
chosen based upon their particular
expertise and experience in relation to
the seat for which they are applying;
community and professional affiliations;
philosophy regarding the protection and
management of marine resources; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Mar 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
possibly the length of residence in the
area affected by the sanctuary.
Applicants who are chosen should
expect to serve until February 2016.
DATES: Applications are due by April 1,
2013.
ADDRESSES: Application kits may be
obtained from 99 Pacific Street, Bldg.
455A, Monterey, CA, 93940 or online at
https://montereybay.noaa.gov/.
Completed applications should be sent
to the same address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Sommers, 99 Pacific Street,
Bldg. 455A, Monterey, CA, 93940, (831)
647–4247,
Jacqueline.sommers@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
MBNMS Advisory Council is a
community-based group that was
established in March 1994 to assure
continued public participation in the
management of the Sanctuary. Since its
establishment, the Advisory Council has
played a vital role in decisions affecting
the Sanctuary along the central
California coast.
The Advisory Council’s twenty voting
members represent a variety of local
user groups, as well as the general
public, plus seven local, state and
federal governmental jurisdictions. In
addition, the respective managers or
superintendents for the four California
National Marine Sanctuaries (Channel
Islands National Marine Sanctuary,
Cordell Bank National Marine
Sanctuary, Gulf of the Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary and the
Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary) and the Elkhorn Slough
National Estuarine Research Reserve sit
as non-voting members.
Four working groups support the
Advisory Council: The Research
Activity Panel (‘‘RAP’’) chaired by the
Research Representative, the Sanctuary
Education Panel (‘‘SEP’’) chaired by the
Education Representative, the
Conservation Working Group (‘‘CWG’’)
chaired by the Conservation
Representative, and the Business and
Tourism Activity Panel (‘‘BTAP’’) cochaired by the Business/Industry
Representative and Tourism
Representative, each dealing with
matters concerning research, education,
conservation and human use. The
working groups are composed of experts
from the appropriate fields of interest
and meet monthly, or bimonthly,
serving as invaluable advisors to the
Advisory Council and the Sanctuary
Superintendent.
The Advisory Council represents the
coordination link between the
Sanctuary and the state and federal
management agencies, user groups,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14271
researchers, educators, policy makers,
and other various groups that help to
focus efforts and attention on the central
California coastal and marine
ecosystems.
The Advisory Council functions in an
advisory capacity to the Sanctuary
Superintendent and is instrumental in
helping develop policies, program goals,
and identify education, outreach,
research, long-term monitoring, resource
protection, and revenue enhancement
priorities. The Advisory Council works
in concert with the Sanctuary
Superintendent by keeping him or her
informed about issues of concern
throughout the Sanctuary, offering
recommendations on specific issues,
and aiding the Superintendent in
achieving the goals of the Sanctuary
program within the context of
California’s marine programs and
policies.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. Sections 1431, et seq.
(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog
Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary Program)
Dated: February 26, 2013.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director, Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries, National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–05011 Filed 3–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DoD–2012–OS–0129]
Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed
Amendments
Joint Service Committee on
Military Justice (JSC), Department of
Defense.
ACTION: Notice of response to public
comments on proposed amendments to
the Manual for Courts-Martial, United
States (2012 ed.)(MCM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Joint Service Committee
on Military Justice (JSC) is publishing
final proposed amendments to the
Manual for Courts-Martial, United
States (MCM) to the Department of
Defense. The proposed changes concern
the rules of procedure and evidence and
the punitive articles applicable in trials
by courts-martial. These proposed
changes have not been coordinated
within the Department of Defense under
DoD Directive 5500.1, ‘‘Preparation,
Processing and Coordinating
Legislation, Executive Orders,
Proclamations, Views Letters and
Testimony,’’ June 15, 2007, and do not
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14270-14271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05060]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-822]
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From Mexico: Notice of
Settlement of NAFTA Proceedings
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is announcing the
settlement of proceedings before five separate North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) binational dispute settlement panels.
DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mykhaylo Gryzlov, Office of the Chief
Counsel for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-0833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 27, 1999, the Department published the antidumping duty
order on stainless steel sheet and strip in coils from Mexico (SSSS
from Mexico). See Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico,
64 FR 40560 (July 27, 1999) (notice of amended LTFV determination and
antidumping duty order) (Order). Since the Order was issued,
ThyssenKrupp Mexinox S.A. de C.V. and Mexinox USA, Inc. (together,
Mexinox) have challenged various aspects of five administrative reviews
\1\ of the Order before NAFTA panels.\2\ On August 10, 2011, the
Department revoked the Order, effective July 25, 2010, as a result of a
sunset review. See Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Germany, Italy and Mexico, 76 FR 49450 (August 10, 2011) (revocation of
the antidumping duty orders). As a result of this revocation, the
Department instructed Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to terminate
the suspension of liquidation and collection of cash deposits of the
subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse on or after
July 25, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico, 71 FR
76978 (December 22, 2006) (admin. review); Stainless Steel Sheet and
Strip in Coils from Mexico, 73 FR 7710 (February 11, 2008) (admin.
review), as amended by 73 FR 14215 (March 17, 2008); Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico, 74 FR 6365 (February 9, 2009);
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico, 75 FR 6627
(February 10, 2010) (admin. review), as amended by 75 FR 17122
(April 05, 2010); Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 76 FR 2332 (January 13, 2011) (admin. review), as amended by
76 FR 76 FR 9542 (February 18, 2011).
\2\ Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, North American Stainless, and
AK Steel Corporation (collectively, the domestic industry or
petitioners) challenged certain aspects of the final results of
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico, 71 FR 76978
(December 22, 2006) (admin. review). On April 14, 2010, the NAFTA
panel affirmed the final results with respect to all aspects
challenged by petitioners.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 20, 2012, the Department and Mexinox entered into a
Settlement Agreement that fully resolves all pending NAFTA disputes
brought by Mexinox. Pursuant to this settlement of litigation, the
Department and Mexinox agreed to a termination of the following cases
(collectively, the five NAFTA disputes):
1. In the Matter of Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico: Final Results of the 2004-2005 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA-MEX-2007-1904-01;
2. In the Matter of Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico: Final Results of the 2005-2006 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA-MEX-2008-1904-01;
3. In the Matter of Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico: Final Results of the 2006-2007 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA-MEX-2009-1904-02;
4. In the Matter of Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico: Final Results of the 2007-2008 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA-MEX-2010-1904-01;
5. In the Matter of Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico: Final Results of the 2008-2009
[[Page 14271]]
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Secretariat File No. USA-MEX-
2011-1904-01.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the five NAFTA disputes have
been dismissed. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, following the
publication of this notice, the Department will instruct CBP to assess
appropriate antidumping duties on the affected entries of the subject
merchandise and liquidate such entries as indicated below.
Assessment of Duties
Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, for any entries
of the subject merchandise produced and exported by Mexinox that were
entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption from July 1, 2004
through June 30, 2005, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate
the entries without regard to antidumping duties. Pursuant to the terms
of the Settlement Agreement, for any entries of the subject merchandise
produced and exported by Mexinox that were entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2009, the
Department will instruct CBP to assess duties at the cash deposit rate
in effect at the time of entry.
Dated: February 26, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-05060 Filed 3-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P