Folding Gift Boxes From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Second Sunset Review and Continuation of the Antidumping Duty Order, 14269-14270 [2013-05055]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2013 / Notices
14. Normal Value.
15. Factor Valuations.
16. Currency Conversion.
17. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of
the Act.
18. Conclusion.
[FR Doc. 2013–05042 Filed 3–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–866]
Folding Gift Boxes From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the
Second Sunset Review and
Continuation of the Antidumping Duty
Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 26, 2012, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of the second sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on folding gift boxes from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). We gave
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the preliminary results.
The Folding Gift Boxes Fair Trade
Coalition (‘‘Domestic Parties’’) 1 filed
comments in support of the
Department’s preliminary results and no
other party submitted comments.
Further, as a result of the
determinations by the Department and
the International Trade Commission
(‘‘ITC’’) that revocation of the
antidumping duty order would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of
dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of the antidumping duty
order.
DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Demitri Kalogeropoulos, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2623.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On October 26, 2012, the Department
published the preliminary results 2 of
1 The Folding Gift Boxes Fair Trade Coalition is
comprised of Harvard Folding Gift Box Company,
Inc. and Graphic Packaging International, Inc., both
U.S. producers of folding gift boxes.
2 See Folding Gift Boxes From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Mar 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
the second sunset review on the
antidumping duty order 3 on folding gift
boxes from the PRC. We invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. Domestic Parties
filed comments in support of the
Department’s Preliminary Results and
no other party submitted comments.
Due to the complex issues discussed in
the Preliminary Results, the Department
has conducted a full sunset review
pursuant to section 75l(c)(5)(C) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’).
On December 10, 2012, the ITC
determined, pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act, that revocation of the Order
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.4
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
certain folding gift boxes. Folding gift
boxes are a type of folding or knockdown carton manufactured from paper
or paperboard. Folding gift boxes are
produced from a variety of recycled and
virgin paper or paperboard materials,
including, but not limited to, claycoated paper or paperboard and kraft
(bleached or unbleached) paper or
paperboard. The scope of the order
excludes gift boxes manufactured from
paper or paperboard of a thickness of
more than 0.8 millimeters, corrugated
paperboard, or paper mache. The scope
also excludes those gift boxes for which
no side of the box, when assembled, is
at least nine inches in length.
Folding gift boxes included in the
scope are typically decorated with a
holiday motif using various processes,
including printing, embossing,
debossing, and foil stamping, but may
also be plain white or printed with a
single color. The subject merchandise
includes folding gift boxes, with or
without handles, whether finished or
unfinished, and whether in one-piece or
multi-piece configuration. One-piece
gift boxes are die-cut or otherwise
formed so that the top, bottom, and
sides form a single, contiguous unit.
Two-piece gift boxes are those with a
folded bottom and a folded top as
separate pieces. Folding gift boxes are
generally packaged in shrink-wrap,
cellophane, or other packaging
Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order, 77 FR 65361 (October 26, 2012)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
3 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Folding Gift Boxes From the People’s Republic of
China, 67 FR 864 (January 8, 2002) (‘‘Order’’).
4 See Folding Gift Boxes from China: Investigation
No. 731–TA–921 (Second Review), USITC
Publication 4365 (November 2012).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14269
materials, in single or multi-box packs
for sale to the retail customer. The scope
excludes folding gift boxes that have a
retailer’s name, logo, trademark or
similar company information printed
prominently on the box’s top exterior
(such folding gift boxes are often known
as ‘‘not-for-resale’’ gift boxes or ‘‘giveaway’’ gift boxes and may be provided
by department and specialty stores at no
charge to their retail customers). The
scope of the order also excludes folding
gift boxes where both the outside of the
box is a single color and the box is not
packaged in shrink-wrap, cellophane,
other resin-based packaging films, or
paperboard.
Imports of the subject merchandise
are classified under Harmonized Tariff
Schedules of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 4819.20.0040
and 4819.50.4060. These subheadings
also cover products that are outside the
scope of the order. Furthermore,
although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Final Determination of Likelihood of
Continuation or Recurrence of
Dumping
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department preliminarily determined
that dumping would likely continue or
recur if the Order were revoked, because
the Department found dumping above
de minimis levels in the investigation
segment of this proceeding, and we
determined that folding gift box imports
from the PRC have been increasing in
volume during the period of this sunset
review. Thus, since issuance of the
Order, dumping has continued at rates
exceeding de minimis levels, which
suggests that dumping is likely to
continue if the Order is revoked.
As stated above, Domestic Parties
submitted comments in support of our
Preliminary Results, and we did not
receive comment from any respondent
interested party. Therefore, for the
reasons explained in the Preliminary
Results, we continue to determine
dumping would likely continue or recur
if the Order were revoked.
Final Determination of Magnitude of
the Dumping Margin Likely To Prevail
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department noted that section 752(c)(3)
of the Act provides that the
administering authority shall provide to
the ITC the magnitude of the margin of
dumping that is likely to prevail if the
order were revoked. While normally, the
Department will select a margin from
the final determination in the
investigation because that is the only
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
14270
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 5, 2013 / Notices
calculated rate that reflects the behavior
of exporters without the discipline of an
order or suspension agreement in place,
under certain circumstances, the
Department may select a more recently
calculated rate to report to the ITC.
Thus, we determined that the margins
likely to prevail were the order revoked
would be above de minimis. As stated
above, Domestic Parties submitted
comments in support of our Preliminary
Results, and we did not receive
comments from any respondent
interested party. Therefore, for the
reasons explained in the Preliminary
Results, we continue to determine that
the margins likely to prevail were the
Order revoked would be above de
minimis.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
the Department determines that
revocation of the Order on folding gift
boxes from the PRC would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the rate listed below:
for all imports of subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation of
the Order will be the date of publication
in the Federal Register of this notice of
final results and continuation. Pursuant
to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the
Department intends to initiate the next
five-year review of the Order not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: February 25, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–05055 Filed 3–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–822]
Exporter
All exporters 5 ............
Weighted-average
margin
Above de minimis.
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
From Mexico: Notice of Settlement of
NAFTA Proceedings
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is announcing the
settlement of proceedings before five
separate North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) binational dispute
settlement panels.
DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mykhaylo Gryzlov, Office of the Chief
Counsel for Import Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the Order on folding gift
boxes from the PRC would likely lead to
a continuation or recurrence of dumping
and material injury to an industry in the
United States, pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department
hereby orders the continuation of the
antidumping duty order on folding gift
boxes from the PRC. U.S. Customs and
Border Protection will continue to
collect antidumping duty cash deposits
at the rates in effect at the time of entry
5 Max Fortune Industrial Ltd. was excluded from
the Order. See Order.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Mar 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
Background
On July 27, 1999, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel sheet and strip in coils
from Mexico (SSSS from Mexico). See
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from Mexico, 64 FR 40560 (July 27,
1999) (notice of amended LTFV
determination and antidumping duty
order) (Order). Since the Order was
issued, ThyssenKrupp Mexinox S.A. de
C.V. and Mexinox USA, Inc. (together,
Mexinox) have challenged various
aspects of five administrative reviews 1
1 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 71 FR 76978 (December 22, 2006) (admin.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the Order before NAFTA panels.2 On
August 10, 2011, the Department
revoked the Order, effective July 25,
2010, as a result of a sunset review. See
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from Germany, Italy and Mexico, 76 FR
49450 (August 10, 2011) (revocation of
the antidumping duty orders). As a
result of this revocation, the Department
instructed Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to terminate the
suspension of liquidation and collection
of cash deposits of the subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse on or after July 25, 2010.
On September 20, 2012, the
Department and Mexinox entered into a
Settlement Agreement that fully
resolves all pending NAFTA disputes
brought by Mexinox. Pursuant to this
settlement of litigation, the Department
and Mexinox agreed to a termination of
the following cases (collectively, the
five NAFTA disputes):
1. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2004–2005
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2007–1904–01;
2. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2005–2006
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2008–1904–01;
3. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2006–2007
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2009–1904–02;
4. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2007–2008
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Secretariat File No. USA–MEX–
2010–1904–01;
5. In the Matter of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico:
Final Results of the 2008–2009
review); Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
from Mexico, 73 FR 7710 (February 11, 2008)
(admin. review), as amended by 73 FR 14215
(March 17, 2008); Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in
Coils from Mexico, 74 FR 6365 (February 9, 2009);
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 75 FR 6627 (February 10, 2010) (admin.
review), as amended by 75 FR 17122 (April 05,
2010); Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 76 FR 2332 (January 13, 2011) (admin.
review), as amended by 76 FR 76 FR 9542 (February
18, 2011).
2 Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, North
American Stainless, and AK Steel Corporation
(collectively, the domestic industry or petitioners)
challenged certain aspects of the final results of
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from
Mexico, 71 FR 76978 (December 22, 2006) (admin.
review). On April 14, 2010, the NAFTA panel
affirmed the final results with respect to all aspects
challenged by petitioners.
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14269-14270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05055]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-866]
Folding Gift Boxes From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of the Second Sunset Review and Continuation of the Antidumping
Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 26, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the
``Department'') published the preliminary results of the second sunset
review of the antidumping duty order on folding gift boxes from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC''). We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. The Folding Gift
Boxes Fair Trade Coalition (``Domestic Parties'') \1\ filed comments in
support of the Department's preliminary results and no other party
submitted comments. Further, as a result of the determinations by the
Department and the International Trade Commission (``ITC'') that
revocation of the antidumping duty order would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of the antidumping duty order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Folding Gift Boxes Fair Trade Coalition is comprised of
Harvard Folding Gift Box Company, Inc. and Graphic Packaging
International, Inc., both U.S. producers of folding gift boxes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Demitri Kalogeropoulos, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2623.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 26, 2012, the Department published the preliminary
results \2\ of the second sunset review on the antidumping duty order
\3\ on folding gift boxes from the PRC. We invited interested parties
to comment on the Preliminary Results. Domestic Parties filed comments
in support of the Department's Preliminary Results and no other party
submitted comments. Due to the complex issues discussed in the
Preliminary Results, the Department has conducted a full sunset review
pursuant to section 75l(c)(5)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(``the Act'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Folding Gift Boxes From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order, 77 FR 65361 (October 26, 2012) (``Preliminary
Results'').
\3\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Folding Gift
Boxes From the People's Republic of China, 67 FR 864 (January 8,
2002) (``Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 10, 2012, the ITC determined, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act, that revocation of the Order would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Folding Gift Boxes from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-
921 (Second Review), USITC Publication 4365 (November 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are certain folding gift boxes.
Folding gift boxes are a type of folding or knock-down carton
manufactured from paper or paperboard. Folding gift boxes are produced
from a variety of recycled and virgin paper or paperboard materials,
including, but not limited to, clay-coated paper or paperboard and
kraft (bleached or unbleached) paper or paperboard. The scope of the
order excludes gift boxes manufactured from paper or paperboard of a
thickness of more than 0.8 millimeters, corrugated paperboard, or paper
mache. The scope also excludes those gift boxes for which no side of
the box, when assembled, is at least nine inches in length.
Folding gift boxes included in the scope are typically decorated
with a holiday motif using various processes, including printing,
embossing, debossing, and foil stamping, but may also be plain white or
printed with a single color. The subject merchandise includes folding
gift boxes, with or without handles, whether finished or unfinished,
and whether in one-piece or multi-piece configuration. One-piece gift
boxes are die-cut or otherwise formed so that the top, bottom, and
sides form a single, contiguous unit. Two-piece gift boxes are those
with a folded bottom and a folded top as separate pieces. Folding gift
boxes are generally packaged in shrink-wrap, cellophane, or other
packaging materials, in single or multi-box packs for sale to the
retail customer. The scope excludes folding gift boxes that have a
retailer's name, logo, trademark or similar company information printed
prominently on the box's top exterior (such folding gift boxes are
often known as ``not-for-resale'' gift boxes or ``give-away'' gift
boxes and may be provided by department and specialty stores at no
charge to their retail customers). The scope of the order also excludes
folding gift boxes where both the outside of the box is a single color
and the box is not packaged in shrink-wrap, cellophane, other resin-
based packaging films, or paperboard.
Imports of the subject merchandise are classified under Harmonized
Tariff Schedules of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings
4819.20.0040 and 4819.50.4060. These subheadings also cover products
that are outside the scope of the order. Furthermore, although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Final Determination of Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of
Dumping
In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily determined
that dumping would likely continue or recur if the Order were revoked,
because the Department found dumping above de minimis levels in the
investigation segment of this proceeding, and we determined that
folding gift box imports from the PRC have been increasing in volume
during the period of this sunset review. Thus, since issuance of the
Order, dumping has continued at rates exceeding de minimis levels,
which suggests that dumping is likely to continue if the Order is
revoked.
As stated above, Domestic Parties submitted comments in support of
our Preliminary Results, and we did not receive comment from any
respondent interested party. Therefore, for the reasons explained in
the Preliminary Results, we continue to determine dumping would likely
continue or recur if the Order were revoked.
Final Determination of Magnitude of the Dumping Margin Likely To
Prevail
In the Preliminary Results, the Department noted that section
752(c)(3) of the Act provides that the administering authority shall
provide to the ITC the magnitude of the margin of dumping that is
likely to prevail if the order were revoked. While normally, the
Department will select a margin from the final determination in the
investigation because that is the only
[[Page 14270]]
calculated rate that reflects the behavior of exporters without the
discipline of an order or suspension agreement in place, under certain
circumstances, the Department may select a more recently calculated
rate to report to the ITC. Thus, we determined that the margins likely
to prevail were the order revoked would be above de minimis. As stated
above, Domestic Parties submitted comments in support of our
Preliminary Results, and we did not receive comments from any
respondent interested party. Therefore, for the reasons explained in
the Preliminary Results, we continue to determine that the margins
likely to prevail were the Order revoked would be above de minimis.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the Department determines
that revocation of the Order on folding gift boxes from the PRC would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the rate listed
below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exporter Weighted-average margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All exporters \5\......................... Above de minimis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Max Fortune Industrial Ltd. was excluded from the Order. See
Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC
that revocation of the Order on folding gift boxes from the PRC would
likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material
injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of
the antidumping duty order on folding gift boxes from the PRC. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect antidumping duty
cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all
imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation
of the Order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of final results and continuation. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-
year review of the Order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of continuation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 25, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-05055 Filed 3-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P