Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Amending the Attestation Requirement of Rule 11.24 Allowing a Retail Member Organization To Attest That “Substantially All” Orders Submitted to The Retail Price Improvement Program Will Qualify as “Retail Orders”, 13915-13916 [2013-04768]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2013 / Notices
survey instruments (needed to timely
implement customer monitoring
activities) to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for expedited review
and approval.
The average burden per response for
customer satisfaction activities is
estimated to range from 2 minutes for a
Web site questionnaire to 2 hours for
participation in a focus group. The RRB
estimates an annual burden of 1,750
annual respondents totaling 735 hours
for the generic customer survey
clearance.
Additional Information or Comments:
To request more information or to
obtain a copy of the information
collection justification, forms, and/or
supporting material, contact Dana
Hickman at (312) 751–4981 or
Dana.Hickman@RRB.GOV. Comments
regarding the information collection
should be addressed to Charles
Mierzwa, Railroad Retirement Board,
844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois
60611–2092 or emailed to
Charles.Mierzwa@RRB.GOV. Written
comments should be received within 60
days of this notice.
Charles Mierzwa,
Chief of Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 2013–04877 Filed 2–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68975; File No. SR–BYX–
2013–008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Amending the
Attestation Requirement of Rule 11.24
Allowing a Retail Member Organization
To Attest That ‘‘Substantially All’’
Orders Submitted to The Retail Price
Improvement Program Will Qualify as
‘‘Retail Orders’’
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
February 25, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
12, 2013, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Feb 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend
the attestation requirement of BYX Rule
11.24 to allow a Retail Member
Organization 3 (‘‘RMO’’) to attest that
‘‘substantially all’’ orders submitted to
the Retail Price Improvement Program
(the ‘‘Program’’) will qualify as Retail
Orders.4 BYX Rule 11.24(b)(2)(C)
currently requires RMOs to attest that
‘‘any order’’ will so qualify, effectively
preventing certain significant retail
brokers from participating in the
Program due to operational constraints.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing an
amendment to BYX Rule 11.24 to
provide that an RMO may attest that
‘‘substantially all’’ of the orders it
submits to the Program are Retail
Orders, replacing the requirement that
the RMO must attest that all submitted
orders qualify as Retail Orders.
Currently, under BYX Rule
3 A Retail Member Organization is a Member (or
a division thereof) that has been approved by the
Exchange under BATS Rule 11.24 to submit Retail
Orders.
4 A Retail Order is an agency order that originates
from a natural person and is submitted to the
Exchange by a RMO, provided that no change is
made to the terms of the order with respect to price
or side of market and the order does not originate
from a trading algorithm or any computerized
methodology.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13915
11.24(b)(2)(C), a Member 5 wishing to
become an RMO must submit: (A) An
application form; (B) supporting
documentation; and (C) an attestation
that ‘‘any order’’ submitted as a Retail
Order will qualify as such under BYX
Rule 11.24.
The Exchange believes that the
categorical nature of the current
attestation language is preventing
certain Members with retail customers
from participating in the Program. In
particular, the Exchange understands
that some Members wishing to
participate in the Program represent
both Retail Orders as well as other
agency flow that may not meet the strict
definition of ‘‘Retail Order.’’ The
Exchange further understands that
limitations in order management
systems and routing networks used by
such Members may make it infeasible
for them to isolate 100% of Retail
Orders from other agency, non-Retail
Order flow that they would direct to the
Program. Unable to make the categorical
attestation required by the current
language of BYX Rule 11.24, some
Members have chosen not to participate,
notwithstanding that substantially all
order flow from such Members would
be Retail Orders. This limitation has the
effect of preventing their retail
customers from benefiting from the
enhanced price competition and
transparency of the Program.
Accordingly, the Exchange is
proposing a de minimis relaxation of the
RMO attestation requirement in order to
accommodate these system limitations
and expand the access of retail
customers to the benefits of the
Program. Specifically, as proposed, an
RMO would be permitted to send de
minimis quantities of agency orders to
the Exchange as Retail Orders that
cannot be explicitly attested to under
existing definitions of the Program.
The Exchange will issue notice to its
Members to make clear that the
‘‘substantially all’’ language is meant to
permit the presence of only isolated and
de minimis quantities of agency orders
that do not qualify as Retail Orders that
cannot be segregated from Retail Orders
due to systems limitations. In this
regard, an RMO would need to retain, in
its books and records, adequate
substantiation that substantially all
orders sent to the Exchange as Retail
Orders met the strict definition and that
those orders not meeting the strict
definition are agency orders that cannot
be segregated from Retail Orders due to
system limitations, and are de minimis
5 A Member is any registered broker or dealer that
has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
13916
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 41 / Friday, March 1, 2013 / Notices
in terms of the overall number of Retail
Orders sent to the Exchange.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The rule change proposed in this
submission is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder that are
applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.6
Specifically, the proposed change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,7 in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices because, while the
proposed rule change represents a
relaxation of the attestation
requirements, the change is a de
minimis relaxation that still requires the
RMO applicant to attest that
‘‘substantially all’’ of its orders will
qualify as Retail Orders. The slight
relaxation will allow enough flexibility
to accommodate system limitations
while still ensuring that only a
fractional amount of orders submitted to
the Program would not qualify as Retail
Orders.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change promotes just and
equitable principles of trade because it
will ensure that similarly situated
Members who have only slight
differences in the capability of their
systems will be able to equally benefit
from the Program.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change will remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system because it
will allow Members, who are concerned
about its system limitations not
allowing 100% certification that
submitted orders are Retail Orders, to
still participate in the Program. By
removing impediments to participation
in the Program, the proposed change
would permit expanded access of retail
customers to the price improvement and
transparency offered by the Program and
thereby potentially stimulate further
price competition for retail orders.
6 15
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Feb 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that the amendment,
by increasing the level of participation
in the Program, will increase the level
of competition around retail executions
such that retail investors would receive
better prices than they currently do on
the Exchange and potentially through
bilateral internalization arrangements.
The Exchange believes that the
transparency and competitiveness of
operating a program such as the
Program on an exchange market would
result in better prices for retail investors
and benefits retail investors by
expanding the capabilities of Exchanges
to encompass practices currently
allowed on non-exchange venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BYX–2013–008 on the
subject line.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BYX–2013–008. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BYX–
2013–008, and should be submitted on
or before March 22, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–04768 Filed 2–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–30403]
Notice of Applications for
Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940
February 22, 2013.
The following is a notice of
applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company
8 17
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 41 (Friday, March 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13915-13916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04768]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68975; File No. SR-BYX-2013-008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change Amending the Attestation Requirement of
Rule 11.24 Allowing a Retail Member Organization To Attest That
``Substantially All'' Orders Submitted to The Retail Price Improvement
Program Will Qualify as ``Retail Orders''
February 25, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 12, 2013, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BYX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend the attestation requirement of
BYX Rule 11.24 to allow a Retail Member Organization \3\ (``RMO'') to
attest that ``substantially all'' orders submitted to the Retail Price
Improvement Program (the ``Program'') will qualify as Retail Orders.\4\
BYX Rule 11.24(b)(2)(C) currently requires RMOs to attest that ``any
order'' will so qualify, effectively preventing certain significant
retail brokers from participating in the Program due to operational
constraints.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A Retail Member Organization is a Member (or a division
thereof) that has been approved by the Exchange under BATS Rule
11.24 to submit Retail Orders.
\4\ A Retail Order is an agency order that originates from a
natural person and is submitted to the Exchange by a RMO, provided
that no change is made to the terms of the order with respect to
price or side of market and the order does not originate from a
trading algorithm or any computerized methodology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing an amendment to BYX Rule 11.24 to provide
that an RMO may attest that ``substantially all'' of the orders it
submits to the Program are Retail Orders, replacing the requirement
that the RMO must attest that all submitted orders qualify as Retail
Orders. Currently, under BYX Rule 11.24(b)(2)(C), a Member \5\ wishing
to become an RMO must submit: (A) An application form; (B) supporting
documentation; and (C) an attestation that ``any order'' submitted as a
Retail Order will qualify as such under BYX Rule 11.24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ A Member is any registered broker or dealer that has been
admitted to membership in the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the categorical nature of the current
attestation language is preventing certain Members with retail
customers from participating in the Program. In particular, the
Exchange understands that some Members wishing to participate in the
Program represent both Retail Orders as well as other agency flow that
may not meet the strict definition of ``Retail Order.'' The Exchange
further understands that limitations in order management systems and
routing networks used by such Members may make it infeasible for them
to isolate 100% of Retail Orders from other agency, non-Retail Order
flow that they would direct to the Program. Unable to make the
categorical attestation required by the current language of BYX Rule
11.24, some Members have chosen not to participate, notwithstanding
that substantially all order flow from such Members would be Retail
Orders. This limitation has the effect of preventing their retail
customers from benefiting from the enhanced price competition and
transparency of the Program.
Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing a de minimis relaxation of
the RMO attestation requirement in order to accommodate these system
limitations and expand the access of retail customers to the benefits
of the Program. Specifically, as proposed, an RMO would be permitted to
send de minimis quantities of agency orders to the Exchange as Retail
Orders that cannot be explicitly attested to under existing definitions
of the Program.
The Exchange will issue notice to its Members to make clear that
the ``substantially all'' language is meant to permit the presence of
only isolated and de minimis quantities of agency orders that do not
qualify as Retail Orders that cannot be segregated from Retail Orders
due to systems limitations. In this regard, an RMO would need to
retain, in its books and records, adequate substantiation that
substantially all orders sent to the Exchange as Retail Orders met the
strict definition and that those orders not meeting the strict
definition are agency orders that cannot be segregated from Retail
Orders due to system limitations, and are de minimis
[[Page 13916]]
in terms of the overall number of Retail Orders sent to the Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
The rule change proposed in this submission is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ Specifically, the
proposed change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in
that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices because, while
the proposed rule change represents a relaxation of the attestation
requirements, the change is a de minimis relaxation that still requires
the RMO applicant to attest that ``substantially all'' of its orders
will qualify as Retail Orders. The slight relaxation will allow enough
flexibility to accommodate system limitations while still ensuring that
only a fractional amount of orders submitted to the Program would not
qualify as Retail Orders.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change promotes just
and equitable principles of trade because it will ensure that similarly
situated Members who have only slight differences in the capability of
their systems will be able to equally benefit from the Program.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because it will allow Members, who are
concerned about its system limitations not allowing 100% certification
that submitted orders are Retail Orders, to still participate in the
Program. By removing impediments to participation in the Program, the
proposed change would permit expanded access of retail customers to the
price improvement and transparency offered by the Program and thereby
potentially stimulate further price competition for retail orders.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that
the amendment, by increasing the level of participation in the Program,
will increase the level of competition around retail executions such
that retail investors would receive better prices than they currently
do on the Exchange and potentially through bilateral internalization
arrangements. The Exchange believes that the transparency and
competitiveness of operating a program such as the Program on an
exchange market would result in better prices for retail investors and
benefits retail investors by expanding the capabilities of Exchanges to
encompass practices currently allowed on non-exchange venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BYX-2013-008 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2013-008. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2013-008, and should be
submitted on or before March 22, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-04768 Filed 2-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P