Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 13321-13322 [2013-04512]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2013 / Notices
for grantees for the establishment or
reorganization of zones and can permit
significantly greater flexibility in the
designation of new subzones or ‘‘usagedriven’’ FTZ sites for operators/users
located within a grantee’s ‘‘service area’’
in the context of the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for a zone.
The application was submitted pursuant
to the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u) and the
regulations of the Board (15 CFR part
400). It was formally docketed on
February 21, 2013.
FTZ 124 was approved by the Board
on December 20, 1985 (Board Order 319,
50 FR 53351, December 31,1985), and
was reorganized under the ASF on
January 31, 2012 (Board Order 1814, 77
FR 6059, February 7, 2012). The zone
currently has a service area that
includes St. Charles, St. John the
Baptist, St. James, La Fourche and St.
Mary Parishes, Louisiana.
The applicant is now requesting
authority to expand the service area of
the zone to include Tangipahoa Parish,
as described in the application. If
approved, the grantee would be able to
serve sites throughout the expanded
service area based on companies’ needs
for FTZ designation. The proposed
expanded service area is adjacent to the
Gramercy Customs and Border
Protection port of entry.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ
Staff is designated examiner to evaluate
and analyze the facts and information
presented in the application and case
record and to report findings and
recommendations to the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the Board’s Executive
Secretary at the address below. The
closing period for their receipt is April
29, 2013. Rebuttal comments in
response to material submitted during
the foregoing period may be submitted
during the subsequent 15-day period to
May 13, 2013.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s
Web site, which is accessible via
www.trade.gov/ftz. For further
information, contact Camille Evans at
Camille.Evans@trade.gov or (202) 482–
2350.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Feb 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
Dated: February 21, 2013.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–04560 Filed 2–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–806]
Silicon Metal From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2011–2012
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: February 27,
2013.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on silicon
metal from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period of review
(‘‘POR’’) June 1, 2011, through May 31,
2012. This review covers one PRC
company, Shanghai Jinneng
International Trade Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai
Jinneng’’).1 The Department
preliminarily finds that Shanghai
Jinneng did not have reviewable
transactions during the POR. We intend
to issue the final results no later than
120 days from the date of publication of
this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori
Apodaca, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 1, 2012, the Department
published a notice of an opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on silicon
metal from the PRC.2 On June 29, 2012,
Globe Metallurgical Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’)
requested a review of Shanghai
Jinneng.3 On July 31, 2012, the
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 77 FR 45338 (July
31, 2012) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 77 FR 32528
(June 1, 2012).
3 See Letter from Petitioner to the Department of
Commerce, Re: Request for Administrative Review,
dated June 29, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13321
Department initiated the review of
Shanghai Jinneng.4 Shanghai Jinneng
certified that the company had no
shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR on August
9, 2012.5 On October 18, 2012, the
Department notified U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) of the
company claiming no shipments and
requested that if CBP has information
contradicting the claim, it provide such
information.6 On November 9, 2012, the
Department notified parties that the
results of the CBP query indicated that
Shanghai Jinneng had not shipped
subject merchandise during the POR.7
As explained in the memorandum
from the Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, the Department has
exercised its discretion to toll deadlines
for the duration of the closure of the
Federal Government from October 29
through October 30, 2012.8 Thus, all
deadlines in this segment of the
proceeding have been extended by two
days. The revised deadline for the
preliminary results of this review is now
March 4, 2013.
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by the order are
shipments of silicon metal containing at
least 96.00 but less than 99.99 percent
of silicon by weight. Also covered by
the order is silicon metal from the PRC
containing between 89.00 and 96.00
percent silicon by weight but which
contain a higher aluminum content than
the silicon metal containing at least
96.00 percent but less than 99.99
percent silicon by weight. Silicon metal
is currently provided for under
subheadings 2804.69.10 and 2804.69.50
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) as a
chemical product, but is commonly
referred to as a metal. Semiconductorgrade silicon (silicon metal containing
by weight not less than 99.99 percent of
silicon and provided for in subheading
2804.61.00 of the HTSUS) is not subject
to the order. Although the HTSUS
4 See
Initiation Notice.
Letter from Shanghai Jinneng to the
Department of Commerce, Re: No Sales
Certification, dated August 9, 2012.
6 See Instructions from the Department to CBP,
Re: No Shipments Inquiry for Silicon Metal from
the People’s Republic of China Exported by
Shanghai Jinneng International Trade Co., Ltd. (A–
570–806), Message number 2292301, dated October
18, 2012 (‘‘CBP Inquiry’’).
7 See Memorandum to the File, Re: Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Silicon Metal from
the People’s Republic of China, dated November 9,
2012 (‘‘CBP Query’’).
8 See Memorandum to the Record from Paul
Piquado, AS for Import Administration, regarding
‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of
the Government Closure During Hurricane,’’ dated
October 31, 2012.
5 See
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
13322
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2013 / Notices
subheadings are provided for
convenience and for customs purposes,
the written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
As noted in the ‘‘Background’’ section
above, Shanghai Jinneng has submitted
a timely-filed certification indicating
that it had no shipments of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR. In addition, in response to our
no-shipments inquiry, CBP did not
provide any evidence contradicting
Shanghai Jinneng’s claim of no
shipments. Further, on November 9,
2012, the Department released to
interested parties the results of the CBP
query that it used for corroboration of
Shanghai Jinneng’s no-shipments
claim.9 The Department received no
comments from any interested parties
concerning the results of the CBP query.
Based on the certification of Shanghai
Jinneng and our analysis of CBP
information, we preliminarily determine
that Shanghai Jinneng did not have any
reviewable transactions during the POR.
In addition, consistent with the
Department’s recently announced
refinement to its assessment practice in
non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases,
the Department finds that it is
appropriate not to rescind the review in
these circumstances but rather, to
complete the review with respect to
Shanghai Jinneng and issue appropriate
instructions to CBP based on the final
results of the review.10
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments
Interested parties are invited to
comment on the preliminary results and
may submit case briefs and/or written
comments within 30 days of the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, will be due five days after the
due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.309(d). Written argument
should be filed electronically using
Import Administration’s Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’).11 Parties who submit case or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
requested to submit with each argument
a statement of the issue, a summary of
the argument not to exceed five pages,
and a table of statutes, regulations, and
9 See
CBP Query.
Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (Oct. 24, 2011) and the ‘‘Assessment
Rates’’ section, below.
11 See, generally, 19 CFR 351.303.
10 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Feb 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
cases cited, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce. The request must be filed
electronically using IA ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
the Department’s electronic records
system, IA ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice.12 Requests should contain: (1)
The party’s name, address and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs.
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, not later than 120 days
after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review. The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP within
15 days after the publication date of the
final results of this review. Pursuant to
the recently announced refinement to its
assessment practice in NME cases, if the
Department continues to determine that
an exporter under review had no
shipments of the subject merchandise,
any suspended entries that entered
under that exporter’s case number (i.e.,
at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated
at the PRC-wide rate. For a full
discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Shanghai
Jinneng, which claimed no shipments,
12 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.310(c).
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the cash deposit rate will remain
unchanged from the rate assigned to the
company in the most recently
completed review of the company; (2)
for previously investigated or reviewed
PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not
under review in this segment of the
proceeding but who have separate rates,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the exporter-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of 139.49
percent; 13 and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
These preliminary results are issued
and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: February 20, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–04512 Filed 2–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Initiation
of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
13 For an explanation of the calculation of the
PRC-wide rate, see Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Metal from the
People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 18570, 18571–
2 (April 23, 1991).
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13321-13322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04512]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-806]
Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: February 27, 2013.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') for the period of review
(``POR'') June 1, 2011, through May 31, 2012. This review covers one
PRC company, Shanghai Jinneng International Trade Co., Ltd. (``Shanghai
Jinneng'').\1\ The Department preliminarily finds that Shanghai Jinneng
did not have reviewable transactions during the POR. We intend to issue
the final results no later than 120 days from the date of publication
of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the ``Act'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 77 FR
45338 (July 31, 2012) (``Initiation Notice'').
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Apodaca, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 1, 2012, the Department published a notice of an
opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on silicon metal from the PRC.\2\ On June 29, 2012, Globe
Metallurgical Inc. (``Petitioner'') requested a review of Shanghai
Jinneng.\3\ On July 31, 2012, the Department initiated the review of
Shanghai Jinneng.\4\ Shanghai Jinneng certified that the company had no
shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR on
August 9, 2012.\5\ On October 18, 2012, the Department notified U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') of the company claiming no
shipments and requested that if CBP has information contradicting the
claim, it provide such information.\6\ On November 9, 2012, the
Department notified parties that the results of the CBP query indicated
that Shanghai Jinneng had not shipped subject merchandise during the
POR.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative
Review, 77 FR 32528 (June 1, 2012).
\3\ See Letter from Petitioner to the Department of Commerce,
Re: Request for Administrative Review, dated June 29, 2012.
\4\ See Initiation Notice.
\5\ See Letter from Shanghai Jinneng to the Department of
Commerce, Re: No Sales Certification, dated August 9, 2012.
\6\ See Instructions from the Department to CBP, Re: No
Shipments Inquiry for Silicon Metal from the People's Republic of
China Exported by Shanghai Jinneng International Trade Co., Ltd. (A-
570-806), Message number 2292301, dated October 18, 2012 (``CBP
Inquiry'').
\7\ See Memorandum to the File, Re: Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Silicon Metal from the People's Republic of
China, dated November 9, 2012 (``CBP Query'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained in the memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, the Department has exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal
Government from October 29 through October 30, 2012.\8\ Thus, all
deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by two
days. The revised deadline for the preliminary results of this review
is now March 4, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum to the Record from Paul Piquado, AS for
Import Administration, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Hurricane,''
dated October 31, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by the order are shipments of silicon metal
containing at least 96.00 but less than 99.99 percent of silicon by
weight. Also covered by the order is silicon metal from the PRC
containing between 89.00 and 96.00 percent silicon by weight but which
contain a higher aluminum content than the silicon metal containing at
least 96.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent silicon by weight.
Silicon metal is currently provided for under subheadings 2804.69.10
and 2804.69.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS'') as a chemical product, but is commonly referred to as a
metal. Semiconductor-grade silicon (silicon metal containing by weight
not less than 99.99 percent of silicon and provided for in subheading
2804.61.00 of the HTSUS) is not subject to the order. Although the
HTSUS
[[Page 13322]]
subheadings are provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise is dispositive.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the ``Background'' section above, Shanghai Jinneng has
submitted a timely-filed certification indicating that it had no
shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.
In addition, in response to our no-shipments inquiry, CBP did not
provide any evidence contradicting Shanghai Jinneng's claim of no
shipments. Further, on November 9, 2012, the Department released to
interested parties the results of the CBP query that it used for
corroboration of Shanghai Jinneng's no-shipments claim.\9\ The
Department received no comments from any interested parties concerning
the results of the CBP query.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See CBP Query.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the certification of Shanghai Jinneng and our analysis of
CBP information, we preliminarily determine that Shanghai Jinneng did
not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. In addition,
consistent with the Department's recently announced refinement to its
assessment practice in non-market economy (``NME'') cases, the
Department finds that it is appropriate not to rescind the review in
these circumstances but rather, to complete the review with respect to
Shanghai Jinneng and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the
final results of the review.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (Oct. 24, 2011) and the
``Assessment Rates'' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary
results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments within 30
days of the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, will be due five days after the due date for case briefs,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). Written argument should be filed
electronically using Import Administration's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA
ACCESS'').\11\ Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are requested to submit with each argument a statement of
the issue, a summary of the argument not to exceed five pages, and a
table of statutes, regulations, and cases cited, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.309(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See, generally, 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce. The request must be filed electronically
using IA ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records
system, IA ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice.\12\ Requests should
contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the
issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the
date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP within 15 days after the publication date of the
final results of this review. Pursuant to the recently announced
refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases, if the Department
continues to determine that an exporter under review had no shipments
of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under
that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. For a full discussion of this
practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Shanghai
Jinneng, which claimed no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain
unchanged from the rate assigned to the company in the most recently
completed review of the company; (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not under review in this
segment of the proceeding but who have separate rates, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise
that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 139.49 percent; \13\ and (4)
for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For an explanation of the calculation of the PRC-wide rate,
see Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon
Metal from the People's Republic of China, 56 FR 18570, 18571-2
(April 23, 1991).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
These preliminary results are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: February 20, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-04512 Filed 2-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P