Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Concerning an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 12354 [2013-04068]

Download as PDF 12354 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2013 / Notices 5 snowmobiles each allocated for noncommercially guided access. BAT requirements for snowmobiles would remain the same as the BAT requirements in the 2011/2012 interim regulation until the 2017/2018 winter season, at which time additional sound and air emission requirements would be implemented. BAT requirements for snowcoaches would also be implemented beginning in the 2017/ 2018 season. If OSVs meet additional voluntary standards for air and sound emissions beyond those required for BAT, the group size of snowmobiles would be allowed to increase from an average of 7 to an average of 8 per transportation event, and snowcoaches would be allowed to increase from one to two snowcoaches per transportation event. Sylvan Pass would remain open. More information regarding Yellowstone in the winter, including educational materials and a detailed history of winter use in Yellowstone, is available at http://www.nps.gov/yell/ planvisit/winteruse/index.htm. Dated: January 15, 2013. John Wessels, Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 2013–04124 Filed 2–21–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–CB–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–853] Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Concerning an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission did not determine to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 17) granting a motion of complainants Technology Properties Limited LLC and Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC of Cupertino, California and Patriot Scientific Corporation of Carlsbad, California (collectively ‘‘Complainants’’) to amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation (‘‘NOI’’). The ID therefore became the determination of the Commission. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:18 Feb 21, 2013 Jkt 229001 Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on August 24, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Complainants. 77 FR 51572–573 (August 24, 2012). The complaint alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,809,336. The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named numerous respondents, including Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. of Shenzhen, China (‘‘Huawei’’); Huawei North America of Plano, Texas (‘‘Huawei North America’’); Sierra Wireless, Inc. of British Columbia, Canada and Sierra Wireless America, Inc. of Carlsbad, California (collectively ‘‘Sierra’’). The Office of Unfair Import Investigation was also named as a participating party. On February 4, 2013, the Commission terminated the investigation with respect to Sierra. Notice (Feb. 4, 2013); see Order No. 17 (Jan. 15, 2013). On November 13, 2012, Complainants filed a motion to amend the Complaint and NOI to remove Huawei North America as a respondent and to add Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA Inc., and Futurewei Technologies, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Proposed Respondents’’) as respondents. On November 23, 2012, the Commission investigative staff filed a response in support of the motion. On November 26, 2012, Huawei and Proposed Respondents filed a response opposing the motion. On January 8, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting Complainants’ motion to amend the Complaint and NOI pursuant to section 210.14(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Procedure (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)). The ALJ found that good cause supported granting the motion because the public interest will be best served by the inclusion of all relevant parties in a single investigation. No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The subject ID became the determination of the Commission on February 8, 2013, under section 210.42(h)(3) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)(3)). The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Issued: February 15, 2013. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–04068 Filed 2–21–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–781] Certain Microprocessors, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Termination of Investigation With a Finding of No Violation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on December 14, 2012, finding no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in this investigation. On review, the Commission has determined to reverse or vacate certain findings, and to terminate the investigation with a finding of no violation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 12354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04068]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-853]


 Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components 
Thereof; Commission Determination Concerning an Initial Determination 
Granting a Motion To Amend Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission did not determine to review the presiding administrative law 
judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 17) 
granting a motion of complainants Technology Properties Limited LLC and 
Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC of Cupertino, California and Patriot 
Scientific Corporation of Carlsbad, California (collectively 
``Complainants'') to amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation 
(``NOI''). The ID therefore became the determination of the Commission.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on August 24, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Complainants. 77 FR 
51572-573 (August 24, 2012). The complaint alleges violations of 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by 
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,809,336. 
The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The 
Commission's notice of investigation named numerous respondents, 
including Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. of Shenzhen, China (``Huawei''); 
Huawei North America of Plano, Texas (``Huawei North America''); Sierra 
Wireless, Inc. of British Columbia, Canada and Sierra Wireless America, 
Inc. of Carlsbad, California (collectively ``Sierra''). The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigation was also named as a participating party. On 
February 4, 2013, the Commission terminated the investigation with 
respect to Sierra. Notice (Feb. 4, 2013); see Order No. 17 (Jan. 15, 
2013).
    On November 13, 2012, Complainants filed a motion to amend the 
Complaint and NOI to remove Huawei North America as a respondent and to 
add Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA Inc., and Futurewei 
Technologies, Inc. (collectively, ``Proposed Respondents'') as 
respondents. On November 23, 2012, the Commission investigative staff 
filed a response in support of the motion. On November 26, 2012, Huawei 
and Proposed Respondents filed a response opposing the motion.
    On January 8, 2013, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting 
Complainants' motion to amend the Complaint and NOI pursuant to section 
210.14(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 
CFR 210.14(b)(1)). The ALJ found that good cause supported granting the 
motion because the public interest will be best served by the inclusion 
of all relevant parties in a single investigation. No petitions for 
review of this ID were filed.
    The subject ID became the determination of the Commission on 
February 8, 2013, under section 210.42(h)(3) of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)(3)).
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

     Issued: February 15, 2013.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-04068 Filed 2-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P