Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 12035-12037 [2013-04043]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Notices corroborated ‘‘to the extent practicable’’ in accordance with section 776(c) of the Act.4 1999). These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant Percent entries during this review period. Manufacturer/Exporter margin Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s Agro Dutch Industries Limited ...... 114.76 presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the Assessment Rates subsequent assessment of double The Department will determine, and antidumping duties. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Notification to Interested Parties (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in accordance This notice serves as the only with 19 CFR 351.212(b). The reminder to parties subject to Department intends to issue appropriate administrative protective order (APO) of assessment instructions directly to CBP their responsibility concerning the 15 days after publication of these final disposition of proprietary information results of review. For Agro Dutch’s U.S. disclosed under APO in accordance sales, we will base the assessment rate with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely assigned to the corresponding entries on written notification of return/ AFA, as noted above. destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is Cash Deposit Requirements hereby requested. Failure to comply The following cash deposit with the regulations and the terms of an requirements will be effective for all APO is a sanctionable violation. shipments of certain preserved This administrative review and notice mushrooms from India entered, or are published in accordance with withdrawn from warehouse, for sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the consumption on or after the publication Act and 19 CFR 351.221. date of the final results of this Dated: February 13, 2013. administrative review, as provided by Paul Piquado, section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Agro Dutch will be Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. the rate established in the final results [FR Doc. 2013–04041 Filed 2–20–13; 8:45 am] of this administrative review; (2) for BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) International Trade Administration if the exporter is not a firm covered in [A–570–601] this review, a previous review, or the original less-than-fair-value Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts investigation, but the manufacturer is, Thereof, Finished and Unfinished From the cash deposit rate will be the rate the People’s Republic of China: established for the most recent period Amended Final Results of for the manufacturer of the Antidumping Duty Administrative merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Review; 2010–2011 rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 11.30 AGENCY: Import Administration, percent, the all-others rate established International Trade Administration, in the Notice of Amendment of Final Department of Commerce. Determination of Sales at Less Than SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Fair Value and Antidumping Duty (the ‘‘Department’’) is amending the Order: Certain Preserved Mushrooms final results of the 2010–2011 From India, 64 FR 8311 (February 19, antidumping duty administrative review of tapered roller bearings and parts 4 See Preliminary Results and accompanying thereof, finished and unfinished Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of (‘‘TRBs’’) from the People’s Republic of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain China (‘‘PRC’’), to correct certain Preserved Mushrooms from India for a full discussion of our corroboration analysis. ministerial errors. erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Final Results of the Review We made no changes to our preliminary results. Therefore, we are assigning the following dumping margin to Agro Dutch for the period February 1, 2011, through January 31, 2012. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:47 Feb 20, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DATES: 12035 Effective Date: February 21, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Farlander or Erin Kearney, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0182 or (202) 482– 0167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 10, 2013, the Department disclosed to interested parties its calculations for the final results of the 2010–2011 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on TRBs from the PRC. On January 15, 2013, Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. (‘‘CPZ/SKF’’) timely filed ministerial error allegations and requested that, pursuant to section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.224, the Department correct the alleged ministerial errors in the calculations. The Department published the final results of this proceeding on January 16, 2013.1 On January 22, 2013, the Timken Company (‘‘Timken’’) filed rebuttal comments to CPZ/SKF’s ministerial error allegations. No other interested party submitted ministerial error allegations or rebuttal comments. Scope of the Order For a full description of the products covered by the antidumping duty order on tapered roller bearings from the PRC, see Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, from Brandon Farlander and Erin Kearney, International Trade Compliance Analysts, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, concerning, ‘‘Final Results of the 2010– 2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Tapered Roller Bearings from the People’s Republic of China: Allegation of Ministerial Errors and Amended Final,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘Ministerial Error Memorandum’’), which is incorporated by reference. Ministerial Errors A ministerial error is defined in section 751(h) of the Act as including ‘‘errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other 1 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–2011, 78 FR 3396 (January 16, 2013) (‘‘Final Results’’). E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM 21FEN1 12036 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Notices erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES type of unintentional error which the administering authority considers ministerial.’’ 2 After analyzing CPZ/SKF’s comments and Timken’s rebuttal comments, we have determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), that we made the following ministerial errors in our calculations for the Final Results: • We unintentionally deducted amounts for domestic brokerage and handling expenses twice for certain sales. • We unintentionally failed to offset CPZ/SKF’s freight expenses with its freight revenue for sales in which it reported both freight expenses from the warehouse to the U.S. customer and corresponding freight revenue. For a detailed discussion of all alleged ministerial errors, as well as the Department’s analysis, see Ministerial Error Memorandum. In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are amending the Final Results of the administrative review of TRBs from the PRC. The revised weighted-average dumping margins are detailed below. For CPZ/SKF-specific calculations, see Memorandum to the File from Brandon Farlander and Erin Kearney, International Trade Analysts, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, ‘‘Administrative Review of Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results Analysis Memorandum of Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. and Peer Bearing Company,’’ dated concurrently with this notice and incorporated by reference. In the Final Results, we determined that one company, in addition to the mandatory respondent, qualified for a separate rate.3 Because we have revised the weighted-average dumping margin for CPZ/SKF, we are also revising the weighted-average dumping margin for Xiang Yang Automobile Bearing Co., Ltd., a separate rate respondent, because the rate for Xiang Yang Automobile Bearing Co., Ltd. is based on the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for CPZ/SKF. The amended, weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: 2 See 3 See also 19 CFR 351.224(e). Final Results, 78 FR at 3397. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:47 Feb 20, 2013 Jkt 229001 Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Exporter Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd ......................................... Xiang Yang Automobile Bearing Co., Ltd ........................... PRC-wide entity * ...................... 14.91 14.91 92.84 * The PRC-wide entity includes Haining Automann Parts Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Zhaofeng Mechanical and Electronic Co., Ltd., and Tianshui Hailin Import and Export Corporation, where the exporter is Tianshui Hailin Import and Export Corporation and the producer is any company other than Hailin Bearing Factory (the successor-in-interest is Gansu Hailin Zhongke Science & Technology Co., Ltd.). The Department has previously found that merchandise produced by Hailin Bearing Factory and exported by Tianshui Hailin Import and Export Corporation is not subject to the order.4 Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed for these amended final results within five days of the date of publication of this notice to interested parties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the amended final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these amended final results of review. For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), we calculated importer-specific assessment rates for merchandise subject to this review.5 4 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 2000–2001 Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, and Determination to Revoke Order, in Part, 67 FR 68990, 68991 (November 14, 2002); see also Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 2009–2010 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part, 77 FR 2271, 2273 (January 17, 2012). 5 As in the Final Results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (‘‘Final Modification for Reviews’’). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 For CPZ/SKF, we calculated an ad valorem rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales by the total entered values associated with those sales. For dutyassessment rates calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess the resulting ad valorem rate against the entered customs values for the subject merchandise. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importer-specific assessment rate is above de minimis. Where either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de minimis,6 or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis,7 we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. We will instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the ad valorem rate of 92.84 percent of entered value. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective retroactively on any entries made on or after January 16, 2013, the date of publication of the Final Results, for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate shown for this company (except if the rate is de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, a zero cash deposit will be required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 92.84 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. These amended final results are published in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 6 See 7 See E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM Final Modification for Reviews. 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 21FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Notices Dated: February 13, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–04043 Filed 2–20–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Announcement of the American Petroleum Institute’s Standards Activities National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce. AGENCY: Notice and request for public comment. ACTION: The American Petroleum Institute (API), with the assistance of other interested parties, continues to develop standards, both national and international, in several areas. This notice lists the standardization efforts currently being conducted by API committees. The publication of this notice by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on behalf of API is being undertaken as a public service. NIST does not necessarily endorse, approve, or recommend the standards referenced. SUMMARY: American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street NW., Washington, DC 20005; telephone (202) 682–8000, http://www.api.org. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Individuals listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice may be reached at the American Petroleum Institute. David F. Alderman, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 2100, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, email: david.alderman@nist.gov or by phone at 301–975–4019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background The American Petroleum Institute develops and publishes voluntary standards for equipment, materials, operations, and processes for the petroleum and natural gas industry. These standards are used by both private industry and by governmental agencies. All interested persons should contact the appropriate source as listed for further information. Exploration & Production Recommended Practice 1FSC, Facilities Systems Completion, Planning, and Execution, 1st Edition VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:47 Feb 20, 2013 Jkt 229001 Standard 2CCU, Offshore Cargo Container Design, Manufacturing and Inspection, 1st Edition Recommended Practice 2D, Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Cranes, 7th Edition Recommended Practice 2EQ, Seismic Design Procedures and Criteria for Offshore Structures, 1st Edition Recommended Practice 2MET, Metocean Design and Operating Considerations, 1st Edition Recommended Practice 2N, Planning, Designing, and Constructing Structures and Pipelines for Arctic Conditions, 3rd Edition Recommended Practice 2RD, Dynamic Risers for Floating Installations, 2nd Edition Recommended Practice 2SIM, Structural Integrity Management of Fixed Offshore Structures, 1st Edition Recommended Practice 2SM, Design, Manufacture, Installation, and Maintenance of Synthetic Fiber Ropes for Offshore Mooring, 2nd Edition Specification 4F, Drilling and Well Servicing Structures, 4th Edition Specification 6A, Specification for Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment—Addendum 3, 20th Edition Specification 6AV1, Specification for Validation of Wellhead Surface Safety Valves and Underwater Safety Valves for Offshore Service, 2nd Edition Recommended Practice 6HT, Heat Treatment and Testing of Large Cross Section and Critical Section Components, 2nd Edition Recommended Practice 7G–1, Recommended Practice for Drill Stem Design and Operating Limits, 1st Edition Specification 7HU2, Hammer Unions, 1st Edition Recommended Practice 10B–2, Recommended Practice for Testing Well Cements, 2nd Edition Recommended Practice 10B–4, Recommended Practice on Preparation and Testing of Foamed Cement Slurries at Atmospheric Pressure, 2nd Edition Specification 11AX, Specification for Subsurface Sucker Rod Pumps and Fittings, 13th Edition Specification 11E, Specification for Pumping Units, 19th Edition Recommended Practice 11BR, Recommended Practice for the Care and Handling of Sucker Rods, 10th Edition Recommended Practice 11G, Recommended Practice for Installation and Lubrication of Pumping Units, 5th Edition Recommended Practice 13B–2, Recommended Practice for Field PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12037 Testing Oil-based Drilling Fluids, 5th Edition Recommended Practice 13C, Recommended Practice on Drilling Fluid Processing Systems Evaluation, 5th Edition Specification 14A, Subsurface Safety Valve Equipment, 12th Edition Recommended Practice 14C, Analysis, Design, Installation and Testing of Basic Surface Safety Systems on Offshore Production Platforms, 8th Edition Specification 14F, Design and Installation of Electrical Systems for Fixed and Floating Offshore Petroleum Facilities for Unclassified and Class I, Division 1, and Division 2 Locations, 5th Edition Standard 14H, Installation, Maintenance and Repair of Surface Safety Valves and Underwater Safety Valves Offshore, 6th Edition Specification 16A, Specification for Drill-through Equipment, 4th Edition Standard 16AR, Repair and Remanufacture of Blowout Prevention Equipment, 1st Edition Specification 16C, Choke and Kill Systems, 2nd Edition Specification 16D, Control Systems for Drilling Well Control Equipment and Control Systems for Diverter Equipment, 2nd Edition Specification 16F, Specification for Marine Drilling Riser Equipment, 2nd Edition Specification 16Q, Design, Selection, Operation and Maintenance of Marine Drilling Riser Systems, 2nd Edition Specification 16R, Marine Drilling Riser Couplings, 2nd Edition Specification 17F, Specification for Subsea Production Control Systems, 3rd Edition Recommended Practice 17G, Recommended Practice for Completion/Workover Riser Systems, 3rd Edition Recommended Practice 17H, Recommended Practice for Remotely Operated Tools (ROT) and Interfaces on Subsea Production Systems, 2nd Edition Specification 17L1, Specification for Flexible Pipe Ancillary Equipment, 1st Edition Recommended Practice 17L2, Recommended Practice for Flexible Pipe Ancillary Equipment, 1st Edition Recommended Practice 17O–A1, Addendum 1 to Recommended Practice for High Integrity Pressure Protection Systems (HIPPS), 1st Edition Recommended Practice 17P, Recommended Practice for Structures and Manifolds of Subsea Production Systems, 1st Edition E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM 21FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12035-12037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-601]


Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') is amending 
the final results of the 2010-2011 antidumping duty administrative 
review of tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and 
unfinished (``TRBs'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''), to 
correct certain ministerial errors.

DATES: Effective Date: February 21, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Farlander or Erin Kearney, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0182 or (202) 482-0167, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On January 10, 2013, the Department disclosed to interested parties 
its calculations for the final results of the 2010-2011 administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on TRBs from the PRC. On January 
15, 2013, Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. (``CPZ/SKF'') timely filed 
ministerial error allegations and requested that, pursuant to section 
751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') and 19 CFR 
351.224, the Department correct the alleged ministerial errors in the 
calculations. The Department published the final results of this 
proceeding on January 16, 2013.\1\ On January 22, 2013, the Timken 
Company (``Timken'') filed rebuttal comments to CPZ/SKF's ministerial 
error allegations. No other interested party submitted ministerial 
error allegations or rebuttal comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 78 FR 3396 
(January 16, 2013) (``Final Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    For a full description of the products covered by the antidumping 
duty order on tapered roller bearings from the PRC, see Memorandum to 
Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, from 
Brandon Farlander and Erin Kearney, International Trade Compliance 
Analysts, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, concerning, ``Final Results of 
the 2010-2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Tapered Roller 
Bearings from the People's Republic of China: Allegation of Ministerial 
Errors and Amended Final,'' dated concurrently with this notice 
(``Ministerial Error Memorandum''), which is incorporated by reference.

Ministerial Errors

    A ministerial error is defined in section 751(h) of the Act as 
including ``errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic 
function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, 
duplication, or the like, and any other

[[Page 12036]]

type of unintentional error which the administering authority considers 
ministerial.'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See also 19 CFR 351.224(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After analyzing CPZ/SKF's comments and Timken's rebuttal comments, 
we have determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.224(e), that we made the following ministerial errors in our 
calculations for the Final Results:
     We unintentionally deducted amounts for domestic brokerage 
and handling expenses twice for certain sales.
     We unintentionally failed to offset CPZ/SKF's freight 
expenses with its freight revenue for sales in which it reported both 
freight expenses from the warehouse to the U.S. customer and 
corresponding freight revenue.

For a detailed discussion of all alleged ministerial errors, as well as 
the Department's analysis, see Ministerial Error Memorandum.
    In accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), 
we are amending the Final Results of the administrative review of TRBs 
from the PRC. The revised weighted-average dumping margins are detailed 
below. For CPZ/SKF-specific calculations, see Memorandum to the File 
from Brandon Farlander and Erin Kearney, International Trade Analysts, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, ``Administrative 
Review of Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results 
Analysis Memorandum of Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd. and Peer 
Bearing Company,'' dated concurrently with this notice and incorporated 
by reference.
    In the Final Results, we determined that one company, in addition 
to the mandatory respondent, qualified for a separate rate.\3\ Because 
we have revised the weighted-average dumping margin for CPZ/SKF, we are 
also revising the weighted-average dumping margin for Xiang Yang 
Automobile Bearing Co., Ltd., a separate rate respondent, because the 
rate for Xiang Yang Automobile Bearing Co., Ltd. is based on the 
weighted-average dumping margin calculated for CPZ/SKF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Final Results, 78 FR at 3397.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The amended, weighted-average dumping margins are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                          Exporter                             dumping
                                                                margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd............................        14.91
Xiang Yang Automobile Bearing Co., Ltd.....................        14.91
PRC-wide entity *..........................................        92.84
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The PRC-wide entity includes Haining Automann Parts Co., Ltd.,
  Zhejiang Zhaofeng Mechanical and Electronic Co., Ltd., and Tianshui
  Hailin Import and Export Corporation, where the exporter is Tianshui
  Hailin Import and Export Corporation and the producer is any company
  other than Hailin Bearing Factory (the successor-in-interest is Gansu
  Hailin Zhongke Science & Technology Co., Ltd.). The Department has
  previously found that merchandise produced by Hailin Bearing Factory
  and exported by Tianshui Hailin Import and Export Corporation is not
  subject to the order.\4\

     
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
2000-2001 Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, and 
Determination to Revoke Order, in Part, 67 FR 68990, 68991 (November 
14, 2002); see also Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 
Finished and Unfinished, from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of 2009-2010 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part, 77 FR 2271, 2273 
(January 17, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed for these amended final 
results within five days of the date of publication of this notice to 
interested parties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
of subject merchandise in accordance with the amended final results of 
this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to 
CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these amended final 
results of review.
    For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average 
dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), we calculated 
importer-specific assessment rates for merchandise subject to this 
review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As in the Final Results, the Department applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (``Final Modification 
for Reviews'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For CPZ/SKF, we calculated an ad valorem rate for each importer by 
dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's 
examined sales by the total entered values associated with those sales. 
For duty-assessment rates calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP 
to assess the resulting ad valorem rate against the entered customs 
values for the subject merchandise. We will instruct CBP to assess 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review 
where an importer-specific assessment rate is above de minimis. Where 
either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de 
minimis,\6\ or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de 
minimis,\7\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Final Modification for Reviews.
    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We will instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject merchandise 
exported by the PRC-wide entity at the ad valorem rate of 92.84 percent 
of entered value.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective 
retroactively on any entries made on or after January 16, 2013, the 
date of publication of the Final Results, for all shipments of the 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, 
the cash deposit rate will be the rate shown for this company (except 
if the rate is de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, a zero cash 
deposit will be required for that company); (2) for previously 
investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above 
that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for 
all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to 
be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-
wide rate of 92.84 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of 
subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that 
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain 
in effect until further notice.
    These amended final results are published in accordance with 
sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.


[[Page 12037]]


    Dated: February 13, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-04043 Filed 2-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P