Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 3 Thereto, To Establish the Market Quality Program, 12116-12117 [2013-03964]
Download as PDF
12116
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Notices
via ISG from other exchanges that are
members of ISG or with which the
Exchange has entered into a
comprehensive surveillance sharing
agreement. In addition, as noted above,
investors will have ready access to
information regarding the Fund’s
holdings, the IOPV, the Disclosed
Portfolio, and quotation and last sale
information for the Shares. The Fund
will not invest in options, futures or
swaps. The Fund’s investments will be
consistent with its investment objective
and will not be used to enhance
leverage.
Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purpose of the Act. The Exchange
notes that the proposed rule change will
facilitate the listing and trading of an
additional type of actively-managed
exchange-traded product that will
enhance competition among market
participants, to the benefit of investors
and the marketplace.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Feb 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–NYSEArca–2013–14 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–NYSEArca-2013–14. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed
rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–NYSEArca–
2013–14 and should be submitted on or
before March 14, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.27
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–03970 Filed 2–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
27 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68925; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2012–137]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 3 Thereto, To Establish the
Market Quality Program
February 14, 2013.
On December 7, 2012, The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘NASDAQ’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
establish the Market Quality Program
(‘‘MQP’’ or ‘‘Program’’) on a pilot basis.
On December 20, 2012, the Exchange
submitted Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change, which replaced
and superseded the proposed rule
change in its entirety. The proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1 thereto, was published for comment in
the Federal Register on December 31,
2012.3 The Commission received two
comment letters on the proposed rule
change.4 On February 7, 2013, the
Exchange submitted Amendment No. 2
to the proposed rule change. On
February 8, 2013, the Exchange
withdrew Amendment No. 2 5 and filed
Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule
change.6
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68515 (Dec.
21, 2012), 77 FR 77141 (Dec. 31, 2012).
4 See Letter from Rey Ramsey, President & CEO,
TechNet, dated January 22, 2013 and Letter from
Daniel G. Weaver, Ph.D., Professor of Finance,
Rutgers Business School, dated January 30, 2013.
5 The Exchange withdrew Amendment No. 2 due
to a technical error in the amendment.
6 In Amendment No. 3, the Exchange clarified: (i)
that the Exchange may limit on a Program-wide
basis the number of Exchange-Traded Funds
(‘‘ETFs’’) per MQP Company that can participate in
the MQP, and that the Exchange would not be
limiting the number of actual shares issued by an
MQP Company for a particular ETF participating in
the Program; (ii) that the Exchange will provide in
the monthly public report to the Commission
relating to the MQP (a) information on the market
quality of MQP Securities after they exceed the
threshold and ‘‘graduate’’ from the Program
pursuant to proposed Rule 5950(d)(1)(A), and (b) its
analysis of the information to be included in the
report and its assessment of the efficacy of the
MQP; and (iii) that the Exchange will provide to the
Commission data and analyses about comparable
ETFs that are listed on the Exchange but that are
not in the MQP, as well as any other MQP-related
data and analyses requested by Commission staff for
the purpose of evaluating the efficacy of the MQP.
Amendment No. 3 provides clarification to the
2 17
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Notices
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 7 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change—or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds the longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons
for so finding or (ii) as to which the selfregulatory organization consents—the
Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day for this filing
is February 14, 2013. The Commission
is extending this 45-day period.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the
proposed rule change so that the
Commission has sufficient time to
consider the proposed rule change and
the comments received. The proposed
rule change would, among other things,
add new Rule 5950 to establish the
Market Quality Program and exempt the
Market Quality Program from NASDAQ
Rule 2460 (Payment for Market Making).
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8
designates March 31, 2013, as the date
by which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change
(File Number SR–NASDAQ–2012–137).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–03964 Filed 2–20–13; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
proposed rule change, and because it does not
materially affect the substance of the proposed rule
change, Amendment No. 3 does not require notice
and comment. All terms relating to the MQP that
are referred to, but not defined in, this Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission
Action are defined in the proposed rule change, as
amended.
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
8 Id.
9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:47 Feb 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68927; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2013–15]
12117
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change Amending Rule 6.87 in
Part and Adding a New Section To
Address Errors That Involve Complex
Orders
The Exchange is proposing to amend
certain existing provisions of Rule 6.87
(‘‘Obvious Error Rule’’).4 In addition,
the Exchange is proposing to add new
language to Rule 6.87 specific to how
errors involving Complex Orders will be
addressed.
February 14, 2013.
Proposed Amendments to Existing
Provisions of Rule 6.87
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on February
1, 2013, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.87 in part and add a new section
to address errors that involve Complex
Orders. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange adopted the Obvious
Error Rule to handle situations where an
order receives an erroneous execution,
such as receiving a price that is higher
or lower than the Theoretical Price by
a specified amount.5 The Exchange is
proposing several amendments to the
Obvious Error Rule. First, the Exchange
is proposing to change the portion of the
rule that addresses errors in series with
zero or no bid. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes replacing reference
to ‘‘series quoted no bid on the
Exchange’’ with ‘‘series where the
NBBO bid is zero.’’ This is being done
to ensure consistency in the language
with other aspects of the existing rule
that reference NBBO for determination
of whether a transaction is deemed
eligible for obvious error treatment. The
Exchange believes the NBBO provides
greater accuracy in determining the
value or valueless of an option because
it takes into account interest from all
market participants and not just those
active on the Exchange. The Exchange
also believes that ensuring consistency
throughout the rule text is important to
help avoid investor confusion.
Second, the Exchange proposes to
amend the times in which certain OTP
Holders are required to notify the
4 See
Exchange Rule 6.87.
e.g. Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
34–48538 (September 25, 2003), 68 FR 56858
(October 2, 2003) (PCX–2002–01); 49718 (May 17,
2004), 69 FR 29611 (May 24, 2004) (PCX–2004–08);
51723 (May 20, 2005), 70 FR 30988 (May 31, 2005)
(PCX–2005–52); 52008 (July 11, 2005), 70 FR 41069
(July 15, 2005) (PCX–2005–78); 53221 (February 3,
2006), 71 FR 6811 (February 9, 2006) (PCX–2005–
102); 55330 (February 21, 2007), 72 FR 9052
(February 28, 2007) (NYSEArca–2007–06); 57103
(January 4, 2008), 73 FR 1903 (January 10, 2008)
(NYSEArca–2007–115); 57653 (April 11, 2008), 73
FR 20996 (April 17, 2008) (NYSEArca–2008–41);
58717 (October 2, 2008), 73 FR 60386 (October 10,
2008) (NYSEArca–2008–106); 59556 (March 11,
2009), 74 FR 11396 (March 17, 2009) (NYSEArca–
2009–17); 61393 (January 21, 2010), 75 FR 4887
(January 29, 2010) (NYSEArca–2010–03); 62019
(April 30, 2010), 75 FR 25889 (May 10, 2010)
(NYSEArca–2010–16); 62052 (May 6, 2010), 75 FR
26832 (May 12, 2010) (NYSEArca–2010–38); 65504
(October 6, 2011), 76 FR 63980 (October 14, 2011)
(NYSEArca–2011–71).
5 See
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12116-12117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03964]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68925; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2012-137]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 3 Thereto, To
Establish the Market Quality Program
February 14, 2013.
On December 7, 2012, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'' or
``NASDAQ'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to establish the Market Quality Program (``MQP''
or ``Program'') on a pilot basis. On December 20, 2012, the Exchange
submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change, which replaced
and superseded the proposed rule change in its entirety. The proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on December 31, 2012.\3\ The Commission
received two comment letters on the proposed rule change.\4\ On
February 7, 2013, the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change. On February 8, 2013, the Exchange withdrew
Amendment No. 2 \5\ and filed Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule
change.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68515 (Dec. 21, 2012),
77 FR 77141 (Dec. 31, 2012).
\4\ See Letter from Rey Ramsey, President & CEO, TechNet, dated
January 22, 2013 and Letter from Daniel G. Weaver, Ph.D., Professor
of Finance, Rutgers Business School, dated January 30, 2013.
\5\ The Exchange withdrew Amendment No. 2 due to a technical
error in the amendment.
\6\ In Amendment No. 3, the Exchange clarified: (i) that the
Exchange may limit on a Program-wide basis the number of Exchange-
Traded Funds (``ETFs'') per MQP Company that can participate in the
MQP, and that the Exchange would not be limiting the number of
actual shares issued by an MQP Company for a particular ETF
participating in the Program; (ii) that the Exchange will provide in
the monthly public report to the Commission relating to the MQP (a)
information on the market quality of MQP Securities after they
exceed the threshold and ``graduate'' from the Program pursuant to
proposed Rule 5950(d)(1)(A), and (b) its analysis of the information
to be included in the report and its assessment of the efficacy of
the MQP; and (iii) that the Exchange will provide to the Commission
data and analyses about comparable ETFs that are listed on the
Exchange but that are not in the MQP, as well as any other MQP-
related data and analyses requested by Commission staff for the
purpose of evaluating the efficacy of the MQP. Amendment No. 3
provides clarification to the proposed rule change, and because it
does not materially affect the substance of the proposed rule
change, Amendment No. 3 does not require notice and comment. All
terms relating to the MQP that are referred to, but not defined in,
this Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action
are defined in the proposed rule change, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12117]]
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \7\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change--or
within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds the longer period to be appropriate and publishes
its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents--the Commission shall either approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day for this filing is February 14, 2013. The
Commission is extending this 45-day period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
the Commission has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change
and the comments received. The proposed rule change would, among other
things, add new Rule 5950 to establish the Market Quality Program and
exempt the Market Quality Program from NASDAQ Rule 2460 (Payment for
Market Making).
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\8\ designates March 31, 2013, as the date by which the Commission
should either approve or disapprove or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change (File Number
SR-NASDAQ-2012-137).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Id.
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-03964 Filed 2-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P