Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 11666-11667 [2013-03621]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11666
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2013 / Notices
a. Recruitment costs, which include
the costs of constructing the frame and
the relative costs and efficiency of
enrolling a participant;
b. Generalizability. What population
is being represented?
c. Extent of exposures and other
information that can be gathered. By
definition, women who enter the study
at the birth visit will have more limited
data on prenatal exposures than
participants enrolled during the
prenatal period; while prenatal
participants will have less information
on prenatal exposures (and much less
information on preconception
exposures) than the subsequent births to
already enrolled mothers or a separate
preconception sample.
2. What should be the allocation of
sample cases among the various strata?
Assume that 10% of the sample is
reserved for preconception and special
studies; then, the allocation involves the
remaining 90,000.
a. One option is the current proposal
which is about a 50–50 split or 45,000
participants in each.
b. Another option is something like an
80–20 split allocated between birth and
pregnancy, with the pregnancy sample
used to form the basis for imputing
prenatal exposures (after using medical
records for the mothers to get as much
prenatal information as possible).
c. Yet another option is like an 80–20
split allocated between pregnancy and
birth, with the birth sample used to
form the basis for providing
generalizability to the data analysis.
d. One extreme could be the entire
initial enrollment allocated to the birth
stratum, with studies of prenatal and
preconception exposures using
primarily the subsequent births to
originally enrolled mothers.
e. At the other extreme, most of the
sample could be allocated to the
prenatal stratum with a small birth
sample consisting of women who did
not receive any prenatal care and are
enrolled at the hospital.
3. Given the challenge as stated in the
Children’s Health Act of 2000 to
‘‘perform complete assessments of
environmental influences on children’s
well-being,’’ does the proposed visit
schedule and environmental sample
collection (https://
www.nationalchildrensstudy.gov/
research/workshops/Pages/potentialenvironmental-exposures-ofinterest.pdf) balance the complex
requirements? Specifically comment on
the proportion of different types of data
collection—primary environmental
sample collection, use of biological
specimens for biomarkers of exposure,
and use of secondary sources including
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Feb 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
retrospective analysis for environmental
exposures. Considerations may include:
a. Are the proposed measures
(biomarkers, questionnaires, physical
measures) the most appropriate to assess
exposures of interest? If not, what
measures should be taken?
b. On what decision points should the
NCS prioritize exposure assessments?
Some examples of factors to consider
are:
1. Potential public health impact of
the outcome
2. Technical feasibility including
timing of data collection with regard to
potential developmental vulnerability
3. Scientific opportunity to address
knowledge gaps and illuminate
developmental pathways
This RFI is for planning purposes
only and should not be construed as a
solicitation for applications or proposals
and/or as an obligation in any way on
the part of the United States Federal
government. The Federal government
will not pay for the preparation of any
information submitted, and/or for the
government’s use of that information.
Additionally, the government cannot
guarantee the confidentiality of the
information provided.
Dated: February 7, 2013.
Alan E. Guttmacher,
Director, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National
Institute of Child Health and Human
Development, NIH.
[FR Doc. 2013–03716 Filed 2–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: Services Accountability
Improvement System—(OMB No. 0930–
0208)—Extension
This is an extension to the previously
OMB approved instrument. The
Services Accountability Improvement
System (SAIS), which is a real-time,
performance management system that
captures information on the substance
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
abuse treatment and mental health
services delivered in the United States.
A wide range of client and program
information is captured through SAIS
for approximately 600 grantees.
Substance abuse treatment facilities
submit their data on a monthly and even
a weekly basis to ensure that SAIS is an
accurate, up-to-date reflection on the
scope of services delivered and
characteristics of the treatment
population. Over 30 reports on grantee
performance are readily available on the
SAIS Web site. The reports inform staff
on the grantees’ ability to serve their
target populations and meet their client
and budget targets. SAIS data allow
grantees information that can guide
modifications to their service array.
Continued approval of this information
collection will allow SAMHSA to
continue to meet Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993
(GPRA) reporting requirements that
quantify the effects and
accomplishments of its discretionary
grant programs which are consistent
with OMB guidance.
Note that there are no changes to the
instrument or the burden hours from the
previous OMB submission.
Based on current funding and
planned fiscal year 2010 notice of
funding announcements (NOFA), the
CSAT programs that will use these
measures in fiscal years 2013 through
2014 include: the Access to Recovery 2
(ATR2), ATR3, Addictions Treatment
for Homeless; Adult Criminal Justice
Treatment; Assertive Adolescent Family
Treatment; HIV/AIDS Outreach; Office
of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention—Brief Intervention and
Referral to Treatment (OJJDP–BIRT);
OJJDP-Juvenile Drug Court (OJJDP–JDC);
Offender Re-entry Program; Pregnant
and Postpartum Women; Recovery
Community Services Program—
Services; Recovery Oriented Systems of
Care; Screening and Brief Intervention
and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT),
Targeted Capacity Expansion (TCE);
TCE/HIV; Treatment Drug Court; and
the Youth Offender Reentry Program.
SAMHSA uses the performance
measures to report on the performance
of its discretionary services grant
programs. The performance measures
information is used by individuals at
three different levels: the SAMHSA
administrator and staff, the Center
administrators and government project
officers, and grantees
SAMHSA and its Centers will use the
data for annual reporting required by
GPRA and for NOMs comparing
baseline with discharge and follow-up
data. GPRA requires that SAMHSA’s
report for each fiscal year include actual
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
11667
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2013 / Notices
results of performance monitoring for
the three preceding fiscal years. The
additional information collected
through this process will allow
SAMHSA to report on the results of
these performance outcomes as well as
be consistent with the specific
performance domains that SAMHSA is
implementing as the NOMs, to assess
the accountability and performance of
its discretionary and formula grant
programs.
Note that there are no changes to the
instrument or the burden hours from the
previous OMB submission.
ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN 1—CSAT GPRA CLIENT OUTCOME MEASURES FOR DISCRETIONARY
PROGRAMS
Center/form/respondent type
Number of
respondents
Responses per
respondent
Clients:
Adolescents ...............................
Adults:
General non ATR or
SBIRT).
ATR ....................................
SBIRT 4 Screening Only .....
SBIRT Brief Intervention ............
SBIRT Brief Tx & Refer to Tx ...
Client Subtotal .............
272,730 ...................
Data Extract 5 and Upload:
Adolescent Records ..................
Adult Records:
General (non ATR or
SBIRT).
ATR Data Extract ......................
ATR Upload 6 .............................
SBIRT Screening Only Data Extract.
SBIRT Brief Intervention Data
Extract.
SBIRT Brief Tx&Refer to Tx
Data Extract.
SBIRT Upload 7 .........................
Data Extract and
Upload Subtotal.
Total .....................
Total
responses
Hours per response
Total hour
burden
Added burden
proportion 2
3,900 .......................
4
15,600
.5 .............................
7,800
.34
28,000 .....................
3
84,000
.5 .............................
42,000
.34
53,333 .....................
150,618 ...................
27,679 .....................
9,200 .......................
3
1
3
3
159,999
150,618
83,037
27,600
.5 .............................
.13 ...........................
.20 ...........................
.5 .............................
80,000
19,580
16,607
13,800
.34
0
0
.34
520,854
.................................
179,787
........................
44 grants .................
44 X 4
176
.18 ...........................
32
........................
528 grants ...............
70 X 3
210
.18 ...........................
38
........................
53,333 .....................
24 grants .................
3
3
160,000
160,000
25,600
27
........................
........................
9 grants ...................
21,517 X 1
21,517
.16 ...........................
1 hr. per 6,000
records.
.07 ...........................
1,506
........................
9 grants ...................
3,954 X 3
11,862
.10 ...........................
1,186
........................
9 grants ...................
1,314 X 3
3,942
.18 ...........................
710
........................
29
........................
7 grants ...................
171,639
1 hr. per 6,000
records.
53,856 .....................
529,382
.................................
29,134
........................
326,586 ...................
1,050,236
.................................
208,921
........................
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
NOTES:
1. This table represents the maximum additional burden if adult respondents, for the discretionary services programs including ATR, provide
three sets of responses/data and if CSAT adolescent respondents, provide four sets of responses/data.
2. Added burden proportion is an adjustment reflecting customary and usual business practices programs engage in (e.g., they already collect
the data items).
3. Estimate based on 2010 hourly wave of $19.97 for U.S. workforce eligible from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
4. Screening, Brief Intervention, Treatment and Referral (SBIRT) grant program:
* 27,679 Brief Intervention (BI) respondents complete sections A & B of the GPRA instrument, all of these items are asked during a customary
and usual intake process resulting in zero burden; and
* 9,200 Brief Treatment (BT) & Referral to Treatment (RT) respondents complete all sections of the GPRA instrument.
5. Data Extract by Grants: Grant burden for capturing customary and usual data.
6. Upload: all 24 ATR grants upload data.
7. Upload: 7 of the 9 SBIRT grants upload data; the other 2 grants conduct direct data entry.
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by March 21, 2013 to the
SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). To ensure timely receipt of
comments, and to avoid potential delays
in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service,
commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Feb 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email,
commenters may also fax their
comments to: 202–395–7285.
Commenters may also mail them to:
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Summer King,
Statistician.
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
[FR Doc. 2013–03621 Filed 2–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11666-11667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03621]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: Services Accountability Improvement System--(OMB No. 0930-
0208)--Extension
This is an extension to the previously OMB approved instrument. The
Services Accountability Improvement System (SAIS), which is a real-
time, performance management system that captures information on the
substance abuse treatment and mental health services delivered in the
United States. A wide range of client and program information is
captured through SAIS for approximately 600 grantees. Substance abuse
treatment facilities submit their data on a monthly and even a weekly
basis to ensure that SAIS is an accurate, up-to-date reflection on the
scope of services delivered and characteristics of the treatment
population. Over 30 reports on grantee performance are readily
available on the SAIS Web site. The reports inform staff on the
grantees' ability to serve their target populations and meet their
client and budget targets. SAIS data allow grantees information that
can guide modifications to their service array. Continued approval of
this information collection will allow SAMHSA to continue to meet
Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) reporting
requirements that quantify the effects and accomplishments of its
discretionary grant programs which are consistent with OMB guidance.
Note that there are no changes to the instrument or the burden
hours from the previous OMB submission.
Based on current funding and planned fiscal year 2010 notice of
funding announcements (NOFA), the CSAT programs that will use these
measures in fiscal years 2013 through 2014 include: the Access to
Recovery 2 (ATR2), ATR3, Addictions Treatment for Homeless; Adult
Criminal Justice Treatment; Assertive Adolescent Family Treatment; HIV/
AIDS Outreach; Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention--
Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (OJJDP-BIRT); OJJDP-
Juvenile Drug Court (OJJDP-JDC); Offender Re-entry Program; Pregnant
and Postpartum Women; Recovery Community Services Program--Services;
Recovery Oriented Systems of Care; Screening and Brief Intervention and
Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), Targeted Capacity Expansion (TCE); TCE/
HIV; Treatment Drug Court; and the Youth Offender Reentry Program.
SAMHSA uses the performance measures to report on the performance of
its discretionary services grant programs. The performance measures
information is used by individuals at three different levels: the
SAMHSA administrator and staff, the Center administrators and
government project officers, and grantees
SAMHSA and its Centers will use the data for annual reporting
required by GPRA and for NOMs comparing baseline with discharge and
follow-up data. GPRA requires that SAMHSA's report for each fiscal year
include actual
[[Page 11667]]
results of performance monitoring for the three preceding fiscal years.
The additional information collected through this process will allow
SAMHSA to report on the results of these performance outcomes as well
as be consistent with the specific performance domains that SAMHSA is
implementing as the NOMs, to assess the accountability and performance
of its discretionary and formula grant programs.
Note that there are no changes to the instrument or the burden
hours from the previous OMB submission.
Estimates of Annualized Hour Burden \1\--CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Responses per Total Total hour Added burden
Center/form/respondent type Number of respondents respondent responses Hours per response burden proportion \2\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clients:
Adolescents.......................... 3,900.................. 4 15,600 .5..................... 7,800 .34
Adults:
General non ATR or SBIRT)........ 28,000................. 3 84,000 .5..................... 42,000 .34
ATR.............................. 53,333................. 3 159,999 .5..................... 80,000 .34
SBIRT \4\ Screening Only......... 150,618................ 1 150,618 .13.................... 19,580 0
SBIRT Brief Intervention............. 27,679................. 3 83,037 .20.................... 16,607 0
SBIRT Brief Tx & Refer to Tx......... 9,200.................. 3 27,600 .5..................... 13,800 .34
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Client Subtotal.............. 272,730................ ..................... 520,854 ....................... 179,787 ..............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data Extract \5\ and Upload:
Adolescent Records................... 44 grants.............. 44 X 4 176 .18.................... 32 ..............
Adult Records:
General (non ATR or SBIRT)....... 528 grants............. 70 X 3 210 .18.................... 38 ..............
ATR Data Extract..................... 53,333................. 3 160,000 .16.................... 25,600 ..............
ATR Upload \6\....................... 24 grants.............. 3 160,000 1 hr. per 6,000 records 27 ..............
SBIRT Screening Only Data Extract.... 9 grants............... 21,517 X 1 21,517 .07.................... 1,506 ..............
SBIRT Brief Intervention Data Extract 9 grants............... 3,954 X 3 11,862 .10.................... 1,186 ..............
SBIRT Brief Tx&Refer to Tx Data 9 grants............... 1,314 X 3 3,942 .18.................... 710 ..............
Extract.
SBIRT Upload \7\..................... 7 grants............... ..................... 171,639 1 hr. per 6,000 records 29 ..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data Extract and Upload 53,856................. ..................... 529,382 ....................... 29,134 ..............
Subtotal.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... 326,586................ ..................... 1,050,236 ....................... 208,921 ..............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES:
1. This table represents the maximum additional burden if adult respondents, for the discretionary services programs including ATR, provide three sets
of responses/data and if CSAT adolescent respondents, provide four sets of responses/data.
2. Added burden proportion is an adjustment reflecting customary and usual business practices programs engage in (e.g., they already collect the data
items).
3. Estimate based on 2010 hourly wave of $19.97 for U.S. workforce eligible from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
4. Screening, Brief Intervention, Treatment and Referral (SBIRT) grant program:
* 27,679 Brief Intervention (BI) respondents complete sections A & B of the GPRA instrument, all of these items are asked during a customary and usual
intake process resulting in zero burden; and
* 9,200 Brief Treatment (BT) & Referral to Treatment (RT) respondents complete all sections of the GPRA instrument.
5. Data Extract by Grants: Grant burden for capturing customary and usual data.
6. Upload: all 24 ATR grants upload data.
7. Upload: 7 of the 9 SBIRT grants upload data; the other 2 grants conduct direct data entry.
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by March 21, 2013 to the SAMHSA
Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of
comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing
of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged
to submit their comments to OMB via email to: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Although commenters are encouraged to send
their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments to:
202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive
Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2013-03621 Filed 2-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
