Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1992 Porsche Carrera Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation, 10687-10689 [2013-03461]
Download as PDF
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Notices
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
G&K Automotive Conversion, Inc. of
Santa Ana, California (G&K)(Registered
Importer 90–007) has petitioned NHTSA
to decide whether nonconforming 2005
LWB Mercedes-Benz G-class (Type 463)
MPVs are eligible for importation into
the United States. The vehicles which
WETL believes are substantially similar
are 2005 LWB Mercedes-Benz G-class
(Type 463) MPVs that were
manufactured for importation into and
sale in the United States and certified by
their manufacturer as conforming to all
applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared
non-U.S. certified 2005 LWB MercedesBenz G-class (Type 463) MPVs to their
U.S.-certified counterparts, and found
the vehicles to be substantially similar
with respect to compliance with most
FMVSS. G&K submitted information
with its petition intended to
demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2005
LWB Mercedes-Benz G-class (Type 463)
MPVs, as originally manufactured,
conform to many FMVSS in the same
manner as their U.S. certified
counterparts, or are capable of being
readily altered to conform to those
standards. Specifically, the petitioner
claims that non-U.S. certified 2005 LWB
Mercedes-Benz G-class (Type 463)
MPVs are identical to their U.S. certified
counterparts with respect to compliance
with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission
Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock,
and Transmission Braking Effect; 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging
Systems; 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems; 105 Hydraulic and
Electric Brake Systems; 106 Brake
Hoses; 113 Hood Latch System; 116
Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids; 119 New
Pneumatic Tires; 124 Accelerator
Control Systems; 201 Occupant
Protection in Interior Impact; 202 Head
Restraints; 204 Steering Control
Rearward Displacement; 205 Glazing
Materials; 206 Door Locks and Door
Retention Components; 207 Seating
Systems; 209 Seat Belt Assemblies; 210
Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages; 212
Windshield Mounting; 216 Roof Crush
Resistance; 219 Windshield Zone
Intrusion; 225 Child Restraint
Anchorage Systems; and 302
Flammability of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the
vehicles are capable of being altered to
meet the following standards, in the
manner indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and
Displays: Replacement of the instrument
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
cluster with a U.S.-model component
and reprogramming and initializing the
vehicle control system to integrate the
instrument cluster and activate the
required warning systems.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment:
Installation of U.S.- model headlamps
and front and rear side marker lamps.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors:
Replacement of the passenger-side
rearview mirror with a U.S.-model
component, or inscription of the
required warning statement on the face
of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection:
Reprogramming the vehicle’s control
system so that the required warning is
activated when the key is in the ignition
and the driver’s door is open.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated
Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Reprogramming the vehicle’s
control system and door modules so that
the window transport mechanism is
inoperative when the ignition is turned
in the off position.
Standard No. 120 Tire Selection and
Rims for Motor Vehicles Other than
Passenger Cars: Installation of a tire
information placard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash
Protection: Reprogramming the interior
control computer to activate the seat
belt warning system.
The petitioner also stated that the
vehicles are equipped with an automatic
restraint system that consists of a seat
belt warning lamp, driver and passenger
air bags and knee bolsters, air bag crash
sensors, and an air bag control unit. The
vehicles are also equipped in the front
and rear outboard seating positions with
Type 2 lap and shoulder belts identical
to those found on the vehicle’s U.S.
certified counterpart that are selftensioning and released by means of a
single red push button.
Standard No. 214Side Impact
Protection: Inspection of each vehicle to
ensure it is equipped with door beams
that meet the requirements of the
standard.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System
Integrity: Inspection of each vehicle and
replacement of non-U.S. model
components with U.S. model
components to meet the requirement of
the standard.
In addition, the petitioner states that
a vehicle identification number (VIN)
plate must be installed in the area of the
left windshield post with the vehicle’s
original VIN identified as a substitute
for a U.S. VIN to meet the requirements
of 49 CFR Part 565.
All comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be considered, and
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10687
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above addresses both
before and after that date. To the extent
possible, comments filed after the
closing date will also be considered.
Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A),
(a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.7; delegation
of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Issued on: February 11, 2013.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2013–03459 Filed 2–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0014, Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 1992
Porsche Carrera Passenger Cars Are
Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that 1992 Porsche
Carrera passenger cars that were not
originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standards (FMVSS), are eligible
for importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to
vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 1992 Porsche Carrera) and
they are capable of being readily altered
to conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is March 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
10688
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Notices
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How to Read Comments submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC (‘‘JK’’), of
Baltimore, Maryland (Registered
Importer 90–006) has petitioned NHTSA
to decide whether nonconforming 1992
Porsche Carrera passenger cars are
eligible for importation into the United
States. The vehicles which JK believes
are substantially similar are 1992
Porsche Carrera passenger cars that were
manufactured for sale in the United
States and certified by their
manufacturer as conforming to all
applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared
the non-U.S. certified 1992 Porsche
Carrera to its U.S.-certified counterpart,
and found the vehicles to be
substantially similar with respect to
compliance with most FMVSS.
JK submitted information with its
petition intended to demonstrate that
the non-U.S. certified 1992 Porsche
Carrera, as originally manufactured,
conforms to many FMVSS in the same
manner as its U.S. certified counterpart,
or is capable of being readily altered to
conform to those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that
the non-U.S. certified 1992 Porsche
Carrera is identical to its U.S. certified
counterpart with respect to compliance
with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission
Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock,
and Transmission Braking Effect, 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging
Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 113
Hood Latch System, 114 Theft
Protection, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake
Fluids, Standard No. 118 PowerOperated Window, Partition, and Roof
Panel Systems, 109 New Pneumatic
Tires and certain specialty tires, 124
Accelerator Control Systems, 135 Light
Vehicle Brake Systems, 201 Occupant
Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head
Restraints, 203 Impact Protection for the
Driver from the Steering Control System,
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
204 Steering Control Rearward
Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials,
206 Door Locks and Door Retention
Components, 207 Seating Systems, 209
Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt
Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield
Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection,
216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219
Windshield Zone Intrusion, 225 Child
Restraint Anchorage Systems, 301 Fuel
System Integrity, and 302 Flammability
of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the
vehicle is capable of being readily
altered to meet the following standards,
in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls Telltales,
and Indicators: Replacement of the
instrument cluster with a U.S.-model
component.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment:
Installation of the following U.S.-model
components on vehicles not already so
equipped: (a) Headlamps; (b) tail lamps
(c) front and rear side marker lamps;
and (d) a high-mounted stop lamp.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors:
Installation of a U.S.-model passenger
side rearview mirror, or inscription of
the required warning statement on the
face of the existing mirror.
Standard No. 120 Tire Selection and
Rims for Vehicles other than Passenger
Cars: Installation of a tire and rim
information placard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash
Protection: (a) Reprogramming the
vehicle computer to activate the seat
belt warning lamp in a manner that
meets the standard; and (b) inspection
of all vehicles and installation of the
following U.S.-model components on
vehicles that are not already so
equipped: (1)Airbags; (2)control unit; (3)
sensors; (4) seat belts; and (5) knee
bolster. The petitioner states that the
vehicle is equipped with an automatic
restraint system that consists of dual
front airbags and knee bolsters, and with
combination lap and shoulder belts at
the front and rear outboard seating
positions that are automatic, selftensioning, and capable of being
released by means of a single red push
button.
The petitioner states that each vehicle
will be inspected prior to importation
for compliance with the Theft
Prevention Standard in 49 CFR Part 541
and that anti-theft devices will be
installed on all vehicles not already so
equipped.
The petitioner additionally states that
a vehicle identification plate must be
affixed to the vehicles near the left
windshield post to meet the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 565 and
that a certification label must be affixed
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Notices
to the driver’s door jamb to meet the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 567.
All comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above addresses both
before and after that date. To the extent
possible, comments filed after the
closing date will also be considered.
Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and
(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority
at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: February 11, 2013.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2013–03461 Filed 2–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2013–0029]
Pipeline Safety: Public Forum State
One-Call Exemptions
Office of Pipeline Safety,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice; public forum.
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration will
sponsor a public forum on state one-call
exemptions. The forum will be held on
March 14, 2013, in West Palm Beach,
Florida at the Palm Beach County
Convention Center. At the forum,
PHMSA will discuss the requirements
of the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory
Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011
relating to exemptions in state one-call
programs and actions taken to date. In
addition, damage prevention
stakeholders will discuss existing data
relating to this topic and present
perspectives during panel discussions.
DATES: The public forum will be held on
Thursday, March 14, 2013, from 9:30
a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EST. Name badge
pickup and onsite registration will be
available starting at 8:30 a.m. Refer to
the forum Web site for the agenda and
times at: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/
meetings/MtgHome.mtg?mtg=85. Please
note that the public forum will be
webcast live and presentations will be
available on the forum Web site within
30 days following the public forum.
ADDRESSES: The forum is open to all.
There is no cost to attend. The forum
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
will be held at the Palm Beach County
Convention Center, 650 Okeechobee
Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida,
33401. PHMSA is holding the forum at
this location because it is the same
location where the Common Ground
Alliance (CGA) 811 Excavation Safety
Conference & Expo will be held March
11–14, 2013, and many of the likely
attendees for the PHMSA Forum will
participate in the CGA Excavation
Safety Conference. Attendees can make
hotel arrangements for the PHMSA
Forum under the CGA room block at a
rate of $199.00 per night. Further details
can be found at https://
www.cgaconference.com.
Registration: To help assure that
adequate space is provided, all
attendees are encouraged to register for
the workshop at https://
primis.phmsa.dot.gov/meetings/
MtgHome.mtg?mtg=85.
Comments: Members of the public
may also submit written comments,
either before or after the workshop.
Comments should reference Docket No.
PHMSA–2013–0029. Comments may be
submitted in the following ways:
• E-Gov Web Site: https://
www.regulations.gov. This site allows
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management System,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: DOT Docket
Management System, Room W12–140,
on the ground floor of the West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Identify the Docket No.
at the beginning of your comments. If
you submit your comments by mail,
submit two copies. If you wish to
receive confirmation that PHMSA has
received your comments, include a selfaddressed stamped postcard. Internet
users may submit comments at https://
www.regulations.gov. Note: Comments
will be posted without changes or edits
to https://www.regulations.gov including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading in
the Regulatory Analyses and Notices
section of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for additional information.
Privacy Act Statement: Anyone may
search the electronic form of all
comments received for any of our
dockets. You may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10689
Federal Register published April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).
Information on Services for
Individuals with Disabilities: For
information on facilities or services for
individuals with disabilities, or to
request special assistance at the
meeting, please contact Annmarie
Robertson at 317–253–1622, or by email
at annmarie.robertson@dot.gov by
March 4, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Annmarie Robertson, Office of Pipeline
Safety, at 317–253–1622 or email at
annmarie.robertson@dot.gov, regarding
the subject matter of this notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3
of the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory
Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011
(Pub. L. 112–90) requires that PHMSA
address exemptions in state one-call
laws in two ways: As a factor in
determining eligibility for certain grants,
and in a requirement to prepare a stateby-state exemption study. With respect
to grant eligibility, in order to qualify for
a state one-call grant under 49 U.S.C.
6106, a state may not provide any
exemptions to municipalities, state
agencies, or their contractors from the
one-call notification system
requirements of the program. This
amendment takes effect 1/3/2014.
With respect to the study on the
impact of exemptions on pipeline
safety, Section 3(d) states:
(1) Study.—The Secretary of
Transportation shall conduct a study on
the impact of excavation damage on
pipeline safety.
(2) Contents.—The study shall
include—
(A) an analysis of the frequency and
severity of different types of excavation
damage incidents;
(B) an analysis of exemptions to the
one-call notification system
requirements in each State;
(C) a comparison of exemptions to the
one-call notification system
requirements in each State to the types
of excavation damage incidents in that
State; and
(D) an analysis of the potential safety
benefits and adverse consequences of
eliminating all exemptions for
mechanized excavation from State onecall notification systems.
(3) Report.—Not later than 2 years
after the date of enactment of this Act,
the Secretary shall submit to the
Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure and the Committee on
Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
of the Senate a report on the results of
the study.
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10687-10689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03461]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2013-0014, Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
1992 Porsche Carrera Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
1992 Porsche Carrera passenger cars that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS), are eligible for importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United States and that were certified by
their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-
certified version of the 1992 Porsche Carrera) and they are capable of
being readily altered to conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is March 18, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001
[[Page 10688]]
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to
the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
How to Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the
heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit
late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search
the Docket for new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC (``JK''), of Baltimore, Maryland (Registered
Importer 90-006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming
1992 Porsche Carrera passenger cars are eligible for importation into
the United States. The vehicles which JK believes are substantially
similar are 1992 Porsche Carrera passenger cars that were manufactured
for sale in the United States and certified by their manufacturer as
conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared the non-U.S. certified 1992
Porsche Carrera to its U.S.-certified counterpart, and found the
vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with
most FMVSS.
JK submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate
that the non-U.S. certified 1992 Porsche Carrera, as originally
manufactured, conforms to many FMVSS in the same manner as its U.S.
certified counterpart, or is capable of being readily altered to
conform to those standards. Specifically, the petitioner claims that
the non-U.S. certified 1992 Porsche Carrera is identical to its U.S.
certified counterpart with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102
Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission
Braking Effect, 103 Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104
Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 113 Hood Latch
System, 114 Theft Protection, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids, Standard
No. 118 Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel Systems, 109
New Pneumatic Tires and certain specialty tires, 124 Accelerator
Control Systems, 135 Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 201 Occupant
Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head Restraints, 203 Impact
Protection for the Driver from the Steering Control System, 204
Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door
Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating Systems, 209 Seat Belt
Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting,
214 Side Impact Protection, 216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield
Zone Intrusion, 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems, 301 Fuel System
Integrity, and 302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the vehicle is capable of being
readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner
indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls Telltales, and Indicators: Replacement of
the instrument cluster with a U.S.-model component.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: Installation of the following U.S.-model components on
vehicles not already so equipped: (a) Headlamps; (b) tail lamps (c)
front and rear side marker lamps; and (d) a high-mounted stop lamp.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Installation of a U.S.-model
passenger side rearview mirror, or inscription of the required warning
statement on the face of the existing mirror.
Standard No. 120 Tire Selection and Rims for Vehicles other than
Passenger Cars: Installation of a tire and rim information placard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: (a) Reprogramming the
vehicle computer to activate the seat belt warning lamp in a manner
that meets the standard; and (b) inspection of all vehicles and
installation of the following U.S.-model components on vehicles that
are not already so equipped: (1)Airbags; (2)control unit; (3) sensors;
(4) seat belts; and (5) knee bolster. The petitioner states that the
vehicle is equipped with an automatic restraint system that consists of
dual front airbags and knee bolsters, and with combination lap and
shoulder belts at the front and rear outboard seating positions that
are automatic, self-tensioning, and capable of being released by means
of a single red push button.
The petitioner states that each vehicle will be inspected prior to
importation for compliance with the Theft Prevention Standard in 49 CFR
Part 541 and that anti-theft devices will be installed on all vehicles
not already so equipped.
The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification
plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post to
meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 565 and that a certification label
must be affixed
[[Page 10689]]
to the driver's door jamb to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 567.
All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: February 11, 2013.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2013-03461 Filed 2-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P