Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Requesting Permanent Approval of a Pilot Program To Receive Inbound Equities Orders From PSX Through NES, 10674-10676 [2013-03397]
Download as PDF
10674
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Notices
products on the same security to be
priced in the same minimum price
increments.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2013–016 and should be submitted on
or before March 7, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–03386 Filed 2–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2013–016 on the
subject line.
[Release No. 34–68890; File No. SR–BX–
2013–013]
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2013–016. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
February 8, 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change Requesting
Permanent Approval of a Pilot Program
To Receive Inbound Equities Orders
From PSX Through NES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on February
6, 2013, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange has filed a proposed
rule change for the permanent approval
of the Exchange’s pilot program to
permit the BX Equities Market
(‘‘System’’) to accept inbound orders
routed by Nasdaq Execution Services
LLC (‘‘NES’’) from the NASDAQ OMX
PSX facility of NASDAQ OMX PHLX
LLC (‘‘PHLX’’).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
In conjunction with PHLX providing
outbound routing services on PSX to all
markets using its affiliated routing
broker, NES,4 BX proposed that NES be
permitted to route orders from PHLX to
the Exchange on a pilot basis, subject to
certain limitations and conditions, as
described below.5 The current pilot
program expires March 30, 2013.6
NES is a broker-dealer and member of
NASDAQ, PHLX and BX. NES provides
all routing functions for The NASDAQ
Stock Market (‘‘NASDAQ’’), BX and
PHLX. BX, NASDAQ, PHLX and NES
are affiliates. Accordingly, the affiliate
relationship between BX and NES, its
member, raises the issue of an
exchange’s affiliation with a member of
such exchange. Specifically, in
connection with prior filings, the
Commission has expressed concern that
the affiliation of an exchange with one
of its members raises the potential for
unfair competitive advantage and
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65469
(October 3, 2011), 76 FR 62486 (October 7, 2011)
(SR–Phlx–2011–108).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65514
(October 7, 2011), 76 FR 63969 (October 14, 2011)
(SR–BX–2011–066).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67995
(October 5, 2012), 77 FR 62292 (October 12, 2012)
(SR–BX–2012–066).
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
potential conflicts of interest between
an exchange’s self-regulatory obligations
and its commercial interests.7
Recognizing that the Commission has
previously expressed concern regarding
the potential for conflicts of interest in
instances where a member firm is
affiliated with an exchange of which it
is a member, the Exchange previously
proposed, and the Commission
approved, limitations and conditions on
NES’s affiliation with the Exchange.8
Also recognizing that the Commission
has expressed concern regarding the
potential for conflicts of interest in
instances where a member firm is
affiliated with an exchange to which it
is routing orders, the Exchange
previously proposed, and the
Commission approved,9 NES’s
affiliation with the Exchange to permit
the Exchange to accept inbound orders
that NES routes in its capacity as a
facility of NASDAQ, subject to the
certain limitations and conditions. The
Exchange now proposes to permit BX to
accept inbound orders that NES routes
in its capacity as a facility of PHLX on
a permanent basis, subject to the
limitations and conditions of this pilot:
• First, the Exchange and FINRA
maintain a Regulatory Contract, as well
as an agreement pursuant to Rule 17d–
2 under the Act (‘‘17d–2 Agreement’’).10
Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract and
the 17d–2 Agreement, FINRA is
allocated regulatory responsibilities to
review NES’s compliance with certain
Exchange rules.11 Pursuant to the
Regulatory Contract, however, BX
retains ultimate responsibility for
enforcing its rules with respect to NES.
• Second, FINRA monitors NES for
compliance with the Exchange’s trading
rules, and collects and maintains certain
related information.12
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59153
(December 23, 2008), 73 FR 80485 (December 31,
2008) (SR–NASDAQ–2008–098); and 62736 (August
17, 2010), 75 FR 51861 (August 23, 2010) (SR–
NASDAQ–2010–100).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58324
(August 7, 2008), 73 FR 46936 (August 12, 2008)
(File Nos. SR–BSE–2008–02; SR–BSE–2008–23; SR–
BSE–2008–25; SR–BSECC–2008–01) (‘‘Order
approving the Acquisition of the Boston Stock
Exchange, Incorporated by The NASDAQ OMX
Group, Inc.’’).
9 Id.
10 17 CFR 240.17d–2.
11 NES is also subject to independent oversight by
FINRA, its designated examining authority, for
compliance with financial responsibility
requirements.
12 Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract, both
FINRA and the Exchange collect and maintain all
alerts, complaints, investigations and enforcement
actions in which NES (in its capacity as a facility
of PHLX routing orders to BX) is identified as a
participant that has potentially violated applicable
Commission or Exchange rules. The Exchange and
FINRA retain these records in an easily accessible
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Third, FINRA provides a report to
the Exchange’s chief regulatory officer
(‘‘CRO’’), on a quarterly basis, that: (i)
Quantifies all alerts (of which FINRA is
aware) that identify NES as a participant
that has potentially violated
Commission or Exchange rules, and (ii)
lists all investigations that identify NES
as a participant that has potentially
violated Commission or Exchange rules.
• Fourth, the Exchange has in place
BX Rule 2140(c), which requires The
NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., as the
holding company owning both the
Exchange and NES, to establish and
maintain procedures and internal
controls reasonably designed to ensure
that NES does not develop or implement
changes to its system, based on nonpublic information obtained regarding
planned changes to the Exchange’s
systems as a result of its affiliation with
the Exchange, until such information is
available generally to similarly situated
Exchange members, in connection with
the provision of inbound order routing
to the Exchange.
The Exchange has met all the abovelisted conditions. By meeting the above
conditions, the Exchange has set up
mechanisms that protect the
independence of the Exchange’s
regulatory responsibility with respect to
NES, as well as demonstrate that NES
cannot use any information advantage it
may have because of its affiliation with
the Exchange. Because the Exchange has
met all the above-listed conditions, it
now seeks permanent approval of this
inbound routing relationship. The
Exchange will continue to comply with
the conditions 1–4 stated above.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,13
in general, and with Sections 6(b)(5) of
the Act,14 in particular, in that the
proposal is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest,
because the proposed rule change will
manner in order to facilitate any potential review
conducted by the Commission’s Office of
Compliance Inspections and Examinations.
13 15 U.S.C. 78f.
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10675
allow the Exchange to continue to
receive inbound orders from NES, acting
in its capacity as a facility of PHLX, in
a manner consistent with prior
approvals and established protections.
The Exchange believes that these
conditions establish mechanisms that
protect the independence of the
Exchange’s regulatory responsibility
with respect to NES, as well as ensure
that NES cannot use any information it
may have because of its affiliation with
the Exchange to its advantage.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
Permanent approval of the current pilot
program does not raise any issues of
intramarket competition because it
involves inbound routing from an
affiliated exchange. Nor does it result in
a burden on competition among
exchanges, because there are many
competing exchanges that provide
routing services, including through an
affiliate.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission shall: (a) By order
approve or disapprove such proposed
rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
10676
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 / Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Notices
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BX–2013–013 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2013–013. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, on business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
located at 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549–1090. Copies of the filing will
also be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BX–
2013–013 and should be submitted on
or before March 7, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–03397 Filed 2–13–13; 8:45 am]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68878; File No. SR–EDGX–
2013–07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Amendments
to the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee
Schedule
February 8, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
31, 2013, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fees and rebates applicable to Members 3
of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rule
15.1(a) and (c). All of the changes
described herein are applicable to EDGX
Members. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Internet Web site at
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 As defined in Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
2 17
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange currently assesses a
charge of $0.0003 per share for
Members’ orders that yield Flag RY. The
Exchange proposes to increase the rate
it charges for Flag RY from $0.0003 per
share to $0.0005 per share for Members’
orders that route to the BATS YExchange, Inc. (‘‘BATS BYX’’) and add
liquidity. This proposed change
represents a pass through of the rate that
Direct Edge ECN LLC (d/b/a DE Route)
(‘‘DE Route’’), the Exchange’s affiliated
routing broker dealer, is charged for
routing orders to BATS BYX that do not
qualify for additional volume tiered
discounts, as described in BATS BYX’s
fee filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.4
The Exchange proposes to add Flag
RT to its fee schedule for Members’
orders that route to away trading centers
using the ROUT routing strategy 5 and
remove liquidity from the away
exchange. The Exchange proposes to
assess a fee of $0.0030 per share for
orders yielding Flag RT.
The Exchange proposes to add Flag
RX to its fee schedule for Members’
orders that route to away trading centers
using the ROUX routing strategy 6 and
remove liquidity from the away
exchange. The Exchange proposes to
assess a fee of $0.0030 per share for
orders yielding Flag RX.
The Exchange proposes to implement
these amendments to its fee schedule on
February 1, 2013.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,7
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4),8 in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its Members and
other persons using its facilities.
The Exchange’s proposed fee increase
for Flag RY represents a pass-through
rate where BATS BYX charges DE Route
$0.0005 per share for Members’ orders
that route to BATS BYX through DE
Route and add liquidity, and then DE
Route charges the Exchange $0.0005 per
share, and then the Exchange charges its
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68665
(January 16, 2013), 78 FR 4946 (January 23, 2013)
(SR–BYX–2013–001).
5 As defined in Exchange Rule 11.9(b)(3)(c)(ii).
6 As defined in Exchange Rule 11.9(b)(3)(c)(iii).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\14FEN1.SGM
14FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10674-10676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03397]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68890; File No. SR-BX-2013-013]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change Requesting Permanent Approval of a Pilot
Program To Receive Inbound Equities Orders From PSX Through NES
February 8, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on February 6, 2013, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``Exchange'' or
``BX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange has filed a proposed rule change for the permanent
approval of the Exchange's pilot program to permit the BX Equities
Market (``System'') to accept inbound orders routed by Nasdaq Execution
Services LLC (``NES'') from the NASDAQ OMX PSX facility of NASDAQ OMX
PHLX LLC (``PHLX'').
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
In conjunction with PHLX providing outbound routing services on PSX
to all markets using its affiliated routing broker, NES,\4\ BX proposed
that NES be permitted to route orders from PHLX to the Exchange on a
pilot basis, subject to certain limitations and conditions, as
described below.\5\ The current pilot program expires March 30,
2013.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65469 (October 3,
2011), 76 FR 62486 (October 7, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-108).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65514 (October 7,
2011), 76 FR 63969 (October 14, 2011) (SR-BX-2011-066).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67995 (October 5,
2012), 77 FR 62292 (October 12, 2012) (SR-BX-2012-066).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NES is a broker-dealer and member of NASDAQ, PHLX and BX. NES
provides all routing functions for The NASDAQ Stock Market
(``NASDAQ''), BX and PHLX. BX, NASDAQ, PHLX and NES are affiliates.
Accordingly, the affiliate relationship between BX and NES, its member,
raises the issue of an exchange's affiliation with a member of such
exchange. Specifically, in connection with prior filings, the
Commission has expressed concern that the affiliation of an exchange
with one of its members raises the potential for unfair competitive
advantage and
[[Page 10675]]
potential conflicts of interest between an exchange's self-regulatory
obligations and its commercial interests.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59153 (December 23,
2008), 73 FR 80485 (December 31, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-098); and
62736 (August 17, 2010), 75 FR 51861 (August 23, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-
2010-100).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recognizing that the Commission has previously expressed concern
regarding the potential for conflicts of interest in instances where a
member firm is affiliated with an exchange of which it is a member, the
Exchange previously proposed, and the Commission approved, limitations
and conditions on NES's affiliation with the Exchange.\8\ Also
recognizing that the Commission has expressed concern regarding the
potential for conflicts of interest in instances where a member firm is
affiliated with an exchange to which it is routing orders, the Exchange
previously proposed, and the Commission approved,\9\ NES's affiliation
with the Exchange to permit the Exchange to accept inbound orders that
NES routes in its capacity as a facility of NASDAQ, subject to the
certain limitations and conditions. The Exchange now proposes to permit
BX to accept inbound orders that NES routes in its capacity as a
facility of PHLX on a permanent basis, subject to the limitations and
conditions of this pilot:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58324 (August 7,
2008), 73 FR 46936 (August 12, 2008) (File Nos. SR-BSE-2008-02; SR-
BSE-2008-23; SR-BSE-2008-25; SR-BSECC-2008-01) (``Order approving
the Acquisition of the Boston Stock Exchange, Incorporated by The
NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.'').
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, the Exchange and FINRA maintain a Regulatory
Contract, as well as an agreement pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act
(``17d-2 Agreement'').\10\ Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract and the
17d-2 Agreement, FINRA is allocated regulatory responsibilities to
review NES's compliance with certain Exchange rules.\11\ Pursuant to
the Regulatory Contract, however, BX retains ultimate responsibility
for enforcing its rules with respect to NES.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 240.17d-2.
\11\ NES is also subject to independent oversight by FINRA, its
designated examining authority, for compliance with financial
responsibility requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, FINRA monitors NES for compliance with the
Exchange's trading rules, and collects and maintains certain related
information.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Pursuant to the Regulatory Contract, both FINRA and the
Exchange collect and maintain all alerts, complaints, investigations
and enforcement actions in which NES (in its capacity as a facility
of PHLX routing orders to BX) is identified as a participant that
has potentially violated applicable Commission or Exchange rules.
The Exchange and FINRA retain these records in an easily accessible
manner in order to facilitate any potential review conducted by the
Commission's Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, FINRA provides a report to the Exchange's chief
regulatory officer (``CRO''), on a quarterly basis, that: (i)
Quantifies all alerts (of which FINRA is aware) that identify NES as a
participant that has potentially violated Commission or Exchange rules,
and (ii) lists all investigations that identify NES as a participant
that has potentially violated Commission or Exchange rules.
Fourth, the Exchange has in place BX Rule 2140(c), which
requires The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., as the holding company owning both
the Exchange and NES, to establish and maintain procedures and internal
controls reasonably designed to ensure that NES does not develop or
implement changes to its system, based on non-public information
obtained regarding planned changes to the Exchange's systems as a
result of its affiliation with the Exchange, until such information is
available generally to similarly situated Exchange members, in
connection with the provision of inbound order routing to the Exchange.
The Exchange has met all the above-listed conditions. By meeting
the above conditions, the Exchange has set up mechanisms that protect
the independence of the Exchange's regulatory responsibility with
respect to NES, as well as demonstrate that NES cannot use any
information advantage it may have because of its affiliation with the
Exchange. Because the Exchange has met all the above-listed conditions,
it now seeks permanent approval of this inbound routing relationship.
The Exchange will continue to comply with the conditions 1-4 stated
above.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\13\ in general, and with
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in particular, in that the proposal is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest, because the
proposed rule change will allow the Exchange to continue to receive
inbound orders from NES, acting in its capacity as a facility of PHLX,
in a manner consistent with prior approvals and established
protections. The Exchange believes that these conditions establish
mechanisms that protect the independence of the Exchange's regulatory
responsibility with respect to NES, as well as ensure that NES cannot
use any information it may have because of its affiliation with the
Exchange to its advantage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
Permanent approval of the current pilot program does not raise any
issues of intramarket competition because it involves inbound routing
from an affiliated exchange. Nor does it result in a burden on
competition among exchanges, because there are many competing exchanges
that provide routing services, including through an affiliate.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
[[Page 10676]]
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2013-013 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2013-013. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., located at 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090. Copies of the filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2013-013 and should be
submitted on or before March 7, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-03397 Filed 2-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P