Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe From Japan: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 10134-10135 [2013-03364]

Download as PDF 10134 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2013 / Notices in the same manner that the Department adjusted each company’s cash deposit rate. See Cash Deposit Requirements section below. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Cash Deposit Requirements While the Department did not conduct a companion countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) administrative review, in the final determination of the CVD investigation on narrow woven ribbons from the PRC, the Department determined that the product under investigation benefitted from an export subsidy.44 Accordingly, the Department will instruct CBP to require an antidumping cash deposit equal to the weighted-average amount by which the normal value exceeds the export price, as indicated above, reduced by an amount, as appropriate, determined to constitute an export subsidy in the Final CVD Determination. Therefore, for Hubschercorp, the separate rate respondent, Weifang Dongfang and the PRC-wide entity the Department will instruct CBP to require an antidumping duty cash deposit for each entry equal to the weighted-average margins indicated above adjusted for the export subsidy rate determined in the Final CVD Determination. The adjusted cash deposit rates are 123.44 percent for Weifang Dongfang and 247.26 percent for Hubschercorp and the PRC-wide entity.45 The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Hubschercorp, a third-country reseller from Canada, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review; (2) for Weifang Dongfang, a PRC exporter which has a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review; (3) for previously investigated PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate; (4) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 247.26 percent; 46 and (5) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the review period. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.402(f)(3), failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department presuming that the exporter or producer paid or reimbursed the antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice of the final results of this review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: February, 5, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. APPENDIX Comment in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Comment 1: Use of the Highest Petition Rate as Adverse Facts Available [FR Doc. 2013–03236 Filed 2–12–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 44 See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 75 FR 41801 (July 19, 2010) (‘‘Final CVD Determination’’). 45 See Memorandum from Karine Gziryan to Robert Bolling regarding the adjusted cash deposit rate (dated concurrently with this notice) for further detail on the calculation of these adjustments. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Feb 12, 2013 Jkt 229001 46 See PO 00000 Final LTFV Determination, 75 FR at 41812. Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–588–857] Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe From Japan: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 1, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated the second sunset review of the antidumping duty order on welded large diameter line pipe (line pipe) from Japan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).1 On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of domestic interested parties, and no response from a respondent interested party, the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review. As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the margin of dumping likely to prevail if the order were revoked is identified in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective Date: February 13, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–3019, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On October 1, 2012, the Department initiated the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on line pipe from Japan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Sunset Initiation. The Department received a notice of intent to participate from United States Steel Corporation on October 10, 2012, and a notice of intent to participate from American Cast Iron Pipe Company (ACIPCO); Berg Steel Pipe Company; Dura-Bond Pipe LLC; Stupp Corporation; and Welspun Tubular LLC USA on October 11, 2012 (collectively, 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 77 FR 59897 (October 1, 2012) (Sunset Initiation). E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM 13FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2013 / Notices domestic interested parties). All domestic interested parties provided information within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), and provided information required under 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as U.S. producers of a domestic like product. We received a complete substantive response from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i) on October 31, 2012. No respondent interested parties submitted responses. As a result of the timely filed, substantive response from the domestic interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order The product currently is classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) item numbers 7305.11.10.30, 7305.11.10.60, 7305.11.50.00, 7305.12.10.30, 7305.12.10.60, 7305.12.50.00, 7305.19.10.30. 7305.19.10.60, and 7305.19.50.00. Although the HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope in the accompanying decision memorandum remains dispositive. See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated concurrently with this notice (Decision Memorandum). Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of the continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margin of dumping that is likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file electronically via Import Administration’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046, of the main Department of Commerce building. In VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Feb 12, 2013 Jkt 229001 addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https:// ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Review The Department determines that revocation of the antidumping duty order on line pipe from Japan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. Further, the Department finds that the magnitude of the margin of dumping that is likely to prevail if the order was revoked is 30.80 percent for Nippon Steel Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and for all other Japanese producers and exporters of subject merchandise. Notification This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. The Department is issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 31, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–03364 Filed 2–12–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XC485 Fishing Capacity Reduction Program for the Longline Catcher Processor Subsector of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Non-Pollock Groundfish Fishery National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce. ACTION: Notice of fee rate adjustment. AGENCY: NMFS issues this notice to decrease the fee rate for the non-pollock groundfish fishery to repay the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10135 $35,000,000 reduction loan to finance the non-pollock groundfish fishing capacity reduction program. DATES: The non-pollock groundfish program fee rate decrease is effective January 1, 2013. ADDRESSES: Send questions about this notice to Paul Marx, Chief, Financial Services Division, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910– 3282. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Marx, (301) 427–8799. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Sections 312(b)–(e) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(b) through (e)) generally authorize fishing capacity reduction programs. In particular, section 312(d) authorizes industry fee systems for repaying reduction loans which finance reduction program costs. Subpart L of 50 CFR part 600 is the framework rule generally implementing section 312(b)–(e). Sections 1111 and 1112 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 App. U.S.C. 1279f and 1279g) generally authorize reduction loans. Enacted on December 8, 2004, section 219, Title II, of FY 2005 Appropriations Act, Public Law 104–447 (Act) authorizes a fishing capacity reduction program implementing capacity reduction plans submitted to NMFS by catcher processor subsectors of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (‘‘BSAI’’) non-pollock groundfish fishery (‘‘reduction fishery’’) as set forth in the Act. The longline catcher processor subsector (the ‘‘Longline Subsector’’) is among the catcher processor subsectors eligible to submit to NMFS a capacity reduction plan under the terms of the Act. The longline subsector non-pollock groundfish reduction program’s objective was to reduce the number of vessels and permits endorsed for longline subsector of the non-pollock groundfish fishery. All post-reduction fish landings from the reduction fishery are subject to the longline subsector non-pollock groundfish program’s fee. NMFS proposed the implementing notice on August 11, 2006 (71 FR 46364), and published the final notice on September 29, 2006 (71 FR 57696). NMFS allocated the $35,000,000 reduction loan (A loan) to the reduction fishery and this loan is repayable by fees from the fishery. E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM 13FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10134-10135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-588-857]


Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe From Japan: Final Results of the 
Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On October 1, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) initiated the second sunset review of the antidumping duty 
order on welded large diameter line pipe (line pipe) from Japan 
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act).\1\ On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an 
adequate substantive response filed on behalf of domestic interested 
parties, and no response from a respondent interested party, the 
Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review. As a result 
of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the 
antidumping duty order would likely lead to the continuation or 
recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the margin of dumping likely to 
prevail if the order were revoked is identified in the ``Final Results 
of Review'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 77 FR 59897 
(October 1, 2012) (Sunset Initiation).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: February 13, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD 
Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0195 or (202) 482-3019, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 1, 2012, the Department initiated the sunset review of 
the antidumping duty order on line pipe from Japan pursuant to section 
751(c) of the Act. See Sunset Initiation. The Department received a 
notice of intent to participate from United States Steel Corporation on 
October 10, 2012, and a notice of intent to participate from American 
Cast Iron Pipe Company (ACIPCO); Berg Steel Pipe Company; Dura-Bond 
Pipe LLC; Stupp Corporation; and Welspun Tubular LLC USA on October 11, 
2012 (collectively,

[[Page 10135]]

domestic interested parties). All domestic interested parties provided 
information within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), 
and provided information required under 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). The 
domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under 
section 771(9)(C) of the Act as U.S. producers of a domestic like 
product. We received a complete substantive response from the domestic 
interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i) on October 31, 2012. No respondent interested parties 
submitted responses. As a result of the timely filed, substantive 
response from the domestic interested parties, the Department conducted 
an expedited sunset review of the order, pursuant to section 
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).

Scope of the Order

    The product currently is classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule (HTSUS) item numbers 7305.11.10.30, 7305.11.10.60, 
7305.11.50.00, 7305.12.10.30, 7305.12.10.60, 7305.12.50.00, 
7305.19.10.30. 7305.19.10.60, and 7305.19.50.00. Although the HTSUS 
item numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the scope in the accompanying decision 
memorandum remains dispositive. See ``Issues and Decision Memorandum'' 
from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary 
for Import Administration, dated concurrently with this notice 
(Decision Memorandum).

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the 
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues 
discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of the 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margin 
of dumping that is likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties 
can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset 
review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, 
which is on file electronically via Import Administration's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA 
ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, Room 7046, of the main Department of Commerce building. 
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be 
accessed directly on the Internet at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The 
paper copy and electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Final Results of Review

    The Department determines that revocation of the antidumping duty 
order on line pipe from Japan would likely lead to continuation or 
recurrence of dumping. Further, the Department finds that the magnitude 
of the margin of dumping that is likely to prevail if the order was 
revoked is 30.80 percent for Nippon Steel Corporation, Kawasaki Steel 
Corporation, and for all other Japanese producers and exporters of 
subject merchandise.

Notification

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    The Department is issuing and publishing the results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: January 31, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-03364 Filed 2-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.