Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico: Intent To Terminate Suspension Agreement and Resume Antidumping Investigation and Intent To Terminate Sunset Review, 9366-9368 [2013-02914]
Download as PDF
9366
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 / Notices
customer)-specific ad valorem rate is
greater than de minimis and we do not
have reliable entered values, we
calculate a per-unit assessment rate by
aggregating the amount of dumping for
all U.S. sales to each importer (or
customer) and dividing this amount by
the total quantity sold to that importer
(or customer).
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003.18 This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by the
respondent for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see the
Automatic Assessment Clarification.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit rates will
be effective upon publication of the
final results of this administrative
review for all shipments of pasta from
Italy entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the publication date of these final
results, as provided for by section
751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act): (1) The cash deposit
rate for companies subject to this review
will be the rate established in the final
results of this review, except if the rate
is less than 0.5 percent and, therefore,
de minimis, no cash deposit will be
required; (2) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, but was covered
in a previous review or the original lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate established for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the LTFV
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered by this review, a prior review,
or the LTFV investigation, the cash
deposit rate will be 15.45 percent, the
all-others rate established in the Section
129 determination.19 These cash deposit
18 See
Automatic Assessment Clarification.
Implementation of the Findings of the WTO
Panel in US—Zeroing (EC): Notice of
Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial
Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders,
72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007).
19 See
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Feb 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent increase in antidumping
duties by the amount of antidumping
and/or countervailing duties
reimbursed.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(5). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice
are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 1, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–820]
Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico: Intent
To Terminate Suspension Agreement
and Resume Antidumping
Investigation and Intent To Terminate
Sunset Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 2, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) and Mexican tomato
growers/exporters accounting for a
significant percentage of all fresh
tomatoes imported into the United
States from Mexico initialed a draft
agreement that would suspend a
resumed antidumping investigation on
fresh tomatoes from Mexico. Based on
this draft agreement, and if an
acceptable agreement is reached, we
anticipate that the Mexican tomato
growers/exporters will withdraw from
the 2008 Agreement in order to enter
into a new agreement. If the Mexican
tomato growers/exporters withdraw
from the 2008 Agreement, the
Agreement will no longer cover
substantially all imports of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico. Accordingly, the
Department of Commerce would
terminate the suspension agreement and
resume the antidumping investigation.
In addition, in the event the Department
terminates the suspension agreement
and resumes the investigation, the
Department intends to terminate the
ongoing sunset review. Conclusion of a
new agreement would result in
suspension of the resumed
investigation.
AGENCY:
Effective Date: February 8, 2013.
List of Comments in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
DATES:
Comment 1: Whether the Department Should
Collapse the Reported Control Numbers for
Granoro
Comment 2: Whether the Department Should
Offset Transport Recovery Against U.S.
Freight for Granoro
Comment 3: Whether the Department Erred
in Applying Quarterly Cost to Granoro
Comment 4: Whether the Department Should
Continue To Rely on Protein Content Based
on the Nutritional Label
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should
Review All of Rummo’s EP Entries During
the POR
Comment 6: Analysis of Targeted Dumping
Allegation
Judith Wey Rudman or Julie Santoboni
at (202) 482–0192 or (202) 482–3063,
respectively; Office of Policy, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2013–02909 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On April 18, 1996, the Department
initiated an antidumping investigation
to determine whether imports of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico are being, or are
likely to be, sold in the United States at
less than fair value (LTFV) (61 FR
18377, April 25, 1996). On May 16,
1996, the United States International
Trade Commission (ITC) notified the
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 / Notices
Department of its affirmative
preliminary injury determination.
On October 10, 1996, the Department
and Mexican tomato growers/exporters
initialed a proposed agreement to
suspend the antidumping investigation.
On October 28, 1996, the Department
preliminarily determined that imports
of fresh tomatoes from Mexico are being
sold at LTFV in the United States. See
Notice of Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination:
Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 61 FR
56608 (November 1, 1996) (Preliminary
Determination). On the same day on
which the Department issued the
Preliminary Determination, the
Department and certain growers/
exporters of fresh tomatoes from Mexico
signed an agreement to suspend the
investigation (1996 Suspension
Agreement). See Suspension of
Antidumping Investigation: Fresh
Tomatoes from Mexico, 61 FR 56618
(November 1, 1996).
On May 31, 2002, Mexican tomato
growers/exporters accounting for a
significant percentage of all fresh
tomatoes imported into the United
States from Mexico provided written
notice to the Department of their
withdrawal from the 1996 Suspension
Agreement, effective July 30, 2002.
Because the 1996 Suspension
Agreement would no longer cover
substantially all imports of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico, effective July 30,
2002, the Department terminated the
1996 Suspension Agreement, terminated
the sunset review of the suspended
investigation, and resumed the
antidumping investigation. See Notice
of Termination of Suspension
Agreement, Termination of Sunset
Review, and Resumption of
Antidumping Investigation: Fresh
Tomatoes from Mexico, 67 FR 50858
(August 6, 2002).
On November 8, 2002, the Department
and Mexican tomato growers/exporters
initialed a proposed agreement
suspending the resumed antidumping
investigation on imports of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico. On December 4,
2002, the Department and certain
growers/exporters of fresh tomatoes
from Mexico signed a new suspension
agreement (2002 Suspension
Agreement). See Suspension of
Antidumping Investigation: Fresh
Tomatoes From Mexico, 67 FR 77044
(December 16, 2002). On November 3,
2003, the Department published the
Final Results of Analysis of Reference
Prices and Clarifications and
Corrections; Agreement Suspending the
Antidumping Duty Investigation on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Feb 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico, 68 FR
62281 (November 3, 2003).
On November 26, 2007, Mexican
tomato growers/exporters accounting for
a significant percentage of all fresh
tomatoes imported into the United
States from Mexico provided written
notice to the Department of their
withdrawal from the 2002 Suspension
Agreement, effective 90 days from the
date of their withdrawal letter (i.e.,
February 24, 2008), or earlier, at the
Department’s discretion.
On November 28, 2007, the
Department and Mexican tomato
growers/exporters initialed a new
proposed agreement to suspend the
antidumping investigation on imports of
fresh tomatoes from Mexico. On
December 3, 2007, the Department
released the initialed agreement to
interested parties and afforded them an
opportunity to comment on the initialed
agreement. On December 17 and 18,
2007, several interested parties filed
comments in support of the initialed
agreement.
Because the 2002 Suspension
Agreement would no longer cover
substantially all imports of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico, the Department
published a notice of intent to terminate
the 2002 Suspension Agreement, intent
to terminate the five-year sunset review
of the suspended investigation, and
intent to resume the antidumping
investigation. See Fresh Tomatoes from
Mexico: Notice of Intent to Terminate
Suspension Agreement, Intent to
Terminate the Five-Year Sunset Review,
and Intent to Resume Antidumping
Investigation, 72 FR 70820 (December
13, 2007). On January 16, 2008, the
Department published a notice of
termination of the 2002 Suspension
Agreement, termination the five-year
sunset review of the suspended
investigation, and resumption of the
antidumping investigation, effective
January 18, 2008. See Fresh Tomatoes
from Mexico: Notice of Termination of
Suspension Agreement, Termination of
Five-Year Sunset Review, and
Resumption of Antidumping
Investigation, 73 FR 2887 (January 16,
2008).
On January 22, 2008, the Department
signed a new suspension agreement
(2008 Suspension Agreement) with
certain growers/exporters of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico. See Suspension
of Antidumping Investigation: Fresh
Tomatoes from Mexico, 73 FR 4831
(January 28, 2008).
On August 15, 2012, certain Mexican
growers/exporters filed a letter with the
Department requesting consultations
under section IV.G. of the 2008
Suspension Agreement and the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9367
Department agreed to consult. As a
result of these consultations, on
February 2, 2013, the Department and
Mexican tomato growers/exporters
accounting for a significant percentage
of all fresh tomatoes imported into the
United States from Mexico initialed a
draft agreement that would suspend a
resumed antidumping investigation on
fresh tomatoes from Mexico.
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise subject to the
suspended investigation is all fresh or
chilled tomatoes (fresh tomatoes) which
have Mexico as their origin, except for
those tomatoes which are for processing.
For purposes of this suspended
investigation, processing is defined to
include preserving by any commercial
process, such as canning, dehydrating,
drying, or the addition of chemical
substances, or converting the tomato
product into juices, sauces, or purees.
Fresh tomatoes that are imported for
cutting up, not further processing (e.g.,
tomatoes used in the preparation of
fresh salsa or salad bars), are covered by
this Agreement.
Commercially grown tomatoes, both
for the fresh market and for processing,
are classified as Lycopersicon
esculentum. Important commercial
varieties of fresh tomatoes include
common round, cherry, grape, plum,
greenhouse, and pear tomatoes, all of
which are covered by this investigation.
Tomatoes imported from Mexico
covered by this suspended investigation
are classified under the following
subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedules of the United States
(HTSUS), according to the season of
importation: 0702 and 9906.07.01
through 9906.07.09. Although the
HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
suspended investigation is dispositive.
Intent To Terminate Suspension
Agreement and Resume the
Antidumping Investigation
Based on the initialed draft
agreement, and if an acceptable
agreement is reached, we anticipate that
the Mexican tomato growers will
withdraw from the 2008 Suspension
Agreement. If the growers/exporters
accounting for a significant percentage
of exports of tomatoes to the United
States withdraw from the 2008
Suspension Agreement, the 2008
Suspension Agreement will no longer
cover substantially all imports of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico. Accordingly, the
Department would terminate the 2008
Suspension Agreement and resume the
antidumping investigation in
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
9368
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2013 / Notices
accordance with section 734(i)(1)(B) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). Pursuant to section 734(i)(1)(B) of
the Act, the Department would resume
the investigation as if it had published
the affirmative preliminary
determination under section 733(b) of
the Act on the effective date of the
termination. As explained in the
Preliminary Determination (61 FR at
56609), the Department postponed the
final determination until the 135th day
after the date of the preliminary
determination. The Department
therefore would make its final
determination in a resumed
investigation within 135 days of
termination of the 2008 Suspension
Agreement, unless a new suspension
agreement becomes effective. However,
if the Department and substantially all
of the growers/exporters of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico sign a new
suspension agreement, following the
notice and comment period provided in
accordance with section 734(c) of the
Act, the resumed investigation would be
suspended.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Intent To Terminate the Five-Year
Sunset Review
On December 3, 2012, the Department
initiated a five-year sunset review of the
suspended antidumping investigation
on fresh tomatoes from Mexico pursuant
to section 751(c) of the Act. See
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Review, 77 FR 71684 (December 3,
2012).
If the Department terminates the 2008
Suspension Agreement, there will no
longer be a suspended investigation of
which to conduct a sunset review.
Therefore, the Department would
terminate the sunset review of the
suspended antidumping investigation
on fresh tomatoes from Mexico, effective
on the date of termination of the 2008
Suspension Agreement.
International Trade Commission
The Department has notified the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
its intent to terminate the 2008
Suspension Agreement and resume the
antidumping investigation. If the
Department resumes the antidumping
investigation, and if the Department
makes a final affirmative determination
in the investigation, the ITC is
scheduled to make its final
determination concerning injury within
45 days of publication of the
Department’s final determination. If
both the Department’s and the ITC’s
final determinations are affirmative, the
Department will issue an antidumping
duty order. However, as indicated
above, if the Department and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Feb 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
substantially all of the growers/
exporters of fresh tomatoes from Mexico
sign a new suspension agreement,
following the notice and comment
period provided in accordance with
section 734(c) of the Act, the resumed
investigation would be suspended.
Suspension of Liquidation
If the Department terminates the 2008
Suspension Agreement and resumes the
antidumping investigation as described
above, the Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
suspend liquidation of entries of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico that are entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective
date of the termination of the 2008
Suspension Agreement. CBP shall
require antidumping duty cash deposits
or bonds for entries of the subject
merchandise based on the preliminary
dumping margins, which range from
4.16 to 188.45 percent. See Preliminary
Determination, 61 FR at 56615.
Administrative Protective Order Access
and Applicable Regulations
The following requirements will
apply if and during such time as the
investigation is resumed. Because of the
significant changes made to the
administrative protective order (APO)
process since the investigation, the
Department will issue a new APO for
any resumed investigation that will
supersede the previously issued firmspecific APOs. Those authorized
applicants that were granted APOs
during the original investigation, as
indicated in the most recent APO
service list on the Department’s Web
site, will continue to have access to
business proprietary information under
APO. Any new APO applications or
necessary amendments for changes in
staff under the pre-existing APOs
should be submitted promptly, and in
accordance with the Department’s
regulations currently in effect. See
section 777(c)(1) of the Act; 19 CFR
351.103, 351.304, 351.305 and 351.306.
In addition, because of the significant
changes made to the Department’s filing
and certification requirements since the
investigation, including electronic
filing, the Department intends to apply
its current regulations and practices
with regard to filing and certification,
should the antidumping investigation be
resumed. See 19 CFR 351.303(b) and (g).
However, with respect to the procedures
for the conduct of any resumed
investigation generally, including any
possible suspension thereof, the
Department’s regulations in effect in
1996 shall govern. See 19 CFR 351.701;
San Vicente Camalu SPR de Ri v.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
United States, 491 F.Supp.2d 1186 (CIT
2007).
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with section
733(f) and 734(i) of the Act.
Dated: February 4, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–02914 Filed 2–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–944]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on certain oil
country tubular goods (‘‘OCTG’’) from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is January
1, 2011, through December 31, 2011. We
preliminarily determine that Wuxi
Seamless Oil Pipe Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wuxi’’)
and Jiangsu Chengde Steel Tube Share
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiangsu Chengde’’) received
countervailable subsidies during the
POR.
DATES: Effective Date: February 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Morris or Christopher Siepmann,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1779 or (202) 482–
7958, respectively.
AGENCY:
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order consists of
OCTG. The merchandise subject to the
order is currently classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item
numbers: 7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20,
7304.29.10.30, 7304.29.10.40,
7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60,
7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10,
7304.29.20.20, 7304.29.20.30,
7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50,
7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80,
7304.29.31.10, 7304.29.31.20,
7304.29.31.30, 7304.29.31.40,
7304.29.31.50, 7304.29.31.60,
7304.29.31.80, 7304.29.41.10,
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9366-9368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02914]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-820]
Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico: Intent To Terminate Suspension
Agreement and Resume Antidumping Investigation and Intent To Terminate
Sunset Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 2, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) and Mexican tomato growers/exporters accounting for a
significant percentage of all fresh tomatoes imported into the United
States from Mexico initialed a draft agreement that would suspend a
resumed antidumping investigation on fresh tomatoes from Mexico. Based
on this draft agreement, and if an acceptable agreement is reached, we
anticipate that the Mexican tomato growers/exporters will withdraw from
the 2008 Agreement in order to enter into a new agreement. If the
Mexican tomato growers/exporters withdraw from the 2008 Agreement, the
Agreement will no longer cover substantially all imports of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico. Accordingly, the Department of Commerce would
terminate the suspension agreement and resume the antidumping
investigation. In addition, in the event the Department terminates the
suspension agreement and resumes the investigation, the Department
intends to terminate the ongoing sunset review. Conclusion of a new
agreement would result in suspension of the resumed investigation.
DATES: Effective Date: February 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Wey Rudman or Julie Santoboni
at (202) 482-0192 or (202) 482-3063, respectively; Office of Policy,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 18, 1996, the Department initiated an antidumping
investigation to determine whether imports of fresh tomatoes from
Mexico are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at
less than fair value (LTFV) (61 FR 18377, April 25, 1996). On May 16,
1996, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) notified
the
[[Page 9367]]
Department of its affirmative preliminary injury determination.
On October 10, 1996, the Department and Mexican tomato growers/
exporters initialed a proposed agreement to suspend the antidumping
investigation. On October 28, 1996, the Department preliminarily
determined that imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico are being sold at
LTFV in the United States. See Notice of Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination:
Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 61 FR 56608 (November 1, 1996) (Preliminary
Determination). On the same day on which the Department issued the
Preliminary Determination, the Department and certain growers/exporters
of fresh tomatoes from Mexico signed an agreement to suspend the
investigation (1996 Suspension Agreement). See Suspension of
Antidumping Investigation: Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 61 FR 56618
(November 1, 1996).
On May 31, 2002, Mexican tomato growers/exporters accounting for a
significant percentage of all fresh tomatoes imported into the United
States from Mexico provided written notice to the Department of their
withdrawal from the 1996 Suspension Agreement, effective July 30, 2002.
Because the 1996 Suspension Agreement would no longer cover
substantially all imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico, effective July
30, 2002, the Department terminated the 1996 Suspension Agreement,
terminated the sunset review of the suspended investigation, and
resumed the antidumping investigation. See Notice of Termination of
Suspension Agreement, Termination of Sunset Review, and Resumption of
Antidumping Investigation: Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 67 FR 50858
(August 6, 2002).
On November 8, 2002, the Department and Mexican tomato growers/
exporters initialed a proposed agreement suspending the resumed
antidumping investigation on imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico. On
December 4, 2002, the Department and certain growers/exporters of fresh
tomatoes from Mexico signed a new suspension agreement (2002 Suspension
Agreement). See Suspension of Antidumping Investigation: Fresh Tomatoes
From Mexico, 67 FR 77044 (December 16, 2002). On November 3, 2003, the
Department published the Final Results of Analysis of Reference Prices
and Clarifications and Corrections; Agreement Suspending the
Antidumping Duty Investigation on Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico, 68 FR
62281 (November 3, 2003).
On November 26, 2007, Mexican tomato growers/exporters accounting
for a significant percentage of all fresh tomatoes imported into the
United States from Mexico provided written notice to the Department of
their withdrawal from the 2002 Suspension Agreement, effective 90 days
from the date of their withdrawal letter (i.e., February 24, 2008), or
earlier, at the Department's discretion.
On November 28, 2007, the Department and Mexican tomato growers/
exporters initialed a new proposed agreement to suspend the antidumping
investigation on imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico. On December 3,
2007, the Department released the initialed agreement to interested
parties and afforded them an opportunity to comment on the initialed
agreement. On December 17 and 18, 2007, several interested parties
filed comments in support of the initialed agreement.
Because the 2002 Suspension Agreement would no longer cover
substantially all imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico, the Department
published a notice of intent to terminate the 2002 Suspension
Agreement, intent to terminate the five-year sunset review of the
suspended investigation, and intent to resume the antidumping
investigation. See Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico: Notice of Intent to
Terminate Suspension Agreement, Intent to Terminate the Five-Year
Sunset Review, and Intent to Resume Antidumping Investigation, 72 FR
70820 (December 13, 2007). On January 16, 2008, the Department
published a notice of termination of the 2002 Suspension Agreement,
termination the five-year sunset review of the suspended investigation,
and resumption of the antidumping investigation, effective January 18,
2008. See Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico: Notice of Termination of
Suspension Agreement, Termination of Five-Year Sunset Review, and
Resumption of Antidumping Investigation, 73 FR 2887 (January 16, 2008).
On January 22, 2008, the Department signed a new suspension
agreement (2008 Suspension Agreement) with certain growers/exporters of
fresh tomatoes from Mexico. See Suspension of Antidumping
Investigation: Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 73 FR 4831 (January 28,
2008).
On August 15, 2012, certain Mexican growers/exporters filed a
letter with the Department requesting consultations under section IV.G.
of the 2008 Suspension Agreement and the Department agreed to consult.
As a result of these consultations, on February 2, 2013, the Department
and Mexican tomato growers/exporters accounting for a significant
percentage of all fresh tomatoes imported into the United States from
Mexico initialed a draft agreement that would suspend a resumed
antidumping investigation on fresh tomatoes from Mexico.
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise subject to the suspended investigation is all fresh
or chilled tomatoes (fresh tomatoes) which have Mexico as their origin,
except for those tomatoes which are for processing. For purposes of
this suspended investigation, processing is defined to include
preserving by any commercial process, such as canning, dehydrating,
drying, or the addition of chemical substances, or converting the
tomato product into juices, sauces, or purees. Fresh tomatoes that are
imported for cutting up, not further processing (e.g., tomatoes used in
the preparation of fresh salsa or salad bars), are covered by this
Agreement.
Commercially grown tomatoes, both for the fresh market and for
processing, are classified as Lycopersicon esculentum. Important
commercial varieties of fresh tomatoes include common round, cherry,
grape, plum, greenhouse, and pear tomatoes, all of which are covered by
this investigation.
Tomatoes imported from Mexico covered by this suspended
investigation are classified under the following subheadings of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (HTSUS), according to
the season of importation: 0702 and 9906.07.01 through 9906.07.09.
Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope of this suspended
investigation is dispositive.
Intent To Terminate Suspension Agreement and Resume the Antidumping
Investigation
Based on the initialed draft agreement, and if an acceptable
agreement is reached, we anticipate that the Mexican tomato growers
will withdraw from the 2008 Suspension Agreement. If the growers/
exporters accounting for a significant percentage of exports of
tomatoes to the United States withdraw from the 2008 Suspension
Agreement, the 2008 Suspension Agreement will no longer cover
substantially all imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico. Accordingly,
the Department would terminate the 2008 Suspension Agreement and resume
the antidumping investigation in
[[Page 9368]]
accordance with section 734(i)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Pursuant to section 734(i)(1)(B) of the Act, the
Department would resume the investigation as if it had published the
affirmative preliminary determination under section 733(b) of the Act
on the effective date of the termination. As explained in the
Preliminary Determination (61 FR at 56609), the Department postponed
the final determination until the 135th day after the date of the
preliminary determination. The Department therefore would make its
final determination in a resumed investigation within 135 days of
termination of the 2008 Suspension Agreement, unless a new suspension
agreement becomes effective. However, if the Department and
substantially all of the growers/exporters of fresh tomatoes from
Mexico sign a new suspension agreement, following the notice and
comment period provided in accordance with section 734(c) of the Act,
the resumed investigation would be suspended.
Intent To Terminate the Five-Year Sunset Review
On December 3, 2012, the Department initiated a five-year sunset
review of the suspended antidumping investigation on fresh tomatoes
from Mexico pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of
Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 77 FR 71684 (December 3, 2012).
If the Department terminates the 2008 Suspension Agreement, there
will no longer be a suspended investigation of which to conduct a
sunset review. Therefore, the Department would terminate the sunset
review of the suspended antidumping investigation on fresh tomatoes
from Mexico, effective on the date of termination of the 2008
Suspension Agreement.
International Trade Commission
The Department has notified the International Trade Commission
(ITC) of its intent to terminate the 2008 Suspension Agreement and
resume the antidumping investigation. If the Department resumes the
antidumping investigation, and if the Department makes a final
affirmative determination in the investigation, the ITC is scheduled to
make its final determination concerning injury within 45 days of
publication of the Department's final determination. If both the
Department's and the ITC's final determinations are affirmative, the
Department will issue an antidumping duty order. However, as indicated
above, if the Department and substantially all of the growers/exporters
of fresh tomatoes from Mexico sign a new suspension agreement,
following the notice and comment period provided in accordance with
section 734(c) of the Act, the resumed investigation would be
suspended.
Suspension of Liquidation
If the Department terminates the 2008 Suspension Agreement and
resumes the antidumping investigation as described above, the
Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
suspend liquidation of entries of fresh tomatoes from Mexico that are
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
effective date of the termination of the 2008 Suspension Agreement. CBP
shall require antidumping duty cash deposits or bonds for entries of
the subject merchandise based on the preliminary dumping margins, which
range from 4.16 to 188.45 percent. See Preliminary Determination, 61 FR
at 56615.
Administrative Protective Order Access and Applicable Regulations
The following requirements will apply if and during such time as
the investigation is resumed. Because of the significant changes made
to the administrative protective order (APO) process since the
investigation, the Department will issue a new APO for any resumed
investigation that will supersede the previously issued firm-specific
APOs. Those authorized applicants that were granted APOs during the
original investigation, as indicated in the most recent APO service
list on the Department's Web site, will continue to have access to
business proprietary information under APO. Any new APO applications or
necessary amendments for changes in staff under the pre-existing APOs
should be submitted promptly, and in accordance with the Department's
regulations currently in effect. See section 777(c)(1) of the Act; 19
CFR 351.103, 351.304, 351.305 and 351.306.
In addition, because of the significant changes made to the
Department's filing and certification requirements since the
investigation, including electronic filing, the Department intends to
apply its current regulations and practices with regard to filing and
certification, should the antidumping investigation be resumed. See 19
CFR 351.303(b) and (g). However, with respect to the procedures for the
conduct of any resumed investigation generally, including any possible
suspension thereof, the Department's regulations in effect in 1996
shall govern. See 19 CFR 351.701; San Vicente Camalu SPR de Ri v.
United States, 491 F.Supp.2d 1186 (CIT 2007).
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
section 733(f) and 734(i) of the Act.
Dated: February 4, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-02914 Filed 2-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P