Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 7397-7399 [2013-02224]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Notices proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 12.45 percent, the all-others rate established in Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar from India, 59 FR 66915, 66921 (December 28, 1994). These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 24, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Summary Background Partial Rescission Scope of the Order Discussion of the Methodology Fair Value Comparisons Product Comparisons Date of Sale Export Price Level of Trade Analysis of Home Market Sales Level of Trade Analysis of U.S. Sales Level of Trade Level of Trade Determination Normal Value Home Market Viability as Comparison Market Cost of Production Analysis Calculation of Cost of Production Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices Results of the COP Test Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices Calculation of Normal Value Based on Constructed Value 17:26 Jan 31, 2013 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: Background Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. Upcoming Sunset Reviews for March 2013 The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in March 2013 and will appear in that month’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review. Antidumping Duty Proceedings Persulfates from China (A–570–847) (3rd Review) Appendix I VerDate Mar<15>2010 Currency Conversion [FR Doc. 2013–02216 Filed 1–31–13; 8:45 am] Jkt 229001 Department Contact Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047 Countervailing Duty Proceedings No Sunset Review of countervailing duty orders is scheduled for initiation in March 2013. Suspended Investigations No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in March 2013. The Department’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to the Department’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in the Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3— Policies Regarding the Conduct of FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998). The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7397 provides further information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in Sunset Reviews. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no later than 30 days after the date of initiation. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: January 11, 2013. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2013–02223 Filed 1–31–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Unit, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. AGENCY: Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 7398 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Notices order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after February 2013, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative Review’’ notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of February 2013,1 interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in February for the following periods: srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Period of review Antidumping Duty Proceedings BRAZIL: Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A–351–838 ................................................................................................................................. Stainless Steel Bar A–351–825 ............................................................................................................................................. FRANCE: Uranium A–427–818 ..................................................................................................................................................... INDIA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate A–533–817 ............................................................................................ Certain Preserved Mushrooms A–533–813 ........................................................................................................................... Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A–533–840 ................................................................................................................................. Stainless Steel Bar A–533–810 ............................................................................................................................................. INDONESIA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate A–560–805 ............................................................................................ Certain Preserved Mushrooms A–560–802 ........................................................................................................................... ITALY: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A–475–828 ......................................................................................................... JAPAN: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A–588–602 ................................................................................................................. Stainless Steel Bar A–588–833 ............................................................................................................................................. MALAYSIA: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A–557–809 ................................................................................................. PHILIPPINES: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A–565–801 ............................................................................................. REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate A–580–836 ........................................................... 1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:26 Jan 31, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 7399 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Notices Period of review SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A–522–802 ........................................................................ THAILAND: Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A–549–822 .................................................................................................................... THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Preserved Mushrooms A–570–851 ........................................................................................................................... Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A–570–893 ................................................................................................................................. Heavy Forged Hand Tools, With or Without Handles A–570–803 ........................................................................................ Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes A–570–929 .................................................................................................................. Uncovered Innerspring Units A–570–928 .............................................................................................................................. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Countervailing Duty Proceedings INDIA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate C–533–818 ............................................................................................ Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand C–533–829 ........................................................................................................... INDONESIA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate C–560–806 ............................................................................. REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate C–580–837 ........................................................... Suspension Agreements None. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters.2 If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Please note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party’s location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the 2 If the review request involves a non-market economy and the parties subject to the review request do not qualify for separate rates, all other exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a separate rate will be covered by the review as part of the single entity of which the named firms are a part. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:26 Jan 31, 2013 Jkt 229001 same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party’s attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department has clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders. See also the Import Administration Web site at http:// trade.gov/ia. All requests must be filed electronically in Import Administration’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site at http://iaaccess.trade.gov. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation’’ for requests received by the last day of February 2013. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of February 2013, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 2/1/12–1/31/13 1/1/12–12/31/12 1/1/12–12/31/12 1/1/12–12/31/12 1/1/12–12/31/12 instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: January 18, 2013. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2013–02224 Filed 1–31–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being manufactured in the United States. Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be postmarked on or before February 21, E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7397-7399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 
Operations, Customs Unit, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
4735.

Background

    Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an 
antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended 
investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or 
countervailing duty

[[Page 7398]]

order, finding, or suspended investigation.
    All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the 
Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from 
the applicable starting date.

Respondent Selection

    In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for 
individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to 
requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends 
to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend 
to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') 
to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the 
initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent 
selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal 
Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in 
commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on 
the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter 
as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and 
respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on 
the record of the review.
    In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit 
individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection 
under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
    In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning 
whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as 
a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) 
require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, 
which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the 
Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent 
selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the 
respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to 
collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping 
proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper 
review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to 
this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that 
company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such 
companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them 
for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not 
collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are 
requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously 
were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which 
they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete 
the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent 
selection, in general each company must report volume and value data 
separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other 
party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity 
with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company 
or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding 
where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete 
quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted.

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a 
review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The 
regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is 
reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty 
with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to 
extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with 
regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or 
after February 2013, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-
day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary 
circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal 
request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline 
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
    The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as 
in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so 
that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the 
Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future.
    Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of 
February 2013,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review 
of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with 
anniversary dates in February for the following periods:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a 
weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is 
closed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Period of review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Antidumping Duty Proceedings
BRAZIL:
    Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A-351-838................     2/1/12-1/31/13
    Stainless Steel Bar A-351-825....................     2/1/12-1/31/13
FRANCE: Uranium A-427-818............................     2/1/12-1/31/13
INDIA:
    Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate      2/1/12-1/31/13
     A-533-817.......................................
    Certain Preserved Mushrooms A-533-813............     2/1/12-1/31/13
    Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A-533-840................     2/1/12-1/31/13
    Stainless Steel Bar A-533-810....................     2/1/12-1/31/13
INDONESIA:
    Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate      2/1/12-1/31/13
     A-560-805.......................................
    Certain Preserved Mushrooms A-560-802............     2/1/12-1/31/13
ITALY: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A-475-     2/1/12-1/31/13
 828.................................................
JAPAN:
    Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A-588-602...     2/1/12-1/31/13
    Stainless Steel Bar A-588-833....................     2/1/12-1/31/13
MALAYSIA: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A-      2/1/12-1/31/13
 557-809.............................................
PHILIPPINES: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings      2/1/12-1/31/13
 A-565-801...........................................
REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-          2/1/12-1/31/13
 Quality Steel Plate A-580-836.......................

[[Page 7399]]

 
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Frozen Warmwater           2/1/12-1/31/13
 Shrimp A-522-802....................................
THAILAND: Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A-549-822..........     2/1/12-1/31/13
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:
    Certain Preserved Mushrooms A-570-851............     2/1/12-1/31/13
    Frozen Warmwater Shrimp A-570-893................     2/1/12-1/31/13
    Heavy Forged Hand Tools, With or Without Handles      2/1/12-1/31/13
     A-570-803.......................................
    Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes A-570-929.....     2/1/12-1/31/13
    Uncovered Innerspring Units A-570-928............     2/1/12-1/31/13
 
           Countervailing Duty Proceedings
 
INDIA:
    Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate     1/1/12-12/31/12
     C-533-818.......................................
    Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand C-533-829.    1/1/12-12/31/12
INDONESIA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel    1/1/12-12/31/12
 Plate C-560-806.....................................
REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-         1/1/12-12/31/12
 Quality Steel Plate C-580-837.......................
                Suspension Agreements
None.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as 
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the 
Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and 
countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the 
individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or 
an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for 
which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested 
party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 
must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular 
producers or exporters.\2\ If the interested party intends for the 
Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer 
if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which 
were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of 
origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must 
state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the 
request is intended to cover.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ If the review request involves a non-market economy and the 
parties subject to the review request do not qualify for separate 
rates, all other exporters of subject merchandise from the non-
market economy country who do not have a separate rate will be 
covered by the review as part of the single entity of which the 
named firms are a part.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Please note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate 
in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an 
administrative review of that party absent new information as to the 
party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request 
for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it 
requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation 
of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same 
time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to 
determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant 
to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).
    As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the 
Department has clarified its practice with respect to the collection of 
final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate 
firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in 
determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise 
subject to antidumping findings and orders. See also the Import 
Administration Web site at http://trade.gov/ia.
    All requests must be filed electronically in Import 
Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized 
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') on the IA ACCESS Web site at 
http://iaaccess.trade.gov. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective 
Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). Further, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on 
the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request.
    The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of 
``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing 
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received 
by the last day of February 2013. If the Department does not receive, 
by the last day of February 2013, a request for review of entries 
covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this 
notice and for the period identified above, the Department will 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those 
entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated 
antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the 
time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to 
continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered.
    For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no 
assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period, of 
the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review.
    This notice is not required by statute but is published as a 
service to the international trading community.

    Dated: January 18, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-02224 Filed 1-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P