Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof: Commission Determination To Review a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Remand-in-Part of the Investigation to the Administrative Law Judge, 6130-6131 [2013-01771]

Download as PDF 6130 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Notices written statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least seven days prior to the meeting. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: January 23, 2013. Alma Ripps, Acting Chief, Office of Policy. [FR Doc. 2013–01729 Filed 1–28–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–WV–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Information Collection Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing its intention to request approval for the collection of information for the Abandoned Mine Land Problem Area Description form. This information collection activity was previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and assigned control number 1029–0087. DATES: Comments on the proposed information collection must be received by April 1, 2013, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to John Trelease, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 Constitution Ave. NW., Room 203—SIB, Washington, DC 20240. Comments may also be submitted electronically to jtrelease@osmre.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To receive a copy of the information collection request, contact John Trelease, at (202) 208–2783 or by email at jtrelease@osmre.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which implement provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:47 Jan 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 require that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities [see 5 CFR 1320.8 (d)]. This notice identifies an information collection that OSM will be submitting to OMB for approval. This collection is contained in the Form OSM–76, Abandoned Mine Land Problem Area Description form. OSM will request a 3-year term of approval for each information collection activity. Responses are required to obtain a benefit. Comments are invited on: (1) the need for the collection of information for the performance of the functions of the agency; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s burden estimates; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to minimize the information collection burden on respondents, such as use of automated means of collection of the information. A summary of the public comments will accompany OSM’s submissions of the information collection requests to OMB. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Title: OSM–76—Abandoned Mine Land Problem Area Description Form. OMB Control Number: 1029–0087. Summary: This form will be used to update the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement’s electronic inventory of abandoned mine lands (e-AMLIS). From this inventory, the most serious problem areas are selected for reclamation through the apportionment of funds to States and Indian tribes. Bureau Form Number: OSM–76. Frequency of Collection: On occasion. Description of Respondents: State governments and Indian tribes. Total Annual Responses: 2,720. Total Annual Burden Hours: 7,450. Dated: January 23, 2013. Andrew F. DeVito, Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. [FR Doc. 2013–01865 Filed 1–28–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–796] Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof: Commission Determination To Review a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Remand-inPart of the Investigation to the Administrative Law Judge U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in its entirety the final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on October 24, 2012, finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in this investigation. The Commission has also determined to remand-in-part the investigation to the ALJ. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2392. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on August 5, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Apple Inc. (‘‘Apple’’) of Cupertino, California. 76 FR 47610 (Aug. 5, 2011). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic digital media devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,479,949 SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 6131 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2013 / Notices (‘‘the ’949 patent’’); RE 41,922 (‘‘the ’922 patent’’); 7,863,533 (‘‘the ’533 patent’’); 7,789,697 (‘‘the ’697 patent’’); 7,912,501 (‘‘the ’501 patent’’); D558,757 (‘‘the D’757 patent’’); and D618,678 (‘‘the D’678 patent’’) (collectively, ‘‘the Asserted Patents’’). The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The respondents named in the Commission’s notice of investigation are Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. of Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively, ‘‘Samsung’’). A Commission investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) participated in the investigation. On May 3, 2012, the ALJ issued an ID partially terminating the investigation with respect to all claims of the ’533 patent; claims 1–3, 11, 12, 15, 16 and 21–27 of the ’697 patent; and claim 3 of the ’949 patent (Order No. 17) (not reviewed by the Commission, May 3, 2012). On October 24, 2012, the ALJ issued his final ID in this investigation finding a violation of section 337 in connection with the claim of the D’678 patent; claims 1, 4–6 and 10–20 of the ’949 patent; claims 29, 30 and 33–35 of the ’922 patent; and claims 1–4 and 8 of the ’501 patent. The ALJ found no violation of section 337 in connection with the claim of the D’757 patent; claims 31 and 32 of the ’922 patent; and claims 13 and 14 of the ’697 patent. The ALJ also found that the asserted claims of the Asserted Patents were not shown to be invalid. The ALJ further found that a domestic industry in the United States exists that practices the Asserted Patents, except for the ’697 patent. On November 7, 2012, the ALJ issued his recommended determination on remedy and bonding. Apple and Samsung filed timely petitions for review of various portions of the final ID, as well as timely responses to the petitions. The IA filed only a response to the petitions for review. On December 3, 2012, Apple and Samsung filed public interest comments pursuant to Commission rule 210.50(a)(4). That same day, non-party Google filed submissions in response to the Notice of Request for Statements on the Public Interest. See 77 FR 68829–30 (Nov. 16, 2012). Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ALJ’s final ID, the petitions for review, and the responses thereto, the Commission has determined to review the final ID in its entirety. The Commission does not seek further briefing at this time. Rather, the Commission remands the investigation VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:47 Jan 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 to the ALJ with respect to certain issues related to the ’922 patent and the ’501 patent, as set forth in the accompanying Remand Order. In light of the remand, the ALJ shall set a new target date within thirty days of this notice consistent with the Remand Order. The current target date for this investigation is March 27, 2013. Briefing, if any, on remanded and reviewed issues, and on remedy, bonding, and the public interest will follow Commission consideration of the remand ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42–46 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–46). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 23, 2013. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–01771 Filed 1–28–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P the federal trustees), to complete two restoration projects selected by the trustees valued at approximately $800,000.00, and to reimburse the trustees for any further monitoring or corrective action obligations after completion of construction of the restoration project. The Settlement includes a covenant not to sue under Section 107(a) of CERCLA. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States and State of Texas v. GB Biosciences Corp., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–09071. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments: By e-mail By mail ..... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act On January 22, 2013, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in the lawsuit entitled, United States and State of Texas v. GB Biosciences Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 4:13–CV– 00151. In this action the United States, on behalf of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (‘‘NOAA’’) and the U.S. Department of Interior (‘‘DOI’’), as federal trustees, together with the State of Texas, seeks natural resource damages pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), in connection with the Greens Bayou Site located in Houston, Texas (the ‘‘Site’’). The United States and the State have negotiated a consent decree with GB Biosciences Corp., ISK Magnetics, Inc., and Occidental Chemical Corp. (collectively ‘‘Settlors’’) to resolve the CERCLA claims, as well as the state law claims. Under the Consent Decree, the Settlors agree to reimburse the United States and the State for natural resource damage assessment costs ($31,060.00 to PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Send them to: pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov. Assistant Attorney General U.S. DOJ—ENRD P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C. 20044–7611. During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: http:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $54.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. For a paper copy without the exhibits, the cost is $17.50. Maureen Katz, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2013–01761 Filed 1–28–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application; Mylan Technologies, Inc. Pursuant to Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations 1301.34 (a), this is notice that on December 7, 2012, Mylan E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6130-6131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01771]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-796]


Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof: 
Commission Determination To Review a Final Initial Determination 
Finding a Violation of Section 337; Remand-in-Part of the Investigation 
to the Administrative Law Judge

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to review in its entirety the final initial 
determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') on October 24, 2012, finding a violation of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in this 
investigation. The Commission has also determined to remand-in-part the 
investigation to the ALJ.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on August 5, 2011, based on a complaint filed by Apple Inc. (``Apple'') 
of Cupertino, California. 76 FR 47610 (Aug. 5, 2011). The complaint 
alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain electronic digital media devices and components 
thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 
7,479,949

[[Page 6131]]

(``the '949 patent''); RE 41,922 (``the '922 patent''); 7,863,533 
(``the '533 patent''); 7,789,697 (``the '697 patent''); 7,912,501 
(``the '501 patent''); D558,757 (``the D'757 patent''); and D618,678 
(``the D'678 patent'') (collectively, ``the Asserted Patents''). The 
complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The 
respondents named in the Commission's notice of investigation are 
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. of Korea; Samsung Electronics America, 
Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Telecommunications 
America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively, ``Samsung''). A 
Commission investigative attorney (``IA'') participated in the 
investigation.
    On May 3, 2012, the ALJ issued an ID partially terminating the 
investigation with respect to all claims of the '533 patent; claims 1-
3, 11, 12, 15, 16 and 21-27 of the '697 patent; and claim 3 of the '949 
patent (Order No. 17) (not reviewed by the Commission, May 3, 2012).
    On October 24, 2012, the ALJ issued his final ID in this 
investigation finding a violation of section 337 in connection with the 
claim of the D'678 patent; claims 1, 4-6 and 10-20 of the '949 patent; 
claims 29, 30 and 33-35 of the '922 patent; and claims 1-4 and 8 of the 
'501 patent. The ALJ found no violation of section 337 in connection 
with the claim of the D'757 patent; claims 31 and 32 of the '922 
patent; and claims 13 and 14 of the '697 patent. The ALJ also found 
that the asserted claims of the Asserted Patents were not shown to be 
invalid. The ALJ further found that a domestic industry in the United 
States exists that practices the Asserted Patents, except for the '697 
patent. On November 7, 2012, the ALJ issued his recommended 
determination on remedy and bonding.
    Apple and Samsung filed timely petitions for review of various 
portions of the final ID, as well as timely responses to the petitions. 
The IA filed only a response to the petitions for review. On December 
3, 2012, Apple and Samsung filed public interest comments pursuant to 
Commission rule 210.50(a)(4). That same day, non-party Google filed 
submissions in response to the Notice of Request for Statements on the 
Public Interest. See 77 FR 68829-30 (Nov. 16, 2012).
    Having examined the record of this investigation, including the 
ALJ's final ID, the petitions for review, and the responses thereto, 
the Commission has determined to review the final ID in its entirety. 
The Commission does not seek further briefing at this time. Rather, the 
Commission remands the investigation to the ALJ with respect to certain 
issues related to the '922 patent and the '501 patent, as set forth in 
the accompanying Remand Order.
    In light of the remand, the ALJ shall set a new target date within 
thirty days of this notice consistent with the Remand Order. The 
current target date for this investigation is March 27, 2013.
    Briefing, if any, on remanded and reviewed issues, and on remedy, 
bonding, and the public interest will follow Commission consideration 
of the remand ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.42-46 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-46).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 23, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-01771 Filed 1-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P