Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Pilot Program That Provides an Exception to NYSE Rule 2B by Permitting the Exchange's Equity Ownership Interest in BIDS Holdings L.P., 4524-4526 [2013-01173]
Download as PDF
4524
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Notices
particular, with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act.185
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,186 that the
proposed rule change, SR–NYSEArca–
2012–105, as modified by Amendment
No. 2, be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.187
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–01105 Filed 1–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68658; File No. SR–NYSE–
2013–01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Extend the
Pilot Program That Provides an
Exception to NYSE Rule 2B by
Permitting the Exchange’s Equity
Ownership Interest in BIDS Holdings
L.P.
January 15, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on January
2, 2013, the New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend for
an additional 12 months the January 22,
2013 expiration date of the pilot
program that provides an exception to
NYSE Rule 2B by permitting the
Exchange’s equity ownership interest in
BIDS Holdings L.P. (‘‘BIDS Holdings’’),
which is the parent company of a
member of the Exchange, and BIDS
Holdings’ affiliation with the New York
Block Exchange LLC, an affiliate of the
Exchange. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
185 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
187 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
186 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
On January 22, 2009, the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) approved the
governance structure proposed by the
Exchange with respect to the New York
Block Exchange (‘‘NYBX’’), an
electronic trading facility of the
Exchange for NYSE-listed securities that
was established by means of a joint
venture between the Exchange and BIDS
Holdings.3 The governance structure
that was approved is reflected in the
Limited Liability Company Agreement
of New York Block Exchange LLC (the
‘‘Company’’), the entity that owns and
operates NYBX. Under the governance
structure approved by the Commission,
the Exchange and BIDS Holdings each
own a 50% economic interest in the
Company. In addition, the Exchange,
through its wholly-owned subsidiary
NYSE Market, Inc., owns less than 10%
of the aggregate limited partnership
interest in BIDS Holdings. BIDS
Holdings is the parent company of BIDS
Trading, L.P. (‘‘BIDS Trading’’), which
became a member of the Exchange in
connection with the establishment of
NYBX.
The foregoing ownership
arrangements would violate NYSE Rule
2B without an exception from the
Commission.4 First, the Exchange’s
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59281
(January 22, 2009), 74 FR 5014 (January 28, 2009)
(SR–NYSE–2008–120) (the ‘‘Approval Order’’).
4 NYSE Rule 2B provides, in relevant part, that
‘‘[w]ithout prior SEC approval, the Exchange or any
entity with which it is affiliated shall not, directly
or indirectly, acquire or maintain an ownership
interest in a member organization. In addition, a
member organization shall not be or become an
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
indirect ownership interest in BIDS
Trading violates the prohibition in Rule
2B against the Exchange maintaining an
ownership interest in a member
organization. Second, BIDS Trading is
an affiliate of an affiliate of the
Exchange,5 which violates the
prohibition in Rule 2B against a member
of the Exchange having such status.
Consequently, in the Approval Order,
the Commission permitted an exception
to these two potential violations of
NYSE Rule 2B, subject to a number of
limitations and conditions. One of the
conditions for Commission approval
was that the proposed exception from
NYSE Rule 2B to permit NYSE’s
indirect ownership/interest in BIDS
Trading and BIDS Trading’s affiliation
with the Company (which is an affiliate
of NYSE) would be for a pilot period of
12 months.6
In discussing the pilot basis of the
exception to NYSE Rule 2B, the
Approval Order noted that the pilot
period ‘‘will provide NYSE and the
Commission an opportunity to assess
whether there might be any adverse
consequences of the exception and
whether a permanent exception is
warranted.’’ 7 The original 12-month
pilot period expired on January 22, 2010
and was extended for three additional
12-month periods to January 22, 2013.8
While the Exchange believes that the
experience to date operating under the
exception to Rule 2B fully justifies
making the exception permanent, the
Exchange now seeks to extend the
ending date for the pilot program for an
additional 12 months, to January 22,
2014, to allow additional time, if
necessary, for the Commission to obtain
and review the information it needs in
order to make its determination
regarding any adverse consequences of
the exception and whether a permanent
exception is warranted. During the
proposed extension of the pilot program
period, the Exchange’s current indirect
ownership interest in BIDS Trading 9
affiliate of the Exchange, or an affiliate of any
affiliate of the Exchange. * * * The term affiliate
shall have the meaning specified in Rule 12b–2
under the Act.’’
5 Specifically, the Company is an affiliate of the
Exchange, and BIDS Trading is an affiliate of the
Company based on their common control by BIDS
Holdings. The affiliation in each case is the result
of the 50% ownership interest in the Company by
each of the Exchange and BIDS Holdings.
6 See Approval Order at 5018.
7 Id. at 5019.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 61409
(January 22, 2010), 75 FR 4889 (January 29, 2010)
(SR–NYSE–2010–04); 63545 (December 14, 2010),
75 FR 80088 (December 21, 2010) (SR–NYSE–2010–
82); and 66059 (December 27, 2011), 77 FR 145
(January 3, 2012) (SR–NYSE–2011–67).
9 Another condition for the exception to NYSE
Rule 2B specified in the Approval Order was that
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Notices
and BIDS Trading’s affiliation with the
Company would continue to be
permitted.
If the Commission should determine
prior to the end of the extended pilot
period that a permanent exception to
NYSE Rule 2B is warranted, the
Exchange would have the option of
submitting a proposed rule change to
accomplish this and simultaneously
terminate the pilot program.
The proposed change is not otherwise
intended to address any other matter,
and the Exchange is not aware of any
significant problem that the Exchange
would have in complying with the
proposed change.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,10 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,11
in particular, which requires a national
securities exchange to be so organized
and have the capacity to carry out the
purposes of the Act and to comply, and
to enforce compliance by its members
and persons associated with its
members, with the provisions of the
Act. The proposed rule change is also
consistent with, and furthers the
objectives of, Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,12 in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in facilitating transactions in securities,
to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanisms of a free and open
market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.
In the Approval Order, the
Commission determined that the
proposed exception from NYSE Rule 2B
to permit NYSE’s indirect ownership
interest in BIDS Trading and BIDS
Trading’s affiliation with the Company
was consistent with the Act, including
Section 6(b)(5) thereof.13 As the basis for
its determination, the Commission cited
the specific limitations and conditions
listed in the Approval Order to which
the Exchange’s equity interest in BIDS Holdings
must remain less than 9%, absent prior Commission
approval of any increase. See Approval Order at
5018. Subsequently, the Commission approved a
proposal by the Exchange to slightly increase the
ceiling on its equity ownership in BIDS Holdings
to less than 10%, and that will be the applicable
limitation during the extension of the pilot period.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61257
(December 30, 2009), 75 FR 500 (January 5, 2010)
(SR–NYSE–2009–116).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
13 See Approval Order at 5018–5019.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 Jan 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
its approval of the exception to NYSE
Rule 2B was subject,14 stating that
‘‘[t]hese conditions appear reasonably
designed to mitigate concerns about
potential conflicts of interest and unfair
competitive advantage,’’ that ‘‘[t]hese
conditions appear reasonably designed
to promote robust and independent
regulation of BIDS [Trading],’’ and that
[t]he Commission believes that, taken
together, these conditions are
reasonably designed to mitigate
potential conflicts between the
Exchange’s commercial interest in BIDS
[Holdings] and its regulatory
responsibilities with respect to BIDS
[Trading].’’ 15 The Exchange believes
that the exception from NYSE Rule 2B
described above will continue to be
consistent with the Act during that
extension because, other than the
ending date of the pilot period and the
aforementioned small increase in the
ceiling on the Exchange’s equity interest
in BIDS Holdings, these same
limitations and conditions will continue
to be applicable during the additional
extension of the pilot period.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Specifically,
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Approval Order, the conditions
of which are reasonably designed to
mitigate concerns about potential
conflicts of interest and unfair
competitive advantage. In this regard,
although BIDS Holdings and the
Exchange are affiliated, NYSE and BIDS
Holdings have established and
maintained procedures and internal
controls that are designed to prevent
BIDS Holdings and its affiliates from
deriving any unfair informational
advantage resulting from its affiliation
with the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
14 Id.
15 Id.
PO 00000
at 5018.
at 5019.
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4525
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 16 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.17 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.18
The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because such waiver would allow the
benefits of the pilot program to operate
without interruption after January 22,
2013. Therefore, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change as
operative upon filing.19
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2013–01 on the
subject line.
16 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
18 In addition, Rule 19–b–4(f)(6)(iii) requires the
Exchange to give the Commission written notice of
the Exchange’s intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of
the proposed rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
19 For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
17 17
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
4526
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2013–01. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2013–01 and should be submitted on or
before February 12, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–01173 Filed 1–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68656; File No. SR–CBOE–
2013–001]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To List and Trade Option
Contracts Overlying 10 Shares of
Certain Securities
January 15, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January 4,
2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE proposes to list and trade
option contracts overlying 10 shares of
a security (‘‘mini-option contracts’’).
The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.cboe.org/legal ), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to amend CBOE rules to
enable the listing and trading of option
1 15
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 Jan 18, 2013
2 17
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contracts overlying 10 shares of a
security (‘‘mini-option contracts’’). This
is a competitive filing based on filings
submitted by NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Arca’’) and International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’), which the
Commission recently approved.3
Pursuant to CBOE Rule 5.5, the
Exchange currently lists and trades
standardized option contracts on a
number of equities and exchange-traded
fund shares (‘‘ETFs’’) (referred to as
‘‘Units’’ in Rule 5.3.06), each with a unit
of trading of 100 shares. The purpose of
this proposed rule change is to expand
investors’ choices by listing and trading
option contracts on a select number of
high-priced and actively traded
securities, each with a unit of trading
ten times lower than that of standardsized option contracts, or 10 shares.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
list and trade mini-options overlying
five (5) high-priced securities for which
the standard contract overlying the same
security has significant liquidity.4 The
Exchange believes that mini-options
will appeal to retail investors who may
not currently be able to participate in
the trading of options on such high
priced securities. The Exchange believes
that investors would benefit from the
availability of mini-options contracts by
making options overlying high priced
securities more readily available as an
investing tool and at more affordable
and realistic prices, most notably for the
average retail investor.
For example, with AAPL trading at
$638.17 on October 8, 2012, ($63,817 for
100 shares underlying a standard
contract), the 640 level call expiring on
October 19 was trading at $8.30. The
cost of the standard contract overlying
100 shares would be $830, which is
substantially higher in notional terms
than the average equity option price of
$255.02.5 Proportionately equivalent
mini-options contracts on AAPL would
provide investors with the ability to
manage and hedge their portfolio risk on
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67948
(September 28, 2012) 77 FR 60735 (October 4, 2012)
(Notice of Filing of Amendments No. 1 and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule
Changes as Modified by Amendments No. 1 to List
and Trade Option Contracts Overlying 10 Shares of
Certain Securities) (SR–NYSEArca–2012–64 and
SR–ISE–2012–58).
4 The Exchange proposes to list Mini Options on
SPDR S&P 500 (‘‘SPY’’), Apple, Inc. (‘‘AAPL’’),
SPDR Gold Trust (‘‘GLD’’), Google Inc. (‘‘GOOG’’)
and Amazon.com Inc. (‘‘AMZN’’). The Exchange
notes that any expansion of the program would
require that a subsequent proposed rule change be
submitted to the Commission.
5 Year-to-date through September 28, 2012. A
high priced underlying security may have relatively
expensive options, because a low percentage move
in the share price may mean a large movement in
the options in terms of absolute dollars.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4524-4526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01173]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68658; File No. SR-NYSE-2013-01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Extend the Pilot Program That Provides an Exception to NYSE Rule 2B by
Permitting the Exchange's Equity Ownership Interest in BIDS Holdings
L.P.
January 15, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on January 2, 2013, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend for an additional 12 months the
January 22, 2013 expiration date of the pilot program that provides an
exception to NYSE Rule 2B by permitting the Exchange's equity ownership
interest in BIDS Holdings L.P. (``BIDS Holdings''), which is the parent
company of a member of the Exchange, and BIDS Holdings' affiliation
with the New York Block Exchange LLC, an affiliate of the Exchange. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
On January 22, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'' or ``SEC'') approved the governance structure proposed
by the Exchange with respect to the New York Block Exchange (``NYBX''),
an electronic trading facility of the Exchange for NYSE-listed
securities that was established by means of a joint venture between the
Exchange and BIDS Holdings.\3\ The governance structure that was
approved is reflected in the Limited Liability Company Agreement of New
York Block Exchange LLC (the ``Company''), the entity that owns and
operates NYBX. Under the governance structure approved by the
Commission, the Exchange and BIDS Holdings each own a 50% economic
interest in the Company. In addition, the Exchange, through its wholly-
owned subsidiary NYSE Market, Inc., owns less than 10% of the aggregate
limited partnership interest in BIDS Holdings. BIDS Holdings is the
parent company of BIDS Trading, L.P. (``BIDS Trading''), which became a
member of the Exchange in connection with the establishment of NYBX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59281 (January 22,
2009), 74 FR 5014 (January 28, 2009) (SR-NYSE-2008-120) (the
``Approval Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The foregoing ownership arrangements would violate NYSE Rule 2B
without an exception from the Commission.\4\ First, the Exchange's
indirect ownership interest in BIDS Trading violates the prohibition in
Rule 2B against the Exchange maintaining an ownership interest in a
member organization. Second, BIDS Trading is an affiliate of an
affiliate of the Exchange,\5\ which violates the prohibition in Rule 2B
against a member of the Exchange having such status. Consequently, in
the Approval Order, the Commission permitted an exception to these two
potential violations of NYSE Rule 2B, subject to a number of
limitations and conditions. One of the conditions for Commission
approval was that the proposed exception from NYSE Rule 2B to permit
NYSE's indirect ownership/interest in BIDS Trading and BIDS Trading's
affiliation with the Company (which is an affiliate of NYSE) would be
for a pilot period of 12 months.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ NYSE Rule 2B provides, in relevant part, that ``[w]ithout
prior SEC approval, the Exchange or any entity with which it is
affiliated shall not, directly or indirectly, acquire or maintain an
ownership interest in a member organization. In addition, a member
organization shall not be or become an affiliate of the Exchange, or
an affiliate of any affiliate of the Exchange. * * * The term
affiliate shall have the meaning specified in Rule 12b-2 under the
Act.''
\5\ Specifically, the Company is an affiliate of the Exchange,
and BIDS Trading is an affiliate of the Company based on their
common control by BIDS Holdings. The affiliation in each case is the
result of the 50% ownership interest in the Company by each of the
Exchange and BIDS Holdings.
\6\ See Approval Order at 5018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In discussing the pilot basis of the exception to NYSE Rule 2B, the
Approval Order noted that the pilot period ``will provide NYSE and the
Commission an opportunity to assess whether there might be any adverse
consequences of the exception and whether a permanent exception is
warranted.'' \7\ The original 12-month pilot period expired on January
22, 2010 and was extended for three additional 12-month periods to
January 22, 2013.\8\ While the Exchange believes that the experience to
date operating under the exception to Rule 2B fully justifies making
the exception permanent, the Exchange now seeks to extend the ending
date for the pilot program for an additional 12 months, to January 22,
2014, to allow additional time, if necessary, for the Commission to
obtain and review the information it needs in order to make its
determination regarding any adverse consequences of the exception and
whether a permanent exception is warranted. During the proposed
extension of the pilot program period, the Exchange's current indirect
ownership interest in BIDS Trading \9\
[[Page 4525]]
and BIDS Trading's affiliation with the Company would continue to be
permitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Id. at 5019.
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 61409 (January 22,
2010), 75 FR 4889 (January 29, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010-04); 63545
(December 14, 2010), 75 FR 80088 (December 21, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010-
82); and 66059 (December 27, 2011), 77 FR 145 (January 3, 2012) (SR-
NYSE-2011-67).
\9\ Another condition for the exception to NYSE Rule 2B
specified in the Approval Order was that the Exchange's equity
interest in BIDS Holdings must remain less than 9%, absent prior
Commission approval of any increase. See Approval Order at 5018.
Subsequently, the Commission approved a proposal by the Exchange to
slightly increase the ceiling on its equity ownership in BIDS
Holdings to less than 10%, and that will be the applicable
limitation during the extension of the pilot period. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 61257 (December 30, 2009), 75 FR 500
(January 5, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2009-116).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Commission should determine prior to the end of the extended
pilot period that a permanent exception to NYSE Rule 2B is warranted,
the Exchange would have the option of submitting a proposed rule change
to accomplish this and simultaneously terminate the pilot program.
The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
matter, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problem that
the Exchange would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\10\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(1) of
the Act,\11\ in particular, which requires a national securities
exchange to be so organized and have the capacity to carry out the
purposes of the Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its
members and persons associated with its members, with the provisions of
the Act. The proposed rule change is also consistent with, and furthers
the objectives of, Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in that it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Approval Order, the Commission determined that the proposed
exception from NYSE Rule 2B to permit NYSE's indirect ownership
interest in BIDS Trading and BIDS Trading's affiliation with the
Company was consistent with the Act, including Section 6(b)(5)
thereof.\13\ As the basis for its determination, the Commission cited
the specific limitations and conditions listed in the Approval Order to
which its approval of the exception to NYSE Rule 2B was subject,\14\
stating that ``[t]hese conditions appear reasonably designed to
mitigate concerns about potential conflicts of interest and unfair
competitive advantage,'' that ``[t]hese conditions appear reasonably
designed to promote robust and independent regulation of BIDS
[Trading],'' and that [t]he Commission believes that, taken together,
these conditions are reasonably designed to mitigate potential
conflicts between the Exchange's commercial interest in BIDS [Holdings]
and its regulatory responsibilities with respect to BIDS [Trading].''
\15\ The Exchange believes that the exception from NYSE Rule 2B
described above will continue to be consistent with the Act during that
extension because, other than the ending date of the pilot period and
the aforementioned small increase in the ceiling on the Exchange's
equity interest in BIDS Holdings, these same limitations and conditions
will continue to be applicable during the additional extension of the
pilot period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Approval Order at 5018-5019.
\14\ Id. at 5018.
\15\ Id. at 5019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Approval Order, the conditions of
which are reasonably designed to mitigate concerns about potential
conflicts of interest and unfair competitive advantage. In this regard,
although BIDS Holdings and the Exchange are affiliated, NYSE and BIDS
Holdings have established and maintained procedures and internal
controls that are designed to prevent BIDS Holdings and its affiliates
from deriving any unfair informational advantage resulting from its
affiliation with the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\17\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\18\ In addition, Rule 19-b-4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange
to give the Commission written notice of the Exchange's intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and
text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior
to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter
time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied
this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because such waiver would allow the benefits of the pilot program to
operate without interruption after January 22, 2013. Therefore, the
Commission designates the proposed rule change as operative upon
filing.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative
delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2013-01 on the subject line.
[[Page 4526]]
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2013-01. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2013-01 and should be
submitted on or before February 12, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-01173 Filed 1-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P