Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain Electronic Devices With Graphics Data Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software, 4438 [2013-01090]

Download as PDF 4438 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2013 / Notices decided to conduct a full review of the antidumping duty order on imports of silicomanganese from Venezuela. The Commission found that the respondent interested party group responses with respect to the reviews on subject imports from India and Kazakhstan were inadequate. Notwithstanding this, the Commission determined to conduct full reviews of the antidumping duty orders on imports of silicomanganese from India and Kazakhstan to promote administrative efficiency in light of its decision to conduct a full review with respect to the order on subject imports from Venezuela. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: January 15, 2013. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–01089 Filed 1–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–813] Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain Electronic Devices With Graphics Data Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (Order No. 32) terminating the above-captioned investigation in its entirety based upon a settlement agreement. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–2661. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:11 Jan 18, 2013 Jkt 229001 Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on November 14, 2011, based on a complaint filed by S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., of Grand Cayman Islands, British West Indies, and S3 Graphics, Inc., of Fremont, California (collectively, ‘‘S3G’’). 76 FR 70490 (Nov. 14, 2011). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic devices with graphics data processing systems, components thereof, and associated software, by reason of infringement of various claims of four United States patents. The notice of investigation named Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California (‘‘Apple’’), as the only respondent. On November 19, 2012, S3G and Apple filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation based upon a settlement agreement. On December 7, 2012, S3G and Apple supplemented their motion. On December 12, 2012, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting the motion to terminate. On December 13, 2012, the ALJ granted the motion and issued an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) terminating the investigation in its entirety. The ALJ found that termination of the investigation based upon an alternative method of dispute resolution is generally in the public interest. The ALJ further found that granting the motion would not be contrary to the public interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). Issued: January 15, 2013. PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–01090 Filed 1–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Clean Air Act On January 14, 2013, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Government of the Virgin Islands, et al., Civil Action No. 3:10–cv– 48. In this action the United States seeks, among other things, injunctive relief and civil penalties for the failure by the Government of the Virgin Islands (‘‘GVI’’) and the Virgin Islands Waste Management Authority (‘‘WMA’’) to operate the Anguilla Landfill on St. Croix in compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (‘‘RCRA’’) and the Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’). The proposed Consent Decree provides for the GVI and WMA to: (a) Operate and maintain the landfill in accordance with RCRA; (b) construct and operate a landfill gas collection and combustion system (GCCS); (c) construct and operate a storm water collection system; (d) install groundwater monitoring wells; (e) implement closure of the landfill in phases beginning in 2014; (f) remove and dispose of off-site used tires remaining at the landfill; (g) remove and dispose of off-site scrap metal remaining at the landfill; (h) remediate the soils in the former scrap metal storage area; (i) construct and operate a scrap metal management facility; (j) implement a waste diversion/recycling program; and (k) pay a civil penalty of $50,000. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. Government of the Virgin Islands, et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90– 5–2–1–08776. All comments must be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM 22JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 4438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-813]


Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain 
Electronic Devices With Graphics Data Processing Systems, Components 
Thereof, and Associated Software

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (Order 
No. 32) terminating the above-captioned investigation in its entirety 
based upon a settlement agreement. The investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2661. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on 202-205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on November 14, 2011, based on a complaint filed by S3 Graphics Co., 
Ltd., of Grand Cayman Islands, British West Indies, and S3 Graphics, 
Inc., of Fremont, California (collectively, ``S3G''). 76 FR 70490 (Nov. 
14, 2011). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain electronic devices with 
graphics data processing systems, components thereof, and associated 
software, by reason of infringement of various claims of four United 
States patents. The notice of investigation named Apple Inc. of 
Cupertino, California (``Apple''), as the only respondent.
    On November 19, 2012, S3G and Apple filed a joint motion to 
terminate the investigation based upon a settlement agreement. On 
December 7, 2012, S3G and Apple supplemented their motion. On December 
12, 2012, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response 
supporting the motion to terminate.
    On December 13, 2012, the ALJ granted the motion and issued an 
initial determination (``ID'') terminating the investigation in its 
entirety. The ALJ found that termination of the investigation based 
upon an alternative method of dispute resolution is generally in the 
public interest. The ALJ further found that granting the motion would 
not be contrary to the public interest. No petitions for review of the 
ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The 
investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    Issued: January 15, 2013.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-01090 Filed 1-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.