Proposed Priority-National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research-Disability and Rehabilitation Research Project-Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, 2923-2925 [2013-00580]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Dated: January 9, 2013.
Michael Yudin,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–00577 Filed 1–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
Proposed Priority—National Institute
on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research—Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Project—
Center on Knowledge Translation for
Technology Transfer
CFDA Number: 84.133A–08.
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Proposed priority.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a priority under the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects (DRRP) and Centers Program
administered by the National Institute
on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research (NIDRR). Specifically, this
notice proposes a priority for a DRRP to
serve as the Center on Knowledge
Translation for Technology Transfer
(Center). The Assistant Secretary may
use this priority for competitions in
fiscal year (FY) 2013 and later years. We
take this action to focus research
attention on areas of national need. We
intend this priority to contribute to
improved outcomes for individuals with
a disability.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before February 14, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this notice to Marlene Spencer, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., room 5133, Potomac
Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC
20202–2700.
If you prefer to send your comments
by email, use the following address:
marlene.spencer@ed.gov. You must
include the phrase ‘‘Proposed Priority
for DRRP to serve as the Center’’ in the
subject line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene Spencer. Telephone: (202) 245–
7532 or by email:
marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of proposed priority is in concert
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jan 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
with NIDRR’s currently approved LongRange Plan (Plan). The currently
approved Plan, which was published in
the Federal Register on February 15,
2006 (71 FR 8166), can be accessed on
the Internet at the following site:
https://www2.ed.gov/legislation/Fed
Register/other/2006-1/021506d.pdf.
Through the implementation of the
currently approved Plan, NIDRR seeks
to: (1) Improve the quality and utility of
disability and rehabilitation research;
(2) foster an exchange of expertise,
information, and training to facilitate
the advancement of knowledge and
understanding of the unique needs of
traditionally underserved populations;
(3) determine best strategies and
programs to improve rehabilitation
outcomes for underserved populations;
(4) identify research gaps; (5) identify
mechanisms of integrating research and
practice; and (6) disseminate findings.
This notice proposes a priority that
NIDRR intends to use for a DRRP
competition in FY 2013 and possibly
later years. However, nothing precludes
NIDRR from publishing additional
priorities, if needed. Furthermore,
NIDRR is under no obligation to make
an award using this priority. The
decision to make an award will be based
on the quality of applications received
and available funding.
Invitation to Comment: We invite you
to submit comments regarding this
notice. To ensure that your comments
have maximum effect in developing the
notice of final priority, we urge you to
identify clearly the specific topic that
each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 and their overall requirement
of reducing regulatory burden that
might result from this proposed priority.
Please let us know of any further ways
we could reduce potential costs or
increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice in room 5133, 550 12th
Street, SW., PCP, Washington, DC,
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, Monday
through Friday of each week except
Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2923
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
is to plan and conduct research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, including
international activities, and to develop
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation
technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities, and to
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation
Act).
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects
The purpose of NIDRR’s DRRPs,
which are funded through the Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Program, are to improve the
effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act by
developing methods, procedures, and
rehabilitation technologies that advance
a wide range of independent living and
employment outcomes for individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals
with the most severe disabilities. DRRPs
carry out one or more of the following
types of activities, as specified and
defined in 34 CFR 350.13 through
350.19: research, training,
demonstration, development,
dissemination, utilization, and technical
assistance.
Additional information on the DRRP
program can be found at: www.ed.gov/
rschstat/research/pubs/resprogram.html#DRRP.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g)
and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority:
This notice contains one proposed
priority.
DRRP to Serve as the Center on
Knowledge Translation for Technology
Transfer (Center).
Background:
Knowledge translation (KT) is a
process to ensure that new knowledge
and products gained through research
and development will ultimately be
used to improve the lives of individuals
with disabilities and further their
participation in society. Technology
transfer is a subset of knowledge
translation that focuses on ensuring that
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
2924
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
technology-based knowledge and
products will be transferred into
tangible benefits for individuals with
disabilities through commercialization,
engineering standards, freeware, and
other tangible applications.
Under section 200(3) of the
Rehabilitation Act, NIDRR is charged
with promoting the transfer of
rehabilitation technology to individuals
with disabilities. NIDRR carries out this
responsibility through the
Rehabilitation Engineering Research
Centers (RERC) and Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) programs.
NIDRR has long required RERCs to
develop technology transfer plans. In
analyzing grantee performance
information, NIDRR determined that it
would be useful to provide technical
assistance to grantees to improve the
rates of technology transfer. NIDRR’s
concerns were supported by findings
from a recent retrospective case study
analysis indicating that, while a
majority of development projects
supported by RERC grants result in
prototypes, only a quarter of those
projects have evidence of transfer into
broader uses (Lane, 2008). More
information on technology research
funded by NIDRR can be found at:
www.naric.com/research/pd/
results.cfm?type=priority&display=
detailed&criteria=Technology for
Access and Function.
Transfer of rehabilitation technology
products is often difficult because of the
small market for each product. Often,
the broader technology transfer field
does not provide guidance that is
directly applicable to technology
transfer in the rehabilitation technology
area. Thus, there is a need to continue
to build a body of knowledge that will
advance understanding and practices of
technology transfer for rehabilitation
technology products.
To support, promote, and improve the
technology transfer of its RERC, SBIR,
and other technology grantees, NIDRR
will fund a Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Project (DRRP) on Knowledge
Translation for Technology Transfer.
References:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Lane, J. (2008). Delivering on the ‘D’ in R&D:
Recommendations for Increasing
Transfer Outcomes From Development
Projects. Assistive Technology Outcomes
and Benefits, Fall 2008 Special Issue.
Retrieved 10/15/2012 from
www.atia.org/files/public/ATOBSIF2008
.pdf.
Proposed Priority:
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
establishes a priority for a Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Project to serve
as the Center on Knowledge Translation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jan 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
for Technology Transfer (Center). The
Center must conduct rigorous research,
development, technical assistance,
dissemination, and utilization activities
to increase successful technology
transfer of rehabilitation technology
products and devices developed by
NIDRR-funded technology grantees.
In planning and conducting all
activities, the Center must partner with
relevant stakeholders such as NIDRR’s
technology grantees, trade and
professional associations, industry
representatives, individuals with
disabilities, and others.
Under this priority, the Center must
be designed to contribute to the
following outcomes:
(a) Increased rate of successful
technology transfer of rehabilitation
technology products developed by
NIDRR-funded technology grantees to
the marketplace, into engineering
standards, or into other intended
applications;
(b) Increased understanding among
rehabilitation engineers and others
engaged in disability research and
development of technology transfer
processes and practices that lead to
successful transfer of rehabilitation
technology products to the marketplace,
into engineering standards, or into other
intended applications;
(c) Increased capacity of NIDRR’s
technology grantees to plan and to
engage in technology transfer activities.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We will announce the final priority in
a notice in the Federal Register. We will
determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the
Department. This notice does not
preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or
selection criteria, subject to meeting
applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563:
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Secretary must determine whether this
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and,
therefore, subject to the requirements of
the Executive order and subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action likely to
result in a rule that may—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local or Tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
This proposed regulatory action is not
a significant regulatory action subject to
review by OMB under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this regulatory
action under Executive Order 13563,
which supplements and explicitly
reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing regulatory review
established in Executive Order 12866.
To the extent permitted by law,
Executive Order 13563 requires that an
agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
upon a reasoned determination that
their benefits justify their costs
(recognizing that some benefits and
costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
obtaining regulatory objectives and
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
taking into account—among other things
and to the extent practicable—the costs
of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than the
behavior or manner of compliance a
regulated entity must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
including economic incentives—such as
user fees or marketable permits—to
encourage the desired behavior, or
provide information that enables the
public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires
an agency ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We are issuing this proposed priority
only upon a reasoned determination
that its benefits justify its costs. In
choosing among alternative regulatory
approaches, we selected those
approaches that would maximize net
benefits. Based on the analysis that
follows, the Department believes that
this proposed priority is consistent with
the principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this
regulatory action would not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action. The potential costs
are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities.
The benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Programs have been well
established over the years in that similar
projects have been completed
successfully. This proposed priority
would generate new knowledge through
research and development. Another
benefit of this proposed priority is that
the establishment of new DRRPs would
improve the lives of individuals with
disabilities. The new DRRP would
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Jan 14, 2013
Jkt 229001
generate, disseminate, and promote the
use of new information that would
improve employment opportunities for
individuals with disabilities.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD or a TTY, call
the FRS, toll free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: January 9, 2013.
Michael Yudin,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–00580 Filed 1–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[MB Docket No. 07–294; FCC 12–166]
Promoting Diversification of
Ownership in the Broadcasting
Services
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission seeks further comment on
its requirement that licensees and other
entities filing the FCC Form 323,
Ownership Report for Commercial
Broadcast Station, provide an FCC
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2925
Registration Number (FRN) generated by
the Commission’s Registration System
(CORES) (CORES FRN) for attributable
individuals reported on the Form 323.
The Sixth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (Sixth FNPRM) also seeks
comment on the Commission’s proposal
to eliminate the ‘‘Special Use’’ FRN for
individuals reported on the Form 323
and on a proposal to amend the Form
323–E, Ownership Report for
Noncommercial Educational Broadcast
Station to require filers to report the
CORES FRN for individuals with
attributable interests in licensees
reported on the Form 323–E. The
Commission also invites comment on
whether it should extend the CORES
FRN requirements, as they apply to
entities and individuals, to any nonattributable interest holders that the
Commission might ultimately conclude
should be reported on the Form 323, as
proposed by the Fifth Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (Fifth FNPRM).
Finally, comment is sought on a
proposal to extend the biennial
ownership report filing period and on
proposed revisions to the Form 323 as
submitted in comments in the Review of
Media Bureau Data Practices
proceeding.
DATES: The Commission must receive
written comments on or before February
14, 2013 and reply comments on or
before March 1, 2013. Written
comments on the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) proposed information
collection requirements must be
submitted by the public, Office of
Management (OMB) and other
interested parties on or before March 18,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by MB Docket. No. 07–294, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Judith Herman of
the Media Bureau, Industry Analysis
Division, at (202) 418–2330. For
additional information concerning the
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 15, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2923-2925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00580]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
Proposed Priority--National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research--Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Project--Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
CFDA Number: 84.133A-08.
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Proposed priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services proposes a priority under the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP) and Centers Program
administered by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation
Research (NIDRR). Specifically, this notice proposes a priority for a
DRRP to serve as the Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology
Transfer (Center). The Assistant Secretary may use this priority for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2013 and later years. We take this
action to focus research attention on areas of national need. We intend
this priority to contribute to improved outcomes for individuals with a
disability.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before February 14, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this notice to Marlene Spencer,
U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., room 5133,
Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700.
If you prefer to send your comments by email, use the following
address: marlene.spencer@ed.gov. You must include the phrase ``Proposed
Priority for DRRP to serve as the Center'' in the subject line of your
electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlene Spencer. Telephone: (202) 245-
7532 or by email: marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of proposed priority is in
concert with NIDRR's currently approved Long-Range Plan (Plan). The
currently approved Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on
February 15, 2006 (71 FR 8166), can be accessed on the Internet at the
following site: https://www2.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/other/2006-1/021506d.pdf.
Through the implementation of the currently approved Plan, NIDRR
seeks to: (1) Improve the quality and utility of disability and
rehabilitation research; (2) foster an exchange of expertise,
information, and training to facilitate the advancement of knowledge
and understanding of the unique needs of traditionally underserved
populations; (3) determine best strategies and programs to improve
rehabilitation outcomes for underserved populations; (4) identify
research gaps; (5) identify mechanisms of integrating research and
practice; and (6) disseminate findings.
This notice proposes a priority that NIDRR intends to use for a
DRRP competition in FY 2013 and possibly later years. However, nothing
precludes NIDRR from publishing additional priorities, if needed.
Furthermore, NIDRR is under no obligation to make an award using this
priority. The decision to make an award will be based on the quality of
applications received and available funding.
Invitation to Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding
this notice. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final priority, we urge you to identify
clearly the specific topic that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and their overall
requirement of reducing regulatory burden that might result from this
proposed priority. Please let us know of any further ways we could
reduce potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving
the effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this notice in room 5133, 550 12th Street, SW., PCP,
Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to plan and
conduct research, demonstration projects, training, and related
activities, including international activities, and to develop methods,
procedures, and rehabilitation technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living,
family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe
disabilities, and to improve the effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation Act).
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
The purpose of NIDRR's DRRPs, which are funded through the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program,
are to improve the effectiveness of services authorized under the
Rehabilitation Act by developing methods, procedures, and
rehabilitation technologies that advance a wide range of independent
living and employment outcomes for individuals with disabilities,
especially individuals with the most severe disabilities. DRRPs carry
out one or more of the following types of activities, as specified and
defined in 34 CFR 350.13 through 350.19: research, training,
demonstration, development, dissemination, utilization, and technical
assistance.
Additional information on the DRRP program can be found at:
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-program.html#DRRP.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority:
This notice contains one proposed priority.
DRRP to Serve as the Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology
Transfer (Center).
Background:
Knowledge translation (KT) is a process to ensure that new
knowledge and products gained through research and development will
ultimately be used to improve the lives of individuals with
disabilities and further their participation in society. Technology
transfer is a subset of knowledge translation that focuses on ensuring
that
[[Page 2924]]
technology-based knowledge and products will be transferred into
tangible benefits for individuals with disabilities through
commercialization, engineering standards, freeware, and other tangible
applications.
Under section 200(3) of the Rehabilitation Act, NIDRR is charged
with promoting the transfer of rehabilitation technology to individuals
with disabilities. NIDRR carries out this responsibility through the
Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERC) and Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) programs. NIDRR has long required RERCs to
develop technology transfer plans. In analyzing grantee performance
information, NIDRR determined that it would be useful to provide
technical assistance to grantees to improve the rates of technology
transfer. NIDRR's concerns were supported by findings from a recent
retrospective case study analysis indicating that, while a majority of
development projects supported by RERC grants result in prototypes,
only a quarter of those projects have evidence of transfer into broader
uses (Lane, 2008). More information on technology research funded by
NIDRR can be found at: www.naric.com/research/pd/results.cfm?type=priority&display=detailed&criteria=Technology for
Access and Function.
Transfer of rehabilitation technology products is often difficult
because of the small market for each product. Often, the broader
technology transfer field does not provide guidance that is directly
applicable to technology transfer in the rehabilitation technology
area. Thus, there is a need to continue to build a body of knowledge
that will advance understanding and practices of technology transfer
for rehabilitation technology products.
To support, promote, and improve the technology transfer of its
RERC, SBIR, and other technology grantees, NIDRR will fund a Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP) on Knowledge Translation for
Technology Transfer.
References:
Lane, J. (2008). Delivering on the `D' in R&D: Recommendations for
Increasing Transfer Outcomes From Development Projects. Assistive
Technology Outcomes and Benefits, Fall 2008 Special Issue. Retrieved
10/15/2012 from www.atia.org/files/public/ATOBSIF2008.pdf.
Proposed Priority:
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services establishes a priority for a Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Project to serve as the Center on Knowledge Translation for
Technology Transfer (Center). The Center must conduct rigorous
research, development, technical assistance, dissemination, and
utilization activities to increase successful technology transfer of
rehabilitation technology products and devices developed by NIDRR-
funded technology grantees.
In planning and conducting all activities, the Center must partner
with relevant stakeholders such as NIDRR's technology grantees, trade
and professional associations, industry representatives, individuals
with disabilities, and others.
Under this priority, the Center must be designed to contribute to
the following outcomes:
(a) Increased rate of successful technology transfer of
rehabilitation technology products developed by NIDRR-funded technology
grantees to the marketplace, into engineering standards, or into other
intended applications;
(b) Increased understanding among rehabilitation engineers and
others engaged in disability research and development of technology
transfer processes and practices that lead to successful transfer of
rehabilitation technology products to the marketplace, into engineering
standards, or into other intended applications;
(c) Increased capacity of NIDRR's technology grantees to plan and
to engage in technology transfer activities.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority:
We will announce the final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final priority after considering
responses to this notice and other information available to the
Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563:
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the Secretary must determine whether
this regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to
the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely
to result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local or
Tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
This proposed regulatory action is not a significant regulatory
action subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866.
We have also reviewed this regulatory action under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and
[[Page 2925]]
taking into account--among other things and to the extent practicable--
the costs of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide
information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated
behavioral changes.''
We are issuing this proposed priority only upon a reasoned
determination that its benefits justify its costs. In choosing among
alternative regulatory approaches, we selected those approaches that
would maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis that follows, the
Department believes that this proposed priority is consistent with the
principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this regulatory action would not
unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive orders, the Department has
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs are those resulting from statutory requirements and
those we have determined as necessary for administering the
Department's programs and activities.
The benefits of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Programs have been well established over the years in that
similar projects have been completed successfully. This proposed
priority would generate new knowledge through research and development.
Another benefit of this proposed priority is that the establishment of
new DRRPs would improve the lives of individuals with disabilities. The
new DRRP would generate, disseminate, and promote the use of new
information that would improve employment opportunities for individuals
with disabilities.
Intergovernmental Review: This program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: January 9, 2013.
Michael Yudin,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-00580 Filed 1-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P