Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Intent Not To Revoke Order In Part; 2010-2011, 2363-2365 [2013-00452]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
2363
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 8
Friday, January 11, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
including company name, company
address, account number and balance,
as well as company contact information,
including name, telephone number, and
mailing address, were transferred to
FMMI. All other information was
destroyed. Accordingly, this notice
formally terminates this system of
records.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary.
Office of the Secretary
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
[FR Doc. 2013–00440 Filed 1–10–13; 8:45 am]
[Docket No. APHIS–2012–0041]
Notification of Deletion of a System of
Records; Automated Trust Funds
Database
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of deletion of a system of
records.
Notice of New Fee Site; Federal Lands
Recreation Enhancement Act
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the
U.S. Department of Agriculture is giving
notice that it is deleting a system of
records that is no longer in use.
DATES: Effective Date: January 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Julie Tripp, Supervisory Accountant,
International Operations and
Accounting Team, Financial Operations
Branch, APHIS, 100 North Sixth Street,
Ste. 510 C, Minneapolis, MN 55403;
(612) 336–3240.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
30, 2008, pursuant to the provisions of
the Privacy Act of 1974, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA)
published in the Federal Register (73
FR 23414–23416, Docket No. APHIS–
2008–0026) a system of records notice
establishing the Automated Trust Funds
(ATF) database system of records. The
Federal Information Security
Management Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C.
3541 et seq.), the Chief Financial
Officers Act of 1990 (31 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.), the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (40
U.S.C. 1401(3)), and the Federal
Managers’ Financial Integrity Act of
1982, Public Law 97–255, provided
authority for the system.
The ATF database has been replaced
by USDA’s Financial Management
Modernization Initiative (FMMI) and is
no longer in use. Information in the ATF
database about cooperators who have
trust fund agreements with APHIS,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:33 Jan 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Forest Service
Coronado National Forest,
USDA Forest Service, Tucson, Arizona.
ACTION: Notice of New Fee Site.
AGENCY:
The Coronado National Forest
is proposing to charge a fee for the
overnight rental of the Palisades Ranger
Residence, located on the Santa Catalina
Ranger District approximately 20 miles
north of Tucson, Arizona. The building
was constructed in 1933 by the Civilian
Conservation Corps and has been
determined eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places. The
proposed fee will be $125.00 per night,
to accommodate up to four people.
Other cabin rentals on National Forests
in Arizona have shown that the public
appreciates the enhanced recreational
opportunity afforded by these
rehabilitated historic structures.
Revenues from the rentals will be used
for the continued operation and
maintenance of this facility and other
properties in the Arizona ‘‘Rooms with
a View’’ Cabin Rental Program.
DATES: Send any comments regarding
this fee proposal by April 26, 2013.
Comments will be compiled, analyzed,
and shared with the BLM-Arizona
Recreation Resource Advisory Council
(RRAC). Palisades Cabin is scheduled to
become available for rent in fall of 2013.
Please send comments to: Forest
Supervisor, Coronado National Forest,
300 West Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Makansi, Archaeologist,
Coronado National Forest at (520) 760–
2502 or by email at kmakansi@fs.fed.us.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The
Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement
Act (Title VII, Pub. L. 108–447) directed
the Secretary of Agriculture to publish
a six month advance notice in the
Federal Register whenever new
recreation fee areas are established. The
Coronado National Forest currently has
four other rental facilities. These
facilities are booked regularly
throughout the year. A business analysis
for the rental of the Palisades Ranger
Residence shows public interest in this
sort of recreational experience on the
Coronado National Forest. A market
analysis indicates that the $125.00 daily
fee is both reasonable and acceptable for
this sort of unique recreational
experience.
People wanting to rent the Palisades
Ranger Residence will need to do so
through the National Recreation
Reservation Service at
www.recreation.gov, or by calling 1–
877–444–6777. The National Recreation
Reservation Service charges a $9
reservation fee for Internet reservations
and a $10 reservation fee for phone
reservations.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: January 2, 2013.
Jim Upchurch,
Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2013–00332 Filed 1–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–827]
Certain Cased Pencils From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Intent
Not To Revoke Order In Part; 2010–
2011
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
cased pencils (‘‘pencils’’) from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is
December 1, 2010, through November
30, 2011. The review covers one
exporter of subject merchandise, Beijing
Fila Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd. a/
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
2364
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2013 / Notices
k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga
Stationery Company, Ltd., a/k/a Beijing
Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd., and
Dixon Ticonderoga Company
(collectively, ‘‘Dixon’’). We
preliminarily find that Dixon made sales
of subject merchandise at less than
normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: January 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sergio Balbontin or Mary Kolberg, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–6478 or (202) 482–1785,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
includes certain cased pencils from the
PRC. The subject merchandise is
currently classifiable under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheading 9609.10.00.
Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product
description available in Antidumping
Duty Order: Certain Cased Pencils from
the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR
66909 (December 28, 1994) is
dispositive.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Partial Rescission of Review
For those companies named in the
Initiation Notice 1 for whom all review
requests have been withdrawn and who
previously received separate rate status
in prior segments of this case, we are
rescinding this administrative review, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(I).
These companies are listed in Appendix
II.
Methodology
The Department has conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’). Export prices
have been calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC
is a non-market economy within the
meaning of section 771(18) of the Act,
normal value has been calculated in
accordance with section 773(c) of the
Act. Specifically, Dixon’s factors of
production have been valued in
Thailand and Indonesia, both of which
are economically comparable to the PRC
and significant producers of comparable
merchandise.
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Requests for Revocation in Part, 77 FR 4759
(January 31, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jan 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
2010–2011 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Cased
Pencils from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, dated January 2,
2013 (‘‘Preliminary Decision
Memorandum’’) and hereby adopted by
this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Import
Administration’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at
https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Intent Not To Revoke Order In Part
We preliminary find that Dixon has
not satisfied the requirements of 19 CFR
351.222(b).2 Thus, under section 751 of
the Act, we preliminarily determine not
to revoke in part the order with respect
to Dixon. See Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists:
2 The Department recently published a final rule
amending this section of its regulations concerning
the revocation of antidumping and countervailing
duty orders in whole or in part, but that final rule
does not apply to this administrative review. See
Modification to Regulation Concerning the
Revocation of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Orders, 77 FR 29875 (May 21, 2012). Reference
to 19 CFR 351.222(b) thus refers to the Department’s
regulations in effect prior to June 20, 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exporter
Beijing Fila Dixon Stationery
Company, Ltd. a/k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga
Stationery Company, Ltd.
a/k/a Beijing Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd., and
Dixon Ticonderoga Company ..................................
Weighted
average
dumping
margin
(percent)
92.46
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department will disclose
calculations performed for these
preliminary results to the parties within
five days of the date of publication of
this notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). Interested parties may
submit written comments no later than
30 days after the date of publication of
these preliminary results of review.3
Rebuttals to written comments may be
filed no later than five days after the
written comments are filed.4
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
this notice.5 Hearing requests should
contain the following information: (1)
The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Oral presentations will
be limited to issues raised in the briefs.
If a request for a hearing is made, parties
will be notified of the time and date for
the hearing to be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230.6
The Department will issue the final
results of this administrative review,
which will include the results of its
analysis of issues raised in any such
comments, within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act.
Deadline for Submission of Publicly
Available Surrogate Value Information
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.301(c)(3)(ii), the deadline for
submission of publicly available
information to value factors of
production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) is
20 days after the date of publication of
the preliminary results. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1), if an
interested party submits factual
information less than ten days before,
on, or after (if the Department has
3 See
19 CFR 351.309(c).
19 CFR 351.309(d).
5 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
6 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
4 See
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2013 / Notices
extended the deadline), the applicable
deadline for submission of such factual
information, an interested party may
submit factual information to rebut,
clarify, or correct the factual
information no later than ten days after
such factual information is served on
the interested party. However, the
Department generally will not accept in
the rebuttal submission additional or
alternative surrogate value information
not previously on the record, if the
deadline for submission of surrogate
value information has passed.7
Furthermore, the Department generally
will not accept business proprietary
information in either the surrogate value
submissions or the rebuttals thereto, as
the regulation regarding the submission
of surrogate values allows only for the
submission of publicly available
information.8
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.9 For assessment purposes, we
calculated exporter/importer- (or
customer-) specific assessment rates for
merchandise subject to this review.
Dixon reported that its U.S. affiliate was
the importer of record for all U.S. sales.
Thus, we calculated an ad valorem rate
by dividing the total dumping margins
for reviewed sales by the total entered
values associated with those
transactions. If Dixon’s antidumping
duty rate exceeds 0.5 percent ad
valorem for the final results of this
review, we will instruct CBP to assess
duties on all of Dixon’s entries. See 19
CFR 351.106(c)(2). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of the final results of
this review.
For companies for which this review
is rescinded, antidumping duties shall
be assessed at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions regarding entries of the
rescinded companies directly to CBP 15
days after publication of this notice.
7 See, e.g., Glycine from the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final Rescission, in
Part, 72 FR 58809 (October 17, 2007), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 2.
8 See 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3).
9 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jan 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for shipments of
the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Dixon,
which has a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be that established in
the final results of this review (except,
if the rate is zero or de minimis, then no
cash deposit will be required); (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters not listed above
that received a separate rate in a prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all
PRC exporters of subject merchandise
that have not been found to be entitled
to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213.
Dated: January 2, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Scope of the Order
2. Non-Market Economy Country
3. Separate Rates
4. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value
Data
5. Economic Comparability
6. Significant Producers of Identical or
Comparable Merchandise
7. Data Availability
8. Date of Sale
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2365
9. Fair Value Comparisons
10. U.S. Price
11. Normal Value
12. Factor Valuations
13. Currency Conversion
Appendix II
Separate rate companies for which we are
rescinding this administrative review:
China First Pencil Co., Ltd. Orient
International Holding Shanghai Foreign
Trade Co., Ltd. Shandong Rongxin Import
and Export Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2013–00452 Filed 1–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–824]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip From India: Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011–2012
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: January 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1398.
AGENCY:
Background
On July 2, 2012, the Department of
Commerce (Department) published a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip from India covering the period
July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012.1
The Department received a timely
request from Petitioners 2 for an AD
administrative review of five
companies: Ester Industries Limited
(Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd.
(Garware), Polyplex Corporation Ltd.
(Polyplex), SRF Limited (SRF), and
Jindal Poly Films Limited of India
(Jindal).3 In addition, the Department
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 77 FR 39216,
39217 (July 2, 2012).
2 Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi
Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics
(America), Inc.
3 See Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,
Sheet, and Strip from India: Request for
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Petitioners’ Request for an Administrative Review
(July 31, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2363-2365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00452]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-827]
Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Intent Not To Revoke Order In Part; 2010-2011
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cased
pencils (``pencils'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').
The period of review (``POR'') is December 1, 2010, through November
30, 2011. The review covers one exporter of subject merchandise,
Beijing Fila Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd. a/
[[Page 2364]]
k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery Company, Ltd., a/k/a Beijing
Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd., and Dixon Ticonderoga Company
(collectively, ``Dixon''). We preliminarily find that Dixon made sales
of subject merchandise at less than normal value.
DATES: Effective Date: January 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sergio Balbontin or Mary Kolberg, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6478 or (202) 482-1785,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order includes certain cased pencils
from the PRC. The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheading
9609.10.00. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written product description available in
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased Pencils from the People's
Republic of China, 59 FR 66909 (December 28, 1994) is dispositive.
Partial Rescission of Review
For those companies named in the Initiation Notice \1\ for whom all
review requests have been withdrawn and who previously received
separate rate status in prior segments of this case, we are rescinding
this administrative review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(I).
These companies are listed in Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 77 FR
4759 (January 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').
Export prices have been calculated in accordance with section 772 of
the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy within the meaning of
section 771(18) of the Act, normal value has been calculated in
accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. Specifically, Dixon's
factors of production have been valued in Thailand and Indonesia, both
of which are economically comparable to the PRC and significant
producers of comparable merchandise.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 2010-
2011 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Cased Pencils from
the People's Republic of China,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations
to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated
January 2, 2013 (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum'') and hereby
adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically via Import Administration's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (``IA ACCESS''). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of
the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Intent Not To Revoke Order In Part
We preliminary find that Dixon has not satisfied the requirements
of 19 CFR 351.222(b).\2\ Thus, under section 751 of the Act, we
preliminarily determine not to revoke in part the order with respect to
Dixon. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Department recently published a final rule amending this
section of its regulations concerning the revocation of antidumping
and countervailing duty orders in whole or in part, but that final
rule does not apply to this administrative review. See Modification
to Regulation Concerning the Revocation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 29875 (May 21, 2012). Reference to
19 CFR 351.222(b) thus refers to the Department's regulations in
effect prior to June 20, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margin exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
average
Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing Fila Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd. a/k/a 92.46
Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery Company, Ltd. a/k/
a Beijing Dixon Stationery Company, Ltd., and Dixon
Ticonderoga Company....................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department will disclose calculations performed for these
preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Interested parties may submit written comments no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of these preliminary results of
review.\3\ Rebuttals to written comments may be filed no later than
five days after the written comments are filed.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of
publication of this notice.\5\ Hearing requests should contain the
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to
be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in
the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be
notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department will issue the final results of this administrative
review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised
in any such comments, within 120 days of publication of these
preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Deadline for Submission of Publicly Available Surrogate Value
Information
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(ii), the deadline for
submission of publicly available information to value factors of
production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) is 20 days after the date of
publication of the preliminary results. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.301(c)(1), if an interested party submits factual information less
than ten days before, on, or after (if the Department has
[[Page 2365]]
extended the deadline), the applicable deadline for submission of such
factual information, an interested party may submit factual information
to rebut, clarify, or correct the factual information no later than ten
days after such factual information is served on the interested party.
However, the Department generally will not accept in the rebuttal
submission additional or alternative surrogate value information not
previously on the record, if the deadline for submission of surrogate
value information has passed.\7\ Furthermore, the Department generally
will not accept business proprietary information in either the
surrogate value submissions or the rebuttals thereto, as the regulation
regarding the submission of surrogate values allows only for the
submission of publicly available information.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., Glycine from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Rescission, in Part, 72 FR 58809 (October 17, 2007), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2.
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review.\9\ For assessment purposes, we calculated exporter/importer-
(or customer-) specific assessment rates for merchandise subject to
this review. Dixon reported that its U.S. affiliate was the importer of
record for all U.S. sales. Thus, we calculated an ad valorem rate by
dividing the total dumping margins for reviewed sales by the total
entered values associated with those transactions. If Dixon's
antidumping duty rate exceeds 0.5 percent ad valorem for the final
results of this review, we will instruct CBP to assess duties on all of
Dixon's entries. See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). The Department intends to
issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions regarding entries of the rescinded companies
directly to CBP 15 days after publication of this notice.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Dixon, which has a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the
final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, then no cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above
that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-
specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit
rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: January 2, 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
1. Scope of the Order
2. Non-Market Economy Country
3. Separate Rates
4. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Data
5. Economic Comparability
6. Significant Producers of Identical or Comparable Merchandise
7. Data Availability
8. Date of Sale
9. Fair Value Comparisons
10. U.S. Price
11. Normal Value
12. Factor Valuations
13. Currency Conversion
Appendix II
Separate rate companies for which we are rescinding this
administrative review:
China First Pencil Co., Ltd. Orient International Holding
Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. Shandong Rongxin Import and Export
Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2013-00452 Filed 1-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
