Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 769-771 [2012-31657]

Download as PDF 769 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Notices Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of TA–W No. Subject firm 81,946 ............. Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., Senior Analyst—Sales Implementation, Service Program Delivery Division. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of December 3, 2012 through December 7, 2012. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 365–6822. Dated: December 12, 2012. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2012–31661 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of December 10, 2012 through December 14, 2012. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:34 Jan 03, 2013 Jkt 229001 Location Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date San Francisco, CA. produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group PO 00000 workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM 04JAN1 770 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Notices eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 82,081 ............... 82,152 ............... Teters Floral Products, Penmac Personnel ................................. Systemax Manufacturing, Inc., Systemax, Inc., Manpower, Staffmark, Securitas Security Service USA, Inc. Bolivar, MO ............................... Fletcher, OH .............................. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or Impact date October 12, 2011. November 13, 2011. services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 81,837 ............... Avid Technology, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers From Advantage. Oce Reprographic Technologies .................................................. Hutchinson Technology Incorporated ........................................... Hutchinson Technology Incorporated, Including On-Site Leased Workers from Atterro. Express Employment Professionals, Working On-Site at Hutchinson Technology Incorporated. Doherty Staffing Solutions, Working On-Site at Hutchinson Technology Incorporated. Precision Dynamics Corporation .................................................. Gemesis Diamond Company ........................................................ Crane Payment Solutions, Inc., Operations Department, Randstad. Crane Payment Solutions, Inc., Engineering Department, Entegee. KEMET Electronics Corporation, Accounts Payable Department, Accounts Receivable Department. New Process Gear, Magna Powertrain Division, Magna International Inc., ABM Janitorial, etc. EEP Quality Group, Inc., Working On-Site at New Process Gear Cequent Performance Products, Inc., Trimas Corporation, Forge Industrial Staffing, Elwood. Burlington, MA .......................... July 30, 2011. Phoenix, AZ .............................. Eau Claire, WI ........................... Plymouth, MN ........................... October 16, 2011. April 16, 2012. November 9, 2011. Eau Claire, WI ........................... November 9, 2011. Eau Claire, WI ........................... November 9, 2011. San Fernando, CA .................... Bradenton, FL ........................... Salem, NH ................................. August 3, 2012. November 13, 2011. November 19, 2011. Salem, NH ................................. November 19, 2011. Simpsonville, SC ....................... November 26, 2011. East Syracuse, NY .................... January 8, 2013. East Syracuse, NY .................... Goshen, IN ................................ November 27, 2011. November 28, 2011. 82,090 ............... 82,145 ............... 82,145A ............. 82,145B ............. 82,145C ............. 82,146 ............... 82,154 ............... 82,162 ............... 82,162A ............. 82,178 ............... 82,185 ............... 82,185A ............. 82,187 ............... Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with TA–W No. Subject firm 81,885 ............... NCO Financial Systems, Inc., Utilities Division, Expert Global Services (EGS). The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:34 Jan 03, 2013 Jkt 229001 Frm 00082 (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. Location Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date Jackson, MI. (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or PO 00000 Impact date services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM 04JAN1 771 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 3 / Friday, January 4, 2013 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm 82,113 ............... SGL Carbon, LLC, Reflex Staffing Services and Manpower ....... The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) Location St. Marys, PA. (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign TA–W No. Subject firm 81,920 ............... Kronotex USA Holdings, Inc., Krono Holding AG, Kelly Services, MAU Workforce Solutions, Phillips, etc. Hewlett Packard Company, Worldwide Legal Ethics Division ..... Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center, Department of Saint Mary’s Hospital. Verizon Wireless ........................................................................... 82,110 ............... 82,137 ............... 82,202 ............... Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance TA–W No. 82,164 ............... Karastan, Division of Mohawk Industries, Inc .............................. Wayland, MA. Waterbury, CT. Southfield, MI. workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve 82,119 ............... Hewlett-Packard Company, Printing & Personal Systems (PPS), IWS, DDO, ISB, IPS. Hewlett-Packard Company, Printing and Personal Systems, Supply Chain Operations Business. ODW Contract Services, Working On-site at SST Truck Company, LLC, a Navistar, Inc. Company. 82,218 ............... Vancouver, WA. Garland, TX. Dated: December 18, 2012. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of November 26, 2012 through November 30, 2012. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:34 Jan 03, 2013 Jkt 229001 Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date Corvallis, OR. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Location I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of December 10, 2012 through December 14, 2012. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 365–6822. [FR Doc. 2012–31657 Filed 1–3–13; 8:45 am] Impact date Eden, NC. Subject firm 82,133 ............... The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Location TA–W No. Impact date Barnwell, SC. Subject firm The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of country) of section 222 have not been met. Location on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and Impact date I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM 04JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 769-771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
December 10, 2012 through December 14, 2012.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased 
absolutely; and
    (3) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive 
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have 
increased;
    (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are 
directly incorporated, have increased;
    (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more 
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or 
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more 
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
    (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have 
increased; and
    (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the 
sales or production of such firm; or
    II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign 
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or 
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
    (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly 
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
    (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' 
separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public 
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to 
become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services 
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such 
agency; and
    (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or 
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for 
such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described 
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or 
threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade 
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply 
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group

[[Page 770]]

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
    (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the 
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an 
investigation resulting in--
    (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat 
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
    (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat 
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
    (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat 
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
    (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the 
date on which--
    (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the 
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to 
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is 
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
    (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in 
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
    (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the 
workers' firm within--
    (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
    (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding 
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         TA-W No.                  Subject firm               Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,081....................  Teters Floral Products,     Bolivar, MO.........  October 12, 2011.
                             Penmac Personnel.
82,152....................  Systemax Manufacturing,     Fletcher, OH........  November 13, 2011.
                             Inc., Systemax, Inc.,
                             Manpower, Staffmark,
                             Securitas Security
                             Service USA, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act 
have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         TA-W No.                  Subject firm               Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,837....................  Avid Technology, Inc.,      Burlington, MA......  July 30, 2011.
                             Including On-Site Leased
                             Workers From Advantage.
82,090....................  Oce Reprographic            Phoenix, AZ.........  October 16, 2011.
                             Technologies.
82,145....................  Hutchinson Technology       Eau Claire, WI......  April 16, 2012.
                             Incorporated.
82,145A...................  Hutchinson Technology       Plymouth, MN........  November 9, 2011.
                             Incorporated, Including
                             On-Site Leased Workers
                             from Atterro.
82,145B...................  Express Employment          Eau Claire, WI......  November 9, 2011.
                             Professionals, Working On-
                             Site at Hutchinson
                             Technology Incorporated.
82,145C...................  Doherty Staffing            Eau Claire, WI......  November 9, 2011.
                             Solutions, Working On-
                             Site at Hutchinson
                             Technology Incorporated.
82,146....................  Precision Dynamics          San Fernando, CA....  August 3, 2012.
                             Corporation.
82,154....................  Gemesis Diamond Company...  Bradenton, FL.......  November 13, 2011.
82,162....................  Crane Payment Solutions,    Salem, NH...........  November 19, 2011.
                             Inc., Operations
                             Department, Randstad.
82,162A...................  Crane Payment Solutions,    Salem, NH...........  November 19, 2011.
                             Inc., Engineering
                             Department, Entegee.
82,178....................  KEMET Electronics           Simpsonville, SC....  November 26, 2011.
                             Corporation, Accounts
                             Payable Department,
                             Accounts Receivable
                             Department.
82,185....................  New Process Gear, Magna     East Syracuse, NY...  January 8, 2013.
                             Powertrain Division,
                             Magna International Inc.,
                             ABM Janitorial, etc.
82,185A...................  EEP Quality Group, Inc.,    East Syracuse, NY...  November 27, 2011.
                             Working On-Site at New
                             Process Gear.
82,187....................  Cequent Performance         Goshen, IN..........  November 28, 2011.
                             Products, Inc., Trimas
                             Corporation, Forge
                             Industrial Staffing,
                             Elwood.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph 
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of 
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         TA-W No.                  Subject firm               Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,885....................  NCO Financial Systems,      Jackson, MI.          ..................................
                             Inc., Utilities Division,
                             Expert Global Services
                             (EGS).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs 
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) 
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 
have not been met.

[[Page 771]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         TA-W No.                  Subject firm               Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,113....................  SGL Carbon, LLC, Reflex     St. Marys, PA.
                             Staffing Services and
                             Manpower.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs 
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         TA-W No.                  Subject firm               Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,920....................  Kronotex USA Holdings,      Barnwell, SC.
                             Inc., Krono Holding AG,
                             Kelly Services, MAU
                             Workforce Solutions,
                             Phillips, etc.
82,110....................  Hewlett Packard Company,    Wayland, MA.
                             Worldwide Legal Ethics
                             Division.
82,137....................  Naugatuck Valley Surgical   Waterbury, CT.
                             Center, Department of
                             Saint Mary's Hospital.
82,202....................  Verizon Wireless..........  Southfield, MI.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register 
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act 
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these 
petitions.
    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         TA-W No.                  Subject firm               Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,164....................  Karastan, Division of       Eden, NC.
                             Mohawk Industries, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active 
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases 
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be 
covered by more than one certification at a time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         TA-W No.                  Subject firm               Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,119....................  Hewlett-Packard Company,    Corvallis, OR.
                             Printing & Personal
                             Systems (PPS), IWS, DDO,
                             ISB, IPS.
82,133....................  Hewlett-Packard Company,    Vancouver, WA.
                             Printing and Personal
                             Systems, Supply Chain
                             Operations Business.
82,218....................  ODW Contract Services,      Garland, TX.
                             Working On-site at SST
                             Truck Company, LLC, a
                             Navistar, Inc. Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were 
issued during the period of December 10, 2012 through December 14, 
2012. These determinations are available on the Department's Web 
site tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing 
of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment 
Assistance toll free at 888-365-6822.

    Dated: December 18, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-31657 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.