Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from Taiwan: Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76456 [2012-31320]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
76456
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 249 / Friday, December 28, 2012 / Notices
Dated: December 21, 2012.
David Mussatt,
Director—Midwestern Regional Office.
the remaining request for an
administrative review of Nan Ya.
[FR Doc. 2012–31165 Filed 12–26–12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip from Taiwan: Partial
Rescission of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: December 28,
2012.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Carey or Milton Koch, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3964 or (202) 482–
2584, respectively.
Background
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
On July 2, 2012, the Department of
Commerce (Department) published a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip from Taiwan covering the
period July 1, 2011, through June 30,
2012.1 The Department received a
timely request for an AD administrative
review from Petitioners 2 for two
companies: Shinkong Materials
Technology Corporation (Shinkong),
and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan
Ya). On August 30, 2012, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of administrative review with
respect to Nan Ya and Shinkong.3 On
September 26, 2012, DuPont Teijin
Films, one of the petitioners who
requested the review, withdrew its
request for an administrative review of
Nan Ya and Shinkong. On November 30,
2012, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.,
SKC Inc., and Toray Plastics withdrew
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 77 FR 39216,
39217 (July 2, 2012).
2 Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi
Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc. and Toray Plastics
(America), Inc.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Requests for Revocation in Part, 77 FR 52688
(August 30, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:15 Dec 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
Rescission, In Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if a party
that requested the review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. Petitioners’
withdrawal requests were timely
submitted within the 90-day period.4 As
the withdrawal letters filed by
Petitioners are timely and no other party
requested a review of Nan Ya, we are
rescinding this review with respect to
Nan Ya, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1). Because the review
request for Shinkong was not
withdrawn by Mitsubishi Polyester
Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics,
Inc., the Department will continue to
conduct the AD administrative review
of Shinkong.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Nan Ya shall be
assessed antidumping duties at rates
equal to the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
4 The 90th day fell on November 28, 2012;
however, as explained in the memorandum from
the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
the Department has exercised its discretion to toll
deadlines for the duration of the closure of the
Federal Government from October 29, through
October 30, 2012. Thus, all deadlines in this
segment of the proceeding have been extended by
two days. The revised deadline for withdrawing a
review request was therefore, November 30, 2012.
See Memorandum to the Record from Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As
a Result of the Government Closure During the
Recent Hurricane’’ (October 31, 2012).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 20, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–31320 Filed 12–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we
invite comments on the question of
whether instruments of equivalent
scientific value, for the purposes for
which the instruments shown below are
intended to be used, are being
manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR
301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and
be postmarked on or before January 17,
2013. Address written comments to
Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Washington, DC 20230. Applications
may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and
5:00 p.m. at the U.S. Department of
Commerce in Room 3720.
Docket Number: 12–058. Applicant:
Regents of the University of California,
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
1 Cyclotron Road, MS 46R0125,
Berkeley, CA 94720. Instrument:
Neodymium Iron Boron (NdFeB)
Magentic Block—HXU Model (Vacodym
776). Manufacturer: Vacuumschemelze
GmbH & Co KG, Germany. Intended
Use: The instrument will be used to
study matter on the fundamental atomic
length scale and the associated ultrafast
time scales of atomic motion and
electronic transformation. The NdFeB
magnet blocks must be of high magnetic
field density to achieve the base spectral
range. They must also be of high
uniformity in order to achieve FreeElectron Laser (FEL) saturation. In
addition to meeting these requirements,
the unique capabilities of this
instrument are expanded spectral reach,
x-ray beams with controllable
polarization, and ‘‘pump’’ pulses over a
vastly extended range of photon
energies to a sample, which are
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 76456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31320]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from Taiwan:
Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: December 28, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey or Milton Koch, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-3964 or (202) 482-2584, respectively.
Background
On July 2, 2012, the Department of Commerce (Department) published
a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip from Taiwan covering the period July 1, 2011, through June
30, 2012.\1\ The Department received a timely request for an AD
administrative review from Petitioners \2\ for two companies: Shinkong
Materials Technology Corporation (Shinkong), and Nan Ya Plastics
Corporation (Nan Ya). On August 30, 2012, the Department published a
notice of initiation of administrative review with respect to Nan Ya
and Shinkong.\3\ On September 26, 2012, DuPont Teijin Films, one of the
petitioners who requested the review, withdrew its request for an
administrative review of Nan Ya and Shinkong. On November 30, 2012,
Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC Inc., and Toray Plastics withdrew
the remaining request for an administrative review of Nan Ya.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative
Review, 77 FR 39216, 39217 (July 2, 2012).
\2\ Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester
Film, Inc., SKC, Inc. and Toray Plastics (America), Inc.
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 77 FR
52688 (August 30, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission, In Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review.
Petitioners' withdrawal requests were timely submitted within the 90-
day period.\4\ As the withdrawal letters filed by Petitioners are
timely and no other party requested a review of Nan Ya, we are
rescinding this review with respect to Nan Ya, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1). Because the review request for Shinkong was not
withdrawn by Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray
Plastics, Inc., the Department will continue to conduct the AD
administrative review of Shinkong.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The 90th day fell on November 28, 2012; however, as
explained in the memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll
deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government
from October 29, through October 30, 2012. Thus, all deadlines in
this segment of the proceeding have been extended by two days. The
revised deadline for withdrawing a review request was therefore,
November 30, 2012. See Memorandum to the Record from Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, regarding ``Tolling
of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure
During the Recent Hurricane'' (October 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Nan Ya
shall be assessed antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit
of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of
this notice.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 20, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-31320 Filed 12-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
