Certain Video Analytics Software, Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Joint Motion for Termination of the Investigation Based on a License Agreement; Termination of Investigation, 75188-75189 [2012-30488]
Download as PDF
75188
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2012 / Notices
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 11) granting a joint
motion to terminate the above-captioned
investigation as to Respondents Trans
World International (New York), Inc.,
Green Wave International, Inc., and
John Calarese & Co. (collectively, the
‘‘Green Wave Respondents’’) on the
basis of a settlement agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3041. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on April 6, 2012, based on a complaint
filed by Fabri-Kal Corporation of
Kalamazoo, Michigan (‘‘Fabri-Kal’’). 77
FR 20846 (April 6, 2012). The
complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain food containers, cups, plates,
cutlery, and related items and packaging
thereof by reason of infringement of U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 3,021,945.
The complaint further alleged that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337. The complainant requested that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders. The notice of investigation
named the following companies as
respondents: Green Wave International
Inc., Brooklyn, NY; Trans World
International (New York), Inc.,
Brooklyn, NY; John Calarese & Co., Inc.,
Medway, MA; and Eco Greenwares,
Fremont, CA.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Dec 18, 2012
Jkt 229001
On October 25, 2012, Fabri-Kal and
the Green Wave Respondents filed a
joint motion to terminate the
investigation as to the Green Wave
Respondents on the basis of a settlement
agreement. Commission staff filed a
response in support of the motion on
November 5, 2012.
On November 14, 2012, the ALJ
issued the subject ID, granting the joint
motion to terminate the Green Wave
Respondents from the investigation. The
ALJ found that the settlement agreement
complies with the requirements of
Commission Rule 210.21(b) (19 CFR
210.21(b)) and that terminating the
Green Wave Respondents from the
investigation would not be contrary to
the public interest. None of the parties
petitioned for review of the ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID and there are no
remaining respondents. Accordingly,
this investigation is terminated.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
Issued: December 14, 2012.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–30524 Filed 12–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–795]
Certain Video Analytics Software,
Systems, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing Same;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting Joint Motion for Termination
of the Investigation Based on a
License Agreement; Termination of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 39) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
terminating the investigation based on a
license agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3115. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on August 1, 2011, based on a complaint
filed by ObjectVideo, Inc. of Reston,
Virginia (‘‘ObjectVideo’’). 76 FR 45859
(Aug. 1, 2011). The complaint, as
amended, alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
§ 1337), as amended, in the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain video analytics software,
systems, components thereof, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 6,696,945; 6,970,083;
7,613,324; 7,424,175; 7,868,912; and
7,932,923. The notice of investigation
names numerous parties as respondents.
Subsequently, the investigation was
terminated as to respondents Samsung
Techwin Co., Ltd. and Samsung OptoElectronics America, Inc. The remaining
respondents are Bosch Security
Systems, Inc.; Robert Bosch GmbH;
Bosch Sicherheitssysteme GmbH; Bosch
Security Systems B.V.; Bosch
Sicherheitssysteme Engineering GmbH;
Bosch Security Systems—Sistemas de
Seguranca, S.A.; Bosch (Zhuhai)
Security Systems, Co., Ltd.; and Extreme
CCTV, Inc.
Complainant Object Video and
respondents jointly moved to terminate
this investigation based upon a license
agreement and to suspend the
procedural schedule. On November 14,
2012, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No.
39) granting the motion. The ALJ found
that termination of the investigation is
in the interest of public policy. No party
petitioned for review of the ID, and the
Commission has determined not to
review it.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 19, 2012 / Notices
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in
sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 13, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–30488 Filed 12–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–843]
Certain Electronic Devices Having a
Retractable USB Connector;
Termination of an Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 36) terminating the
investigation as to the last remaining
respondent, and thereby terminating the
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on May 24, 2012, based on a complaint
filed by Anu IP LLC of Longview, Texas
(‘‘Anu’’), alleging a violation of section
337 by reason of the infringement of
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,979,210 and
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Dec 18, 2012
Jkt 229001
7,090,515. 77 FR 31039–40 (Aug. 12,
2011). The notice of investigation
named more than forty respondents.
The investigation has since been
terminated as to all but one respondent
on the basis of withdrawal of the
complaint, settlement agreement, or
consent order.
On November 14, 2012, Anu moved
for termination of the investigation as to
respondent Option, Inc. (‘‘Option’’),
formerly of Alpharetta, Georgia, on the
basis of withdrawal of the complaint.
Anu stated that Option has been
dissolved and is no longer in existence.
On November 28, 2012, the ALJ granted
the motion as an ID. Order No. 36. The
ALJ found termination to be in the
public interest. Id. at 2. Because Option
is the last remaining respondent,
termination as to Option terminates the
investigation.
No petitions for review of the ID were
filed. The Commission has determined
not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.21 and 210.42 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.21 and 210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 14, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–30534 Filed 12–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–802]
Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and
Products Containing Same;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate
the Investigation; Termination of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an ID (Order No. 30) of the
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting a joint motion to terminate the
investigation. The investigation is
hereby terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Worth, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75189
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3065. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on August
31, 2011, based on a complaint filed
with the U.S. International Trade
Commission on July 27, 2011, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
LG Electronics, Inc. of Korea and LG
Innotek Co., Ltd. of Korea (collectively,
‘‘LG’’). 76 FR 54254 (August 31, 2011).
The complaint alleged violations of
section 337 in the sale for importation,
importation, or sale after importation
into the United States of certain lightemitting diodes and products containing
same that infringe one or more claims of
U.S. Patent Nos. 7,928,465; 7,956,364;
6,841,802; 7,649,210; 7,884,388;
7,821,024; 7,868,348; and 7,768,025.
The notice of investigation named as
respondents OSRAM GmbH of Munich,
Germany; OSRAM Sylvania Inc. of
Danvers, MA; and OSRAM Opto
Semiconductors GmbH of Regensburg,
Germany.
On October 27, 2011, the Commission
issued notice of its determination not to
review an ID granting a motion inter alia
(a) to correct the name of OSRAM
GmbH, which recently changed its name
to OSRAM AG and (b) to add as
respondents Hella KgaA Hueck & Co.,
Hella Electronics Corp., Hella Corporate
Center USA, Hella, Inc., Automotive
Lighting Reutlingen GmbH, Automotive
Lighting LLC, Tecnologia de
Iluminacion Automotriz S.A. de C.V.,
and OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc.
On November 2, 2012, LG and
respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM
Sylvania Inc., OSRAM Opto
Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto
Semiconductors, Inc., Hella KGaA
Hueck & Co., Hella Electronics Corp.,
Hella Corporate Center USA, Inc., Hella,
Inc., Automotive Lighting Reutlingen
GmbH, Automotive Lighting, LLC, and
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75188-75189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30488]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-795]
Certain Video Analytics Software, Systems, Components Thereof,
and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an
Initial Determination Granting Joint Motion for Termination of the
Investigation Based on a License Agreement; Termination of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 39) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') terminating the investigation based on a license agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on August 1, 2011, based on a complaint filed by ObjectVideo, Inc. of
Reston, Virginia (``ObjectVideo''). 76 FR 45859 (Aug. 1, 2011). The
complaint, as amended, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337), as amended, in the importation into
the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of certain video analytics software,
systems, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,696,945;
6,970,083; 7,613,324; 7,424,175; 7,868,912; and 7,932,923. The notice
of investigation names numerous parties as respondents. Subsequently,
the investigation was terminated as to respondents Samsung Techwin Co.,
Ltd. and Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc. The remaining
respondents are Bosch Security Systems, Inc.; Robert Bosch GmbH; Bosch
Sicherheitssysteme GmbH; Bosch Security Systems B.V.; Bosch
Sicherheitssysteme Engineering GmbH; Bosch Security Systems--Sistemas
de Seguranca, S.A.; Bosch (Zhuhai) Security Systems, Co., Ltd.; and
Extreme CCTV, Inc.
Complainant Object Video and respondents jointly moved to terminate
this investigation based upon a license agreement and to suspend the
procedural schedule. On November 14, 2012, the ALJ issued an ID (Order
No. 39) granting the motion. The ALJ found that termination of the
investigation is in the interest of public policy. No party petitioned
for review of the ID, and the Commission has determined not to review
it.
[[Page 75189]]
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 13, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-30488 Filed 12-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P