Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity, 74699-74700 [2012-30271]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 242 / Monday, December 17, 2012 / Notices
Dated: December 5, 2012.
Antonio Dias,
Technical Advisor, Advisory Committee on
Reactor Safeguards.
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[FR Doc. 2012–30318 Filed 12–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68402; File No. SR–Phlx–
2012–137]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Rebates and Fees for Adding and
Removing Liquidity
December 11, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that, on December
3, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to file Section
I of the Exchange’s Pricing Schedule
entitled ‘‘Rebates and Fees for Adding
and Removing Liquidity in Select
Symbols’’ in order to preserve
amendments to the Pricing Schedule
that became effective after the
suspension of certain fees on April 30,
2012.
The Exchange has designated the
proposed amendment to be operative on
December 3, 2012.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Dec 14, 2012
Jkt 229001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange filed two immediately
effective rule changes, SR–Phlx–2012–
27 and SR–Phlx–2012–54,3 to amend
certain fees and rebates in Section I,
which filings were temporarily
suspended by the Commission as of
April 30, 2012 (‘‘Suspension Order’’).4
In order to continue the effectiveness of
certain fees and rebates that were
contained in SR–Phlx–2012–27, but not
the subject of the Suspension Order, the
Exchange filed a rule change on April
30, 2012.5 On November 9, 2012, the
Commission approved SR–Phlx–2012–
27 and SR–Phlx–2012–54, as modified
by Amendment No. 1, on a one-year
pilot basis, with such fees being
operative on December 3, 2012
(‘‘Approval Order’’).6
The Approval Order reinstated the
fees that were proposed by the Exchange
in SR–Phlx–2012–27.7 Since the date of
the suspension, the Exchange filed
multiple amendments to Section I of the
Pricing Schedule which became
effective after the Suspension Order.8
3 See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66551
(March 9, 2012), 77 FR 15400 (March 15, 2012) (SR–
Phlx–2012–27) and 66883 (April 30, 2012), 77 FR
26591 (May 4, 2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–54).
4 By order dated April 30, 2012, the Commission
suspended SR–Phlx–2012–27 and SR–Phlx–2012–
54. See Securities Exchange Release No. 66884
(April 30, 2012), 77 FR 26595 (May 4, 2012) (SR–
Phlx–2012–27 and SR–Phlx–2012–54).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66968
(May 11, 2012), 77 FR 29425 (May 17, 2012) (SR–
Phlx–2012–57).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68202
(November 9, 2012), 77 FR 68856 (November 16,
2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–27 and SR–Phlx–2012–54).
7 Specifically, SR–Phlx–2012–27 proposed to: (1)
Increase the Customer Complex Order Rebate for
Adding Liquidity from $0.30 to $0.32 per contract,
(2) create a new Complex Order Rebate for
Removing Liquidity and specifically pay a
Customer a $0.06 Complex Order Rebate for
Removing Liquidity, and (3) increase the Complex
Order Fees for Removing Liquidity for Firms,
Broker-Dealers and Professionals from $0.35 per
contract to $0.38 per contract.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66985
(May 14, 2012), 77 FR 29726 (May 18, 2012) (SR–
Phlx–2012–61); 67047 (May 23, 2012), 77 FR 32165
(May 31, 2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–70); 67189 (June 12,
2012), 77 FR 36310 (June 18, 2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–
77); 67439 (July 13, 2012), 77 FR 42541 (July 19,
2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–90); 67633 (August 9, 2012),
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74699
The Exchange proposes to preserve the
amendments to Section I of the Pricing
Schedule that became effective after the
Suspension Order in order to continue
the effectiveness of the current fees and
rebates which were not the subject of
the Approval Order. The fees for
executions of Complex Orders by
Directed Participants and Market
Makers, which were the subject of the
Approval Order, will be addressed in a
separate filing proposed to be operative
on December 3, 2012 and are not
included in this filing.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Pricing Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act 9 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 10
in particular, in that it is concerned
solely with the administration of the
Exchange. This filing serves to preserve
the current pricing that has been filed
with the Commission notwithstanding
the Approval Order that was issued by
the Commission. The Exchange believes
this proposal is a technical and nonsubstantive rule change with the sole
purpose of preserving the current fees
and rebates in Section I. The fees that
were the subject of the Approval Order,
which related to fees for executions of
Complex Orders by Directed
Participants and Market Makers, will be
addressed in a separate filing. This
proposal maintains the status quo,
which would be otherwise altered by
the Approval Order.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
77 FR 49040 (August 15, 2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–
104); 67830 (September 11, 2012), 77 FR 57169
(September 17, 2012) (SR–Phlx–2012–112); and SR–
Phlx–2012–125) (not yet published).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
74700
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 242 / Monday, December 17, 2012 / Notices
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act.11 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–137 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–137. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2012–137 and should be submitted on
or before January 7, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–30271 Filed 12–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68398; File No. SR–ISE–
2012–93]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Increase Position and
Exercise Limits in EEM Options
December 11, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
28, 2012, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules to increase position and exercise
limits for options on the iShares MSCI
Emerging Markets Index Fund (‘‘EEM’’).
The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
www.ise.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Dec 14, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
ISE proposes to amend
Supplementary Material .01 to ISE Rule
412 and Supplementary Material .01 of
ISE Rule 414 to increase position and
exercise limits, respectively, for EEM
options. This filing is based on a filing
previously submitted by the Chicago
Board Options Exchange (‘‘CBOE’’),
which the Commission recently
approved.3
Position limits for exchange-traded
fund (‘‘ETFs’’) options, such as EEM
options, are determined pursuant to
Rule 412 and vary according to the
number of outstanding shares and
trading volume during the most recent
six-month trading period of an
underlying stock or ETF. The largest in
capitalization and most frequently
traded stocks and ETFs have an option
position limit of 250,000 contracts (with
adjustments for splits, re-capitalizations,
etc.) on the same side of the market;
smaller capitalization stocks and ETFs
have position limits of 200,000, 75,000,
50,000 or 25,000 contracts (with
adjustments for splits, re-capitalizations,
etc.) on the same side of the market. The
current position limit for EEM options
is 250,000 contracts. The purpose of the
proposed rule change is to amend Rules
412 and 414 to increase the position and
exercise limits for EEM options to
500,000 contracts. There is precedent
for establishing position limits for
options on actively-traded ETFs and
these position limit levels are set forth
in Rule 412, Supplementary Material
.01.4
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68086
(October 23, 2012), 77 FR 65600 (October 29, 2012)
(SR–CBOE–2012–066).
4 Rule 412, Supplementary Material .01, lists
exceptions to standard position limits which are:
put or call option contracts overlying the
PowerShares QQQ Trust (‘‘QQQQ’’), for which the
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 242 (Monday, December 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74699-74700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30271]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68402; File No. SR-Phlx-2012-137]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity
December 11, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that, on December 3, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to file Section I of the Exchange's Pricing
Schedule entitled ``Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity
in Select Symbols'' in order to preserve amendments to the Pricing
Schedule that became effective after the suspension of certain fees on
April 30, 2012.
The Exchange has designated the proposed amendment to be operative
on December 3, 2012.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange filed two immediately effective rule changes, SR-Phlx-
2012-27 and SR-Phlx-2012-54,\3\ to amend certain fees and rebates in
Section I, which filings were temporarily suspended by the Commission
as of April 30, 2012 (``Suspension Order'').\4\ In order to continue
the effectiveness of certain fees and rebates that were contained in
SR-Phlx-2012-27, but not the subject of the Suspension Order, the
Exchange filed a rule change on April 30, 2012.\5\ On November 9, 2012,
the Commission approved SR-Phlx-2012-27 and SR-Phlx-2012-54, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, on a one-year pilot basis, with such fees
being operative on December 3, 2012 (``Approval Order'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66551 (March 9,
2012), 77 FR 15400 (March 15, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-27) and 66883
(April 30, 2012), 77 FR 26591 (May 4, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-54).
\4\ By order dated April 30, 2012, the Commission suspended SR-
Phlx-2012-27 and SR-Phlx-2012-54. See Securities Exchange Release
No. 66884 (April 30, 2012), 77 FR 26595 (May 4, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-
27 and SR-Phlx-2012-54).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66968 (May 11,
2012), 77 FR 29425 (May 17, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-57).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68202 (November 9,
2012), 77 FR 68856 (November 16, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-27 and SR-Phlx-
2012-54).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Approval Order reinstated the fees that were proposed by the
Exchange in SR-Phlx-2012-27.\7\ Since the date of the suspension, the
Exchange filed multiple amendments to Section I of the Pricing Schedule
which became effective after the Suspension Order.\8\ The Exchange
proposes to preserve the amendments to Section I of the Pricing
Schedule that became effective after the Suspension Order in order to
continue the effectiveness of the current fees and rebates which were
not the subject of the Approval Order. The fees for executions of
Complex Orders by Directed Participants and Market Makers, which were
the subject of the Approval Order, will be addressed in a separate
filing proposed to be operative on December 3, 2012 and are not
included in this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Specifically, SR-Phlx-2012-27 proposed to: (1) Increase the
Customer Complex Order Rebate for Adding Liquidity from $0.30 to
$0.32 per contract, (2) create a new Complex Order Rebate for
Removing Liquidity and specifically pay a Customer a $0.06 Complex
Order Rebate for Removing Liquidity, and (3) increase the Complex
Order Fees for Removing Liquidity for Firms, Broker-Dealers and
Professionals from $0.35 per contract to $0.38 per contract.
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66985 (May 14,
2012), 77 FR 29726 (May 18, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-61); 67047 (May 23,
2012), 77 FR 32165 (May 31, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-70); 67189 (June 12,
2012), 77 FR 36310 (June 18, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-77); 67439 (July
13, 2012), 77 FR 42541 (July 19, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-90); 67633
(August 9, 2012), 77 FR 49040 (August 15, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-104);
67830 (September 11, 2012), 77 FR 57169 (September 17, 2012) (SR-
Phlx-2012-112); and SR-Phlx-2012-125) (not yet published).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \10\ in
particular, in that it is concerned solely with the administration of
the Exchange. This filing serves to preserve the current pricing that
has been filed with the Commission notwithstanding the Approval Order
that was issued by the Commission. The Exchange believes this proposal
is a technical and non-substantive rule change with the sole purpose of
preserving the current fees and rebates in Section I. The fees that
were the subject of the Approval Order, which related to fees for
executions of Complex Orders by Directed Participants and Market
Makers, will be addressed in a separate filing. This proposal maintains
the status quo, which would be otherwise altered by the Approval Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
[[Page 74700]]
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act.\11\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2012-137 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-137. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-137 and should be
submitted on or before January 7, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-30271 Filed 12-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P