Certain CMOS Image Sensors and Products Containing Same; Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings, 74513-74514 [2012-30161]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA define cooperating agencies as those with ‘‘jurisdiction by law or special expertise’’ (40 CFR 1508.5). Potential cooperating agencies should consider their authority and capacity to assume the responsibilities of a cooperating agency and remember that an agency’s role in the environmental analysis neither enlarges nor diminishes the final decisionmaking authority of any other agency involved in the NEPA process. Upon request, BOEM will provide potential cooperating agencies with a draft Memorandum of Agreement that includes a schedule with critical action dates and milestones, mutual responsibilities, designated points of contact, and expectations for handling pre-decisional information. Agencies should also consider the ‘‘Factors for Determining Whether To Invite, Decline, or End Cooperating Agency Status’’ in Attachment 1 of CEQ’s January 30, 2002, Memorandum for the Heads of Federal Agencies: Cooperating Agencies in Implementing the Procedural Requirements of the NEPA. Copies of this document are available at the following web addresses: http:// ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/cooperating/ cooperatingagenciesmemorandum.html and http://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ cooperating/ cooperatingagencymemofactors.html. BOEM, as the lead agency, will not provide financial assistance to cooperating agencies. Even if an organization is not a cooperating agency, opportunities will exist to provide information and comments to BOEM during the normal public input phases of the NEPA process. 3. Comments Federal, state, local government agencies, tribal governments, and other interested parties are requested to send their written comments regarding important environmental issues and the identification of reasonable alternatives related to the proposed issuance of an interim policy lease to Southern Company to conduct data collection and technology testing activities in one of the following ways: 1. Electronically: http:// www.regulations.gov. In the entry titled ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter ‘‘BOEM– 2012–0074,’’ then click ‘‘Search.’’ Follow the instructions to submit public comments and view supporting and related materials available for this document. 2. In written form, delivered by hand or by mail, enclosed in an envelope labeled ‘‘Comments on OCS Renewable Energy Program Interim Policy Lease for VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:41 Dec 13, 2012 Jkt 229001 Southern Company’’ to Program Manager, Office of Renewable Energy Programs (HM 1328), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, Virginia 20170. Comments should be submitted no later than January 14, 2013. Dated: December 5, 2012. Tommy P. Beaudreau, Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Second Review)] Folding Gift Boxes From China Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on folding gift boxes from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted this review on April 2, 2012 (77 FR 19714) and determined on July 6, 2012 that it would conduct an expedited review (77 FR 42762, July 20, 2012). The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on December 10, 2012. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4365 (November 2012), entitled Folding Gift Boxes from China: Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Second Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: December 10, 2012. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–30162 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Investigation No. 337–TA–846] Certain CMOS Image Sensors and Products Containing Same; Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P Frm 00060 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION AGENCY: [FR Doc. 2012–30185 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am] PO 00000 74513 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) granting unopposed motions to terminate the abovecaptioned investigation based on a settlement agreement. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–2661. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on June 6, 2012, based on a complaint filed by California Institute of Technology of Pasadena, California (‘‘CalTech’’). 77 FR 33488 (June 6, 2012). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain CMOS image sensors and products containing the same based on infringement of three United States patents. The notice of investigation named as respondents STMicroelectronics of Geneva, Switzerland, and STMicroelectronics Inc., of Coppell, Texas (collectively, ‘‘STMicro’’); Nokia Corp., of Espoo, E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM 14DEN1 74514 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Notices Finland, and Nokia, Inc., of White Plains, New York (collectively, ‘‘Nokia’’); and Research In Motion Ltd., of Ontario, Canada, and Research In Motion Corp., of Irving, Texas (collectively, ‘‘RIM’’).. On October 16, 2012, CalTech and STMicro jointly moved to terminate the investigation based upon a settlement agreement between CalTech and STMicro. On October 26, 2012, RIM and Nokia filed a separate joint motion to terminate the investigation based on the same settlement agreement between CalTech and STMicro. Neither motion was opposed. On November 8, 2012, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 9) granting both motions to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found no indication that termination of the investigation based on the settlement agreement would have an adverse impact on the public interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). Issued: December 10, 2012. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–30161 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Representative Fee Request mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL) is submitting the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) sponsored information collection request (ICR) revision titled, ‘‘Representative Fee Request,’’ to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval for use in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). DATES: Submit comments on or before January 14, 2013. ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation; VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:41 Dec 13, 2012 Jkt 229001 including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Web site, http://www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain, on the day following publication of this notice or by contacting Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or sending an email to DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Submit comments about this request to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL–OWCP, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Fax: 202–395–6881 (this is not a toll-free number), email: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email at DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D). An attorney or other representative may represent an individual filing for compensation benefits with the OWCP. The representative is entitled to request a fee for services under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act and under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act; however, the OWCP must approve the fee before the representative can make any demand for payment. This ICR sets forth the criteria for the information the respondent must present in order to have the fee approved by the OWCP. The information collection does not impose a particular form or format for the application, provided all required information is presented. This information collection has been characterized as a revision to account for an electronic filing option and because the OWCP has enhanced the information provided about the rights of respondents with disabilities. This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public is generally not required to respond to an information collection, unless it is approved by the OMB under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval for this information collection under Control SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 Number 1240–0049. The current approval is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2012; however, it should be noted that existing information collection requirements submitted to the OMB receive a month-to-month extension while they undergo review. For additional information, see the related notice published in the Federal Register on August 27, 2012 (77 FR 51829). Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the address shown in the ADDRESSES section within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. In order to help ensure appropriate consideration, comments should mention OMB Control Number 1240– 0049. The OMB is particularly interested in comments that: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Agency: DOL–OWCP. Title of Collection: Representative Fee Request. OMB Control Number: 1240–0049. Affected Public: Private Sector— businesses or other for-profits. Total Estimated Number of Respondents: 12,363. Total Estimated Number of Responses: 12,363. Total Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 6,182. Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $15,696. Dated: December 7, 2012. Michel Smyth, Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2012–30201 Filed 12–13–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–CR–P E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM 14DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 241 (Friday, December 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74513-74514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-846]


Certain CMOS Image Sensors and Products Containing Same; 
Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 9) granting unopposed motions to terminate the 
above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement. The 
investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2661. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on June 6, 2012, based on a complaint filed by California Institute of 
Technology of Pasadena, California (``CalTech''). 77 FR 33488 (June 6, 
2012). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain CMOS image sensors and products 
containing the same based on infringement of three United States 
patents. The notice of investigation named as respondents 
STMicroelectronics of Geneva, Switzerland, and STMicroelectronics Inc., 
of Coppell, Texas (collectively, ``STMicro''); Nokia Corp., of Espoo,

[[Page 74514]]

Finland, and Nokia, Inc., of White Plains, New York (collectively, 
``Nokia''); and Research In Motion Ltd., of Ontario, Canada, and 
Research In Motion Corp., of Irving, Texas (collectively, ``RIM'')..
    On October 16, 2012, CalTech and STMicro jointly moved to terminate 
the investigation based upon a settlement agreement between CalTech and 
STMicro. On October 26, 2012, RIM and Nokia filed a separate joint 
motion to terminate the investigation based on the same settlement 
agreement between CalTech and STMicro. Neither motion was opposed.
    On November 8, 2012, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 9) 
granting both motions to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found no 
indication that termination of the investigation based on the 
settlement agreement would have an adverse impact on the public 
interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The 
investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    Issued: December 10, 2012.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-30161 Filed 12-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P