Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Exchange Rule 903 To Provide That the Exchange May Not List Short Term Option Series Expirations That Coincide With the Expiration of Quarterly Option Series on the Same Class, 74263-74265 [2012-30045]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 240 / Thursday, December 13, 2012 / Notices would not (i.e., classes in which the Market Maker is not assigned or quoting). Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 14 of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 15 thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by NYSE MKT. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–77 on the subject line. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Paper Comments [Release No. 34–68380; File No. SR– NYSEMKT–2012–76] • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–77. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of NYSE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–77, and should be submitted on or before January 3, 2013. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.16 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–30046 Filed 12–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 14 15 15 17 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:21 Dec 12, 2012 Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Exchange Rule 903 To Provide That the Exchange May Not List Short Term Option Series Expirations That Coincide With the Expiration of Quarterly Option Series on the Same Class December 7, 2012. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that on November 30, 2012, NYSE MKT LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 4 and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,5 which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 903 to provide that the Exchange may not list Short Term Option Series (‘‘STOS’’) expirations that coincide with the expiration of Quarterly Option Series on the same class. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, 1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1). U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 2 15 16 17 Jkt 229001 74263 PO 00000 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM 13DEN1 74264 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 240 / Thursday, December 13, 2012 / Notices and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 903 to provide that the Exchange may not list Short Term Option Series (‘‘STOS’’) expirations that coincide with the expiration of Quarterly option series on the same class. Exchange Rule 903(h) currently provides that no STOS may expire in the same week in which monthly or Quarterly option series on the same class expire. When the STOS Program was originally established in 2006, the Exchange could not list expirations in the same week as the monthly expiration.6 Quarterly options series on the Exchange were subsequently added in 2006.7 The Exchange, as part of the Quarterly options series Rules, adopted a provision in Commentary .09 of 903 that provided that the ‘‘Exchange will not list a Short Term Options Series on an options class whose expiration coincides with that of a Quarterly Options Series on that same options class.’’ 8 In 2010, the Exchange added to the Rule 903(h) that no STOS expirations could be added in the same week as the Quarterly options series expiration.9 NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.4, Commentary .07, provides that no STOS may expire in the same week in which monthly option series on the same class expire or, in the case of Quarterly options series, on an expiration that coincides with an expiration of Quarterly option series on the same class.10 For example, if the Quarterly options series would expire on a Monday, since Monday does not 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52014 (July 12, 2005), 70 FR 41244 (July 18, 2005) (SR– Amex–2005–035). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54137 (July 12, 2006), 71 FR 41283 (July 20, 2006) (SR– Amex–2006–67). 8 See id. 9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.62370 (June 23, 2010), 75 FR 37870 (June 30, 2010) (SR– NYSEAmex–2010–62). 10 Other options exchanges have similar rules. See Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Rule 5.5(d)(2); NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC Rule 1012, Commentary .11(b). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:21 Dec 12, 2012 Jkt 229001 coincide (not the same day) as Friday when STOS would normally expire, NYSE Arca Options and other options exchanges could list a STOS expiration for that week. In contrast, pursuant to current Exchange Rule 903(h), the Exchange could not list STOS that expire on that Friday in the same week that Quarterly options series expires on Monday. The Exchange proposes to adopt the same language that is used for NYSE Arca Options to ensure conformity between the options exchanges. The proposed change would allow the Exchange to list STOS expirations the same week as Quarterly option series, but not on a day that coincides or is the same as the expiration of Quarterly option series on the same class. The Exchange believes that the STOS Program has provided investors with greater trading opportunities and flexibility and the ability to more closely tailor their investment and risk management strategies and decisions. The Exchange believes that this proposal would eliminate inconsistencies in expirations between the STOS Programs of two exchanges and help provide the investing public and other market participants with additional opportunities to hedge their investment, thus allowing these investors to better manage their risk exposure. 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),11 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),12 in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. The proposal is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by ensuring conformity between STOS Programs on competing options exchanges. 11 15 12 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest, does not impose any significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 13 and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder.14 The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The Commission believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because waiver of the operative delay will allow the Exchange to clarify its own rules as well as list STOs on the same dates as other exchanges without undue delay. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative upon filing.15 At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 15 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 14 17 E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM 13DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 240 / Thursday, December 13, 2012 / Notices IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.16 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–30045 Filed 12–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–76 on the subject line. Paper Comments srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEMKT–2012–76. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the NYSE’s principal office and on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR– NYSEMKT–2012–76 and should be submitted on or before January 3, 2013. DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8117] Designation of Hamad el Khairy, Also Known as Abderrahmane Ould Mohamed Lemine Ould Mohamed Khairy, Also Known as Hamada Ould Mohamed Kheirou, Also Known as Abou Qumqum, Also Known as Amada Ould Kheirou, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Hamad el Khairy, also known as Abderrahmane Ould Mohamed Lemine Ould Mohamed Khairy, also known as Hamada Ould Mohamed Kheirou, also known as Abou Qumqum, also known as Amada Ould Kheirou, committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States. Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that ‘‘prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,’’ I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order. This notice shall be published in the Federal Register. Dated: December 4, 2012. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State. [FR Doc. 2012–30128 Filed 12–12–12; 8:45 am] 16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:21 Dec 12, 2012 BILLING CODE 4710–10–P Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 74265 DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8115] In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of the Al-Shabaab (and Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (‘‘INA’’), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 2008 designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation and that the national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation. Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be maintained. This determination shall be published in the Federal Register. Dated: December 4, 2012. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State. [FR Doc. 2012–30135 Filed 12–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–10–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8114] In the Matter of the Designation of Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa; Also Known as Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa; Also Known as Unity Movement for Jihad in West Africa; Also Known as Jamat Tawhid Wal Jihad Fi Garbi Afriqqiya; Also Known as Tawhid Wal Jihad in West Africa; Also Known as MUJWA; Also Known as MUJAO; Also Known as TWJWA as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the entity known as Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa, also known as Movement E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM 13DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 240 (Thursday, December 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74263-74265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68380; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2012-76]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Exchange Rule 
903 To Provide That the Exchange May Not List Short Term Option Series 
Expirations That Coincide With the Expiration of Quarterly Option 
Series on the Same Class

December 7, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that on November 30, 2012, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or 
``NYSE MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \4\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\5\ 
which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the 
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 903 to provide that 
the Exchange may not list Short Term Option Series (``STOS'') 
expirations that coincide with the expiration of Quarterly Option 
Series on the same class. The text of the proposed rule change is 
available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal 
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of,

[[Page 74264]]

and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it 
received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may 
be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has 
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the 
most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 903 to provide that 
the Exchange may not list Short Term Option Series (``STOS'') 
expirations that coincide with the expiration of Quarterly option 
series on the same class.
    Exchange Rule 903(h) currently provides that no STOS may expire in 
the same week in which monthly or Quarterly option series on the same 
class expire. When the STOS Program was originally established in 2006, 
the Exchange could not list expirations in the same week as the monthly 
expiration.\6\ Quarterly options series on the Exchange were 
subsequently added in 2006.\7\ The Exchange, as part of the Quarterly 
options series Rules, adopted a provision in Commentary .09 of 903 that 
provided that the ``Exchange will not list a Short Term Options Series 
on an options class whose expiration coincides with that of a Quarterly 
Options Series on that same options class.'' \8\ In 2010, the Exchange 
added to the Rule 903(h) that no STOS expirations could be added in the 
same week as the Quarterly options series expiration.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52014 (July 12, 
2005), 70 FR 41244 (July 18, 2005) (SR-Amex-2005-035).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54137 (July 12, 
2006), 71 FR 41283 (July 20, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-67).
    \8\ See id.
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No.62370 (June 23, 
2010), 75 FR 37870 (June 30, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-62).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.4, Commentary .07, provides that no STOS 
may expire in the same week in which monthly option series on the same 
class expire or, in the case of Quarterly options series, on an 
expiration that coincides with an expiration of Quarterly option series 
on the same class.\10\ For example, if the Quarterly options series 
would expire on a Monday, since Monday does not coincide (not the same 
day) as Friday when STOS would normally expire, NYSE Arca Options and 
other options exchanges could list a STOS expiration for that week. In 
contrast, pursuant to current Exchange Rule 903(h), the Exchange could 
not list STOS that expire on that Friday in the same week that 
Quarterly options series expires on Monday.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Other options exchanges have similar rules. See Chicago 
Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Rule 5.5(d)(2); NASDAQ OMX PHLX 
LLC Rule 1012, Commentary .11(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to adopt the same language that is used for 
NYSE Arca Options to ensure conformity between the options exchanges. 
The proposed change would allow the Exchange to list STOS expirations 
the same week as Quarterly option series, but not on a day that 
coincides or is the same as the expiration of Quarterly option series 
on the same class. The Exchange believes that the STOS Program has 
provided investors with greater trading opportunities and flexibility 
and the ability to more closely tailor their investment and risk 
management strategies and decisions. The Exchange believes that this 
proposal would eliminate inconsistencies in expirations between the 
STOS Programs of two exchanges and help provide the investing public 
and other market participants with additional opportunities to hedge 
their investment, thus allowing these investors to better manage their 
risk exposure.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\11\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\12\ in particular, in that 
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating 
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect 
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal is designed to promote just and equitable principles 
of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged 
in facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system by ensuring conformity between STOS Programs on competing 
options exchanges.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly 
affect the protection of investors or the public interest, does not 
impose any significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does 
not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, 
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) 
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the 
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a 
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least 
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The 
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day 
operative delay. The Commission believes that waiver of the operative 
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public 
interest because waiver of the operative delay will allow the Exchange 
to clarify its own rules as well as list STOs on the same dates as 
other exchanges without undue delay. Therefore, the Commission 
designates the proposal operative upon filing.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

[[Page 74265]]

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2012-76 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2012-76. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street 
NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the filing will also be available 
for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and on its 
Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted 
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying 
information from submissions. You should submit only information that 
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to 
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2012-76 and should be submitted on or before 
January 3, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-30045 Filed 12-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.