Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 73015-73017 [2012-29635]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Notices Cash Deposit Requirements The following antidumping duty deposit rates will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of steel plate from Belgium entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results, as provided for by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) For AS Belgium, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the final results of this review; (2) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, but was covered in a previous review or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate established for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered by this review, a prior review, or the LTFV investigation, the cash deposit rate will be 8.54 percent ad valorem, the ‘‘allothers’’ rate established in the LTFV investigation.11 These deposit rates, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. See 19 CFR 351.402(f)(3). Notification to Interested Parties This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 11 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium, 64 FR 15476 (March 31, 1999). VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:05 Dec 06, 2012 Jkt 229001 protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: November 30, 2012. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix List of Comments Comment 1: Bundled Pricing Comment 2: Targeted Dumping Comment 3: Constructed Value (CV) Profit and Selling Expense Ratios Comment 4: Verification Comment 5: Customs Instructions [FR Doc. 2012–29645 Filed 12–6–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–809] Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010– 2011 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011, and the review covers two producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) and Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO). We have preliminarily found that one respondent has made sales of the subject merchandise at prices below normal value. We are also rescinding this review for seven other producers/ exporters. AGENCY: DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg, or Jennifer Meek, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1785 or (202) 482– 2778, respectively. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 73015 Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube. The product is currently classifiable under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) subheadings: 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90. Although the HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description, available in Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 63 FR 32833 (June 16, 1998), remains dispositive. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to the following parties because the review requests were timely withdrawn: Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., SeAH Steel Corporation, A-JU Besteel Co., Ltd., Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd., Nexteel Co., Ltd., Korea Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., and Union Steel Co., Ltd. Methodology The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. In accordance with section 773(b) of the Act, we disregarded certain sales made by Husteel and HYSCO in the home market which were made at below-cost prices. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the memorandum from Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, ‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea’’ dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Import Administration’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is available to E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1 73016 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Notices registered users at http:// iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http:// www.trade.gov/ia/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of the Review date of publication of this notice.5 Requests should contain: (1) The party’s name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the respondents for the period November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011. Assessment Rates For Husteel and HYSCO, upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all Weighted- appropriate entries covered by this review. Husteel and HYSCO reported average Manufacturer/exporter dumping the name of the importer of record and margin the entered value for all of their sales to (percent) the United States during the POR. If Husteel Co., Ltd. ......................... 6.54 Husteel and HYSCO’s weighted-average Hyundai HYSCO ......................... 0.00 dumping margins are above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate an Disclosure and Public Comment importer-specific assessment rate on the The Department intends to disclose to basis of the ratio of the total amount of interested parties the calculations dumping calculated for the importer’s performed in connection with these examined sales and the total entered preliminary results within five days of value of those sales in accordance with the date of publication of this notice.1 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), The Department clarified its interested parties may submit cases ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on briefs not later than the later of 30 days May 6, 2003. This clarification will after the date of publication of this apply to entries of subject merchandise notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues during the POR produced by Husteel raised in the case briefs, may be filed and HYSCO for which they did not not later than five days after the date for know its merchandise was destined for filing case briefs.2 Parties who submit the United States. In such instances, we case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this will instruct CBP to liquidate proceeding are encouraged to submit unreviewed entries at the all-others rate with each argument: (1) A statement of if there is no rate for the intermediate the issue; (2) a brief summary of the company(ies) involved in the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.3 transaction. For a full discussion of this Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed clarification, see Antidumping and using IA ACCESS.4 Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 interested parties who wish to request a FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). For Husteel and HYSCO, we intend to hearing, or to participate if one is issue instructions to CBP 15 days after requested, must submit a written publication of the final results of this request to the Assistant Secretary for review. Import Administration, filed For the rescinded companies, electronically via IA ACCESS. An antidumping duties shall be assessed at electronically filed document must be rates equal to the cash deposit of received successfully in its entirety by estimated antidumping duties required the Department’s electronic records at the time of entry, or withdrawal from system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern warehouse, for consumption, in Standard Time within 30 days after the accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 1 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 2 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). intends to issue appropriate assessment 3 See 4 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 19 CFR 351.303. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:05 Dec 06, 2012 Jkt 229001 5 See PO 00000 19 CFR 351.310(c). Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of CWP from Korea entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for HYSCO and Husteel will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 4.80 percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established in the order.6 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder and, with respect to companies which we rescind in part as a final reminder, to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. The Department is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 6 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, the Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 49453 (November 2, 1992). E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 236 / Friday, December 7, 2012 / Notices Dated: December 3, 2012. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3586, (202) 482–1396, or (202) 482– 0176, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Targeted Dumping Allegations Application of the Average-to-Transaction Methodology Results of the Targeted Dumping Analysis Comparisons to Normal Value Product Comparisons Date of Sale Level of Trade/Constructed Export Price Offset Constructed Export Price Normal Value A. Selection of Comparison Market B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’s Length Test C. Cost of Production 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the COP Test D. Constructed Value E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices Currency Conversion [FR Doc. 2012–29635 Filed 12–6–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–980] Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: Based on an affirmative final determination by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the Department of Commerce (the Department) is issuing a countervailing duty order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells), from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). On November 30, 2012, the ITC notified the Department of its affirmative determination of material injury to a U.S. industry.1 DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Calvert, Jun Jack Zhao, or Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 7866, 14th Street tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with AGENCY: 1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules from China, Investigation Nos. 701–TA– 481 and 731–TA–1190 (Final), USITC Publication 4360 (November 2012). VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:05 Dec 06, 2012 Jkt 229001 Case History In accordance with section 705(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), on October 17, 2012, the Department published its final determination in the countervailing duty investigation of solar cells from the PRC.2 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, and modules, laminates, and panels, consisting of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or fully assembled into other products, including, but not limited to, modules, laminates, panels and building integrated materials. This order covers crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells of thickness equal to or greater than 20 micrometers, having a p/n junction formed by any means, whether or not the cell has undergone other processing, including, but not limited to, cleaning, etching, coating, and/or addition of materials (including, but not limited to, metallization and conductor patterns) to collect and forward the electricity that is generated by the cell. Merchandise under consideration may be described at the time of importation as parts for final finished products that are assembled after importation, including, but not limited to, modules, laminates, panels, building-integrated modules, buildingintegrated panels, or other finished goods kits. Such parts that otherwise meet the definition of merchandise under consideration are included in the scope of this order. Excluded from the scope of this order are thin film photovoltaic products produced from amorphous silicon (a-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS). Also excluded from the scope of this order are crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, not exceeding 10,000mm2 in surface area, that are permanently integrated into a consumer good whose function is other than power generation and that consumes the electricity generated by the integrated crystalline silicon photovoltaic cell. Where more 2 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, 77 FR 63788 (October 17, 2012). PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 73017 than one cell is permanently integrated into a consumer good, the surface area for purposes of this exclusion shall be the total combined surface area of all cells that are integrated into the consumer good. Modules, laminates, and panels produced in a third-country from cells produced in the PRC are covered by this order; however, modules, laminates, and panels produced in the PRC from cells produced in a third-country are not covered by this order. Merchandise covered by this order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under subheadings 8501.61.0000, 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, and 8501.31.8000.3 These HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Countervailing Duty Order On November 30, 2012, the ITC notified the Department of its final determination, pursuant to section 705(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, that an industry in the United States is materially injured as a result of subsidized imports from the PRC. The ITC also determined that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to subject imports from the PRC. As a result of the ITC’s final determination, in accordance with section 706(a) of the Act, the Department will direct CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, countervailing duties on unliquidated entries of solar cells from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after March 26, 2012, the date on which the Department published its preliminary countervailing duty determination in the Federal Register, and before July 24, 2012, the date on which the Department instructed CBP to discontinue the suspension of liquidation in accordance with section 703(d) of the Act. Section 703(d) of the Act states that the suspension of liquidation pursuant to a preliminary determination may not remain in effect for more than four months. Entries of solar cells from the PRC made on or after July 24, 2012, and prior to the date of publication of the ITC’s final determination in the Federal Register are not liable for the assessment of countervailing duties, due 3 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) provided notification that HTSUS number 8501.31.8000 should be added to the scope of the order, as certain articles under this number might fall within the scope. See the May 16, 2012 Memorandum to The File, ‘‘ACE Case Reference File Update.’’ E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 236 (Friday, December 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73015-73017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-809]


Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-
2011

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded 
non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The 
period of review (POR) is November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011, 
and the review covers two producers/exporters of the subject 
merchandise, Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) and Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO). We 
have preliminarily found that one respondent has made sales of the 
subject merchandise at prices below normal value. We are also 
rescinding this review for seven other producers/exporters.

DATES: Effective Date: December 7, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg, or Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1785 
or (202) 482-2778, respectively.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy 
steel pipe and tube. The product is currently classifiable under the 
following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) subheadings: 7306.30.10.00, 
7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 
7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90. Although the HTS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product 
description, available in Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the 
Republic of Korea; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 63 FR 32833 (June 16, 1998), remains dispositive.

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 
administrative review with respect to the following parties because the 
review requests were timely withdrawn: Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., SeAH 
Steel Corporation, A-JU Besteel Co., Ltd., Kumkang Industrial Co., 
Ltd., Nexteel Co., Ltd., Korea Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., and Union Steel 
Co., Ltd.

Methodology

    The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed 
export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. 
Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. 
In accordance with section 773(b) of the Act, we disregarded certain 
sales made by Husteel and HYSCO in the home market which were made at 
below-cost prices.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the memorandum from Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, ``Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of 
Korea'' dated concurrently with this notice (``Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum''), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS 
is available to

[[Page 73016]]

registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all 
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department 
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the 
Internet at http://www.trade.gov/ia/frn/index.html. The signed 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Preliminary Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the 
following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the respondents 
for the period November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Manufacturer/exporter                       dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Husteel Co., Ltd............................................        6.54
Hyundai HYSCO...............................................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the 
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results 
within five days of the date of publication of this notice.\1\ Pursuant 
to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs not 
later than the later of 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, 
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case 
briefs.\2\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement 
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of 
authorities.\3\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using IA 
ACCESS.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    \2\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, 
filed electronically via IA ACCESS. An electronically filed document 
must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's 
electronic records system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time 
within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\5\ 
Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone 
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised 
in the respective case briefs. The Department will issue the final 
results of this administrative review, including the results of its 
analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 
days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    For Husteel and HYSCO, upon issuance of the final results, the 
Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review. Husteel and HYSCO reported the name of the 
importer of record and the entered value for all of their sales to the 
United States during the POR. If Husteel and HYSCO's weighted-average 
dumping margins are above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final 
results of this review, we will calculate an importer-specific 
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total 
entered value of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by Husteel and HYSCO for which they 
did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In 
such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at 
the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this 
clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
    For Husteel and HYSCO, we intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 
days after publication of the final results of this review.
    For the rescinded companies, antidumping duties shall be assessed 
at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties 
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for 
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the date of publication of this notice.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of CWP from Korea entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by 
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for HYSCO and 
Husteel will be the rate established in the final results of this 
administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or 
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of 
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter 
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original 
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of 
the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers 
or exporters will continue to be 4.80 percent, the ``all others'' rate 
established in the order.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Circular 
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, the Republic of Korea 
(Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy 
Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 49453 (November 2, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder and, with respect to 
companies which we rescind in part as a final reminder, to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    The Department is issuing and publishing these results in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.


[[Page 73017]]


    Dated: December 3, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

Targeted Dumping Allegations
Application of the Average-to-Transaction Methodology
Results of the Targeted Dumping Analysis
Comparisons to Normal Value
Product Comparisons
Date of Sale
Level of Trade/Constructed Export Price Offset
Constructed Export Price
Normal Value
    A. Selection of Comparison Market
    B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's Length Test
    C. Cost of Production
    1. Calculation of Cost of Production
    2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
    3. Results of the COP Test
    D. Constructed Value
    E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices 
Currency Conversion

[FR Doc. 2012-29635 Filed 12-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P