Folding Metal Tables and Chairs From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset Review and Revocation of Order, 71168-71169 [2012-28913]
Download as PDF
71168
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2012 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
results of redetermination 2 pursuant to
the CIT’s Remand Order.3
Consistent with the decision of the
United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken,4 as
clarified by Diamond Sawblades,5 the
Department is notifying the public that
the final judgment in this case is not in
harmony with the Department’s Wood
Flooring Final,6 and is amending the
final affirmative countervailing duty
(‘‘CVD’’) determination and order on
multilayered wood flooring (‘‘wood
flooring’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of
investigation, January 1, 2009, through
December 31, 2009, with respect to the
inclusion of Shanghai Eswell Enterprise
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Eswell Enterprise’’) and
Elegant Living Corporation (‘‘Elegant
Living’’) on the list of non-cooperating
companies.
DATES: Effective Date: November 26,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Morris, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1779.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Subsequent to completion of its CVD
investigation of wood flooring from the
PRC, parties filed a suit with the CIT
challenging the inclusion of Eswell
Enterprise and Elegant Living in the
non-cooperating companies list. On
August 31, 2012, the CIT remanded to
the Department the issue of inclusion of
Eswell Enterprise and Elegant Living on
that list.7 The Department filed its
Remand Results on October 31, 2012.
On November 15, 2012, the CIT upheld
the Department’s Remand Results
2 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Remand in Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited, et
al. (Plaintiff) and Hunchun Forest Wolf Industry
Company Limited, et al. (Plaintiff-Intervenors) v.
United States (Defendant) and the Coalition for
American Hardwood Parity (DefendantIntervenors), CIT Court No. 11–00533, (October 31,
2012) (Public Version) (‘‘Remand Results’’).
3 See Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited, et al.
(Plaintiff) and Hunchun Forest Wolf Industry
Company Limited, et al. (Plaintiff-Intervenors) v.
United States (Defendant) and the Coalition for
American Hardwood Parity (DefendantIntervenors), Slip-Op. 12–113 (CIT 2012) (‘‘Remand
Order’’).
4 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
(CAFC 1990) (‘‘Timken’’).
5 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (CAFC 2010)
(‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’).
6 See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, 76 FR 64313
(October 18, 2011) (‘‘Wood Flooring Final’’).
7 See Remand Order.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Nov 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
wherein the Department reconsidered
the inclusion of Elegant Living and
Eswell Enterprises on the list of noncooperating companies, and determined
to remove Eswell Enterprise and Elegant
Living from that list.8
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken, as clarified
by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held
that, pursuant to section 516(e) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department must publish a
notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Department
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.9 The CIT’s
November 15, 2012, judgment
sustaining the Remand Results
constitutes a final decision of that court
that is not in harmony with the Wood
Flooring Final. This notice is published
in fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken. Accordingly,
the Department will continue the
suspension of liquidation of the subject
merchandise pending the expiration of
the period of appeal or, if appealed,
pending a final and conclusive court
decision.
Amended Final Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order
Because there is now a final court
decision with respect to Eswell
Enterprise and Elegant Living, we are
amending the Wood Flooring Final and
the Amended CVD Order 10 on wood
flooring with respect to the margin for
Eswell Enterprise and Elegant Living.
Consequently, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to impose cash deposits on
entries of the subject merchandise
exported by Eswell Enterprise or Elegant
Living at the all-others rate of 1.50
percent.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 23, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–868]
Folding Metal Tables and Chairs From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Sunset Review and
Revocation of Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 1, 2012, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated the sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on folding metal tables and chairs from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).
Because the domestic interested parties
did not participate in this sunset review,
the Department is revoking this
antidumping duty order.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit
Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
27, 2002, the Department issued an
antidumping duty order on folding
metal tables and chairs from the PRC.1
On November 6, 2007, the Department
published its most recent continuation
of the order.2 On October 1, 2012, the
Department initiated a sunset review of
this order.3
We did not receive a notice of intent
to participate from domestic interested
parties in this sunset review by the
deadline date. As a result, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A), the
Department determined that no
domestic interested party intends to
participate in the sunset review, and on
October 21, 2012, we notified the
International Trade Commission, in
writing, that we intended to issue a final
determination revoking this
antidumping duty order.4
Scope of the Order: The products
covered by the order consist of
assembled and unassembled folding
tables and folding chairs made primarily
or exclusively from steel or other metal,
as described below:
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2012–28916 Filed 11–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
8 See
Remand Results.
Timken, 893 F.2d at 341.
10 See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 5484
(February 3, 2012) (‘‘Amended CVD Order’’).
9 See
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Folding Metal
Tables and Chairs From the People’s Republic of
China, 67 FR 43277 (June 27, 2002).
2 See Folding Metal Tables and Chairs From the
People’s Republic of China: Continuation of the
Antidumping Duty Order, 72 FR 62626 (November
6, 2007).
3 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 77
FR 59897 (October 1, 2012).
4 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2).
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2012 / Notices
(1) Assembled and unassembled
folding tables made primarily or
exclusively from steel or other metal
(folding metal tables). Folding metal
tables include square, round,
rectangular, and any other shapes with
legs affixed with rivets, welds, or any
other type of fastener, and which are
made most commonly, but not
exclusively, with a hardboard top
covered with vinyl or fabric. Folding
metal tables have legs that mechanically
fold independently of one another, and
not as a set. The subject merchandise is
commonly, but not exclusively, packed
singly, in multiple packs of the same
item, or in five piece sets consisting of
four chairs and one table. Specifically
excluded from the scope of the order
regarding folding metal tables are the
following:
Lawn furniture;
Trays commonly referred to as ‘‘TV
trays;’’
Side tables;
Child-sized tables;
Portable counter sets consisting of
rectangular tables 36″ high and
matching stools; and,
Banquet tables. A banquet table is a
rectangular table with a plastic or
laminated wood table top approximately
28″ to 36″ wide by 48″ to 96″ long and
with a set of folding legs at each end of
the table. One set of legs is composed
of two individual legs that are affixed
together by one or more cross-braces
using welds or fastening hardware. In
contrast, folding metal tables have legs
that mechanically fold independently of
one another, and not as a set.
(2) Assembled and unassembled
folding chairs made primarily or
exclusively from steel or other metal
(folding metal chairs). Folding metal
chairs include chairs with one or more
cross-braces, regardless of shape or size,
affixed to the front and/or rear legs with
rivets, welds or any other type of
fastener. Folding metal chairs include:
Those that are made solely of steel or
other metal; those that have a back pad,
a seat pad, or both a back pad and a seat
pad; and those that have seats or backs
made of plastic or other materials. The
subject merchandise is commonly, but
not exclusively, packed singly, in
multiple packs of the same item, or in
five piece sets consisting of four chairs
and one table. Specifically excluded
from the scope of the order regarding
folding metal chairs are the following:
Folding metal chairs with a wooden
back or seat, or both;
Lawn furniture;
Stools;
Chairs with arms; and
Child-sized chairs.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Nov 28, 2012
Jkt 229001
The subject merchandise is currently
classifiable under subheadings
9401.71.0010, 9401.71.011,
9401.71.0030, 9401.71.0031,
9401.79.0045, 9401.79.0046,
9401.79.0050, 9403.20.0018,
9403.20.0015, 9403.20.0030,
9403.60.8040, 9403.70.8015,
9403.70.8020, and 9403.70.8031 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
Department’s written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.
Determination To Revoke: Pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) and 19
CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3), if no
domestic interested party files a notice
of intent to participate, the Department
shall, within 90 days after the initiation
of the review, issue a final
determination revoking the order.
Because no domestic interested party
filed a notice of intent to participate in
this sunset review, the Department finds
that no domestic interested party is
participating in this sunset review.
Therefore, consistent with 19 CFR
351.222(i)(1)(i) and section 751(c)(3)(A)
of the Act, we are revoking this
antidumping duty order.
Effective Date of Revocation: The
effective date of revocation is November
6, 2012, the fifth anniversary of the date
of publication in the Federal Register of
the most recent notice of continuation of
this antidumping duty order. Pursuant
to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the Department
intends to issue instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, 15 days
after publication of this notice, to
terminate the suspension of liquidation
of the merchandise subject to this order
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
on or after November 6, 2012. Entries of
subject merchandise prior to the
effective date of revocation will
continue to be subject to suspension of
liquidation and antidumping duty
deposit requirements. The Department
will complete any pending
administrative reviews of this order and
will conduct administrative reviews of
subject merchandise entered prior to the
effective date of revocation in response
to appropriately filed requests of review.
This five-year (sunset) review and
notice are published in accordance with
sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 20, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–28913 Filed 11–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71169
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Smart Grid Advisory Committee
Meeting
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
The Smart Grid Advisory
Committee (SGAC or Committee), will
meet in open session on Tuesday,
December 18, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. Eastern time and Wednesday,
December 19, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to
12:00 p.m. Eastern time. The primary
purposes of this meeting are to discuss
NIST’s response to recommendations
from the Committee’s report and to
receive presentations on cybersecurity
coordination and the NIST Smart Grid
Program Plan. The agenda may change
to accommodate Committee business.
The final agenda will be posted on the
Smart Grid Web site at https://
www.nist.gov/smartgrid.
DATES: The SGAC will meet on Tuesday,
December 18, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. Eastern time and Wednesday,
December 19, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to
12:00 p.m. Eastern time. The meeting
will be open to the public.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
Lecture Room A, Administration
Building, National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau
Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.
Please note admittance instructions
under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
George W. Arnold, National Coordinator
for Smart Grid Interoperability, National
Institute of Standards and Technology,
100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8200,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8200;
telephone 301–975–2232, fax 301–975–
4091; or via email at nistsgfac@nist.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Committee was established in
accordance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C.
App. The Committee is composed of ten
to fifteen members, appointed by the
Director of NIST, who were selected for
their technical expertise and experience,
established records of distinguished
professional service, and knowledge of
issues affecting Smart Grid deployment
and operations. The Committee advises
the Director of NIST on carrying out
duties authorized by section 1305 of the
Energy Independence and Security Act
of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–140). The
Committee provides input to NIST on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 230 (Thursday, November 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71168-71169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28913]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-868]
Folding Metal Tables and Chairs From the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of Sunset Review and Revocation of Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 1, 2012, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated the sunset review of the antidumping duty order
on folding metal tables and chairs from the People's Republic of China
(``PRC''). Because the domestic interested parties did not participate
in this sunset review, the Department is revoking this antidumping duty
order.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD
Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6412.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 27, 2002, the Department issued an
antidumping duty order on folding metal tables and chairs from the
PRC.\1\ On November 6, 2007, the Department published its most recent
continuation of the order.\2\ On October 1, 2012, the Department
initiated a sunset review of this order.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Folding Metal Tables and Chairs
From the People's Republic of China, 67 FR 43277 (June 27, 2002).
\2\ See Folding Metal Tables and Chairs From the People's
Republic of China: Continuation of the Antidumping Duty Order, 72 FR
62626 (November 6, 2007).
\3\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 77 FR 59897
(October 1, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We did not receive a notice of intent to participate from domestic
interested parties in this sunset review by the deadline date. As a
result, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A), the Department
determined that no domestic interested party intends to participate in
the sunset review, and on October 21, 2012, we notified the
International Trade Commission, in writing, that we intended to issue a
final determination revoking this antidumping duty order.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order: The products covered by the order consist of
assembled and unassembled folding tables and folding chairs made
primarily or exclusively from steel or other metal, as described below:
[[Page 71169]]
(1) Assembled and unassembled folding tables made primarily or
exclusively from steel or other metal (folding metal tables). Folding
metal tables include square, round, rectangular, and any other shapes
with legs affixed with rivets, welds, or any other type of fastener,
and which are made most commonly, but not exclusively, with a hardboard
top covered with vinyl or fabric. Folding metal tables have legs that
mechanically fold independently of one another, and not as a set. The
subject merchandise is commonly, but not exclusively, packed singly, in
multiple packs of the same item, or in five piece sets consisting of
four chairs and one table. Specifically excluded from the scope of the
order regarding folding metal tables are the following:
Lawn furniture;
Trays commonly referred to as ``TV trays;''
Side tables;
Child-sized tables;
Portable counter sets consisting of rectangular tables
36 high and matching stools; and,
Banquet tables. A banquet table is a rectangular table with a
plastic or laminated wood table top approximately 28 to
36 wide by 48 to 96 long and with a
set of folding legs at each end of the table. One set of legs is
composed of two individual legs that are affixed together by one or
more cross-braces using welds or fastening hardware. In contrast,
folding metal tables have legs that mechanically fold independently of
one another, and not as a set.
(2) Assembled and unassembled folding chairs made primarily or
exclusively from steel or other metal (folding metal chairs). Folding
metal chairs include chairs with one or more cross-braces, regardless
of shape or size, affixed to the front and/or rear legs with rivets,
welds or any other type of fastener. Folding metal chairs include:
Those that are made solely of steel or other metal; those that have a
back pad, a seat pad, or both a back pad and a seat pad; and those that
have seats or backs made of plastic or other materials. The subject
merchandise is commonly, but not exclusively, packed singly, in
multiple packs of the same item, or in five piece sets consisting of
four chairs and one table. Specifically excluded from the scope of the
order regarding folding metal chairs are the following:
Folding metal chairs with a wooden back or seat, or both;
Lawn furniture;
Stools;
Chairs with arms; and
Child-sized chairs.
The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under subheadings
9401.71.0010, 9401.71.011, 9401.71.0030, 9401.71.0031, 9401.79.0045,
9401.79.0046, 9401.79.0050, 9403.20.0018, 9403.20.0015, 9403.20.0030,
9403.60.8040, 9403.70.8015, 9403.70.8020, and 9403.70.8031 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the Department's written description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
Determination To Revoke: Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') and 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3), if no domestic interested party files a
notice of intent to participate, the Department shall, within 90 days
after the initiation of the review, issue a final determination
revoking the order. Because no domestic interested party filed a notice
of intent to participate in this sunset review, the Department finds
that no domestic interested party is participating in this sunset
review. Therefore, consistent with 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(i) and section
751(c)(3)(A) of the Act, we are revoking this antidumping duty order.
Effective Date of Revocation: The effective date of revocation is
November 6, 2012, the fifth anniversary of the date of publication in
the Federal Register of the most recent notice of continuation of this
antidumping duty order. Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the Department intends to issue instructions
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 15 days after publication of
this notice, to terminate the suspension of liquidation of the
merchandise subject to this order entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
on or after November 6, 2012. Entries of subject merchandise prior to
the effective date of revocation will continue to be subject to
suspension of liquidation and antidumping duty deposit requirements.
The Department will complete any pending administrative reviews of this
order and will conduct administrative reviews of subject merchandise
entered prior to the effective date of revocation in response to
appropriately filed requests of review.
This five-year (sunset) review and notice are published in
accordance with sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 20, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-28913 Filed 11-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P