Petition To Modify an Exemption of a Previously Approved Antitheft Device; Mitsubishi Motors R&D of America, 71030-71031 [2012-28813]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
71030
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Notices
Issued on: November 21, 2012.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–28823 Filed 11–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition To Modify an Exemption of a
Previously Approved Antitheft Device;
Mitsubishi Motors R&D of America
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition to modify an
exemption of a previously approved
antitheft device.
AGENCY:
On February 2, 2009, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) granted in full
Mitsubishi Motors R&D (Mitsubishi) of
America’s petition for an exemption in
accordance with § 543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption From the Theft
Prevention Standard for the Mitsubishi
Outlander vehicle line beginning with
its model year (MY) 2011 vehicles. On
August 6, 2012, Mitsubishi submitted a
petition to modify its previously
approved exemption for the Outlander
vehicle line beginning with its model
year (MY) 2014 vehicles. Mitsubishi
also requested confidential treatment of
specific information in its petition. The
agency will address Mitsubishi’s request
for confidential treatment by separate
letter. NHTSA is granting Mitsubishi’s
petition to modify the exemption in full
because it has determined that the
modified device is also likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard.
DATES: The modification granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2014 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Mazyck’s telephone number is (202)
366–4139. Her fax number is (202) 493–
2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 2, 2009, NHTSA published in
the Federal Register a notice granting in
full a petition from Mitsubishi for an
exemption from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR 541) for the Outlander
vehicle line beginning with its MY 2011
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:52 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
vehicles (see 74 FR 5891, February 2,
2009). The Mitsubishi Outlander is
currently equipped with a passive,
transponder-based, electronic engine
immobilizer device and an audible and
visible alarm.
On August 6, 2012, Mitsubishi
submitted a petition to modify the
previously approved exemption for the
Outlander vehicle line. This notice
grants in full Mitsubishi’s petition to
modify the exemption for the Outlander
vehicle line beginning with its MY 2014
vehicles. Mitsubishi’s submission is a
complete petition, as required by 49
CFR part 543.9(d), in that it meets the
general requirements contained in 49
CFR Part 543.5 and the specific content
requirements of 49 CFR part 543.6.
Mitsubishi’s petition for modification
provides a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and
location of the components of the
antitheft device proposed for
installation beginning with the 2014
model year.
The current antitheft device installed
on the Mitsubishi Outlander included
an electronic key, electronic control unit
(ECU), and a passive immobilizer.
Mitsubishi stated that entry models for
the Outlander vehicle line are equipped
with an immobilizer that functions via
a Wireless Control Module (WCM). The
features of the WCM include a
transponder key, key ring antenna,
Electronic time and alarm control
system (ETACS) ECU, and Engine ECU
and a receiver antenna. Mitsubishi also
incorporated an alarm system as
standard equipment on all trimline
vehicles. Mitsubishi stated that this is a
keyless entry system in which the
transponder is located in a traditional
key and must be inserted into the key
cylinder in order to activate the ignition.
All other models of the Outlander
vehicle line are equipped with an
immobilizer that functions via a Keyless
Operation System (KOS). The KOS
utilizes a keyless system that allows the
driver to push a knob in the steering
lock unit to activate the ignition (instead
of using a traditional key in the key
cylinder) as long as the transponder is
located in close proximity to the driver
inside the vehicle.
Mitsubishi stated that once the
ignition switch is turned to the ‘‘on’’
position, the transceiver module reads
the specific ignition key code for the
vehicle and transmits an encrypted
message containing the key code to the
electronic control unit (ECU). The
immobilizer receives the key code signal
transmitted from either type of key
(WCM or KOS) and verifies that the key
code signal is correct. The immobilizer
then sends a separate encrypted start-
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
code signal to the engine ECU to allow
the driver to start the vehicle. The
power train only will function if the key
code matches the unique identification
key code previously programmed into
the ECU. If the codes do not match, the
power train engine and fuel system will
be disabled. Mitsubishi state that the
only difference between the two keyless
entry systems is the ‘‘key’’ and the
method used to transmit the information
from the key to the immobilizer.
In its 2014 modification, Mitsubishi
stated that it will continue to offer the
WCM as standard equipment for the
entry models for the Outlander vehicle
line but all models other than the entry
models will be equipped with a Onetouch Starting System (OSS). The
features of the OSS are the Engine ECU,
ETACS ECU, OSS ECU, KOS ECU,
engine (power) switch, keyless
Operation Key (transponder key) and LF
antenna. The OSS utilizes a keyless
system that allows the driver to press a
button located on the instrument panel
to activate and deactivate the ignition
(instead of using a traditional key in the
key cylinder) as long as the transponder
is located in close proximity to the
driver. Mitsubishi stated that it will also
introduce another model into the
Outlander vehicle line beginning with
its MY 2014 vehicle.
Once the ignition switch is pushed to
the ‘‘on’’ position, the transceiver
module reads the specific ignition key
code for the vehicle and transmits an
encrypted message containing the key
code to the electronic control unit (ECU)
which verifies that the key is correct.
The immobilizer then sends a separate
encrypted start-code signal to the engine
ECU to allow the driver to start the
vehicle. The engine will only function
if the key code matches the unique
identification key code previously
programmed into the ECU. If the codes
do not match, the engine and fuel
system will be disabled. Mitsubishi
further stated that the OSS has 250
million possible codes, making
successful key code duplication nearly
impossible. Mitsubishi stated that the
immobilizer device and the ECU share
security data when first installed during
vehicle assembly, making them a
matched set. These matched modules
will not function if taken out and
reinstalled separately on other vehicles.
Mitsubishi also stated that the device is
extremely reliable and durable because
there are no moving parts, the key does
not require a separate battery and it is
impossible to mechanically override the
device and start the vehicle.
Mitsubishi stated that the Mitsubishi
Outlander has been equipped with the
immobilizer device since MY 2007.
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 28, 2012 / Notices
Mitsubishi further stated that the OSS
immobilizer device will be identical to
the one installed on its Outlander Sport
vehicle line. Mitsubishi was granted an
exemption for the Outlander Sport
vehicle line on February 14, 2011 by
NHTSA (See 76 FR 8400) beginning
with its MY 2012 vehicles. Since the
agency granted Mitsubishi’s exemption
for its MY 2012 Outlander Sport vehicle
line, there has been no available theft
rate information for this vehicle.
Mitsubishi also informed the agency
that the Eclipse, Galant, Endeavor,
Outlander, Lancer, and I-MiEv vehicle
lines have been equipped with a similar
type of immobilizer device since
January 2000, January 2004, April 2004,
September 2006, March 2007, and
October 2011 respectively, and they
have all been granted parts-marking
exemptions by the agency. Mitsubishi
also stated that its Eclipse vehicle line
has been equipped with a similar device
since introduction of its MY 2000
vehicles. Mitsubishi further stated that
the theft rate for the MY 2000 Eclipse
decreased by almost 42% when
compared with that of its MY 1999
Mitsubishi Eclipse (unequipped with an
immobilizer device). Mitsubishi has
concluded that the proposed antitheft
device for its vehicle line is no less
effective than those devices in the lines
for which NHTSA has already granted
full exemption from the parts-marking
requirements. The average theft rates
using 3 MY’s data for the Mitsubishi
Eclipse, Galant, Endeavor, Outlander
and Lancer vehicle lines are 1.7356,
4.8973, 1.1619, 0.3341 and 1.0871
respectively. Theft rate data for the
Outlander Sport and i-MiEV are not
available.
S.P No.
The agency has evaluated
Mitsubishi’s MY 2014 petition to
modify the exemption for the Outlander
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR Part 541, and
has decided to grant it. Since the same
aspects of performance (i.e., arming and
the immobilization feature) are still
provided, the agency believes that the
same level of protection is being met.
The agency believes that the proposed
device will continue to provide the five
types of performance listed in
§ 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation;
attracting attention to the efforts of
unauthorized persons to enter or operate
a vehicle by means other than a key;
preventing defeat or circumvention of
the device by unauthorized persons;
preventing operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
If Mitsubishi decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it should
formally notify the agency. If such a
decision is made, the line must be fully
marked according to the requirements
under 49 CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6
(marking of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: November 21, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012–28813 Filed 11–27–12; 8:45 am]
71031
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Actions on Special Permit Applications
Pipeline And Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Notice of actions on Special
Permit Applications.
ACTION:
In accordance with the
procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special
permits from the Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Material
Regulations (49 CFR Part 107, Subpart
B), notice is hereby given of the actions
on special permits applications in
(October to November 2012). The mode
of transportation involved are identified
by a number in the ‘‘Nature of
Application’’ portion of the table below
as follows: 1—Motor vehicle, 2—Rail
freight, 3—Cargo vessel, 4—Cargo
aircraft only, 5—Passenger-carrying
aircraft. Application numbers prefixed
by the letters EE represent applications
for Emergency Special Permits. It
should be noted that some of the
sections cited were those in effect at the
time certain special permits were
issued.
SUMMARY:
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
13, 2012.
Donald Burger,
Chief, Special Permits and Approvals Branch.
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
Applicant
Regulation(s)
Nature of special permit thereof
MODIFICATION SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
11054–M ............................
Welker Inc. Sugar Land,
TX.
49 CFR 178.36 Subpart C
14546–M ............................
Linde Gas North America
LLC Murray Hill, NJ.
Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM.
49 CFR 180.209 ................
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration
Washington, DC.
Amtro Alfa Metalomecanica
SA Portugal.
Prism Helicopters Inc.
Wasilla, AK.
49 CFR 180.209 and
173.302a.
3549–M ..............................
12396–M ............................
14808–M ............................
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with
15468–M ............................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:52 Nov 27, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
49 CFR 172.101; 173.54;
173.56; 173.62.
49 CFR 178.51(b), (f)(1)
and (2) and (g).
49 CFR 172.101 Column
(9B).
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
To modify the special permit to authorize the containment cylinder or salvage cylinder without the internal
piston.
To modify the special permit to authorize an alternative
testing procedures for requalifying cylinders.
To modify the special permit to authorize the transportation in commerce of additional Division 1.1 hazardous materials.
To modify the special permit to authorize rail freight,
cargo vessel, and passenger aircraft as additional
modes of operation.
To modify the special permit to authorize an additional
2.1 material.
To modify the special permit to authorize the transportation beyond the state of Alaska.
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71030-71031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28813]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition To Modify an Exemption of a Previously Approved
Antitheft Device; Mitsubishi Motors R&D of America
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition to modify an exemption of a previously
approved antitheft device.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On February 2, 2009, the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) granted in full Mitsubishi Motors R&D
(Mitsubishi) of America's petition for an exemption in accordance with
Sec. 543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR part 543, Exemption From the Theft
Prevention Standard for the Mitsubishi Outlander vehicle line beginning
with its model year (MY) 2011 vehicles. On August 6, 2012, Mitsubishi
submitted a petition to modify its previously approved exemption for
the Outlander vehicle line beginning with its model year (MY) 2014
vehicles. Mitsubishi also requested confidential treatment of specific
information in its petition. The agency will address Mitsubishi's
request for confidential treatment by separate letter. NHTSA is
granting Mitsubishi's petition to modify the exemption in full because
it has determined that the modified device is also likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
DATES: The modification granted by this notice is effective beginning
with the 2014 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck's telephone
number is (202) 366-4139. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 2, 2009, NHTSA published in the
Federal Register a notice granting in full a petition from Mitsubishi
for an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541) for the Outlander vehicle line
beginning with its MY 2011 vehicles (see 74 FR 5891, February 2, 2009).
The Mitsubishi Outlander is currently equipped with a passive,
transponder-based, electronic engine immobilizer device and an audible
and visible alarm.
On August 6, 2012, Mitsubishi submitted a petition to modify the
previously approved exemption for the Outlander vehicle line. This
notice grants in full Mitsubishi's petition to modify the exemption for
the Outlander vehicle line beginning with its MY 2014 vehicles.
Mitsubishi's submission is a complete petition, as required by 49 CFR
part 543.9(d), in that it meets the general requirements contained in
49 CFR Part 543.5 and the specific content requirements of 49 CFR part
543.6. Mitsubishi's petition for modification provides a detailed
description and diagram of the identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device proposed for installation beginning
with the 2014 model year.
The current antitheft device installed on the Mitsubishi Outlander
included an electronic key, electronic control unit (ECU), and a
passive immobilizer. Mitsubishi stated that entry models for the
Outlander vehicle line are equipped with an immobilizer that functions
via a Wireless Control Module (WCM). The features of the WCM include a
transponder key, key ring antenna, Electronic time and alarm control
system (ETACS) ECU, and Engine ECU and a receiver antenna. Mitsubishi
also incorporated an alarm system as standard equipment on all trimline
vehicles. Mitsubishi stated that this is a keyless entry system in
which the transponder is located in a traditional key and must be
inserted into the key cylinder in order to activate the ignition. All
other models of the Outlander vehicle line are equipped with an
immobilizer that functions via a Keyless Operation System (KOS). The
KOS utilizes a keyless system that allows the driver to push a knob in
the steering lock unit to activate the ignition (instead of using a
traditional key in the key cylinder) as long as the transponder is
located in close proximity to the driver inside the vehicle.
Mitsubishi stated that once the ignition switch is turned to the
``on'' position, the transceiver module reads the specific ignition key
code for the vehicle and transmits an encrypted message containing the
key code to the electronic control unit (ECU). The immobilizer receives
the key code signal transmitted from either type of key (WCM or KOS)
and verifies that the key code signal is correct. The immobilizer then
sends a separate encrypted start-code signal to the engine ECU to allow
the driver to start the vehicle. The power train only will function if
the key code matches the unique identification key code previously
programmed into the ECU. If the codes do not match, the power train
engine and fuel system will be disabled. Mitsubishi state that the only
difference between the two keyless entry systems is the ``key'' and the
method used to transmit the information from the key to the
immobilizer.
In its 2014 modification, Mitsubishi stated that it will continue
to offer the WCM as standard equipment for the entry models for the
Outlander vehicle line but all models other than the entry models will
be equipped with a One-touch Starting System (OSS). The features of the
OSS are the Engine ECU, ETACS ECU, OSS ECU, KOS ECU, engine (power)
switch, keyless Operation Key (transponder key) and LF antenna. The OSS
utilizes a keyless system that allows the driver to press a button
located on the instrument panel to activate and deactivate the ignition
(instead of using a traditional key in the key cylinder) as long as the
transponder is located in close proximity to the driver. Mitsubishi
stated that it will also introduce another model into the Outlander
vehicle line beginning with its MY 2014 vehicle.
Once the ignition switch is pushed to the ``on'' position, the
transceiver module reads the specific ignition key code for the vehicle
and transmits an encrypted message containing the key code to the
electronic control unit (ECU) which verifies that the key is correct.
The immobilizer then sends a separate encrypted start-code signal to
the engine ECU to allow the driver to start the vehicle. The engine
will only function if the key code matches the unique identification
key code previously programmed into the ECU. If the codes do not match,
the engine and fuel system will be disabled. Mitsubishi further stated
that the OSS has 250 million possible codes, making successful key code
duplication nearly impossible. Mitsubishi stated that the immobilizer
device and the ECU share security data when first installed during
vehicle assembly, making them a matched set. These matched modules will
not function if taken out and reinstalled separately on other vehicles.
Mitsubishi also stated that the device is extremely reliable and
durable because there are no moving parts, the key does not require a
separate battery and it is impossible to mechanically override the
device and start the vehicle.
Mitsubishi stated that the Mitsubishi Outlander has been equipped
with the immobilizer device since MY 2007.
[[Page 71031]]
Mitsubishi further stated that the OSS immobilizer device will be
identical to the one installed on its Outlander Sport vehicle line.
Mitsubishi was granted an exemption for the Outlander Sport vehicle
line on February 14, 2011 by NHTSA (See 76 FR 8400) beginning with its
MY 2012 vehicles. Since the agency granted Mitsubishi's exemption for
its MY 2012 Outlander Sport vehicle line, there has been no available
theft rate information for this vehicle. Mitsubishi also informed the
agency that the Eclipse, Galant, Endeavor, Outlander, Lancer, and I-
MiEv vehicle lines have been equipped with a similar type of
immobilizer device since January 2000, January 2004, April 2004,
September 2006, March 2007, and October 2011 respectively, and they
have all been granted parts-marking exemptions by the agency.
Mitsubishi also stated that its Eclipse vehicle line has been equipped
with a similar device since introduction of its MY 2000 vehicles.
Mitsubishi further stated that the theft rate for the MY 2000 Eclipse
decreased by almost 42% when compared with that of its MY 1999
Mitsubishi Eclipse (unequipped with an immobilizer device). Mitsubishi
has concluded that the proposed antitheft device for its vehicle line
is no less effective than those devices in the lines for which NHTSA
has already granted full exemption from the parts-marking requirements.
The average theft rates using 3 MY's data for the Mitsubishi Eclipse,
Galant, Endeavor, Outlander and Lancer vehicle lines are 1.7356,
4.8973, 1.1619, 0.3341 and 1.0871 respectively. Theft rate data for the
Outlander Sport and i-MiEV are not available.
The agency has evaluated Mitsubishi's MY 2014 petition to modify
the exemption for the Outlander vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR Part 541, and has decided to grant it. Since the
same aspects of performance (i.e., arming and the immobilization
feature) are still provided, the agency believes that the same level of
protection is being met. The agency believes that the proposed device
will continue to provide the five types of performance listed in Sec.
543.6(a)(3): promoting activation; attracting attention to the efforts
of unauthorized persons to enter or operate a vehicle by means other
than a key; preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and durability of
the device.
If Mitsubishi decides not to use the exemption for this line, it
should formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line
must be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts
541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be characterized as de minimis, it
should consult the agency before preparing and submitting a petition to
modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: November 21, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012-28813 Filed 11-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
