Certain Pasta From Turkey: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2010, 69792-69793 [2012-28304]
Download as PDF
69792
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to the administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and this notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: November 13, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–806]
Certain Pasta From Turkey: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2010
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
David Layton or Christopher Siepmann,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0371 and (202)
482–7958, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 We have also assigned a rate to Istanbul Gida Dis
Ticaret A.S. (‘‘Istanbul Gida’’), which is cross¸
owned with Birlik and Bellini and produced the
subject merchandise during the period of review.
See Certain Pasta From Turkey: Preliminary Results
For the period January 1, 2010,
through December 31, 2010, we find the
following ad valorem subsidy rates:
Exporter/manufacturer
Marsan Gida Sanayi
ve Ticaret A.S.
¸
Istanbul Gida Dis
Ticaret A.S./Birlik
¸
Pazarlama Sanayi
ve Ticaret
A.Scedil;./Bellini
Gida Sanayi A.S.
¸
Net subsidy rate
0.15 (de minimis).
0.28 (de minimis).
Background
The Department published the
preliminary results of this
administrative review on August 3,
2012. See Preliminary Results.
We invited interested parties to file
comments following the release of the
Preliminary Results. No comments were
received.
Period of Review
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) for
which we are measuring subsidies is
from January 1, 2010, through December
31, 2010.2
Final Results of Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 3, 2012, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published in the Federal
Register its preliminary results of
administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on certain
pasta from Turkey for the period
January 1, 2010, through December 31,
2010. We received no comments on
those preliminary results and we
continue to determine that Marsan Gida
Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (‘‘Marsan’’),
¸
Birlik Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
¸
(‘‘Birlik’’), and Bellini Gida Sanayi A.S.
¸
(‘‘Bellini’’) received de minimis
countervailable subsidies during the
period of review.1
AGENCY:
Jkt 229001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The merchandise subject to the order
is pasta. The product is currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTS’’)
item numbers 1902.19.20. Although the
HTS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written product description, available in
Notice of Countervailing Duty Order:
Certain Pasta from Turkey, 61 FR 38546
(July 24, 1996), remains dispositive.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Effective Date: November 21,
2012.
Scope of Order
[FR Doc. 2012–28313 Filed 11–20–12; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
DATES:
We have made no changes to our
findings announced in the Preliminary
Results. See Preliminary Results; see
also Memorandum from Christopher
Siepmann, International Trade
Compliance Analyst to Susan Kuhbach,
Office Director, ‘‘Preliminary Results
Calculation Memorandum for Marsan
Gida Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (‘‘Marsan’’),
¸
Birlik Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
¸
(‘‘Birlik’’), Bellini Gida Sanayi A.S.
¸
(‘‘Bellini’’), and Marsa Yag Sanayi ve
Ticaret A.S. (‘‘Marsa Yag’’)’’ (July 27,
¸
2012).
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 77
FR 46386 (August 3, 2012) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’)
at 46387.
2 While the initiation notice correctly identified
the period of review as January 1, 2010 through
December 31, 2010, we note that our extension of
the time limit for the preliminary results incorrectly
identified the period of review as January 1, 2011
through December 31, 2011. See Certain Pasta From
Turkey: Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary
Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 77 FR 11065 (February 24, 2012).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Marsan’s final cash deposit rate is a
‘‘combination rate’’ pursuant to 19 CFR
351.107(b). It applies only to subject
merchandise exported by Marsan and
produced by Birlik and/or Bellini.
Assessment Rates
Because Marsan, Birlik, Bellini and
Istanbul Gida received de minimis
countervailable subsidies during the
POR, the Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to liquidate without regard to
countervailing duties shipments of
subject merchandise (a) exported by
Marsan and produced by Birlik and/or
Bellini, or (b) exported by Istanbul Gida,
Birlik or Bellini, and entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption from January 1, 2010,
through December 31, 2010.
For all other combinations or
companies, as appropriate, that were not
reviewed, the Department will direct
CBP to assess countervailing duties on
all entries between January 1, 2010, and
December 31, 2010, at the rates in effect
at the time of entry.
Cash Deposit Instructions
Because Marsan, Birlik, Bellini and
Istanbul Gida have de minimis
countervailable subsidy rates, the
Department will instruct CBP to
continue to suspend liquidation of
entries, but to collect no cash deposits
of estimated countervailing duties for
the combination and companies
described above on all shipments of the
subject merchandise that are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review.
Also, for all other combinations or
companies, we will instruct CBP to
collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties at the most recent
company-specific or all-others rate
applicable to the company. The cash
deposit rates for all companies not
covered by this review are not changed
by the results of this review.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 21, 2012 / Notices
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended.
Dated: November 14, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–28304 Filed 11–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–475–819]
Certain Pasta From Italy; Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2010
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 1, 2012, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal
Register its preliminary results of
administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on certain
pasta from Italy for the period January
1, 2010, through December 31, 2010. We
received no comments on those
preliminary results and we continue to
determine that Molino e Pastificio
Tomasello S.p.A. (‘‘Tomasello’’)
received countervailable subsidies
during the period of review.
DATES: Effective Date: November 21,
2012.
AGENCY:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Shuler, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–1293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the
preliminary results of this
administrative review on August 1,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 20, 2012
Jkt 229001
2012. See Certain Pasta From Italy:
Preliminary Results of the 15th (2010)
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review and Rescission, In Part, 77 FR
45582 (August 1, 2012) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’). We invited interested parties
to file comments following the release of
the Preliminary Results. No comments
were received.
Period of Review
The period for which we are
measuring subsidies is January 1, 2010,
through December 31, 2010.
Certification of Organic Pasta
As discussed further under ‘‘Scope of
the Order,’’ pasta from Italy that is
certified as organic by European Union
authorized agents and accompanied by
a U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
National Organic Program import
certificate is excluded from the order.
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by the order are
shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta
in packages of five pounds four ounces
or less, whether or not enriched or
fortified or containing milk or other
optional ingredients such as chopped
vegetables, vegetable purees, milk,
gluten, diastasis, vitamins, coloring and
flavorings, and up to two percent egg
white. The pasta covered by the scope
of the order is typically sold in the retail
market, in fiberboard or cardboard
cartons, or polyethylene or
polypropylene bags of varying
dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of the order
are refrigerated, frozen, or canned
pastas, as well as all forms of egg pasta,
with the exception of non-egg dry pasta
containing up to two percent egg white.
Also excluded are imports of organic
pasta from Italy that are certified by a
European Union authorized body and
accompanied by a National Organic
Program import certificate for organic
products. See Memorandum from
Yasmin Nair to Susan Kuhbach, entitled
‘‘Recognition of EU Organic Certifying
Agents for Certifying Organic Pasta from
Italy,’’ dated October 10, 2012, which is
on file in the Department’s CRU.
Pursuant to the Department’s May 12,
2011 changed circumstances review,
effective January 1, 2009, gluten-free
pasta is also excluded from the scope of
the countervailing duty order. See
Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Review and Revocation,
In Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 12, 2011).
The merchandise subject to review is
currently classifiable under items
1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69793
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to the order is dispositive.
Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
Sections 776(a)(1) and (2) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
provide that the Department shall apply
‘‘facts otherwise available’’ if necessary
information is not on the record or an
interested party or any other person: (A)
Withholds information that has been
requested; (B) fails to provide
information within the deadlines
established, or in the form and manner
requested by the Department, subject to
subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782
of the Act; (C) significantly impedes a
proceeding; or (D) provides information
that cannot be verified as provided by
section 782(i) of the Act. Section 776(b)
of the Act further provides that the
Department may use an adverse
inference in applying the facts
otherwise available when a party has
failed to cooperate by not acting to the
best of its ability to comply with a
request for information.
As explained in our Preliminary
Results, we find that the Government of
Italy (‘‘GOI’’) failed to respond to our
request for usage information regarding
Measure 3.14 of the POR Sicilia 2000/
2006. Therefore, consistent with section
776(a)(2)(B) of the Act, we have relied
on facts otherwise available.
Furthermore, because the GOI failed to
provide this information, which was in
its possession, we determine that the
GOI did not act to the best of its ability.
Consequently, an adverse inference is
warranted in accordance with section
776(b) of the Act. As adverse facts
available, we determine that the
assistance received by Tomasello under
Measure 3.14 of the POR Sicilia 2000/
2006 is specific within the meaning of
section 771(5A) of the Act. See
Preliminary Results, 77 FR at 45585.
Final Results of Review
We have made no changes to our
findings announced in the Preliminary
Results. See Preliminary Results, 77 FR
at 45586; see also Memorandum from
Joseph Shuler, International Trade
Analyst, to the File, ‘‘2010 Preliminary
Results Calculation Memorandum for
Molino e Pastificio Tomasello, S.p.A.,’’
dated July 24, 2012.
For the period January 1, 2010,
through December 31, 2010, we find
that the ad valorem net subsidy rate for
Tomasello to be:
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69792-69793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28304]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-489-806]
Certain Pasta From Turkey: Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2010
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 3, 2012, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published in the Federal Register its preliminary results
of administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain
pasta from Turkey for the period January 1, 2010, through December 31,
2010. We received no comments on those preliminary results and we
continue to determine that Marsan Gida Sanayi ve Ticaret A.[Scedil].
(``Marsan''), Birlik Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret A.[Scedil].
(``Birlik''), and Bellini Gida Sanayi A.[Scedil]. (``Bellini'')
received de minimis countervailable subsidies during the period of
review.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We have also assigned a rate to Istanbul Gida Dis Ticaret
A.[Scedil]. (``Istanbul Gida''), which is cross-owned with Birlik
and Bellini and produced the subject merchandise during the period
of review. See Certain Pasta From Turkey: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 46386 (August 3,
2012) (``Preliminary Results'') at 46387.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: November 21, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Layton or Christopher Siepmann,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0371 and (202) 482-7958, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the preliminary results of this
administrative review on August 3, 2012. See Preliminary Results.
We invited interested parties to file comments following the
release of the Preliminary Results. No comments were received.
Period of Review
The period of review (``POR'') for which we are measuring subsidies
is from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ While the initiation notice correctly identified the period
of review as January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010, we note that
our extension of the time limit for the preliminary results
incorrectly identified the period of review as January 1, 2011
through December 31, 2011. See Certain Pasta From Turkey: Extension
of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 77 FR 11065 (February 24, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of Order
The merchandise subject to the order is pasta. The product is
currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (``HTS'') item numbers 1902.19.20. Although the HTS numbers are
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product
description, available in Notice of Countervailing Duty Order: Certain
Pasta from Turkey, 61 FR 38546 (July 24, 1996), remains dispositive.
Final Results of Review
We have made no changes to our findings announced in the
Preliminary Results. See Preliminary Results; see also Memorandum from
Christopher Siepmann, International Trade Compliance Analyst to Susan
Kuhbach, Office Director, ``Preliminary Results Calculation Memorandum
for Marsan Gida Sanayi ve Ticaret A.[Scedil]. (``Marsan''), Birlik
Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret A.[Scedil]. (``Birlik''), Bellini Gida
Sanayi A.[Scedil]. (``Bellini''), and Marsa Yag Sanayi ve Ticaret
A.[Scedil]. (``Marsa Yag'')'' (July 27, 2012).
For the period January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010, we find
the following ad valorem subsidy rates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exporter/manufacturer Net subsidy rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marsan Gida Sanayi ve Ticaret A.[Scedil].. 0.15 (de minimis).
Istanbul Gida Dis Ticaret A.[Scedil]./ 0.28 (de minimis).
Birlik Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret
A.Scedil;./Bellini Gida Sanayi A.[Scedil].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marsan's final cash deposit rate is a ``combination rate'' pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.107(b). It applies only to subject merchandise exported
by Marsan and produced by Birlik and/or Bellini.
Assessment Rates
Because Marsan, Birlik, Bellini and Istanbul Gida received de
minimis countervailable subsidies during the POR, the Department will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to liquidate
without regard to countervailing duties shipments of subject
merchandise (a) exported by Marsan and produced by Birlik and/or
Bellini, or (b) exported by Istanbul Gida, Birlik or Bellini, and
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption from January 1,
2010, through December 31, 2010.
For all other combinations or companies, as appropriate, that were
not reviewed, the Department will direct CBP to assess countervailing
duties on all entries between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010,
at the rates in effect at the time of entry.
Cash Deposit Instructions
Because Marsan, Birlik, Bellini and Istanbul Gida have de minimis
countervailable subsidy rates, the Department will instruct CBP to
continue to suspend liquidation of entries, but to collect no cash
deposits of estimated countervailing duties for the combination and
companies described above on all shipments of the subject merchandise
that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final results of this
administrative review.
Also, for all other combinations or companies, we will instruct CBP
to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most
recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company.
The cash deposit rates for all companies not covered by this review are
not changed by the results of this review.
[[Page 69793]]
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: November 14, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-28304 Filed 11-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P