Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Statements on the Public Interest, 68829-68830 [2012-27950]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2012 / Notices
more of claims 1–16 of the ’561 patent,
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Speculative Product Design, LLC, 303
Bryant Street, Mountain View,
California 94041.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Anbess Electronices Co. Ltd., 1F, Block
B, Building 4, Cui Feng hao Yuan,
ShuiJing, BuJi, LongGang, Shenzhen,
GC, 518112, China.
BodyGlove International, LLC, 201
Herondo Street, Redondo Beach,
California 90277.
Fellowes, Inc., 1789 Norwood Avenue,
Itsaca, Illinois 60143.
ROCON Digital Technology Corp., Block
15, Fumin Industrial Zone, Shenzhen,
China 518111.
SW-Box.com, aka Cellphonezone
Limited, Flat A, 15/F Hillier Comm.
Bldg, 65–67 Bonham Strand East,
Sheung Wan, Hong Kong.
Trait Technology (Shenzhen) Co.,
Limited, dba Trait-Tech, 416–419RM,
305# Sufa Building, Huafa North
Road, Futian District, Shenzhen,
China 518031.
Hongkong Wexun Ltd, Wexun Tech
(Hong Kong) Co., Ltd, Block 15,
Fumin Industrial Zone, Pinghu
Community Office, Longgang District,
Guangdong, China 518111.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:43 Nov 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 9, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–27864 Filed 11–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–796]
Certain Electronic Digital Media
Devices and Components Thereof;
Notice of Request for Statements on
the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the presiding administrative law judge
has issued a Final Initial Determination
and Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bonding in the abovecaptioned investigation. The
Commission is soliciting comments on
public interest issues raised by the
recommended relief, specifically a
limited exclusion order against certain
electronic digital media devices and
components thereof imported by
respondents Samsung Electronics Co,
Ltd. of Korea; Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New
Jersey; and Samsung
Telecommunications America, LLC of
Richardson, Texas (collectively
‘‘Samsung’’), and cease and desist
orders against Samsung.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2392. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68829
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides
that if the Commission finds a violation
it shall exclude the articles concerned
from the United States:
Unless, after considering the effect of such
exclusion upon the public health and
welfare, competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the United
States, and United States consumers, it finds
that such articles should not be excluded
from entry.
19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar
provision applies to cease and desist
orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1).
The Commission is interested in
further development of the record on
the public interest in these
investigations. Accordingly, members of
the public are invited to file
submissions of no more than five (5)
pages, inclusive of attachments,
concerning the public interest in light of
the administrative law judge’s
Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bonding issued in this
investigation on November 7, 2012.
Comments should address whether
issuance of an exclusion order and/or
cease and desist orders in this
investigation would affect the public
health and welfare in the United States,
competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like
or directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the recommended
orders are used in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the recommended orders;
(iii) Identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
its licensees, or third parties make in the
United States which could replace the
subject articles if they were to be
excluded;
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
68830
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2012 / Notices
(iv) Indicate whether complainant,
complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to the recommended
exclusion order and/or a cease and
desist order within a commercially
reasonable time; and
(v) Explain how the exclusion order
and/or cease and desist orders would
impact consumers in the United States.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business on
December 3, 2012.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
337–TA–796’’) in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See
Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding filing
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document
must also be filed simultaneously with
the any confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.50 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 13, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–27950 Filed 11–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:43 Nov 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–815]
Certain Projectors With ControlledAngle Optical Retarders, Components
Thereof, and Products Containing
Same; Notice of Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the
Investigation in Its Entirety
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 24) terminating the
above-captioned in its entirety based on
withdrawal of the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on November 25, 2011, based on a
complaint filed on October 21, 2011, as
supplemented on November 2, 2011, by
Compound Photonics Ltd. of London,
United Kingdom and Compound
Photonics U.S. Corporation of Phoenix,
Arizona (collectively ‘‘Compound
Photonics’’). 76 FR 72722–23 (Nov. 25,
2011). The complaint alleges violations
of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain projectors with controlled-angle
optical retarders, components thereof,
and products containing same by reason
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of infringement of claims of U.S. Patent
No. 6,829,027. The complaint further
alleges the existence of a domestic
industry. The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony
Corporation of America of New York,
New York; and Sony Electronics Inc. of
San Diego, California. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigation was named
as a participating party.
On October 17, 2012, Compound
Photonics filed a motion to terminate
the investigation in its entirety based on
withdrawal of the complaint. The
motion stated that the respondents do
not oppose the motion. On October 19,
2012, the Commission investigative
attorney filed a response in support of
the motion.
On October 19, 2012, the ALJ issued
the subject ID, granting Compound
Photonics’ motion pursuant to section
210.21(a)(1) of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.21(a)(1)). No petitions for review of
this ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 13, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–27914 Filed 11–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Delegation of Authority to the Principal
Deputy Assistant Attorney General for
the Civil Division
Department of Justice.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On November 9, 2012, the
Attorney General issued Attorney
General Order No. 3350–2012, which
delegates all of the power and authority
of the Assistant Attorney General for the
Civil Division to the Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General for the Civil
Division, unless any such power or
authority is required by law to be
exercised by the Assistant Attorney
General for the Civil Division
personally. With this delegation, the
Assistant Attorney General for the Civil
Division and the Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General for the Civil
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 222 (Friday, November 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68829-68830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27950]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-796]
Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof;
Notice of Request for Statements on the Public Interest
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the presiding administrative law
judge has issued a Final Initial Determination and Recommended
Determination on Remedy and Bonding in the above-captioned
investigation. The Commission is soliciting comments on public interest
issues raised by the recommended relief, specifically a limited
exclusion order against certain electronic digital media devices and
components thereof imported by respondents Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd.
of Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New
Jersey; and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson,
Texas (collectively ``Samsung''), and cease and desist orders against
Samsung.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. The public version of
the complaint can be accessed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
provides that if the Commission finds a violation it shall exclude the
articles concerned from the United States:
Unless, after considering the effect of such exclusion upon the
public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like or directly competitive
articles in the United States, and United States consumers, it finds
that such articles should not be excluded from entry.
19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar provision applies to cease and desist
orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1).
The Commission is interested in further development of the record
on the public interest in these investigations. Accordingly, members of
the public are invited to file submissions of no more than five (5)
pages, inclusive of attachments, concerning the public interest in
light of the administrative law judge's Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bonding issued in this investigation on November 7, 2012.
Comments should address whether issuance of an exclusion order and/or
cease and desist orders in this investigation would affect the public
health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the
United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive
articles in the United States, or United States consumers.
In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the recommended
orders are used in the United States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the
United States relating to the recommended orders;
(iii) Identify like or directly competitive articles that
complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States
which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded;
[[Page 68830]]
(iv) Indicate whether complainant, complainant's licensees, and/or
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of
articles potentially subject to the recommended exclusion order and/or
a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time; and
(v) Explain how the exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders
would impact consumers in the United States.
Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of
business on December 3, 2012.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day
pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the
investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-796'') in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions
regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A
redacted non-confidential version of the document must also be filed
simultaneously with the any confidential filing. All non-confidential
written submissions will be available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337), and of sections
201.10 and 210.50 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 201.10, 210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 13, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-27950 Filed 11-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
