Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Cabinet Trading Pilot Program in Rule 1059, 68871-68873 [2012-27869]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2012 / Notices
inspection and copying at the principal
office of CME and on CME’s Web site at
https://www.cmegroup.com/marketregulation/rule-filings.html.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CME–2012–43 and should
be submitted on or before December 7,
2012.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change
Section 19(b) of the Act 7 directs the
Commission to approve a proposed rule
change of a self-regulatory organization
if it finds that such proposed rule
change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
such organization. The Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act, in particular the requirements of
Section 17A of the Act, and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
CME.8 Specifically, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act, which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a registered
clearing agency be designed to assure
the safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in the custody or control of
the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible and to protect investors and
the public interest.9
In its filing, CME requested that the
Commission approve this proposed rule
change on an accelerated basis for good
cause shown. CME cites as the reason
for this request that the proposed
changes are necessary to facilitate
CME’s compliance with new CFTC
regulations that become effective on
November 14, 2012.
The Commission finds good cause,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,10 for approving the proposed rule
change prior to the 30th day after the
date of publication of notice in the
Federal Register because, as a registered
derivatives clearing organization, CME
must amend certain of its rules to
comply with the CFTC’s Part 22
7 15
U.S.C. 78s(b).
U.S.C. 78q–1. In approving this proposed
rule change, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Regulations that will become effective
on November 14, 2012.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (SR–CME–2012–
43) be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–27873 Filed 11–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
15:43 Nov 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–68201; File No. SR–Phlx–
2012–131]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Extend the
Cabinet Trading Pilot Program in Rule
1059
November 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
1, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend the
Cabinet Trading Pilot program in Rule
1059. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site at https://
www.nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
8 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
68871
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange proposes to extend the
pilot program in Commentary .02 of
Exchange Rule 1059, Accommodation
Transactions, which sets forth specific
procedures for engaging in cabinet
trades, to allow the Commission
adequate time to consider permanently
allowing transactions to take place on
the Exchange in open outcry at a price
of at least $0 but less than $1 per option
contract.3 Prior to the pilot program,
Rule 1059 required that all orders
placed in the cabinet were assigned
priority based upon the sequence in
which such orders were received by the
specialist. All closing bids and offers
would be submitted to the specialist in
writing, and the specialist effected all
closing cabinet transactions by matching
such orders placed with him. Bids or
offers on orders to open for the accounts
of customer, firm, specialists and ROTs
could be made at $1 per option contract,
but such orders could not be placed in
and must yield to all orders in the
cabinet. Specialists effected all cabinet
transactions by matching closing
purchase or sale orders which were
placed in the cabinet or, provided there
was no matching closing purchase or
sale order in the cabinet, by matching a
closing purchase or sale order in the
cabinet with an opening purchase or
sale order.4 All cabinet transactions
were reported to the Exchange following
3 Cabinet or accommodation trading of option
contracts is intended to accommodate persons
wishing to effect closing transactions in those series
of options dealt in on the Exchange for which there
is no auction market.
4 Specialists and ROTs are not subject to the
requirements of Rule 1014 in respect of orders
placed pursuant to this Rule. Also, the provisions
of Rule 1033(b) and (c), Rule 1034 and Rule 1038
do not apply to orders placed in the cabinet.
Cabinet transactions are not reported on the ticker.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
68872
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2012 / Notices
the close of each business day.5 Any (i)
member, (ii) member organization, or
(iii) other person who was a nonmember broker or dealer and who
directly or indirectly controlled, was
controlled by, or was under common
control with, a member or member
organization (any such other person
being referred to as an affiliated person)
could effect any transaction as principal
in the over-the-counter market in any
class of option contracts listed on the
Exchange for a premium not in excess
of $1.00 per contract.
On December 30, 2010, the Exchange
filed an immediately effective proposal
that established the pilot program being
extended by this filing. The pilot
program allowed transactions to take
place in open outcry at a price of at least
$0 but less than $1 per option contract
until June 1, 2011.6 These lower priced
transactions are traded pursuant to the
same procedures applicable to $1
cabinet trades, except that pursuant to
the pilot program (i) bids and offers for
opening transactions are only permitted
to accommodate closing transactions in
order to limit use of the procedure to
liquidations of existing positions, and
(ii) the procedures are also made
available for trading in options
participating in the Penny Pilot
Program.7 On May 31, 2011, the
Exchange filed an immediately effective
proposal that extended the pilot
program until December 1, 2011 to
consider whether to seek permanent
approval of the temporary procedure.8
On November 30, 2011, the Exchange
filed an immediately effective proposal
that extended the pilot program until
June 1, 2012.9 On May 29, 2012, the
Exchange filed an immediately effective
proposal that extended the pilot
program until December 1, 2012.10 The
5 See
Exchange Rule 1059.
Rule 1059, Commentary .02; See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 63626 (December 30,
2010), 76 FR 812 (January 6, 2011) (SR–Phlx–2010–
185).
7 Prior to the pilot, the $1 cabinet trading
procedures were limited to options classes traded
in $0.05 or $0.10 standard increments. The $1
cabinet trading procedures were not available in
Penny Pilot Program classes because in those
classes, an option series could trade in a standard
increment as low as $0.01 per share (or $1.00 per
option contract with a 100 share multiplier). The
pilot allows trading below $0.01 per share (or $1.00
per option contract with a 100 share multiplier) in
all classes, including those classes participating in
the Penny Pilot Program.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64571
(May 31, 2011), 76 FR 32385 (June 6, 2011) (SR–
Phlx–2011–72).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65852
(November 30, 2011), 76 FR 76212 (December 6,
2011) (SR–Phlx–2011–156).
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67106
(June 4, 2012), 77 FR 34108 (June 8, 2012) (SR–
Phlx–2012–74).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6 Phlx
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:43 Nov 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
Exchange now proposes an extension of
the pilot program to allow additional
time to consider its effects while the
pilot program continues uninterrupted.
The Exchange believes that allowing a
price of at least $0 but less than $1 will
better accommodate the closing of
options positions in series that are
worthless or not actively traded,
particularly due to recent market
conditions which have resulted in a
significant number of series being outof-the-money. For example, a market
participant might have a long position
in a call series with a strike price of
$100 and the underlying stock might
now be trading at $30. In such an
instance, there might not otherwise be a
market for that person to close-out its
position even at the $1 cabinet price
(e.g., the series might be quoted no bid).
The Exchange hereby seeks to extend
the pilot period for such $1 cabinet
trading until June 1, 2013. The
Exchange seeks this extension to allow
the procedures to continue without
interruption.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,11
in general, and with Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,12 in particular, in that the
proposal is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that
allowing for liquidations at a price less
than $1 per option contract pursuant to
the pilot program will better facilitate
the closing of options positions that are
worthless or not actively trading,
especially in Penny Pilot issues where
cabinet trades are not otherwise
permitted. The Exchange believes the
extension is of sufficient length to allow
the Commission to assess the impact of
the Exchange’s authority to allow
transactions to take place in open outcry
at a price of at least $0 but less than $1
per option in accordance with its
attendant obligations and conditions.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 13 and paragraph
(f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder,14 in that
the proposed rule change: (i) Does not
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii) does
not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of
the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest; provided the selfregulatory organization has given the
Commission written notice of its intent
to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the
Commission.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
13 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
15 The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
11 15
U.S.C. 78f.
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
14 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2012 / Notices
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–131 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2012–131. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2012–131 and should be submitted on
or before December 7, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–27869 Filed 11–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:43 Nov 15, 2012
Jkt 229001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68199; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2012–059]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proceedings to
Determine Whether to Approve or
Disapprove Proposed Rule Change To
Establish ‘‘Benchmark Orders’’ Under
NASDAQ Rule 4751(f)
November 9, 2012.
On May 1, 2012, The NASDAQ Stock
Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
establish various ‘‘Benchmark Orders’’
under NASDAQ Rule 4751(f). The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
May 17, 2012.3 On June 26, 2012, the
Commission extended to August 15,
2012, the time period in which to
approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to disapprove the proposed
rule change.4 On August 14, 2012, the
Commission instituted proceedings to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.5
In response to the Order Instituting
Proceedings, the Commission received
two comment letters on the proposed
rule change.6
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 7 provides
that, after initiating proceedings, the
Commission shall issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of the
filing. The Commission may, however,
extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change by up to 60 days if the
Commission determines that a longer
period is appropriate and publishes the
reasons for such determination. In this
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66972
(May 11, 2012), 77 FR 29435 (May 17, 2012)
(‘‘Notice’’).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67258
(June 26, 2012), 77 FR 39314 (July 2, 2012).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67655
(August 14, 2012), 77 FR 50191 (August 20, 2012)
(‘‘Order Instituting Proceedings.’’).
6 See Letters to the Commission from James J.
Angel, dated August 16, 2012; and Theodore R.
Lazo, Managing Director and Associate General
Counsel, SIFMA, dated October 5, 2012.
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68873
case, the proposed rule change was
published for notice and comment in
the Federal Register on May 17, 2012;
November 13, 2012, is 180 days from
that date, and January 12, 2013, is 240
days from that date.
The Commission finds it appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change
so that it has sufficient time to consider
the proposal and the issues that
commenters have raised concerning the
proposal.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8
designates January 12, 2013, as the date
by which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change (File No. SR–NASDAQ–
2012–059).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–27868 Filed 11–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68206; File No. SR–NSX–
2012–18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fee and Rebate Schedule
November 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Exchange Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule
19b-4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby
given that on October 31, 2012 National
Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NSX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend
its Fee and Rebate Schedule (the ‘‘Fee
Schedule’’) issued pursuant to Exchange
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
9 17
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 222 (Friday, November 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68871-68873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27869]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68201; File No. SR-Phlx-2012-131]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend
the Cabinet Trading Pilot Program in Rule 1059
November 9, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 1, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend the Cabinet Trading Pilot program
in Rule 1059. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program in Commentary .02
of Exchange Rule 1059, Accommodation Transactions, which sets forth
specific procedures for engaging in cabinet trades, to allow the
Commission adequate time to consider permanently allowing transactions
to take place on the Exchange in open outcry at a price of at least $0
but less than $1 per option contract.\3\ Prior to the pilot program,
Rule 1059 required that all orders placed in the cabinet were assigned
priority based upon the sequence in which such orders were received by
the specialist. All closing bids and offers would be submitted to the
specialist in writing, and the specialist effected all closing cabinet
transactions by matching such orders placed with him. Bids or offers on
orders to open for the accounts of customer, firm, specialists and ROTs
could be made at $1 per option contract, but such orders could not be
placed in and must yield to all orders in the cabinet. Specialists
effected all cabinet transactions by matching closing purchase or sale
orders which were placed in the cabinet or, provided there was no
matching closing purchase or sale order in the cabinet, by matching a
closing purchase or sale order in the cabinet with an opening purchase
or sale order.\4\ All cabinet transactions were reported to the
Exchange following
[[Page 68872]]
the close of each business day.\5\ Any (i) member, (ii) member
organization, or (iii) other person who was a non-member broker or
dealer and who directly or indirectly controlled, was controlled by, or
was under common control with, a member or member organization (any
such other person being referred to as an affiliated person) could
effect any transaction as principal in the over-the-counter market in
any class of option contracts listed on the Exchange for a premium not
in excess of $1.00 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Cabinet or accommodation trading of option contracts is
intended to accommodate persons wishing to effect closing
transactions in those series of options dealt in on the Exchange for
which there is no auction market.
\4\ Specialists and ROTs are not subject to the requirements of
Rule 1014 in respect of orders placed pursuant to this Rule. Also,
the provisions of Rule 1033(b) and (c), Rule 1034 and Rule 1038 do
not apply to orders placed in the cabinet. Cabinet transactions are
not reported on the ticker.
\5\ See Exchange Rule 1059.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 30, 2010, the Exchange filed an immediately effective
proposal that established the pilot program being extended by this
filing. The pilot program allowed transactions to take place in open
outcry at a price of at least $0 but less than $1 per option contract
until June 1, 2011.\6\ These lower priced transactions are traded
pursuant to the same procedures applicable to $1 cabinet trades, except
that pursuant to the pilot program (i) bids and offers for opening
transactions are only permitted to accommodate closing transactions in
order to limit use of the procedure to liquidations of existing
positions, and (ii) the procedures are also made available for trading
in options participating in the Penny Pilot Program.\7\ On May 31,
2011, the Exchange filed an immediately effective proposal that
extended the pilot program until December 1, 2011 to consider whether
to seek permanent approval of the temporary procedure.\8\ On November
30, 2011, the Exchange filed an immediately effective proposal that
extended the pilot program until June 1, 2012.\9\ On May 29, 2012, the
Exchange filed an immediately effective proposal that extended the
pilot program until December 1, 2012.\10\ The Exchange now proposes an
extension of the pilot program to allow additional time to consider its
effects while the pilot program continues uninterrupted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Phlx Rule 1059, Commentary .02; See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 63626 (December 30, 2010), 76 FR 812 (January 6, 2011)
(SR-Phlx-2010-185).
\7\ Prior to the pilot, the $1 cabinet trading procedures were
limited to options classes traded in $0.05 or $0.10 standard
increments. The $1 cabinet trading procedures were not available in
Penny Pilot Program classes because in those classes, an option
series could trade in a standard increment as low as $0.01 per share
(or $1.00 per option contract with a 100 share multiplier). The
pilot allows trading below $0.01 per share (or $1.00 per option
contract with a 100 share multiplier) in all classes, including
those classes participating in the Penny Pilot Program.
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64571 (May 31,
2011), 76 FR 32385 (June 6, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-72).
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65852 (November 30,
2011), 76 FR 76212 (December 6, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-156).
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67106 (June 4,
2012), 77 FR 34108 (June 8, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-74).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that allowing a price of at least $0 but less
than $1 will better accommodate the closing of options positions in
series that are worthless or not actively traded, particularly due to
recent market conditions which have resulted in a significant number of
series being out-of-the-money. For example, a market participant might
have a long position in a call series with a strike price of $100 and
the underlying stock might now be trading at $30. In such an instance,
there might not otherwise be a market for that person to close-out its
position even at the $1 cabinet price (e.g., the series might be quoted
no bid).
The Exchange hereby seeks to extend the pilot period for such $1
cabinet trading until June 1, 2013. The Exchange seeks this extension
to allow the procedures to continue without interruption.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\11\ in general, and with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, in that the proposal is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically,
the Exchange believes that allowing for liquidations at a price less
than $1 per option contract pursuant to the pilot program will better
facilitate the closing of options positions that are worthless or not
actively trading, especially in Penny Pilot issues where cabinet trades
are not otherwise permitted. The Exchange believes the extension is of
sufficient length to allow the Commission to assess the impact of the
Exchange's authority to allow transactions to take place in open outcry
at a price of at least $0 but less than $1 per option in accordance
with its attendant obligations and conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\14\ in that the proposed rule change: (i) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (iii) does not become operative for 30 days after the date of the
filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest;
provided the self-regulatory organization has given the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\15\ The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[[Page 68873]]
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2012-131 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-131. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2012-131 and should be
submitted on or before December 7, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-27869 Filed 11-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P