Request for Information on the Future Direction of the Rehabilitation Training Program, 66959-66962 [2012-27332]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 217 / Thursday, November 8, 2012 / Notices
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Form for
Maintenance of Effort Waiver Requests
Under the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended.
OMB Control Number: 1810–0693.
Type of Review: Extension of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: State,
Local, or Tribal Governments.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 202.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 5,360
Abstract: Section 9521(a) of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA)
provides that a local educational agency
(LEA) may receive funds under Title I,
Part A and other ESEA covered
programs for any fiscal year only if the
State educational agency (SEA) finds
that either the combined fiscal effort per
student or the aggregate expenditures of
the LEA with respect to the provision of
free public education by the LEA for the
preceding fiscal year was not less than
90 percent of the combined fiscal effort
or aggregate expenditures for the second
preceding fiscal year. This provision is
the maintenance of effort (MOE)
requirement for LEAs under the ESEA.
If an LEA fails to meet the MOE
requirement, under section 9521(b) of
the ESEA, the SEA must reduce the
amount of funds allocated under the
programs covered by the MOE
requirement in any fiscal year in the
exact proportion by which the LEA fails
to maintain effort by falling below 90
percent of either the combined fiscal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Nov 07, 2012
Jkt 229001
effort per student or aggregate
expenditures. In reducing an LEA’s
allocation because it failed to meet the
MOE requirement, the SEA uses the
measure most favorable to the LEA.
Section 9521(c) gives ED the authority
to waive the ESEA’s MOE requirement
for an LEA if it would be equitable to
grant the waiver due to an exceptional
or uncontrollable circumstance such as
a natural disaster or a precipitous
decline in the LEA’s financial resources.
Once an MOE waiver is granted, the
reduction required by section 9521(b)
does not occur for that year. To review
MOE waiver requests, ED relies
primarily on expenditure, revenue, and
other data relevant to an LEA’s request
provided by the SEA. To assist SEAs
with submitting this information, ED
developed an MOE waiver form as part
of the 2009 Title I, Part A Waiver
Guidance, which covered a range of
waivers that ED invited at that time. The
purpose of this collection is to renew
approval for the MOE waiver form. ED
believes that the proposed form, which
is slightly modified from the currently
approved version, will enable an SEA to
provide the information needed in an
efficient manner.
Dated: November 2, 2012.
Darrin A. King,
Director, Information Collection Clearance
Division, Privacy, Information and Records
Management Services, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. 2012–27327 Filed 11–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No: ED–2012–OSERS–0037]
Request for Information on the Future
Direction of the Rehabilitation Training
Program
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The Department is requesting
input to revitalize its training and
technical assistance (TA) activities
funded under the Rehabilitation
Training Program. The Department will
use the information and data gathered in
response to this notice to support the
design and implementation of future
training and TA that is aligned with the
current and future economic trends,
reflects the needs of vocational
rehabilitation (VR) consumers and
ensures that VR counselors are
equipped with new and emerging skills.
The goal of these training and TA
activities is to increase the achievement
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66959
of high-quality integrated employment
for individuals with disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your
submission at or before January 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your response to
this RFI through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
We will not accept submissions by fax
or by email. To ensure that we do not
receive duplicate copies, please submit
your comments only one time. In
addition, please include the Docket ID
and the term ‘‘Future Direction of the
Rehabilitation Training Program’’ at the
top of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov to submit your
comments electronically. Information
on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and
viewing the docket, is available on the
site under ‘‘How To Use This Site.’’
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or
Hand Delivery: If you mail or deliver
your comments, address them to
Roseann Ashby, Office of Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Attention: Future Direction of
Rehabilitation Training Program, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Room 5055, Washington, DC
20202–2800.
Privacy Note: The Department’s
policy for comments received from
members of the public (including
comments submitted by mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery)
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing in their entirety on
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at:
www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to
include in their comments only
information that they wish to make
publicly available on the Internet.
Given the subject matter, some
comments may include proprietary
information as it relates to confidential
commercial information. The Freedom
of Information Act defines ‘‘confidential
commercial information’’ as information
the disclosure of which could
reasonably be expected to cause
substantial competitive harm. You may
wish to request that we not disclose
what you regard as confidential
commercial information.
To assist us in making a
determination on your request, we
encourage you to identify in your
submission any specific information
that you consider confidential
commercial information. Please list the
information by page and paragraph
numbers.
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
66960
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 217 / Thursday, November 8, 2012 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RoseAnn Ashby, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
PCP, Room 5055, Washington, DC
20202–2800. Telephone: (202) 245–
7258.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
The
Rehabilitation Training Program is
authorized by Title III of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
(Rehabilitation Act), and is
administered by the Rehabilitation
Services Administration (RSA) of the
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
Through this Request for Information
(RFI), the Department is seeking input
across four areas:
(1) The preparation of rehabilitation
professionals through the Rehabilitation
Long-Term Training Program.
(2) Methods for disseminating
information to rehabilitation
professionals, including grant-funded
information, promising practices, and
research.
(3) Mechanisms for providing TA and
continuing education (CE) to VR
professionals, State agencies, and other
grantees.
(4) Use of the set-aside under section
21 of the Rehabilitation Act to (a)
improve services to individuals with
disabilities who are members of
minority groups; and (b) conduct
outreach and technical assistance to
minority entities to promote their
participation in activities funded under
the Rehabilitation Act.
We are issuing this RFI solely for
informational and planning purposes.
This notice is not a request for proposals
(RFP) or a promise to issue an RFP or
a notice inviting applications (NIA).
Further, the RFI does not commit the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Department to contract for any supply
or service. At this time, we are not
seeking proposals and will not accept
unsolicited proposals. We will not pay
for any information or administrative
costs a respondent may incur in
responding to this RFI.
If you do not respond to this RFI, you
may still apply for future contracts and
grants. The Department posts RFPs on
the Federal Business Opportunities Web
site: www.fbo.gov. The Department
announces grant competitions in the
Federal Register at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
It is your responsibility to monitor these
sites to determine whether the
Department issues an RFP or NIA after
considering the information received in
response to this RFI.
The documents and information
submitted in response to this RFI
become the property of the U.S.
Government and will not be returned.
Context for Responses
The Department is interested in
responses that contain data, specific
examples, and other relevant
documentation to support the
Department in revitalizing its training
and TA activities. The Department is
not seeking letters of support in each of
the four targeted areas. Rather, it is the
Department’s expectation that
respondents will consider the questions
RSA has developed in the context of
their responses. A response to each
question is not required.
The Department is seeking responses
from a knowledgeable and diverse range
of individuals including but not limited
to the following—
(1) State VR agency staff, including
directors, supervisors, and counselors;
(2) Current or former project directors
or principal investigators of grants
funded under the Rehabilitation
Training Program;
(3) Recipients of TA and CE provided
by a Technical Assistance and
Continuing Education (TACE) Center;
Number of
Grantees
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Specialty area
Rehabilitation Counseling (H129B) ......................................
Rehabilitation Administration (H129C) .................................
Rehabilitation Technology (H129E) .....................................
Vocational Evaluation (H129F) ............................................
Rehabilitation of Individuals with Mental Illnesses (H129H)
Rehabilitation Psychology (H129J) ......................................
Undergraduate Education in Rehabilitation (H129L) ...........
Rehabilitation of Individuals Who Are Blind or Who Have
Low Vision (H129P) .........................................................
Rehabilitation of Individuals Who Are Deaf or Hard of
Hearing (H129Q) ..............................................................
Job Placement and Job Development (H129R) ..................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Nov 07, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Number of
Cert. programs
(4) Users of materials posted on the
Web site currently maintained by the
National Clearinghouse of
Rehabilitation Training Materials
(NCRTM);
(5) Contributors of materials posted
on the Web site currently maintained by
NCRTM;
(6) Current and former scholars
funded under the Rehabilitation LongTerm Training Program;
(7) Recipients of TA currently
provided under grants funded by the
set-aside under section 21 of the
Rehabilitation Act; and
(8) Consumers.
I. Rehabilitation Long-Term Training
Program
The Rehabilitation Long-Term
Training Program supports academic
training grants awarded to colleges and
universities with undergraduate and
graduate programs in the field of
rehabilitation. Grantees must direct 75
percent of the funds they receive to
trainee scholarships. The Rehabilitation
Act requires trainees who receive
assistance either (1) to work two years
in public or private nonprofit
rehabilitation or related agencies for
every year of assistance, or (2) to pay
back the assistance they received.
Grantees must build close
relationships with State VR agencies,
promote careers in VR, identify
potential employers who would meet
the trainees’ payback requirements, and
ensure that data on the employment of
students are accurate.
The Department currently funds 153
grants under the long-term training
program. These grants support
bachelors’, masters’, and doctoral
programs, as well as certificate
programs. Some grants support more
than one degree. The breakdown of the
degree programs offered by the 153
grants follows:
Number of
Bachelors’
programs
Number of
Masters’
programs
Number of
Doctoral
programs
81
1
4
7
10
2
5
1
0
1
1
0
0
5
74
0
3
6
10
1
0
12
0
1
0
3
1
0
15
9
1
14
0
7
9
Fmt 4703
2
1
3
0
1
1
0
3
2
0
0
7
7
0
0
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
66961
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 217 / Thursday, November 8, 2012 / Notices
Number of
Grantees
Specialty area
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Grants to Assist VR Agency Staff to Meet Comprehensive
System of Personnel Development (CSPD) Requirements (H129W) ................................................................
Current data indicate that only about
80 percent of the individuals who are
provided scholarships under these
programs and who graduate with
masters’ degrees obtain employment
that qualifies to repay their service
obligation, and slightly fewer than 50
percent of these individuals obtain
employment in State VR agencies.
The following questions examine the
Department’s pre-service programs that
prepare rehabilitation professionals.
Responses will assist the Department in
designing funding priorities for grants
funded under the Rehabilitation LongTerm Training Program that—
(1) Reflect current knowledge and
skills needed by rehabilitation
professionals;
(2) Effectively link the employment
needs of individuals with disabilities
with current workforce demands;
(3) Demonstrate cost-effective
practices; and
(4) Address personnel shortages in the
field of rehabilitation counseling.
1.1. In your State or local area, what
are the current and projected
employment opportunities in the field
of rehabilitation counseling and related
specialty areas, and what are the degree
requirements for these employment
opportunities (e.g., bachelor’s, master’s,
or doctoral)?
1.2. What are your recommendations
for adding new specialty areas to the list
of eleven specialty areas the Department
currently funds, eliminating some
specialty areas, or combining two or
more specialty areas?
1.3. Should the Department continue
to fund bachelor’s-level programs, and,
if so, in what specialty areas?
1.4. Should the Department continue
to fund doctoral programs, and, if so, in
what specialty areas?
1.5. Currently, the Department
supports certificate programs (e.g., a
certificate in vocational evaluation and
work adjustment, a certificate in
rehabilitation counseling for the deaf,
and a certificate in psychiatric
vocational rehabilitation). What
certificate programs, if any, should the
Department fund? Should the
Department support a stand-alone
certificate program, or should the
Department support a certificate
program only when it is incorporated
into a degree program?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Nov 07, 2012
Jkt 229001
Number of
Cert. programs
11
5
1.6. How do rehabilitation counseling
degree programs ensure that they are
adequately preparing rehabilitation
counselors to meet skill demands now
and in the future?
1.7. How do universities ensure that
programs to support employed State VR
agency staff remain current and effective
in meeting State VR agency’s CSPD
requirements?
1.8. In recent years a number of
rehabilitation counseling programs have
closed. What could the Department do
to support the continuation of viable
programs? For example, should the
Department fund a model for training
rehabilitation counselors that involves
collaboration among several universities
across one or more geographic areas?
1.9. How can the Department increase
the percentage of students (a) who
complete a rehabilitation counseling
program, (b) who obtain qualifying
employment after completing the
program, and (c) who obtain
employment in State VR agencies?
1.10. Currently the Department
provides universities with grants of
$150,000 annually for rehabilitation
counseling programs and grants of
$100,000 annually for the other
specialty areas. At least 75 percent of
these grant funds are to be used for
scholarships. Are these funding levels
appropriate?
1.11. Universities vary in the amount
of scholarship funds they provide. Some
cover all or part of tuition and fees,
others also cover books, and still others
provide stipends for living expenses.
What expenses should these
scholarships cover? Should universities
award more substantial scholarships to
fewer scholars rather than varied
amounts to a number of scholars?
Would this approach increase overall
outcomes in terms of successful
completion of the rehabilitation
counseling program and in obtaining
employment that qualifies to repay the
students’ service obligations?
1.12. What do you anticipate will be
the cost to fund tuition and stipends for
a scholar in the next 5 to 10 years?
Based on this cost, approximately how
many scholars could be adequately
served with a $750,000 grant (i.e.,
$150,000 each year for five years)?
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
Bachelors’
programs
Number of
Masters’
programs
0
11
Number of
Doctoral
programs
0
II. Dissemination
The Department funds the National
Clearinghouse of Rehabilitation
Training Materials (NCRTM) at
$300,000 annually. The NCRTM is a
central repository for information and
training materials to assist in the preservice and in-service training of
rehabilitation professionals. The
NCRTM also responds to inquiries from
researchers, Federal and State agencies,
and individuals with disabilities and
their families. The NCRTM reported
66,607 visits to its Web site in FY 2011,
and 6,558 documents downloaded. The
NCRTM also arranges for webinars at
the request of RSA.
The Department is seeking
information about the need for and use
of a centralized repository of
rehabilitation training materials, as well
as information on how a national
clearinghouse can be used to benefit
rehabilitation professionals, particularly
those working in State VR agencies and
in community rehabilitation programs.
The following questions are designed to
support respondents in thinking about
what technology and information is
necessary for a state-of-the-art
centralized repository of rehabilitation
training materials:
2.1. Should RSA continue to fund a
centralized repository of rehabilitation
training materials?
2.2. How have you used materials
available on the NCRTM Web site? Did
you customize these materials for your
own use? Did these materials support
your work as a grantee, as a professional
in the field of rehabilitation counseling,
as a student, etc.?
2.3. If you have not used materials
available on the NCRTM Web site, why
not? Were you unaware of the Web site?
Did you access the Web site and find the
materials and information there limited,
unhelpful, or of low quality?
2.4. What rehabilitation training
materials currently missing from the
NCRTM site would be beneficial to
grantees, students, counselors,
employers, job seekers, etc.?
2.5. How can the dissemination of
rehabilitation training materials be
improved?
2.6. What new functions could a
national clearinghouse provide to meet
your needs?
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
66962
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 217 / Thursday, November 8, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2.7. What new technologies might be
used to disseminate information to
rehabilitation professionals to keep their
skills current?
III. Technical Assistance and
Continuing Education
The Department currently funds 10
regional TACE Centers, each at just
under $800,000 annually, to provide TA
and CE to State VR agencies and their
partners. The Department also supports
a National Technical Assistance Project
to provide TA on topics of national
scope through a variety of methods,
including conferences and webinars.
This one-time, two-year grant was
awarded in FY 2010 for $800,000. The
following questions are designed to
obtain information and feedback that
reflects future delivery and coordination
of TA and CE that will directly result in
high-quality employment outcomes for
individuals with disabilities.
3.1. How do providers and recipients
of TA and CE assess TA and CE needs,
and how can the needs assessment
process be improved?
3.2. What are the most important TA
needs for State VR agencies and other
grantees, and what are the most effective
and efficient ways for TA to be
delivered?
3.3. What are the most critical CE
needs of State VR agencies and other
grantees, and what are the effective and
efficient ways to provide CE?
3.4. Are current Federal funding
levels for addressing TA needs and
delivering CE adequate?
3.5. What is the best structure for
delivering TA and CE (e.g., a system
comprised of centers providing TA on
topical areas such as program
management or quality assurance, a
system of regional TA Centers, or a
combination of these or other
structures)?
3.6. How can national collaboration
among all TA and CE providers be
improved so that the resources devoted
to TA and CE are efficiently and
effectively used?
3.7. How should disability and
employment research and evaluation on
promising and evidenced-based
practices be incorporated into TA and
CE?
3.8. What outcomes should we expect
from a TA and CE delivery system, and
what performance measures can
effectively measure these outcomes?
IV. Use of Section 21 Set-Aside
Research indicates that individuals
with disabilities who are members of
minority groups are less likely to access
VR services and achieve employment
outcomes at lower rates than other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Nov 07, 2012
Jkt 229001
individuals with disabilities. Funds
made available under section 21 of the
Rehabilitation Act are intended to
improve services and outcomes for
individuals with disabilities who are
members of minority groups. The statute
requires that the Department set aside
for this purpose one percent of all funds
appropriated for programs authorized
under each of Titles II, III, VI, and VII.
In fiscal year 2012 RSA set aside
approximately $2.1 million for grants
funded under section 21.
Currently the Department provides
section 21 funds to four minority
institutions of higher education to
develop rehabilitation training programs
for individuals wishing to enter the field
of rehabilitation counseling. In addition,
the Department funds five grants to
provide outreach, capacity building, TA,
and training to minority entities that are
seeking grants under the Rehabilitation
Act, including grant-writing workshops
and training on disability legislation.
Under the Act, the term minority entity
means an entity that is a historically
black college or university, a Hispanicserving institution of higher education,
an American Indian Tribal college or
university, or another institution of
higher education whose minority
student enrollment is at least 50
percent. Respondents may use the
questions below to guide their input on
how to use the section 21 funds most
effectively to improve services and
outcomes for individuals with
disabilities who are members of
minority groups.
4.1. Is the current use of section 21
funds effective in improving services to
and outcomes for individuals with
disabilities who are members of
minority groups, and if so, what specific
activities or strategies currently funded
by section 21 have been most effective?
4.2. What activities and strategies
currently funded under section 21 are
least effective in improving services to
and outcomes for individuals with
disabilities who are members of
minority groups?
4.3. In what new ways should the
Department use section 21 funds to
improve outcomes for individuals with
disabilities being served by State VR
agencies who are members of minority
groups? Are there new or emerging TA
or training needs that should be
addressed?
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Electronic Access to This Document
The official version of this document
is the document published in the
Federal Register. Free Internet access to
the official edition of the Federal
Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available via the Federal
Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
At this site you can view this document,
as well as all other documents of this
Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,
which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6771.
Dated: November 5, 2012.
Michael Yudin,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2012–27332 Filed 11–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Nevada
Department of Energy.
Notice of Open Meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice announces a
meeting of the Environmental
Management Site-Specific Advisory
Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public
notice of this meeting be announced in
the Federal Register.
DATES: Wednesday, November 28, 2012,
5:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: National Atomic Testing
Museum, 755 E. Flamingo Road, Las
Vegas, Nevada 89119.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Ulmer, Board Administrator,
232 Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las
Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 630–
0522; Fax (702) 295–5300 or Email:
NSSAB@nv.doe.gov.
SUMMARY:
Purpose of
the Board: The purpose of the Board is
to make recommendations to DOE–EM
and site management in the areas of
environmental restoration, waste
management, and related activities.
Tentative Agenda:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 217 (Thursday, November 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66959-66962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27332]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No: ED-2012-OSERS-0037]
Request for Information on the Future Direction of the
Rehabilitation Training Program
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department is requesting input to revitalize its training
and technical assistance (TA) activities funded under the
Rehabilitation Training Program. The Department will use the
information and data gathered in response to this notice to support the
design and implementation of future training and TA that is aligned
with the current and future economic trends, reflects the needs of
vocational rehabilitation (VR) consumers and ensures that VR counselors
are equipped with new and emerging skills. The goal of these training
and TA activities is to increase the achievement of high-quality
integrated employment for individuals with disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your submission at or before January 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your response to this RFI through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand
delivery. We will not accept submissions by fax or by email. To ensure
that we do not receive duplicate copies, please submit your comments
only one time. In addition, please include the Docket ID and the term
``Future Direction of the Rehabilitation Training Program'' at the top
of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov to submit
your comments electronically. Information on using Regulations.gov,
including instructions for accessing agency documents, submitting
comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site under ``How
To Use This Site.''
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery: If you mail or
deliver your comments, address them to Roseann Ashby, Office of Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services, Attention: Future Direction of
Rehabilitation Training Program, U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW., Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Room 5055, Washington,
DC 20202-2800.
Privacy Note: The Department's policy for comments received from
members of the public (including comments submitted by mail, commercial
delivery, or hand delivery) is to make these submissions available for
public viewing in their entirety on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at:
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters should be careful to include
in their comments only information that they wish to make publicly
available on the Internet.
Given the subject matter, some comments may include proprietary
information as it relates to confidential commercial information. The
Freedom of Information Act defines ``confidential commercial
information'' as information the disclosure of which could reasonably
be expected to cause substantial competitive harm. You may wish to
request that we not disclose what you regard as confidential commercial
information.
To assist us in making a determination on your request, we
encourage you to identify in your submission any specific information
that you consider confidential commercial information. Please list the
information by page and paragraph numbers.
[[Page 66960]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RoseAnn Ashby, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., PCP, Room 5055, Washington, DC
20202-2800. Telephone: (202) 245-7258.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Rehabilitation Training Program is
authorized by Title III of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
(Rehabilitation Act), and is administered by the Rehabilitation
Services Administration (RSA) of the Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
Through this Request for Information (RFI), the Department is
seeking input across four areas:
(1) The preparation of rehabilitation professionals through the
Rehabilitation Long-Term Training Program.
(2) Methods for disseminating information to rehabilitation
professionals, including grant-funded information, promising practices,
and research.
(3) Mechanisms for providing TA and continuing education (CE) to VR
professionals, State agencies, and other grantees.
(4) Use of the set-aside under section 21 of the Rehabilitation Act
to (a) improve services to individuals with disabilities who are
members of minority groups; and (b) conduct outreach and technical
assistance to minority entities to promote their participation in
activities funded under the Rehabilitation Act.
We are issuing this RFI solely for informational and planning
purposes. This notice is not a request for proposals (RFP) or a promise
to issue an RFP or a notice inviting applications (NIA). Further, the
RFI does not commit the Department to contract for any supply or
service. At this time, we are not seeking proposals and will not accept
unsolicited proposals. We will not pay for any information or
administrative costs a respondent may incur in responding to this RFI.
If you do not respond to this RFI, you may still apply for future
contracts and grants. The Department posts RFPs on the Federal Business
Opportunities Web site: www.fbo.gov. The Department announces grant
competitions in the Federal Register at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. It is your
responsibility to monitor these sites to determine whether the
Department issues an RFP or NIA after considering the information
received in response to this RFI.
The documents and information submitted in response to this RFI
become the property of the U.S. Government and will not be returned.
Context for Responses
The Department is interested in responses that contain data,
specific examples, and other relevant documentation to support the
Department in revitalizing its training and TA activities. The
Department is not seeking letters of support in each of the four
targeted areas. Rather, it is the Department's expectation that
respondents will consider the questions RSA has developed in the
context of their responses. A response to each question is not
required.
The Department is seeking responses from a knowledgeable and
diverse range of individuals including but not limited to the
following--
(1) State VR agency staff, including directors, supervisors, and
counselors;
(2) Current or former project directors or principal investigators
of grants funded under the Rehabilitation Training Program;
(3) Recipients of TA and CE provided by a Technical Assistance and
Continuing Education (TACE) Center;
(4) Users of materials posted on the Web site currently maintained
by the National Clearinghouse of Rehabilitation Training Materials
(NCRTM);
(5) Contributors of materials posted on the Web site currently
maintained by NCRTM;
(6) Current and former scholars funded under the Rehabilitation
Long-Term Training Program;
(7) Recipients of TA currently provided under grants funded by the
set-aside under section 21 of the Rehabilitation Act; and
(8) Consumers.
I. Rehabilitation Long-Term Training Program
The Rehabilitation Long-Term Training Program supports academic
training grants awarded to colleges and universities with undergraduate
and graduate programs in the field of rehabilitation. Grantees must
direct 75 percent of the funds they receive to trainee scholarships.
The Rehabilitation Act requires trainees who receive assistance either
(1) to work two years in public or private nonprofit rehabilitation or
related agencies for every year of assistance, or (2) to pay back the
assistance they received.
Grantees must build close relationships with State VR agencies,
promote careers in VR, identify potential employers who would meet the
trainees' payback requirements, and ensure that data on the employment
of students are accurate.
The Department currently funds 153 grants under the long-term
training program. These grants support bachelors', masters', and
doctoral programs, as well as certificate programs. Some grants support
more than one degree. The breakdown of the degree programs offered by
the 153 grants follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Number of Number of
Specialty area Number of Number of Bachelors' Masters' Doctoral
Grantees Cert. programs programs programs programs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rehabilitation Counseling 81 2 1 74 12
(H129B)........................
Rehabilitation Administration 1 1 0 0 0
(H129C)........................
Rehabilitation Technology 4 3 1 3 1
(H129E)........................
Vocational Evaluation (H129F)... 7 0 1 6 0
Rehabilitation of Individuals 10 1 0 10 3
with Mental Illnesses (H129H)..
Rehabilitation Psychology 2 1 0 1 1
(H129J)........................
Undergraduate Education in 5 0 5 0 0
Rehabilitation (H129L).........
Rehabilitation of Individuals 15 9 1 14 0
Who Are Blind or Who Have Low
Vision (H129P).................
Rehabilitation of Individuals 7 3 0 7 0
Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
(H129Q)........................
Job Placement and Job 9 2 0 7 0
Development (H129R)............
[[Page 66961]]
Grants to Assist VR Agency Staff 11 5 0 11 0
to Meet Comprehensive System of
Personnel Development (CSPD)
Requirements (H129W)...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current data indicate that only about 80 percent of the individuals
who are provided scholarships under these programs and who graduate
with masters' degrees obtain employment that qualifies to repay their
service obligation, and slightly fewer than 50 percent of these
individuals obtain employment in State VR agencies.
The following questions examine the Department's pre-service
programs that prepare rehabilitation professionals. Responses will
assist the Department in designing funding priorities for grants funded
under the Rehabilitation Long-Term Training Program that--
(1) Reflect current knowledge and skills needed by rehabilitation
professionals;
(2) Effectively link the employment needs of individuals with
disabilities with current workforce demands;
(3) Demonstrate cost-effective practices; and
(4) Address personnel shortages in the field of rehabilitation
counseling.
1.1. In your State or local area, what are the current and
projected employment opportunities in the field of rehabilitation
counseling and related specialty areas, and what are the degree
requirements for these employment opportunities (e.g., bachelor's,
master's, or doctoral)?
1.2. What are your recommendations for adding new specialty areas
to the list of eleven specialty areas the Department currently funds,
eliminating some specialty areas, or combining two or more specialty
areas?
1.3. Should the Department continue to fund bachelor's-level
programs, and, if so, in what specialty areas?
1.4. Should the Department continue to fund doctoral programs, and,
if so, in what specialty areas?
1.5. Currently, the Department supports certificate programs (e.g.,
a certificate in vocational evaluation and work adjustment, a
certificate in rehabilitation counseling for the deaf, and a
certificate in psychiatric vocational rehabilitation). What certificate
programs, if any, should the Department fund? Should the Department
support a stand-alone certificate program, or should the Department
support a certificate program only when it is incorporated into a
degree program?
1.6. How do rehabilitation counseling degree programs ensure that
they are adequately preparing rehabilitation counselors to meet skill
demands now and in the future?
1.7. How do universities ensure that programs to support employed
State VR agency staff remain current and effective in meeting State VR
agency's CSPD requirements?
1.8. In recent years a number of rehabilitation counseling programs
have closed. What could the Department do to support the continuation
of viable programs? For example, should the Department fund a model for
training rehabilitation counselors that involves collaboration among
several universities across one or more geographic areas?
1.9. How can the Department increase the percentage of students (a)
who complete a rehabilitation counseling program, (b) who obtain
qualifying employment after completing the program, and (c) who obtain
employment in State VR agencies?
1.10. Currently the Department provides universities with grants of
$150,000 annually for rehabilitation counseling programs and grants of
$100,000 annually for the other specialty areas. At least 75 percent of
these grant funds are to be used for scholarships. Are these funding
levels appropriate?
1.11. Universities vary in the amount of scholarship funds they
provide. Some cover all or part of tuition and fees, others also cover
books, and still others provide stipends for living expenses. What
expenses should these scholarships cover? Should universities award
more substantial scholarships to fewer scholars rather than varied
amounts to a number of scholars? Would this approach increase overall
outcomes in terms of successful completion of the rehabilitation
counseling program and in obtaining employment that qualifies to repay
the students' service obligations?
1.12. What do you anticipate will be the cost to fund tuition and
stipends for a scholar in the next 5 to 10 years? Based on this cost,
approximately how many scholars could be adequately served with a
$750,000 grant (i.e., $150,000 each year for five years)?
II. Dissemination
The Department funds the National Clearinghouse of Rehabilitation
Training Materials (NCRTM) at $300,000 annually. The NCRTM is a central
repository for information and training materials to assist in the pre-
service and in-service training of rehabilitation professionals. The
NCRTM also responds to inquiries from researchers, Federal and State
agencies, and individuals with disabilities and their families. The
NCRTM reported 66,607 visits to its Web site in FY 2011, and 6,558
documents downloaded. The NCRTM also arranges for webinars at the
request of RSA.
The Department is seeking information about the need for and use of
a centralized repository of rehabilitation training materials, as well
as information on how a national clearinghouse can be used to benefit
rehabilitation professionals, particularly those working in State VR
agencies and in community rehabilitation programs. The following
questions are designed to support respondents in thinking about what
technology and information is necessary for a state-of-the-art
centralized repository of rehabilitation training materials:
2.1. Should RSA continue to fund a centralized repository of
rehabilitation training materials?
2.2. How have you used materials available on the NCRTM Web site?
Did you customize these materials for your own use? Did these materials
support your work as a grantee, as a professional in the field of
rehabilitation counseling, as a student, etc.?
2.3. If you have not used materials available on the NCRTM Web
site, why not? Were you unaware of the Web site? Did you access the Web
site and find the materials and information there limited, unhelpful,
or of low quality?
2.4. What rehabilitation training materials currently missing from
the NCRTM site would be beneficial to grantees, students, counselors,
employers, job seekers, etc.?
2.5. How can the dissemination of rehabilitation training materials
be improved?
2.6. What new functions could a national clearinghouse provide to
meet your needs?
[[Page 66962]]
2.7. What new technologies might be used to disseminate information
to rehabilitation professionals to keep their skills current?
III. Technical Assistance and Continuing Education
The Department currently funds 10 regional TACE Centers, each at
just under $800,000 annually, to provide TA and CE to State VR agencies
and their partners. The Department also supports a National Technical
Assistance Project to provide TA on topics of national scope through a
variety of methods, including conferences and webinars. This one-time,
two-year grant was awarded in FY 2010 for $800,000. The following
questions are designed to obtain information and feedback that reflects
future delivery and coordination of TA and CE that will directly result
in high-quality employment outcomes for individuals with disabilities.
3.1. How do providers and recipients of TA and CE assess TA and CE
needs, and how can the needs assessment process be improved?
3.2. What are the most important TA needs for State VR agencies and
other grantees, and what are the most effective and efficient ways for
TA to be delivered?
3.3. What are the most critical CE needs of State VR agencies and
other grantees, and what are the effective and efficient ways to
provide CE?
3.4. Are current Federal funding levels for addressing TA needs and
delivering CE adequate?
3.5. What is the best structure for delivering TA and CE (e.g., a
system comprised of centers providing TA on topical areas such as
program management or quality assurance, a system of regional TA
Centers, or a combination of these or other structures)?
3.6. How can national collaboration among all TA and CE providers
be improved so that the resources devoted to TA and CE are efficiently
and effectively used?
3.7. How should disability and employment research and evaluation
on promising and evidenced-based practices be incorporated into TA and
CE?
3.8. What outcomes should we expect from a TA and CE delivery
system, and what performance measures can effectively measure these
outcomes?
IV. Use of Section 21 Set-Aside
Research indicates that individuals with disabilities who are
members of minority groups are less likely to access VR services and
achieve employment outcomes at lower rates than other individuals with
disabilities. Funds made available under section 21 of the
Rehabilitation Act are intended to improve services and outcomes for
individuals with disabilities who are members of minority groups. The
statute requires that the Department set aside for this purpose one
percent of all funds appropriated for programs authorized under each of
Titles II, III, VI, and VII. In fiscal year 2012 RSA set aside
approximately $2.1 million for grants funded under section 21.
Currently the Department provides section 21 funds to four minority
institutions of higher education to develop rehabilitation training
programs for individuals wishing to enter the field of rehabilitation
counseling. In addition, the Department funds five grants to provide
outreach, capacity building, TA, and training to minority entities that
are seeking grants under the Rehabilitation Act, including grant-
writing workshops and training on disability legislation. Under the
Act, the term minority entity means an entity that is a historically
black college or university, a Hispanic-serving institution of higher
education, an American Indian Tribal college or university, or another
institution of higher education whose minority student enrollment is at
least 50 percent. Respondents may use the questions below to guide
their input on how to use the section 21 funds most effectively to
improve services and outcomes for individuals with disabilities who are
members of minority groups.
4.1. Is the current use of section 21 funds effective in improving
services to and outcomes for individuals with disabilities who are
members of minority groups, and if so, what specific activities or
strategies currently funded by section 21 have been most effective?
4.2. What activities and strategies currently funded under section
21 are least effective in improving services to and outcomes for
individuals with disabilities who are members of minority groups?
4.3. In what new ways should the Department use section 21 funds to
improve outcomes for individuals with disabilities being served by
State VR agencies who are members of minority groups? Are there new or
emerging TA or training needs that should be addressed?
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document
The official version of this document is the document published in
the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of
the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available
via the Federal Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all other documents of this
Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,
which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6771.
Dated: November 5, 2012.
Michael Yudin,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-27332 Filed 11-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P