Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Relating to the Margining of Segregated Futures Customer Accounts on a Gross Basis, 67036-67037 [2012-27293]
Download as PDF
67036
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 217 / Thursday, November 8, 2012 / Notices
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal offices of
NYSE. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2012–59, and
should be submitted on or before
November 29, 2012.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–27291 Filed 11–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68148; File No. SR–OCC–
2012–17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto,
Relating to the Margining of
Segregated Futures Customer
Accounts on a Gross Basis
November 2, 2012.
I. Introduction
On September 14, 2012, The Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change SR–OCC–2012–17
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder.2 The proposed rule change
was published in the Federal Register
on September 26, 2012.3 On October 11,
2012, OCC filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change.4 The
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 ‘‘Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Margining of Segregated Futures
Customer Accounts on a Gross Basis,’’ Release No.
34–67896 (September 20, 2012), 77 FR 59231
(September 26, 2012).
4 In Amendment No. 1, OCC proposed wording
changes and responded to a CFTC interpretation
concerning what constitutes initial margin.
Specifically, it amended the text of Rule 601 by
inserting the word ‘‘initial’’ before the word
‘‘margin,’’ to more closely parallel CFTC Rule
39.13(g)(8)(i)4 which references ‘‘initial margin.’’ It
also amended Item 3 of Form 19b–4 to, first,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Nov 07, 2012
Jkt 229001
Commission did not receive any
comments on this proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change.5
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to provide for the calculation
of initial margin for OCC segregated
futures customer accounts on a gross
basis, as required by CFTC Rule
39.13(g)(8)(i).6
The CFTC’s Customer Gross Margin
Rule
On October 18, 2011, the CFTC issued
final regulations implementing many of
the new statutory core principles for
CFTC-registered derivatives clearing
organizations (‘‘DCOs’’) enacted under
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the ‘‘DoddFrank Act’’). As a registered DCO (as
well as a registered securities clearing
agency), OCC has previously
implemented rule changes designed to
bring OCC into compliance with CFTC
rules applicable to DCOs that went into
effect on January 9, 2012 7 and May 7,
2012.8 OCC believes it is necessary to
amend its Rules in order to ensure
compliance with the gross margin rule,
which requires a DCO to ‘‘collect initial
margin on a gross basis for each clearing
member’s customer account(s) equal to
the sum of the initial margin amounts
that would be required by the
derivatives clearing organization for
each individual customer within that
account if each individual customer
were a clearing member’’ 9 as required
by CFTC Rule 39.13(g)(8)(i). The gross
margin rule goes into effect on
November 8, 2012; however, OCC
proposed to begin complying with the
gross margin rule on November 5, 2012
as described herein.
OCC’s System for Calculating Margin
OCC currently calculates margin
requirements for each clearing member’s
include CFTC’s definition of ‘‘initial margin’’ and
second, to clarify which components of OCC’s
margin calculations meets the definition of ‘‘initial
margin’’ as the term is defined under CFTC Rules.
Amendment No. 1 is technical in nature, and
therefore the Commission is not publishing
Amendment No. 1 for public comment.
5 OCC also filed an advanced notice relating to
these proposed changes. The advance notice was
published on October 1, 2012. ‘‘Advance Notice
Relating to the Margining of Segregated Futures
Customer Accounts on a Gross Bases,’’ Release No.
34–67921 (September 25, 2012), 77 FR 59998
(October 1, 2012). The Commission did not receive
any comments on this publication.
6 17 CFR 39.13(g)(8)(i).
7 See SR–OCC–2011–18.
8 See SR–OCC–2012–06.
9 Derivatives Clearing Organization General
Provisions and Core Principles, 76 FR 69334, 69439
(November 8, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
segregated futures customer account
held at OCC on a net basis by applying
OCC’s System for Theoretical Analysis
and Numerical Simulations (‘‘STANS’’).
STANS calculates initial margin with
respect to each account of a clearing
member, including each clearing
member’s futures customer account(s),
on a net basis. STANS includes both a
net asset value (‘‘NAV’’) component and
a risk component, with the risk
component being the equivalent of
‘‘initial margin’’ as that term is defined
under CFTC Rules. The NAV
component marks all positions to
market and nets long and short
positions to determine the NAV of each
clearing member’s portfolio of customer
positions. The NAV component
represents the cost to liquidate the
portfolio at current prices by selling the
net long positions and buying in the net
short positions. The risk component is
estimated by means of an expected
shortfall risk measure obtained from
‘‘Monte Carlo’’ simulations designed to
measure the additional asset value
required in any portfolio to eliminate an
unacceptable level of risk that the
portfolio would liquidate to a deficit.
OCC presently lacks sufficient
information about individual customer
positions to calculate initial margin at
the level of each individual customer.
However, OCC has been coordinating
with other DCOs to establish an
industry-wide mechanism for
complying with the customer gross
margin rule. Pursuant to this new
system, each DCO’s clearing members
will submit data files to the DCO
identifying positions by numerical
customer identifiers.10 OCC will use this
information to calculate initial margins,
using STANS, for each customer
identifier of a clearing member and to
aggregate those initial margin
calculations to determine the total
futures customer margin requirement for
the clearing member’s segregated futures
customer account(s) held at OCC.11 OCC
10 The position data provided to OCC by clearing
members will not include (a) information with
respect to the allocation of margin assets to
particular customers, nor (b) information with
respect to settlement obligations arising from the
exercise, assignment or maturity of cleared
contracts. For this reason, OCC will treat all margin
assets and settlement obligations for each account
to which the gross margin rule applies as being in
sub-accounts of the Clearing Member. OCC will
calculate margin, using STANS, separately for each
sub-account and will aggregate the calculated
margin requirements at the level of the clearing
member’s segregated futures customer account to
which the sub-accounts relate.
11 OCC currently carries the following account
types that are segregated pursuant to Section 4d of
the Commodity Exchange Act: Segregated Futures
Accounts, Segregated Futures Professional
Accounts, non-Proprietary X–M accounts, and
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 217 / Thursday, November 8, 2012 / Notices
will then compare the aggregate
positions reported by each clearing
member with its own records and make
any needed adjustments to the initial
margin calculation to ensure all
positions on OCC’s books are properly
margined.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed By-Law and Rule Changes
The proposed changes to OCC’s Rules
provide for the calculation of initial
margin for segregated futures customer
accounts on a gross basis and mandate
submission of the clearing member data
files necessary to allow OCC to calculate
initial margin at the level of each futures
customer. In the event that the data
included in these data files is
incomplete (for example, if OCC shows
positions held in a clearing member’s
segregated futures accounts, but those
positions are not reflected in the data
file), OCC will create a separate subaccount to be used for initial margin
calculation purposes only. Positions
recorded on OCC’s books and records,
but not reflected in the data file, will be
attributed to this sub-account and an
initial margin amount will be calculated
for the sub-account. This initial margin
amount will be added to a clearing
member’s initial margin requirement.
OCC has determined to adopt this
approach to dealing with discrepancies
between its own records and clearing
member data files in order to ensure that
OCC does not collect an inadequate
amount of initial margin from clearing
members.
III. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
Change
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Exchange
Act 12 directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a
self-regulatory organization if it finds
that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to
such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Exchange Act 13 requires that the
rules of the clearing agency, among
other things, are designed to promote
the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions,
and, to the extent applicable, derivative
agreements, contracts, and transactions.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of Section 17A of the
Exchange Act 14 because it is designed
to permit OCC to perform clearing
services for products that are subject to
the jurisdiction of the CFTC without
adversely affecting OCC’s obligations
with respect to the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions or the protection of
securities investors and the public
interest.
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and in particular with the
requirements of Section 17A of the
Act 15 and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,16 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
OCC–2012–17) be and hereby is
approved 17 as of the date of this order
or the date of the ‘‘Notice of No
Objection to Advance Notice Filing, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto,
Relating to the Margining of Segregated
Futures Customer Accounts on a Gross
Basis’’ (File No. SR–2012–17),
whichever is later.
The purpose of the filing is to amend
Rule 53.24 (Quote Maintenance) of the
CBOE Stock Exchange, LLC (‘‘CBSX’’) to
delete references to the automatic quote
regeneration and quote risk monitor
functions. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (https://www.cboe.org/legal), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–27293 Filed 11–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Nov 07, 2012
Jkt 229001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–68144; File No. SR–CBOE–
2012–103]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change to CBSX Rule 53.24
November 2, 2012.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
25, 2012, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
15 15
U.S.C. 78q–1.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
17 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
16 15
internal non-proprietary cross-margining accounts.
All such accounts would be margined on a gross
basis under the proposed amendments to OCC Rule
601.
12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
13 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
14 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
67037
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The purpose of the filing is to
eliminate Rule 53.24(b) (Automatic
Quote Regeneration) and Rule 53.24(c)
(Quote Risk Monitor Function) from
CBOE Stock Exchange, LLC’s (‘‘CBSX’’)
Rule 53.24 (Quote Maintenance).
Pursuant to Rule 53.24(b), once the
CBSX system is so enabled, a CBSX
Remote Market-Maker may have the
CBSX system automatically regenerate
its quote when its bid or offer is filled.
Pursuant to Rule 53.24(c), the CBSX
system may provide a CBSX MarketMaker the opportunity to establish a
share volume limit for a specific
security for a specific period of time. In
the event that trades against a CBSX
Market-Maker’s quotes exceed the
established volume limit, the CBSX
System will cancel that Market-Maker’s
remaining quotes for that security. To
date, neither the automatic quote
regeneration nor the quote risk monitor
function has been made available or
been used. The Exchange also has no
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 217 (Thursday, November 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67036-67037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27293]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68148; File No. SR-OCC-2012-17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1
Thereto, Relating to the Margining of Segregated Futures Customer
Accounts on a Gross Basis
November 2, 2012.
I. Introduction
On September 14, 2012, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a
proposed rule change SR-OCC-2012-17 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published in the Federal
Register on September 26, 2012.\3\ On October 11, 2012, OCC filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission did not
receive any comments on this proposal. This order approves the proposed
rule change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ ``Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Margining of Segregated Futures Customer Accounts on a Gross
Basis,'' Release No. 34-67896 (September 20, 2012), 77 FR 59231
(September 26, 2012).
\4\ In Amendment No. 1, OCC proposed wording changes and
responded to a CFTC interpretation concerning what constitutes
initial margin. Specifically, it amended the text of Rule 601 by
inserting the word ``initial'' before the word ``margin,'' to more
closely parallel CFTC Rule 39.13(g)(8)(i)4 which
references ``initial margin.'' It also amended Item 3 of Form 19b-4
to, first, include CFTC's definition of ``initial margin'' and
second, to clarify which components of OCC's margin calculations
meets the definition of ``initial margin'' as the term is defined
under CFTC Rules. Amendment No. 1 is technical in nature, and
therefore the Commission is not publishing Amendment No. 1 for
public comment.
\5\ OCC also filed an advanced notice relating to these proposed
changes. The advance notice was published on October 1, 2012.
``Advance Notice Relating to the Margining of Segregated Futures
Customer Accounts on a Gross Bases,'' Release No. 34-67921
(September 25, 2012), 77 FR 59998 (October 1, 2012). The Commission
did not receive any comments on this publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this proposed rule change is to provide for the
calculation of initial margin for OCC segregated futures customer
accounts on a gross basis, as required by CFTC Rule 39.13(g)(8)(i).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 39.13(g)(8)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CFTC's Customer Gross Margin Rule
On October 18, 2011, the CFTC issued final regulations implementing
many of the new statutory core principles for CFTC-registered
derivatives clearing organizations (``DCOs'') enacted under the Dodd-
Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the ``Dodd-Frank
Act''). As a registered DCO (as well as a registered securities
clearing agency), OCC has previously implemented rule changes designed
to bring OCC into compliance with CFTC rules applicable to DCOs that
went into effect on January 9, 2012 \7\ and May 7, 2012.\8\ OCC
believes it is necessary to amend its Rules in order to ensure
compliance with the gross margin rule, which requires a DCO to
``collect initial margin on a gross basis for each clearing member's
customer account(s) equal to the sum of the initial margin amounts that
would be required by the derivatives clearing organization for each
individual customer within that account if each individual customer
were a clearing member'' \9\ as required by CFTC Rule 39.13(g)(8)(i).
The gross margin rule goes into effect on November 8, 2012; however,
OCC proposed to begin complying with the gross margin rule on November
5, 2012 as described herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See SR-OCC-2011-18.
\8\ See SR-OCC-2012-06.
\9\ Derivatives Clearing Organization General Provisions and
Core Principles, 76 FR 69334, 69439 (November 8, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC's System for Calculating Margin
OCC currently calculates margin requirements for each clearing
member's segregated futures customer account held at OCC on a net basis
by applying OCC's System for Theoretical Analysis and Numerical
Simulations (``STANS''). STANS calculates initial margin with respect
to each account of a clearing member, including each clearing member's
futures customer account(s), on a net basis. STANS includes both a net
asset value (``NAV'') component and a risk component, with the risk
component being the equivalent of ``initial margin'' as that term is
defined under CFTC Rules. The NAV component marks all positions to
market and nets long and short positions to determine the NAV of each
clearing member's portfolio of customer positions. The NAV component
represents the cost to liquidate the portfolio at current prices by
selling the net long positions and buying in the net short positions.
The risk component is estimated by means of an expected shortfall risk
measure obtained from ``Monte Carlo'' simulations designed to measure
the additional asset value required in any portfolio to eliminate an
unacceptable level of risk that the portfolio would liquidate to a
deficit.
OCC presently lacks sufficient information about individual
customer positions to calculate initial margin at the level of each
individual customer. However, OCC has been coordinating with other DCOs
to establish an industry-wide mechanism for complying with the customer
gross margin rule. Pursuant to this new system, each DCO's clearing
members will submit data files to the DCO identifying positions by
numerical customer identifiers.\10\ OCC will use this information to
calculate initial margins, using STANS, for each customer identifier of
a clearing member and to aggregate those initial margin calculations to
determine the total futures customer margin requirement for the
clearing member's segregated futures customer account(s) held at
OCC.\11\ OCC
[[Page 67037]]
will then compare the aggregate positions reported by each clearing
member with its own records and make any needed adjustments to the
initial margin calculation to ensure all positions on OCC's books are
properly margined.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The position data provided to OCC by clearing members will
not include (a) information with respect to the allocation of margin
assets to particular customers, nor (b) information with respect to
settlement obligations arising from the exercise, assignment or
maturity of cleared contracts. For this reason, OCC will treat all
margin assets and settlement obligations for each account to which
the gross margin rule applies as being in sub-accounts of the
Clearing Member. OCC will calculate margin, using STANS, separately
for each sub-account and will aggregate the calculated margin
requirements at the level of the clearing member's segregated
futures customer account to which the sub-accounts relate.
\11\ OCC currently carries the following account types that are
segregated pursuant to Section 4d of the Commodity Exchange Act:
Segregated Futures Accounts, Segregated Futures Professional
Accounts, non-Proprietary X-M accounts, and internal non-proprietary
cross-margining accounts. All such accounts would be margined on a
gross basis under the proposed amendments to OCC Rule 601.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed By-Law and Rule Changes
The proposed changes to OCC's Rules provide for the calculation of
initial margin for segregated futures customer accounts on a gross
basis and mandate submission of the clearing member data files
necessary to allow OCC to calculate initial margin at the level of each
futures customer. In the event that the data included in these data
files is incomplete (for example, if OCC shows positions held in a
clearing member's segregated futures accounts, but those positions are
not reflected in the data file), OCC will create a separate sub-account
to be used for initial margin calculation purposes only. Positions
recorded on OCC's books and records, but not reflected in the data
file, will be attributed to this sub-account and an initial margin
amount will be calculated for the sub-account. This initial margin
amount will be added to a clearing member's initial margin requirement.
OCC has determined to adopt this approach to dealing with discrepancies
between its own records and clearing member data files in order to
ensure that OCC does not collect an inadequate amount of initial margin
from clearing members.
III. Discussion of the Proposed Rule Change
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Exchange Act \12\ directs the Commission
to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if
it finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Exchange Act \13\ requires that the rules of the clearing agency, among
other things, are designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance
and settlement of securities transactions, and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of Section 17A of the Exchange Act \14\ because
it is designed to permit OCC to perform clearing services for products
that are subject to the jurisdiction of the CFTC without adversely
affecting OCC's obligations with respect to the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions or the protection
of securities investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \15\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\16\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-2012-17) be and
hereby is approved \17\ as of the date of this order or the date of the
``Notice of No Objection to Advance Notice Filing, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Relating to the Margining of Segregated
Futures Customer Accounts on a Gross Basis'' (File No. SR-2012-17),
whichever is later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\17\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-27293 Filed 11-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P