Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation, 65713-65714 [2012-26631]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 30, 2012 / Notices
Issued: October 24, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–26549 Filed 10–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–860]
Certain Optoelectronic Devices for
Fiber Optic Communications,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same; Notice of
Institution of Investigation
Institution of investigation pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
September 25, 2012, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Avago
Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte.
Ltd. of Singapore; Avago Technologies
General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of
Singapore; and Avago Technologies U.S.
Inc. of San Jose, California. Letters
supplementing the complaint were filed
on October 4, October 16, and October
17, 2012. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain optoelectronic devices for fiber
optic communications, components
thereof, and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
6,947,456 (‘‘the ’456 patent’’) and U.S.
Patent No. 5,596,595 (‘‘the ’595 patent’’).
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
order.
SUMMARY:
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:17 Oct 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2012).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
October 24, 2012, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain optoelectronic
devices for fiber optic communications,
components thereof, and products
containing the same that infringe one or
more of claims 1, 2, 4, 6–8, 11–13, 15,
and 20–24 of the ’456 patent and claims
14, 17, and 19 of the ’595 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Avago Technologies Fiber IP,
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 1 Yishun
Avenue 7, Singapore 768923.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65713
Avago Technologies General IP,
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 1 Yishun
Avenue 7, Singapore 768923.
Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., 350 West
Trimble Road, Building 90, San Jose,
CA 95131.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
IPtronics A/S, Langebjergvaenget 8B st,
DK–40000 Roskilde, Denmark.
IPtronics Inc., 1370 Willow Road, Menlo
Park, CA 94025.
FCI USA, LLC, 825 Old Trail Road,
Etters, PA 17319.
FCI Deutschland GmbH, 175 Holzhauser
Str, Floor E, Berlin 13509, Germany.
FCI SA, Immeuble Calypso, 18 Parc
Ariane III, 3–5 Rue Alfred Kastler,
78280 Guyancourt, France.
Mellanox Technologies, Inc., 350
Oakmead Parkway, Suite 100,
Sunnyvale, CA 94085.
Mellanox Technologies Ltd., Beit
Mellanox, Yokneam, Israel 20692.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
65714
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 30, 2012 / Notices
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 25, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your
request and payment to:
Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington,
DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $14.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2012–26631 Filed 10–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On October 23, 2012, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed consent
decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Hawaii in the
lawsuit entitled United States v. County
of Maui, Hawaii, Civil Action No. CV 12
00571 LEK RLP.
In this action, the United States filed
a complaint under the Clean Air Act
alleging violations at the Central Maui
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill located
on the island of Maui in Hawaii. The
consent decree requires the County to
implement injunctive relief including
conducting enhanced gas monitoring,
complying with interim wellhead
temperature limits and implementing
fire response procedures. The consent
decree also requires the County to pay
a civil penalty of $380,000 and to
perform a Supplemental Environmental
Project (‘‘the SEP’’). The SEP requires
the County to install and operate at least
eight wind turbines at the Landfill
property.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
consent decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. County of Maui,
Hawaii, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–09360.
All comments must be submitted no
later than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .....
pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box
7611, Washington, DC.
20044–7611.
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
By mail .......
During the public comment period,
the consent decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide
a paper copy of the consent decree upon
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:17 Oct 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
Henry Friedman,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–26551 Filed 10–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[OMB Number 1117–0034]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested:
Collection of Laboratory Analysis
Data on Drug Samples Tested by NonFederal (State and Local Government)
Crime Laboratories
ACTION: 60-Day notice of information
collection under review.
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA), will
be submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted
until December 31, 2012. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments, especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Cathy Gallagher, Chief,
Liaison and Policy Section, Drug
Enforcement Administration, Office of
Diversion Control, 8701 Morrissette
Drive, Springfield, VA 22152.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Collection of Laboratory Analysis Data
on Drug Samples Tested by Non-Federal
(State and Local Government) Crime
Laboratories.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection:
Form Number: none.
Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration, U.S.
Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Other: None.
Abstract: Information is needed from
state and local laboratories to provide
DEA with additional analyzed drug
information for the National Forensic
Laboratory Information System.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that there are
one hundred forty (140) total
respondents for this information
collection. One hundred thrity-four
(134) respond monthly at .13 hour (8
minutes) for each response and six (6)
respond quarterly at .13 hour (8
minutes) for each response, for a total
number of 1632 responses.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: It is estimated that there are
218 annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65713-65714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26631]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-860]
Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications,
Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of
Institution of Investigation
Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 25, 2012, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on
behalf of Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of
Singapore; Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of
Singapore; and Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. of San Jose, California.
Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on October 4, October
16, and October 17, 2012. The complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain optoelectronic devices for fiber optic communications,
components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,947,456 (``the '456
patent'') and U.S. Patent No. 5,596,595 (``the '595 patent''). The
complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also
be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2012).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on October 24, 2012, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain
optoelectronic devices for fiber optic communications, components
thereof, and products containing the same that infringe one or more of
claims 1, 2, 4, 6-8, 11-13, 15, and 20-24 of the '456 patent and claims
14, 17, and 19 of the '595 patent, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Avago Technologies Fiber IP, (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 1 Yishun Avenue 7,
Singapore 768923.
Avago Technologies General IP, (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 1 Yishun Avenue
7, Singapore 768923.
Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., 350 West Trimble Road, Building 90, San
Jose, CA 95131.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
IPtronics A/S, Langebjergvaenget 8B st, DK-40000 Roskilde, Denmark.
IPtronics Inc., 1370 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
FCI USA, LLC, 825 Old Trail Road, Etters, PA 17319.
FCI Deutschland GmbH, 175 Holzhauser Str, Floor E, Berlin 13509,
Germany.
FCI SA, Immeuble Calypso, 18 Parc Ariane III, 3-5 Rue Alfred Kastler,
78280 Guyancourt, France.
Mellanox Technologies, Inc., 350 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 100, Sunnyvale,
CA 94085.
Mellanox Technologies Ltd., Beit Mellanox, Yokneam, Israel 20692.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
[[Page 65714]]
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 25, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-26631 Filed 10-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
