Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Motor Theft Prevention Standard; General Motors Corporation, 65765-65767 [2012-26628]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 30, 2012 / Notices
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by
December 14, 2012 will be considered
by FRA before final action is taken.
Comments received after that date will
be considered as far as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78), or
online at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 22,
2012.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–26693 Filed 10–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. MARAD 2012 0100]
Requested Administrative Waiver of
the Coastwise Trade Laws: Vessel
TRANQUILO; Invitation for Public
Comments
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
As authorized by 46 U.S.C.
12121, the Secretary of Transportation,
as represented by the Maritime
Administration (MARAD), is authorized
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:17 Oct 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
to grant waivers of the U.S.-build
requirement of the coastwise laws under
certain circumstances. A request for
such a waiver has been received by
MARAD. The vessel, and a brief
description of the proposed service, is
listed below.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
November 29, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
docket number MARAD–2012–0100.
Written comments may be submitted by
hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments will become part of this
docket and will be available for
inspection and copying at the above
address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An electronic version
of this document and all documents
entered into this docket is available on
the World Wide Web at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Williams, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W23–453,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
366–0903, Email
Linda.Williams@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel TRANQUILO is:
Intended Commercial Use of Vessel:
‘‘Sailing Charters’’
Geographic Region: ‘‘California, Oregon,
Washington, Hawaii, Florida.’’
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2012–0100 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65765
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: October 23, 2012.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–26692 Filed 10–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Motor Theft
Prevention Standard; General Motors
Corporation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
General Motors Corporation’s (GM)
petition for an exemption of the Cadillac
ATS vehicle line in accordance with 49
CFR Part 543, Exemption from the Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is
granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541).
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2014 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer
Standards, NHTSA, W43–439, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s phone number
is (202) 366–5222. Her fax number is
(202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated July 31, 2012, GM
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541)
for the Cadillac ATS vehicle line
beginning with MY 2014. The petition
requested an exemption from partsSUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
65766
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 30, 2012 / Notices
marking pursuant to 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one vehicle line per model year. In
its petition, GM provided a detailed
description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components
of the antitheft device for the Cadillac
ATS vehicle line. GM will install a
passive, transponder-based, electronic
immobilizer device (PASS-Key III+) as
standard equipment on its Cadillac ATS
vehicle line beginning with MY 2014.
GM stated that the device will provide
protection against unauthorized use
(i.e., starting and engine fueling), but
will not provide any visible or audible
indication of unauthorized vehicle entry
(i.e., flashing lights or horn alarm).
The PASS-Key III+ device is designed
to be active at all times without direct
intervention by the vehicle operator.
The device is fully armed immediately
after the ignition has been turned off
and the key removed. Components of
the antitheft device include an
electronically-coded ignition key, an
antenna module, a controller module
and an engine control module. The
ignition key contains electronics
molded into the key head, providing
billions of possible electronic
combinations. The electronics receive
energy and data from the antenna
module. Upon receipt of the data, the
key will calculate a response using an
internal encryption algorithm and
transmit the response back to the
vehicle. The antenna module translates
the radio frequency signal received from
the key into a digital signal and
compares the received response to an
internally calculated value. If the values
match, the key is recognized as valid,
and a password is then transmitted
through a serial data link to the engine
control module to enable fueling and
vehicle starting. If an invalid key code
is received, the PASS-Key III+ controller
module will send a ‘‘Disable Password’’
to the engine control module and
starting, ignition, and fuel will be
inhibited.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, GM provided
information on the reliability and
durability of its proposed device. To
ensure reliability and durability of the
device, GM conducted tests based on its
own specified standards. GM provided
information on the specific tests it uses
to validate the integrity, durability and
reliability of the PASS-Key III+ device
and believes that the device is reliable
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:17 Oct 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
and durable since the components must
operate as designed after each test. GM
also stated that the design and assembly
processes of the PASS-Key III+
subsystem and components are
validated for 10 years of vehicle life and
150,000 miles of performance.
GM stated that the PASS-Key III+
device has been designed to enhance the
functionality and theft protection
provided by its first, second and third
generation PASS-Key, PASS-Key II, and
PASS-Key III devices. GM also
referenced data provided by the
American Automobile Manufacturers
Association (AAMA) in support of the
effectiveness of GM’s PASS-Key devices
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft. The AAMA’s comments to the
agency’s Preliminary Report on ‘‘Auto
Theft and Recovery Effects of the AntiCar Theft Act of 1992 and the Motor
Vehicle Theft Law Enforcement Act of
1984’’, (Docket 97–042; Notice 1),
showed that between MYs 1987 and
1993, the Chevrolet Camaro and Pontiac
Firebird vehicle lines experienced a
significant theft rate reduction after
installation of a Pass-Key like antitheft
device as standard equipment on the
vehicle lines.
GM also stated that the theft data, as
provided by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation’s National Crime
Information Center (NCIC) and
compiled by the agency, show that theft
rates are lower for exempted GM models
equipped with the PASS-Key like
systems than the theft rates for earlier
models with similar appearance and
construction that were parts-marked.
Based on the performance of the PASSKey, PASS-Key II, and PASS-Key III
devices on other GM models, and the
advanced technology utilized in PASSKey III+, GM believes that the PASS-Key
III+ device will be more effective in
deterring theft than the parts-marking
requirements of CFR Part 541.
Additionally, GM stated that the
PASS-Key III+ is installed as standard
equipment on the Cadillac CTS vehicle
line. GM was granted an exemption
from the parts-marking requirements by
the agency for the Cadillac CTS vehicle
line beginning with the 2011 MY (See
74 FR 62385, November 27, 2009). The
average theft rate using 3 MYs theft data
(MYs 2008–2010) provided by the
agency for the Cadillac CTS vehicle line
is 1.49.
GM believes that PASS-Key III+
devices will be more effective in
deterring theft than the parts-marking
requirements and that the agency
should find that inclusion of the PASSKey III+ device on the Cadillac ATS
vehicle line is sufficient to qualify it for
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
full exemption from the parts-marking
requirements.
GM’s proposed device lacks an
audible or visible alarm. Therefore, this
device cannot perform one of the
functions listed in 49 CFR 543.6(a)(3),
that is, to call attention to unauthorized
attempts to enter or move the vehicle.
Based on comparison of the reduction in
the theft rates of Chevrolet Corvettes
using a passive theft deterrent system
along with an audible/visible alarm
system to the reduction in theft rates for
the Chevrolet Camaro and the Pontiac
Firebird models equipped with a
passive theft deterrent device without
an alarm, GM finds that the lack of an
alarm or attention-attracting device does
not compromise the theft deterrent
performance of a device such as PASSKey III+ system. Theft data have
indicated a decline in theft rates for
vehicle lines equipped with comparable
devices that have received full
exemptions from the parts-marking
requirements. In these instances, the
agency has concluded that the lack of an
audible or visible alarm has not
prevented these antitheft devices from
being effective protection against theft.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that GM has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device for the Cadillac ATS vehicle line
is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 541). This
conclusion is based on the information
GM provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device
will provide four of the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
promoting activation; preventing defeat
or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
Based on the evidence submitted by
GM, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Cadillac ATS
vehicle line is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 30, 2012 / Notices
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full GM’s petition for
exemption for the Cadillac ATS vehicle
line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with the 2014 model year
vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR
part 541, Appendix A–1, identifies
those lines that are exempted from the
Theft Prevention Standard for a given
model year. 49 CFR 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If GM decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it should
formally notify the agency. If such a
decision is made, the line must be fully
marked according to the requirements
under 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6 (marking
of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if GM wishes in the
future to modify the device on which
this exemption is based, the company
may have to submit a petition to modify
the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that
a Part 543 exemption applies only to
vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the
antitheft device on which the line’s
exemption is based. Further, Part
543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting Part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if the manufacturer contemplates
making any changes, the effects of
which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:17 Oct 29, 2012
Jkt 229001
Issued on: October 24, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012–26628 Filed 10–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Chrysler
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Chrysler LLC, (Chrysler) petition for
exemption of the Chrysler [confidential]
vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR
Part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is
granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard 49 CFR Part 541,
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard. Chrysler requested
confidential treatment for specific
information in its petition. The agency
will grant Chrysler’s request for
confidential treatment by separate letter.
Chrysler informed the agency that the
nameplate will be released prior to
introduction of the vehicle line.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2014 Model Year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, International Policy,
Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs,
NHTSA, W43–439, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard’s phone number is (202) 366–
5222. Her fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated July 31, 2012, Chrysler
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541)
for the MY 2014 Chrysler [confidential]
vehicle line. The petition requested an
exemption from parts-marking pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard,
based on the installation of an antitheft
device as standard equipment for the
entire vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR Part 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65767
grant an exemption for one vehicle line
per model year. In its petition, Chrysler
provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and
location of the components of the
antitheft device for the [confidential]
vehicle line. Chrysler will install the
Sentry Key Immobilizer System (SKIS)
antitheft device as standard equipment
on the vehicle line. The SKIS provides
passive vehicle protection by preventing
the engine from operating unless a valid
electronically encoded key is detected
in the ignition system of the vehicles.
The major components of the SKIS
device consist of the Radio Frequency
Hub Module (RFHM), Ignition Node
Module (IGNM), Engine Control
Module, Body Controller Module,
Sentry Key Immobilizer Module (SKIM),
the transponder key that performs the
immobilizer function and the
Instrument Panel Cluster which
contains the telltale function only.
According to Chrysler, all of these
components work collectively to
perform the immobilizer function.
Chrysler stated that its [confidential]
vehicle line will also be available with
an optional visible or audible alarm
system to provide an indication of
unauthorized vehicle entry (i.e., flashing
lights or horn alarm).
According to Chrysler, the
immobilizer feature is activated when
the key is removed from the ignition
system, whether the doors are open or
not. Only a valid key inserted into the
ignition system will allow the vehicle to
start and continue to run.
Chrysler stated that the functions and
features of the SKIM are all integral to
the RFHM. The SKIM performs the
interrogation with the transponder in
the key. The RFHM receives Low
Frequency (LF) and/or Radio Frequency
(RF) signals from the Sentry Key
transponder which is integral to the
FOB with integrated key. The RFHM
contains an RF transceiver, a
microprocessor and serves as the
Remote Keyless Entry RF receiver.
The RFHM is paired with the IGNM
that contains either a rotary ignition
switch (keyed vehicles) or a START/
STOP push button (keyless vehicles).
According to Chrysler, the SKIS will be
placed on both its keyless entry vehicles
and keyed vehicles. For the keyed
vehicles, the IGNM transmits an LF
signal to excite the transponder in the
key when the ignition switch is turned
to the ON position. The IGNM waits for
a signal response from the transponder
and transmits the response to the
RFHM. If the response identifies the
transponder key as invalid or if no
response is received from the
transponder key, Chrysler stated that the
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65765-65767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26628]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Motor Theft
Prevention Standard; General Motors Corporation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full General Motors Corporation's (GM)
petition for an exemption of the Cadillac ATS vehicle line in
accordance with 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has determined
that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor
vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541).
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2014 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer Standards, NHTSA, W43-
439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's
phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated July 31, 2012, GM
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541) for the Cadillac ATS vehicle line
beginning with MY 2014. The petition requested an exemption from parts-
[[Page 65766]]
marking pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device
as standard equipment for the entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, GM
provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design,
and location of the components of the antitheft device for the Cadillac
ATS vehicle line. GM will install a passive, transponder-based,
electronic immobilizer device (PASS-Key III+) as standard equipment on
its Cadillac ATS vehicle line beginning with MY 2014. GM stated that
the device will provide protection against unauthorized use (i.e.,
starting and engine fueling), but will not provide any visible or
audible indication of unauthorized vehicle entry (i.e., flashing lights
or horn alarm).
The PASS-Key III+ device is designed to be active at all times
without direct intervention by the vehicle operator. The device is
fully armed immediately after the ignition has been turned off and the
key removed. Components of the antitheft device include an
electronically-coded ignition key, an antenna module, a controller
module and an engine control module. The ignition key contains
electronics molded into the key head, providing billions of possible
electronic combinations. The electronics receive energy and data from
the antenna module. Upon receipt of the data, the key will calculate a
response using an internal encryption algorithm and transmit the
response back to the vehicle. The antenna module translates the radio
frequency signal received from the key into a digital signal and
compares the received response to an internally calculated value. If
the values match, the key is recognized as valid, and a password is
then transmitted through a serial data link to the engine control
module to enable fueling and vehicle starting. If an invalid key code
is received, the PASS-Key III+ controller module will send a ``Disable
Password'' to the engine control module and starting, ignition, and
fuel will be inhibited.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, GM
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, GM
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. GM provided
information on the specific tests it uses to validate the integrity,
durability and reliability of the PASS-Key III+ device and believes
that the device is reliable and durable since the components must
operate as designed after each test. GM also stated that the design and
assembly processes of the PASS-Key III+ subsystem and components are
validated for 10 years of vehicle life and 150,000 miles of
performance.
GM stated that the PASS-Key III+ device has been designed to
enhance the functionality and theft protection provided by its first,
second and third generation PASS-Key, PASS-Key II, and PASS-Key III
devices. GM also referenced data provided by the American Automobile
Manufacturers Association (AAMA) in support of the effectiveness of
GM's PASS-Key devices in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft.
The AAMA's comments to the agency's Preliminary Report on ``Auto Theft
and Recovery Effects of the Anti-Car Theft Act of 1992 and the Motor
Vehicle Theft Law Enforcement Act of 1984'', (Docket 97-042; Notice 1),
showed that between MYs 1987 and 1993, the Chevrolet Camaro and Pontiac
Firebird vehicle lines experienced a significant theft rate reduction
after installation of a Pass-Key like antitheft device as standard
equipment on the vehicle lines.
GM also stated that the theft data, as provided by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation's National Crime Information Center (NCIC) and
compiled by the agency, show that theft rates are lower for exempted GM
models equipped with the PASS-Key like systems than the theft rates for
earlier models with similar appearance and construction that were
parts-marked. Based on the performance of the PASS-Key, PASS-Key II,
and PASS-Key III devices on other GM models, and the advanced
technology utilized in PASS-Key III+, GM believes that the PASS-Key
III+ device will be more effective in deterring theft than the parts-
marking requirements of CFR Part 541.
Additionally, GM stated that the PASS-Key III+ is installed as
standard equipment on the Cadillac CTS vehicle line. GM was granted an
exemption from the parts-marking requirements by the agency for the
Cadillac CTS vehicle line beginning with the 2011 MY (See 74 FR 62385,
November 27, 2009). The average theft rate using 3 MYs theft data (MYs
2008-2010) provided by the agency for the Cadillac CTS vehicle line is
1.49.
GM believes that PASS-Key III+ devices will be more effective in
deterring theft than the parts-marking requirements and that the agency
should find that inclusion of the PASS-Key III+ device on the Cadillac
ATS vehicle line is sufficient to qualify it for full exemption from
the parts-marking requirements.
GM's proposed device lacks an audible or visible alarm. Therefore,
this device cannot perform one of the functions listed in 49 CFR
543.6(a)(3), that is, to call attention to unauthorized attempts to
enter or move the vehicle. Based on comparison of the reduction in the
theft rates of Chevrolet Corvettes using a passive theft deterrent
system along with an audible/visible alarm system to the reduction in
theft rates for the Chevrolet Camaro and the Pontiac Firebird models
equipped with a passive theft deterrent device without an alarm, GM
finds that the lack of an alarm or attention-attracting device does not
compromise the theft deterrent performance of a device such as PASS-Key
III+ system. Theft data have indicated a decline in theft rates for
vehicle lines equipped with comparable devices that have received full
exemptions from the parts-marking requirements. In these instances, the
agency has concluded that the lack of an audible or visible alarm has
not prevented these antitheft devices from being effective protection
against theft.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that GM has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Cadillac ATS vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the information GM
provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device will provide four of the five
types of performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation;
preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized
persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants;
and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
Based on the evidence submitted by GM, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Cadillac ATS vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR part 541).
[[Page 65767]]
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full GM's
petition for exemption for the Cadillac ATS vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with the 2014
model year vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-
1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention
Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR 543.7(f) contains publication
requirements incident to the disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release of future product nameplates,
the beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a
general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to
notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the
parts marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If GM decides not to use the exemption for this line, it should
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR 541.5 and
541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if GM wishes in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under
this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the line's
exemption is based. Further, Part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: October 24, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012-26628 Filed 10-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P