Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 62260-62263 [2012-25137]

Download as PDF 62260 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices infringe claim 9. Id. With respect to the ‘704 patent, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ’s conclusion that the asserted claims of the ‘704 patent are invalid for indefiniteness. Id. The Commission further determined to review and vacate as moot the ID’s remaining findings with respect to the ‘704 patent. The Commission determined not to review the remainder of the ID. Id. On August 15, 2012, Kaneka and SKC each filed submissions on review. On August 22, 2012, each filed reply submissions. On review, having examined the final ID, the submissions of the parties, and the relevant portions of the record in this investigation, the Commission has determined to affirm the ID with respect to the issues on review. With respect to the ‘866 patent, the Commission has determined to affirm the ALJ’s determination that Kaneka has failed to satisfy the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement on modified grounds. With respect to the ‘961 patent, the Commission has determined to affirm the ALJ’s finding that the IN70 (50mm) product infringes claim 9 and the other accused products do not. The investigation is terminated. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and under Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 5, 2012. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2012–25077 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [TA–W–81,689; TA–W–81,689A] Niles America Wintech, Inc., Warehousing Division, a Valeo Company, Including On-Site Leased Workers from, Adecco Employment Services, Winchester, KY; Niles America Wintech, Inc., Assembly and Testing Division, a Valeo Company, Including On-Site Leased Workers from Adecco Employment Services, Winchester, KY; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated August 28, 2012 a petitioning worker, requested administrative reconsideration of the VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:59 Oct 11, 2012 Jkt 229001 negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Niles America Wintech, Inc., Warehousing Division and Assembly and Testing Division, including on-site leased workers from Adecco Employment Services, Winchester, Kentucky (collectively referred to as the subject firm). The determination was issued on July 31, 2012. The Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2012 (77 FR 49462). The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that the subject firm did not import services like or directly competitive with the order management, shipping, receiving, and warehousing services supplied by the subject workers. Further, the subject firm did not shift the supply of order management, shipping, receiving and warehousing services (or like or directly competitive services) to a foreign country or acquire the supply of such services from a foreign country. The initial investigation also revealed that the subject firm is not a Supplier to or act as a Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In addition, the subject firm did not satisfy the group eligibility requirements under Section 222(e) of the Act, either because Criterion (1) has not been met since the workers’ firm has not been publically identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in an affirmative finding of serious injury, market disruption, or material injury, or threat thereof. Finally, with respect to Section 222(a) and Section 222(b) of the Act, the investigation revealed that Criterion (1) has not been met because a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, have not become totally or partially separated, during the relevant time period, nor are they threatened to become totally or partially separated. In request for reconsideration, the petitioner supplied new information regarding the number of workers who have been separated or have been threatened with separation. The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of September, 2012. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2012–25135 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of September 24, 2012 through September 28, 2012. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1 62261 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Under Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 81,718 ......................... Daimler Buses of North America, Inc., Daimler North America, Noramtec, First Choice Staffing, etc. Fusion Contact Centers, LLC ....................... Gunite Corporation, incl. Bridge Staffing, Express Employment, Personnel Partners, Aerotek. Oriskany, NY .................................. June 8, 2011. Santa Maria, CA ............................. Elkhart, IN ...................................... August 6, 2011. August 16, 2011. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 81,871 ......................... 81,900 ......................... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:59 Oct 11, 2012 Jkt 229001 Impact date services) of the Trade Act have been met. PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1 62262 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 81,889 ......................... MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc., Ameristaff and Prillman. Senco Brands, Inc., Express Employment Professionals. Adecco, Working On-Site at Senco Brands, Inc. Supervalu, Inc., Finance Department, incl. on-site leased workers from Matthews Professional. Oracle America, Inc., RMA Program Management, Randstad Managed Serv, Oracle America, RMA Program. Parker Hannifin Corporation, Sporlan Division, PRO Resource Staffing Service. Verifications, Inc., Aerotek and Kelly Services. Verifications, Inc., Aerotek and Kelly Services. Edmund Optics, Inc., Bear Staffing and Manpower. Martinsville, VA .............................. August 10, 2011. Cincinnati, OH ................................ December 11, 2011. Cincinnati, OH ................................ August 1, 2011. Pleasant Prairie, WI ....................... August 22, 2011. Redwood Shores, CA .................... August 27, 2011. New Haven, IN ............................... August 30, 2011. Aberdeen, SD ................................. September 5, 2011. Mitchell, SD .................................... September 5, 2011. Pennsburg, PA ............................... September 7, 2011. 81,903 ......................... 81,903A ....................... 81,909 ......................... 81,925 ......................... 81,933 ......................... 81,943 ......................... 81,943A ....................... 81,957 ......................... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to Impact date apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 81,879 ......................... RG Steel Wheeling, LLC, Division of RG Steel, LLC, Wheeling Corrugating Company. Beech Bottom, WV ......................... Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) Impact date (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 81,846 ......................... Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division. Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division. Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division. Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division. Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division. OptumInsight Government Solutions, OptumInsight, Inc., UnitedHealth Group, On-site at CA Depart of Health. Alpharetta, GA ................................ 81,846A ....................... 81,846B ....................... 81,846C ....................... 81,846D ....................... 81,941 ......................... wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES August 7, 2011. VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:59 Oct 11, 2012 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Impact date Hunt Valley, MD ............................. Naperville, IL .................................. St. Louis, MO ................................. Plano, TX ....................................... Sacramento, CA ............................. Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1 62263 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of September 24, 2012 through September 28, 2012. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/ taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 365–6822. Dated: October 1, 2012. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2012–25137 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221 (a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than October 22, 2012. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than October 22, 2012. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of October 2012. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. APPENDIX [31 TAA petitions instituted between 9/24/12 and 9/28/12] TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location 81986 ................ Genzyme, A Sanofi Company, Network Operations Center (NOCC IT Department) (State/One-Stop). Cincinnati Bell, RSC/BSC and Order Support Representatives (Union). Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP (Union) ................. Siemens Energy, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ............................... American Airlines (Union) ..................................................... Delphi Electronics & Safety (Company) ............................... Cox Media Group Ohio, Dayton Daily News (Workers) ....... Experian (State/One-Stop) ................................................... Ahlstrom West Carrollton LLC (Company) ........................... Bank of America—Account Specialists (Workers) ............... Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (State/One-Stop) ...... TE Connectivity (Formerly Tyco) (State/One-Stop) ............. APC Workforce Solutions II, LLC (dba ZeroChaos) (State/ One-Stop). Ferrara Candy Company (formerly Farley’s & Sathers) (State/One-Stop). Parker Hannifin Corporation (State/One-Stop) .................... Royal Appliance Manufacturing Company dba TTI Floor Care N. America & Subsi (Company). E! Entertainment Television Style, G4 Media NBC Universal (State/One-Stop). RR Donnelley (Workers) ...................................................... TRG Customer Solutions (Workers) .................................... Boston Scientific (Workers) .................................................. Tellabs (State/One-Stop) ...................................................... Maysteel LLC (Company) ..................................................... BRP US, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ............................................ ITT Interconnect Solutions (State/One-Stop) ....................... Dell Marketing LP, Americas Transactional Group (State/ One-Stop). Winzen Film, Inc. (Workers) ................................................. Oxford Collections (Workers) ............................................... Hewlett-Packard Company (State/One-Stop) ...................... Advanstar (State/One-Stop) ................................................. PCS Phosphate (Workers) ................................................... Framingham, MA .................. 09/24/12 09/20/12 Norwood, Lebanon, and Cincinnati, OH. Green Bay, WI ...................... Fort Madison, IA ................... Tulsa, OK .............................. Kokomo, IN ........................... Dayton, OH ........................... Schaumburg, IL ..................... West Carrollton, OH .............. Seattle, WA ........................... Schaumberg, IL ..................... Shakopee, MN ...................... Quincy, MA ........................... 09/24/12 09/19/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/24/12 09/05/12 09/20/12 09/19/12 09/20/12 09/20/12 09/20/12 09/20/12 09/19/12 08/27/12 09/21/12 09/21/12 Round Lake, MN ................... 09/24/12 09/21/12 Beaufort, SC ......................... Canton, OH ........................... 09/24/12 09/25/12 09/24/12 09/25/12 Los Angeles, CA ................... 09/25/12 09/24/12 Johnson City, TN .................. Oil City, PA ........................... Maple Grove, MN .................. Naperville, IL ......................... Creedmoor, NC ..................... Benton, IL .............................. Santa Ana, CA ...................... Round Rock, TX ................... 09/25/12 09/25/12 09/25/12 09/26/12 09/26/12 09/26/12 09/26/12 09/27/12 09/24/12 09/19/12 09/25/12 09/25/12 09/25/12 09/25/12 09/25/12 09/26/12 Sulphur Springs, TX .............. Gaffney, SC .......................... Vancouver, WA ..................... Duluth, MN ............................ Aurora, NC ............................ 09/27/12 09/27/12 09/27/12 09/27/12 09/27/12 09/18/12 09/26/12 08/04/12 09/26/12 09/26/12 81987 ................ 81988 81989 81990 81991 81992 81993 81994 81995 81996 81997 81998 ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ 81999 ................ 82000 ................ 82001 ................ wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 82002 ................ 82003 82004 82005 82006 82007 82008 82009 82010 ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ 82011 82012 82013 82014 82015 ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:59 Oct 11, 2012 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM Date of institution 12OCN1 Date of petition

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 198 (Friday, October 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62260-62263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
September 24, 2012 through September 28, 2012.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased 
absolutely; and
    (3) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive 
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have 
increased;
    (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are 
directly incorporated, have increased;
    (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more 
component parts produced outside the United

[[Page 62261]]

States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles 
incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have 
increased;
    (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have 
increased; and
    (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the 
sales or production of such firm; or
    II. Under Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be 
satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign 
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or 
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
    (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly 
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
    (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' 
separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public 
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to 
become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services 
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such 
agency; and
    (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or 
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for 
such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
    (B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described 
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or 
threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade 
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply 
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
    (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the 
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an 
investigation resulting in--
    (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat 
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
    (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat 
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
    (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat 
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
    (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the 
date on which--
    (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the 
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to 
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is 
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
    (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in 
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
    (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the 
workers' firm within--
    (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
    (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding 
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              TA-W No.                       Subject firm                Location               Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,718.............................  Daimler Buses of North       Oriskany, NY..........  June 8, 2011.
                                      America, Inc., Daimler
                                      North America, Noramtec,
                                      First Choice Staffing, etc.
81,871.............................  Fusion Contact Centers, LLC  Santa Maria, CA.......  August 6, 2011.
81,900.............................  Gunite Corporation, incl.    Elkhart, IN...........  August 16, 2011.
                                      Bridge Staffing, Express
                                      Employment, Personnel
                                      Partners, Aerotek.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act 
have been met.

[[Page 62262]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              TA-W No.                       Subject firm                Location               Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,889.............................  MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc.,  Martinsville, VA......  August 10, 2011.
                                      Ameristaff and Prillman.
81,903.............................  Senco Brands, Inc., Express  Cincinnati, OH........  December 11, 2011.
                                      Employment Professionals.
81,903A............................  Adecco, Working On-Site at   Cincinnati, OH........  August 1, 2011.
                                      Senco Brands, Inc.
81,909.............................  Supervalu, Inc., Finance     Pleasant Prairie, WI..  August 22, 2011.
                                      Department, incl. on-site
                                      leased workers from
                                      Matthews Professional.
81,925.............................  Oracle America, Inc., RMA    Redwood Shores, CA....  August 27, 2011.
                                      Program Management,
                                      Randstad Managed Serv,
                                      Oracle America, RMA
                                      Program.
81,933.............................  Parker Hannifin              New Haven, IN.........  August 30, 2011.
                                      Corporation, Sporlan
                                      Division, PRO Resource
                                      Staffing Service.
81,943.............................  Verifications, Inc.,         Aberdeen, SD..........  September 5, 2011.
                                      Aerotek and Kelly Services.
81,943A............................  Verifications, Inc.,         Mitchell, SD..........  September 5, 2011.
                                      Aerotek and Kelly Services.
81,957.............................  Edmund Optics, Inc., Bear    Pennsburg, PA.........  September 7, 2011.
                                      Staffing and Manpower.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              TA-W No.                       Subject firm                Location               Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,879.............................  RG Steel Wheeling, LLC,      Beech Bottom, WV......  August 7, 2011.
                                      Division of RG Steel, LLC,
                                      Wheeling Corrugating
                                      Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that the criteria under 
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in 
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not 
been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              TA-W No.                       Subject firm                Location               Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,846.............................  Goodman Networks, Inc.,      Alpharetta, GA........  ......................
                                      Core Network Engineering
                                      (Deployment Engineering)
                                      Division.
81,846A............................  Goodman Networks, Inc.,      Hunt Valley, MD.......  ......................
                                      Core Network Engineering
                                      (Deployment Engineering)
                                      Division.
81,846B............................  Goodman Networks, Inc.,      Naperville, IL........  ......................
                                      Core Network Engineering
                                      (Deployment Engineering)
                                      Division.
81,846C............................  Goodman Networks, Inc.,      St. Louis, MO.........  ......................
                                      Core Network Engineering
                                      (Deployment Engineering)
                                      Division.
81,846D............................  Goodman Networks, Inc.,      Plano, TX.............  ......................
                                      Core Network Engineering
                                      (Deployment Engineering)
                                      Division.
81,941.............................  OptumInsight Government      Sacramento, CA........  ......................
                                      Solutions, OptumInsight,
                                      Inc., UnitedHealth Group,
                                      On-site at CA Depart of
                                      Health.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 62263]]

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of September 24, 2012 through September 28, 2012. 
These determinations are available on the Department's Web site 
tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of 
determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance 
toll free at 888-365-6822.

    Dated: October 1, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-25137 Filed 10-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P