Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 62260-62263 [2012-25137]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
62260
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices
infringe claim 9. Id. With respect to the
‘704 patent, the Commission determined
not to review the ALJ’s conclusion that
the asserted claims of the ‘704 patent are
invalid for indefiniteness. Id. The
Commission further determined to
review and vacate as moot the ID’s
remaining findings with respect to the
‘704 patent. The Commission
determined not to review the remainder
of the ID. Id.
On August 15, 2012, Kaneka and SKC
each filed submissions on review. On
August 22, 2012, each filed reply
submissions.
On review, having examined the final
ID, the submissions of the parties, and
the relevant portions of the record in
this investigation, the Commission has
determined to affirm the ID with respect
to the issues on review. With respect to
the ‘866 patent, the Commission has
determined to affirm the ALJ’s
determination that Kaneka has failed to
satisfy the technical prong of the
domestic industry requirement on
modified grounds. With respect to the
‘961 patent, the Commission has
determined to affirm the ALJ’s finding
that the IN70 (50mm) product infringes
claim 9 and the other accused products
do not. The investigation is terminated.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and under Part 210 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
Part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 5, 2012.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–25077 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[TA–W–81,689; TA–W–81,689A]
Niles America Wintech, Inc.,
Warehousing Division, a Valeo
Company, Including On-Site Leased
Workers from, Adecco Employment
Services, Winchester, KY; Niles
America Wintech, Inc., Assembly and
Testing Division, a Valeo Company,
Including On-Site Leased Workers
from Adecco Employment Services,
Winchester, KY; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated August 28, 2012
a petitioning worker, requested
administrative reconsideration of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Oct 11, 2012
Jkt 229001
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of Niles America Wintech, Inc.,
Warehousing Division and Assembly
and Testing Division, including on-site
leased workers from Adecco
Employment Services, Winchester,
Kentucky (collectively referred to as the
subject firm). The determination was
issued on July 31, 2012. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on August 16, 2012 (77 FR 49462).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that the subject firm did not
import services like or directly
competitive with the order management,
shipping, receiving, and warehousing
services supplied by the subject
workers.
Further, the subject firm did not shift
the supply of order management,
shipping, receiving and warehousing
services (or like or directly competitive
services) to a foreign country or acquire
the supply of such services from a
foreign country.
The initial investigation also revealed
that the subject firm is not a Supplier to
or act as a Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. 2272(a).
In addition, the subject firm did not
satisfy the group eligibility requirements
under Section 222(e) of the Act, either
because Criterion (1) has not been met
since the workers’ firm has not been
publically identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a
member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in an affirmative
finding of serious injury, market
disruption, or material injury, or threat
thereof.
Finally, with respect to Section 222(a)
and Section 222(b) of the Act, the
investigation revealed that Criterion (1)
has not been met because a significant
number or proportion of the workers in
such workers’ firm, have not become
totally or partially separated, during the
relevant time period, nor are they
threatened to become totally or partially
separated.
In request for reconsideration, the
petitioner supplied new information
regarding the number of workers who
have been separated or have been
threatened with separation.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of
September, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–25135 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of September 24, 2012
through September 28, 2012.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
62261
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) The increase in imports
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Under Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of
the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from
a foreign country by the workers’ firm
of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and
the component parts it supplied to the
firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) a summary of the report submitted
to the President by the International
Trade Commission under section
202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative
determination described in paragraph
(1)(A) is published in the Federal
Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally
or partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
81,718 .........................
Daimler Buses of North America, Inc.,
Daimler North America, Noramtec, First
Choice Staffing, etc.
Fusion Contact Centers, LLC .......................
Gunite Corporation, incl. Bridge Staffing,
Express Employment, Personnel Partners, Aerotek.
Oriskany, NY ..................................
June 8, 2011.
Santa Maria, CA .............................
Elkhart, IN ......................................
August 6, 2011.
August 16, 2011.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
81,871 .........................
81,900 .........................
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Oct 11, 2012
Jkt 229001
Impact date
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
62262
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
81,889 .........................
MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc., Ameristaff and
Prillman.
Senco Brands, Inc., Express Employment
Professionals.
Adecco, Working On-Site at Senco Brands,
Inc.
Supervalu, Inc., Finance Department, incl.
on-site leased workers from Matthews
Professional.
Oracle America, Inc., RMA Program Management, Randstad Managed Serv, Oracle America, RMA Program.
Parker Hannifin Corporation, Sporlan Division, PRO Resource Staffing Service.
Verifications, Inc., Aerotek and Kelly Services.
Verifications, Inc., Aerotek and Kelly Services.
Edmund Optics, Inc., Bear Staffing and
Manpower.
Martinsville, VA ..............................
August 10, 2011.
Cincinnati, OH ................................
December 11, 2011.
Cincinnati, OH ................................
August 1, 2011.
Pleasant Prairie, WI .......................
August 22, 2011.
Redwood Shores, CA ....................
August 27, 2011.
New Haven, IN ...............................
August 30, 2011.
Aberdeen, SD .................................
September 5, 2011.
Mitchell, SD ....................................
September 5, 2011.
Pennsburg, PA ...............................
September 7, 2011.
81,903 .........................
81,903A .......................
81,909 .........................
81,925 .........................
81,933 .........................
81,943 .........................
81,943A .......................
81,957 .........................
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(c) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
Impact date
apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
81,879 .........................
RG Steel Wheeling, LLC, Division of RG
Steel, LLC, Wheeling Corrugating Company.
Beech Bottom, WV .........................
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A)
Impact date
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
81,846 .........................
Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division.
Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division.
Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division.
Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division.
Goodman Networks, Inc., Core Network Engineering (Deployment Engineering) Division.
OptumInsight
Government
Solutions,
OptumInsight, Inc., UnitedHealth Group,
On-site at CA Depart of Health.
Alpharetta, GA ................................
81,846A .......................
81,846B .......................
81,846C .......................
81,846D .......................
81,941 .........................
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
August 7, 2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Oct 11, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Impact date
Hunt Valley, MD .............................
Naperville, IL ..................................
St. Louis, MO .................................
Plano, TX .......................................
Sacramento, CA .............................
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
62263
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of September
24, 2012 through September 28, 2012.
These determinations are available on
the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/
taa search form.cfm under the
searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888–
365–6822.
Dated: October 1, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–25137 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221 (a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than October 22, 2012.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than October 22, 2012.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
October 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
APPENDIX
[31 TAA petitions instituted between 9/24/12 and 9/28/12]
TA–W
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
81986 ................
Genzyme, A Sanofi Company, Network Operations Center
(NOCC IT Department) (State/One-Stop).
Cincinnati Bell, RSC/BSC and Order Support Representatives (Union).
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP (Union) .................
Siemens Energy, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ...............................
American Airlines (Union) .....................................................
Delphi Electronics & Safety (Company) ...............................
Cox Media Group Ohio, Dayton Daily News (Workers) .......
Experian (State/One-Stop) ...................................................
Ahlstrom West Carrollton LLC (Company) ...........................
Bank of America—Account Specialists (Workers) ...............
Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (State/One-Stop) ......
TE Connectivity (Formerly Tyco) (State/One-Stop) .............
APC Workforce Solutions II, LLC (dba ZeroChaos) (State/
One-Stop).
Ferrara Candy Company (formerly Farley’s & Sathers)
(State/One-Stop).
Parker Hannifin Corporation (State/One-Stop) ....................
Royal Appliance Manufacturing Company dba TTI Floor
Care N. America & Subsi (Company).
E! Entertainment Television Style, G4 Media NBC Universal (State/One-Stop).
RR Donnelley (Workers) ......................................................
TRG Customer Solutions (Workers) ....................................
Boston Scientific (Workers) ..................................................
Tellabs (State/One-Stop) ......................................................
Maysteel LLC (Company) .....................................................
BRP US, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ............................................
ITT Interconnect Solutions (State/One-Stop) .......................
Dell Marketing LP, Americas Transactional Group (State/
One-Stop).
Winzen Film, Inc. (Workers) .................................................
Oxford Collections (Workers) ...............................................
Hewlett-Packard Company (State/One-Stop) ......................
Advanstar (State/One-Stop) .................................................
PCS Phosphate (Workers) ...................................................
Framingham, MA ..................
09/24/12
09/20/12
Norwood, Lebanon, and Cincinnati, OH.
Green Bay, WI ......................
Fort Madison, IA ...................
Tulsa, OK ..............................
Kokomo, IN ...........................
Dayton, OH ...........................
Schaumburg, IL .....................
West Carrollton, OH ..............
Seattle, WA ...........................
Schaumberg, IL .....................
Shakopee, MN ......................
Quincy, MA ...........................
09/24/12
09/19/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/24/12
09/05/12
09/20/12
09/19/12
09/20/12
09/20/12
09/20/12
09/20/12
09/19/12
08/27/12
09/21/12
09/21/12
Round Lake, MN ...................
09/24/12
09/21/12
Beaufort, SC .........................
Canton, OH ...........................
09/24/12
09/25/12
09/24/12
09/25/12
Los Angeles, CA ...................
09/25/12
09/24/12
Johnson City, TN ..................
Oil City, PA ...........................
Maple Grove, MN ..................
Naperville, IL .........................
Creedmoor, NC .....................
Benton, IL ..............................
Santa Ana, CA ......................
Round Rock, TX ...................
09/25/12
09/25/12
09/25/12
09/26/12
09/26/12
09/26/12
09/26/12
09/27/12
09/24/12
09/19/12
09/25/12
09/25/12
09/25/12
09/25/12
09/25/12
09/26/12
Sulphur Springs, TX ..............
Gaffney, SC ..........................
Vancouver, WA .....................
Duluth, MN ............................
Aurora, NC ............................
09/27/12
09/27/12
09/27/12
09/27/12
09/27/12
09/18/12
09/26/12
08/04/12
09/26/12
09/26/12
81987 ................
81988
81989
81990
81991
81992
81993
81994
81995
81996
81997
81998
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
81999 ................
82000 ................
82001 ................
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
82002 ................
82003
82004
82005
82006
82007
82008
82009
82010
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
82011
82012
82013
82014
82015
................
................
................
................
................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Oct 11, 2012
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
Date of
institution
12OCN1
Date of
petition
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 198 (Friday, October 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62260-62263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25137]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
September 24, 2012 through September 28, 2012.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United
[[Page 62261]]
States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Under Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be
satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,718............................. Daimler Buses of North Oriskany, NY.......... June 8, 2011.
America, Inc., Daimler
North America, Noramtec,
First Choice Staffing, etc.
81,871............................. Fusion Contact Centers, LLC Santa Maria, CA....... August 6, 2011.
81,900............................. Gunite Corporation, incl. Elkhart, IN........... August 16, 2011.
Bridge Staffing, Express
Employment, Personnel
Partners, Aerotek.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
[[Page 62262]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,889............................. MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc., Martinsville, VA...... August 10, 2011.
Ameristaff and Prillman.
81,903............................. Senco Brands, Inc., Express Cincinnati, OH........ December 11, 2011.
Employment Professionals.
81,903A............................ Adecco, Working On-Site at Cincinnati, OH........ August 1, 2011.
Senco Brands, Inc.
81,909............................. Supervalu, Inc., Finance Pleasant Prairie, WI.. August 22, 2011.
Department, incl. on-site
leased workers from
Matthews Professional.
81,925............................. Oracle America, Inc., RMA Redwood Shores, CA.... August 27, 2011.
Program Management,
Randstad Managed Serv,
Oracle America, RMA
Program.
81,933............................. Parker Hannifin New Haven, IN......... August 30, 2011.
Corporation, Sporlan
Division, PRO Resource
Staffing Service.
81,943............................. Verifications, Inc., Aberdeen, SD.......... September 5, 2011.
Aerotek and Kelly Services.
81,943A............................ Verifications, Inc., Mitchell, SD.......... September 5, 2011.
Aerotek and Kelly Services.
81,957............................. Edmund Optics, Inc., Bear Pennsburg, PA......... September 7, 2011.
Staffing and Manpower.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,879............................. RG Steel Wheeling, LLC, Beech Bottom, WV...... August 7, 2011.
Division of RG Steel, LLC,
Wheeling Corrugating
Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
81,846............................. Goodman Networks, Inc., Alpharetta, GA........ ......................
Core Network Engineering
(Deployment Engineering)
Division.
81,846A............................ Goodman Networks, Inc., Hunt Valley, MD....... ......................
Core Network Engineering
(Deployment Engineering)
Division.
81,846B............................ Goodman Networks, Inc., Naperville, IL........ ......................
Core Network Engineering
(Deployment Engineering)
Division.
81,846C............................ Goodman Networks, Inc., St. Louis, MO......... ......................
Core Network Engineering
(Deployment Engineering)
Division.
81,846D............................ Goodman Networks, Inc., Plano, TX............. ......................
Core Network Engineering
(Deployment Engineering)
Division.
81,941............................. OptumInsight Government Sacramento, CA........ ......................
Solutions, OptumInsight,
Inc., UnitedHealth Group,
On-site at CA Depart of
Health.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 62263]]
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of September 24, 2012 through September 28, 2012.
These determinations are available on the Department's Web site
tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of
determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance
toll free at 888-365-6822.
Dated: October 1, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-25137 Filed 10-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
