Long Elevator & Machine Company, Inc., Including Workers Whose Wages Were Reported Through Kone, Inc., Riverton, IL; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 62265-62266 [2012-25134]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices
and sealants used in window and door
products and photovoltaic panels.
Workers are not separately identifiable
by article produced.
The negative determination was based
on the Department’s findings of no
subject firm sales or production declines
and no shift of production to a foreign
country.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The request for reconsideration
alleges that the subject firm has shifted
to Germany the production of articles
like or directly competitive with the
flashing and sealant produced by the
subject firm and that this information
was provided by a company official.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department received
confirmation from the subject firm of no
shift to (or acquisition from) a foreign
country the production of articles like or
directly competitive with the flashing
and sealant produced by the subject
firm. Rather, the subject firm
consolidated production to an existing,
affiliated domestic facility.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department also
contacted the company official
identified in the request for
reconsideration. The company official
clarified that, while the subject firm
does have a facility in Germany, there
was no shift in production to any
facility than the Cambridge, Ohio
facility and the workers who filed the
request for reconsideration had
misunderstood him.
Previously-submitted information
revealed that subject firm employment,
sales, and production did not decline
prior to the plant closure in August
2012. Rather, employment, sales, and
production increased in 2011 from 2010
levels.
Therefore, after careful review of
previously-submitted information, the
request for reconsideration, and
information obtained during
reconsideration investigation, the
Department determines that 29 CFR
90.18(c) has not been met.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Oct 11, 2012
Jkt 229001
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm
the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Truseal
Technologies, a Division of Quanex
Building Products Corporation,
Barbourville, Kentucky.
Signed in Washington, DC on this 27th day
of September, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–25136 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–80,525]
Long Elevator & Machine Company,
Inc., Including Workers Whose Wages
Were Reported Through Kone, Inc.,
Riverton, IL; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On May 21, 2012, the Department of
Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for workers and
former workers of Long Elevator &
Machine Company, Inc., including
workers whose wages were reported
through Kone, Inc., Riverton, Illinois
(hereafter referred to as Long Elevator &
Machine Company or the subject firm).
The Department’s Notice was published
in the Federal Register on June 6, 2012
(77 FR 33490). The workers’ firm was
engaged in activities related to the
supply of elevator production and repair
services. The subject worker group was
engaged in activities related to the
supply of elevator repair services, which
included production of repair parts
(elevator component parts).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis- interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on no
shift in production of elevator
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62265
component parts to a foreign country
and no increased imports of elevator
component parts (or like or directly
competitive articles). Rather, the supply
of elevator repair services and
production of elevator components at
the subject firm was consolidated to
another facility within the United States
by the parent company, Kone, Inc.
In the request for reconsideration, a
worker alleged that the subject firm’s
parent company had shifted abroad the
production of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced at the
subject firm facility of Long Elevator &
Machine Company.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department clarified
information provided by workers,
sought confirmation of previouslysubmitted information from the subject
firm, and obtained new information
from the subject firm.
Information obtained during the
reconsideration investigation confirmed
that neither the subject firm nor its
parent company shifted to (or acquired
from) a foreign country the production
of articles like or directly competitive
with the elevator component parts
produced by the subject workers and
that neither the subject firm nor its
parent company shifted to (or acquired
from) a foreign country the supply of
services like or directly competitive
with the repair services supplied by the
subject workers.
Because each component part is
specific to an elevator and the
replacement parts produced at the
Riverton, Illinois facility are for existing
elevators, the component parts used in
new elevators are not directly
competitive with those for repaired
elevators.
Although Kone, Inc. has facilities
abroad which produce new elevators for
installation, elevators are not like or
directly competitive with elevator parts
because component parts are not like or
directly competitive with finished
articles (elevators). The subject firm
confirmed that component parts which
are like or directly competitive with
those formerly produced at the Riverton,
Illinois facility are produced at other
domestic facilities.
Therefore, after careful review of
existing information, the request for
reconsideration, and new information
obtained during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm
the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
62266
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Notices
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Long
Elevator & Machine Company, Inc.,
including workers whose wages were
reported through Kone, Inc., Riverton,
Illinois.
Signed in Washington, DC on this 27th day
of September, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012–25134 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[OMB Control No. 1219–0083]
Proposed Extension of Existing
Information Collection; Daily
Inspection of Surface Coal Mines;
Certified Person; Reports of Inspection
(Pertains to Surface Coal Mines)
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This
program helps to assure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the Mine
Safety and Health Administration is
soliciting comments concerning the
extension of the information collection
for 30 CFR 77.1713. OMB last approved
this information collection request (ICR)
on February 1, 2010.
DATES: All comments must be
postmarked or received by midnight
Eastern Standard Time on December 11,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning the
information collection requirements of
this notice must be clearly identified
with ‘‘OMB 1219–0083’’ and sent to the
Mine Safety and Health Administration
(MSHA). Comments may be sent by any
of the methods listed below.
• Federal E-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Oct 11, 2012
• Facsimile: 202–693–9441, include
‘‘OMB 1219–0083’’ in the subject line of
the message.
• Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 1100
Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350,
Arlington, VA 22209–3939. For hand
delivery, sign in at the receptionist’s
desk on the 21st floor.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Moxness, Chief, Economic Analysis
Division, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, MSHA, at
moxness.greg@dol.gov (email); 202–
693–9440 (voice); or 202–693–9441
(facsimile).
Jkt 229001
I. Background
The Secretary shall, in accordance
with procedures set forth in Section
101(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act), and
Section 553 of Title 5, United States
Code, develop, promulgate, and revise
as may be appropriate, improved
mandatory health or safety standards for
the protection of life and prevention of
injuries in coal or other mines. 30 U.S.C.
811(a). Additionally, section 103(h) of
the Mine Act requires mine operators to
establish and maintain ‘‘such records,
make such reports, and provide such
information, as the Secretary * * * may
reasonably require from time to time to
enable [her] to perform [her] functions
under this Act.’’ 30 U.S.C. 813(h).
Section 77.1713, Title 30 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (30 CFR 77.1713)
requires coal mine operators to conduct
examinations of each active working
area of surface mines, active surface
installations at these mines, facilities
and preparation plants not associated
with underground coal mines for
hazardous conditions during each shift.
A report of hazardous conditions
detected must be entered into a record
book along with a description of any
corrective actions taken.
A number of potential hazards can
exist at surface coal mines and facilities.
Highwalls, mining equipment,
travelways, and the handling of mining
materials each present potentially
hazardous conditions. Prior to the
promulgation of 30 CFR 77.1713 in
1971, numerous miners had either lost
their lives or received injuries of varying
degrees of seriousness at areas affected
by the subject standard. The majority of
the injuries and fatalities resulted from
hazardous conditions not detected and
corrected. By conducting an on shift
examination for hazardous conditions,
mine operators better ensure a safe
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
working environment for the miners and
a reduction in accidents.
II. Desired Focus of Comments
The Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) is soliciting
comments concerning the proposed
extension of the information collection
related to Daily Inspection of Surface
Coal Mines; Certified Person; Reports of
Inspection (Pertains to Surface Coal
Mines). MSHA is particularly interested
in comments that:
• Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information has practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
MSHA’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Suggest methods to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Address the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses), to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond.
The public may examine publicly
available documents, including the
public comment version of the
supporting statement, at MSHA, Office
of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 2350, Arlington, VA 22209–3939.
OMB clearance requests are available on
MSHA’s Web site at https://
www.msha.gov under ‘‘Rules & Regs’’ on
the right side of the screen by selecting
Information Collections Requests,
Paperwork Reduction Act Supporting
Statements. The document will be
available on MSHA’s Web site for 60
days after the publication date of this
notice. Comments submitted in writing
or in electronic form will be made
available for public inspection. Because
comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information,
MSHA cautions the commenter against
including any information in the
submission that should not be publicly
disclosed. Questions about the
information collection requirements
may be directed to the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice.
III. Current Actions
The information obtained from mine
operators is used by MSHA during
inspections to determine compliance
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 198 (Friday, October 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62265-62266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25134]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-80,525]
Long Elevator & Machine Company, Inc., Including Workers Whose
Wages Were Reported Through Kone, Inc., Riverton, IL; Notice of
Negative Determination on Reconsideration
On May 21, 2012, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and
former workers of Long Elevator & Machine Company, Inc., including
workers whose wages were reported through Kone, Inc., Riverton,
Illinois (hereafter referred to as Long Elevator & Machine Company or
the subject firm). The Department's Notice was published in the Federal
Register on June 6, 2012 (77 FR 33490). The workers' firm was engaged
in activities related to the supply of elevator production and repair
services. The subject worker group was engaged in activities related to
the supply of elevator repair services, which included production of
repair parts (elevator component parts).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on no shift in production of elevator component parts to a
foreign country and no increased imports of elevator component parts
(or like or directly competitive articles). Rather, the supply of
elevator repair services and production of elevator components at the
subject firm was consolidated to another facility within the United
States by the parent company, Kone, Inc.
In the request for reconsideration, a worker alleged that the
subject firm's parent company had shifted abroad the production of
articles like or directly competitive with those produced at the
subject firm facility of Long Elevator & Machine Company.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department clarified
information provided by workers, sought confirmation of previously-
submitted information from the subject firm, and obtained new
information from the subject firm.
Information obtained during the reconsideration investigation
confirmed that neither the subject firm nor its parent company shifted
to (or acquired from) a foreign country the production of articles like
or directly competitive with the elevator component parts produced by
the subject workers and that neither the subject firm nor its parent
company shifted to (or acquired from) a foreign country the supply of
services like or directly competitive with the repair services supplied
by the subject workers.
Because each component part is specific to an elevator and the
replacement parts produced at the Riverton, Illinois facility are for
existing elevators, the component parts used in new elevators are not
directly competitive with those for repaired elevators.
Although Kone, Inc. has facilities abroad which produce new
elevators for installation, elevators are not like or directly
competitive with elevator parts because component parts are not like or
directly competitive with finished articles (elevators). The subject
firm confirmed that component parts which are like or directly
competitive with those formerly produced at the Riverton, Illinois
facility are produced at other domestic facilities.
Therefore, after careful review of existing information, the
request for reconsideration, and new information obtained during the
reconsideration investigation, the Department determines that 29 CFR
90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of
negative determination of eligibility to apply for
[[Page 62266]]
worker adjustment assistance for workers and former workers of Long
Elevator & Machine Company, Inc., including workers whose wages were
reported through Kone, Inc., Riverton, Illinois.
Signed in Washington, DC on this 27th day of September, 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-25134 Filed 10-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P